Trump administration scraps guidance on emergency abortions
The Trump administration announced on Tuesday that it would revoke guidance to the nation's hospitals that directed them to provide emergency abortions for women when they are necessary to stabilize their medical condition.
That guidance was issued to hospitals in 2022, weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court upended national abortion rights in the U.S. It was an effort by the Biden administration to preserve abortion access for extreme cases in which women were experiencing medical emergencies and needed an abortion to prevent organ loss or severe hemorrhaging, among other serious complications.
The Biden administration had argued that hospitals – including states with near-total bans – needed to provide emergency abortions under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. That law requires emergency rooms that receive Medicare dollars to provide an exam and stabilizing treatment for all patients. Nearly all emergency rooms in the U.S. rely on Medicare funds.
More people in U.S. are obtaining abortions, but fewer are traveling to other states for it, survey finds
The Trump administration announced on Tuesday that it would no longer enforce that policy. The move prompted concerns from some doctors and abortion rights advocates that women will not get emergency abortions in states with strict bans.
'The Trump Administration would rather women die in emergency rooms than receive life-saving abortions,' Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement.
'In pulling back guidance, this administration is feeding the fear and confusion that already exists at hospitals in every state where abortion is banned. Hospitals need more guidance, not less, to stop them from turning away patients experiencing pregnancy crises.'
Anti-abortion advocates praised the move, however. Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of SBA Pro-Life America, said in a statement that the Biden-era policy had been a way to expand abortion access in states where it was banned.
'Democrats have created confusion on this fact to justify their extremely unpopular agenda for all-trimester abortion,' she said. 'In situations where every minute counts, their lies lead to delayed care and put women in needless, unacceptable danger.'
An Associated Press investigation last year found that, even with the Biden administration's guidance, dozens of pregnant women were being turned away from emergency rooms, including some who needed emergency abortions.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which investigates hospitals that are not in compliance, said in a statement that it will continue to enforce the federal law that, 'including for identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy.'
But CMS added that it would also 'rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration's actions.'
The Biden administration sued Idaho over its abortion law that initially only allowed abortions to save the life of the mother. The federal government had argued before the U.S. Supreme Court last year that Idaho's law was in conflict with the federal law, which requires stabilizing treatment that prevents a patient's condition from worsening.
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a procedural ruling in the case last year that left key questions unanswered about whether doctors in abortion ban states can terminate pregnancies when a woman is at risk of serious infection, organ loss or hemorrhage.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
20 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Manfred Stapff's Breakthrough Book Hits #1 on Amazon, Tackles Misinformation with Real-World Evidence
Summary: Dr. Manfred Stapff's newly released book, Real-World Evidence Unveiled: Navigating the Maze of Modern Misinformation, has soared to #1 on Amazon in multiple categories. New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 5, 2025) - Candid-Advisory founder and renowned physician-scientist Dr. Manfred Stapff has made a notable impact in the publishing world with the release of his new book, Real-World Evidence Unveiled: Navigating the Maze of Modern Misinformation. Since its debut on April 23, 2025, the book has become an Amazon bestseller, currently ranked #1 in multiple categories, including Anthropology, Civil Rights and Liberties, Social Theory, Sociology Research and Measurement, Communication Reference, and Social Sciences Research. Image Credit: Real-World Evidence Unveiled by Dr. Manfred Stapff To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: Dr. Stapff's much-needed book has arrived at a time when society is flooded with misleading headlines, viral misinformation, and biased reporting. Through Real-World Evidence Unveiled, he introduces readers to the concept of Real-World Evidence (RWE). This is a powerful approach based on real-life data rather than experimental trials or curated information. Though the term is rooted in healthcare, Stapff broadens its scope to help readers evaluate news, social media narratives, and policy debates through an evidence-based lens. With this book, Stapff refines and filters years of work in regulatory science, quality management, and global medical operations by turning it into an accessible guide for students, professionals, and informed citizens alike. He uses compelling case studies and practical strategies, using the book to show readers the way to distinguish reliable data from noise, break down media narratives, and apply critical thinking in everyday life. Real-World Evidence Unveiled is already earning praise across academic, corporate, and consumer audiences as it continues to climb bestseller charts. The book has become a must-read for anyone interested in truth, transparency, and data-driven thinking. Misinformation prevails in public health, democracy, and social cohesion; Real-World Evidence Unveiled is a warning and a solution. It reminds readers that rigorous thinking and sound data are not just tools for scientists but the foundation of a functional society. About the Author Dr. Manfred Stapff, MD, PhD, is the founder of Candid-Advisory and a leader in clinical research, regulatory science, and real-world data analytics. His career spans over three decades, including senior roles in top pharmaceutical firms across Germany and the United States. He helps individuals and organizations make informed, evidence-based decisions. About Candid-Advisory Candid-Advisory is a life sciences consultancy that offers expert solutions in clinical trials, regulatory affairs, quality management, and real-world data utilization. Headquartered in New York and Boston, the firm partners with healthcare innovators to deliver strategic, unbiased counsel across therapeutic areas and business functions.


Globe and Mail
31 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Ontario fast-tracks process for U.S. doctors, nurses to work in province
Doctors and nurses licensed in the United States will soon be able to more easily practise in Ontario, under changes announced today by the minister of health. Sylvia Jones says the move will increase the number of health-care professionals working in the province. The province is enabling qualified U.S.-licensed physicians, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, and registered practical nurses to start working in Ontario health settings before they register with the regulatory college. They will be allowed to work for up to six months while seeking registration with either the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario or the College of Nurses of Ontario. Doctors and nurses would still have to go through he usual immigration processes, and to qualify they must be licensed in their home jurisdiction with no history of misconduct or incompetence. The government previously expedited the process for physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists and medical laboratory technologists registered in other jurisdictions in Canada to work in Ontario while going through the registration process.


Globe and Mail
31 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Trump and Musk's breakup is just like their honeymoon — intense and public
The breakup between the president of the United States and the world's richest man is unfurling much like their relationship started — rapidly, intensely and very publicly. As President Donald Trump sat in the Oval Office on Thursday with Germany's leader at his side, he lamented his soured relationship with Elon Musk, his adviser-turned-social media antagonist. Trump said he was 'very disappointed' with Musk after the billionaire former backer lambasted the president's signature bill of tax cuts and spending plans. Trump suggested Musk, who left the government last month after spearheading the tumultuous Department of Government Efficiency, misses being in the White House and has 'Trump derangement syndrome.' 'He hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that will be next,' Trump said. 'But I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Musk calls Trump's big budget bill a 'disgusting abomination' Tesla shares down as Trump fires back at ally Musk Observers had long wondered if the friendship between the two brash billionaires known for lobbing insults online would flame out in spectacular fashion. It did, in less than a year. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said. He said that he had helped Musk a lot and brushed aside the billionaire's efforts to get him elected last year, claiming that he would have won closely contested Pennsylvania even without Musk's help, which included spending at least $250 million supporting his campaign. The Republican president's comments came as Musk has continued a storm of social media posts attacking Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' and warning it will increase the federal deficit. Musk has called Trump's big tax break bill a 'disgusting abomination.' As Trump spoke to reporters at the White House on Thursday, Musk was watching. 'False,' he fired back on his social media platform as the president continued speaking. 'This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Trump said Musk, the CEO and founder of Tesla, 'only developed a problem' with the bill because it rolls back tax credits for electric vehicles. 'Whatever,' Musk snapped back in a post on X responding to a video clip of the moment. He went on and said Trump could keep the cuts but should 'ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.' The bill would unleash trillions of dollars in tax cuts and slash spending but also spike deficits by $2.4 trillion over a decade and leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance, according to an analysis by the Congressional Budget Office, which for decades has served as the official scorekeeper of legislation in Congress.