
Why So Many Childcare Centers Are Closing
But at the end of August, before a new school year begins, she's shutting down Corrine's Little Explorers for good.
With the disappearance of federal and state subsidies that kept her afloat for the last few years, she says, the model no longer works, and she doesn't want to have to choose between raising rates or taking a pay cut. She's not alone: in Wisconsin, other childcare centers are closing ahead of the new school year.
'We're getting to an inflection point,' she says. 'I think enough of us are going to close that they're going to have to do something.'
Across the country, childcare centers are struggling as they never have before. A perfect storm of rising costs, worker shortages, and the expiration of federal and state grants makes it extremely difficult for these businesses to operate.
Childcare has long been in crisis. Overhead costs like buildings and liability insurance are expensive, and to take care of young kids, centers need a lot of staff, which means they have to spend a lot on payroll. But they also can't charge too much money, or families will drop out.
'Childcare is a textbook example of a broken market,' said Janet Yellen, back in 2021 when she was Secretary of the Treasury.
Read More: Why So Many Women Are Quitting the Workforce
But for all the struggles of childcare providers in recent years, the pandemic provided an unlikely source of hope. The American Rescue Plan included $24 billion for a Child Care Stabilization program that helped 220,000 centers keep paying wages, benefits, rent, utilities, and other costs. Another $15 billion went to help expand access to childcare.
Some of that funding expired in Sept. 2023; the rest expired one year later. And while some states were able to move around federal funds or pass temporary legislation to financially support childcare facilities, that funding is expiring in much of the country.
'It was already a non-sustainable business model, and it got even worse,' says Julie Kashen, senior fellow and director for women's economic justice at the Century Foundation, a left-leaning think tank. 'The pandemic funding really helped prop it up, but ultimately turned into a bridge to nowhere.'
Indeed, Corrine Hendrickson said she was actually most solvent during the pandemic; the federal funding even allowed her to hire an extra substitute employee. But, she says, she had been thinking of getting out of the childcare business leading up to the pandemic. She only makes a profit of $20,000 a year, which is an extremely low salary for all the work she does. When it became evident that neither the federal nor state government was going to continue to support childcare providers in Wisconsin, she says, she decided to close her business.
The end of funding appears to be leading to many closures. North Carolina, for example, was able to stretch its federal pandemic dollars through June 2024. But after that, 43 centers across the state closed, according to Candace Witherspoon, director of the division of child development and early education in North Carolina. The state was able to release some stopgap funding that lasted through March 2025, but when that ended, even more programs closed. The state has seen 158 programs shutter since the beginning of the year, she says.
Read More: 'People Are Going to Die': Cuts Leave Domestic Violence Support Groups Reeling
The federal funding allowed many centers to raise pay from $11 an hour to $14, Witherspoon says, but even the higher rate is not enough to attract and retain workers when fast-food restaurants and other businesses pay considerably more. About half of childcare providers in the state aren't able to offer health insurance for their workers, and about 43% of childcare workers in the state are on some form of public assistance like Medicaid and food stamps.
Yet demand for childcare is high. 'North Carolina is in crisis because many of our parents are being forced to leave the workforce' since they can't find care for their children, Witherspoon says. In North Carolina, there's only one infant and toddler spot for every five families applying for care.
When childcare centers close or parents are unable to find a spot for their children, one parent—usually the mother—often drops out of the workforce to care for the kids. Between the second quarter of 2023 and the third quarter of 2024, the number of people who reduced their hours to part-time or who left the labor force altogether due to childcare rose 43%, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
One analysis of the childcare stabilization funds dispersed during the pandemic found that they helped the mothers with young children stay in the workforce. About 26% of the money spent to stabilize childcare actually ended up back in the government's coffers through tax receipts.
As federal and state dollars expire, the childcare business is getting even tougher. Inflation is driving up costs like rent and insurance. Labor is becoming more expensive, and providers are facing more competition from other businesses that can pay better. And roughly 20% of the childcare workforce is made up of immigrants, which means that the Trump Administration's deportation campaign is affecting some workers. One childcare provider in Seattle, for instance, was recently detained by ICE.
Read More: Positive Economic Data Is Still Hiding Bleak Reality for Many Families
The cost of childcare now exceeds the price of college tuition in 38 states and Washington, according to an analysis conducted by the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank.
Meanwhile, the median wage in early care and education falls below 97% of other occupations, according to the Center for the Study of Child Care Employment at the University of California, Berkeley. The median wage is $13.07 an hour, but ranges from $10.60 in Louisiana to $18.23 in Washington, D.C.
For many providers, raising prices is not an option. Already, prices have grown by 29% since 2020—faster than overall inflation, according to Child Care Aware, an advocacy group.
'If I raise tuition, will I lose too many families to stay afloat? If I don't raise tuition, will I be able to stay afloat?' says Meghann Carrasco, the founder and executive director of Seedlings to Sunflowers, a nonprofit childcare provider in Maine. The center used the pandemic funding to stay open for all but two months during the pandemic, and is now struggling because its Pre-K program is under-enrolled.
The center raised prices 16% this year, the most it has ever raised tuition, and lost some families who couldn't afford it, Carrasco says. Even with the tuition increase, Seedlings to Sunflowers was only able to stay open because it embarked on a fundraising campaign in its community, securing $25,000 in interest-free loans and donations.
'The amount of programs closing daily is more than we've ever seen,' Carrasco says.
Read More: Why So Many Seniors Can't Afford Long-Term Care
Most providers say that without federal or state funding, they do not have a long-term future. Federal funding for childcare was close to becoming a reality in 2021, when the House passed a child care solution in the Build Back Better Act, but it was stripped from the next version of the bill, which became the Inflation Reduction Act. Democrats in Congress introduced a bill in April 2025 that would increase federal spending on childcare, but it's unlikely to go anywhere, especially in a political climate where some Republicans are backing policies that encourage more mothers to stay at home.
For now, says Kashen of the Century Foundation, childcare providers have to hope that their states will help them survive. This creates a patchwork system where providers in certain states—often blue states—will stay open and educate more children, while others, in red states, will close or only stay open for people who can afford it.
New Mexico, for instance, passed a constitutional amendment in 2022 guaranteeing the right to early childhood education. The state devoted a portion of money from oil and gas development fees to early care and education, amounting to about $150 million a year for early childhood education programs. Vermont passed Act 76 in 2023, which will fund childcare through a 0.44% payroll tax; Massachusetts added half a billion dollars in funding for childcare providers in 2024; and Connecticut passed a bill in 2025 that creates a new endowment for early childhood education.
Most states, though, passed nothing at all.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
17 minutes ago
- Business Insider
3 Economic Reports That Could Affect Your Portfolio This Week, August 18-22, 2025
Stocks ended the week on a soft note, still managing to lock in back-to-back weekly gains. The S&P 500 (SPX) rose 0.94% for the week, and the Nasdaq-100 (NDX) inched up 0.43%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) was the standout, delivering a weekly gain of 1.74%. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. After a red Monday, all three major indexes reached all-time highs on Tuesday. This followed in-line CPI data, which bolstered bets that the Fed would deliver its first rate cut of 2025 in September – traders have priced in nearly a 100% chance of a 25-bps easing. Stocks extended gains on Wednesday: the S&P 500 and Nasdaq hit new ATHs again amid remarks from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urging a 50-bps cut based on downward revisions in payroll data. Wall Street analysts began forecasting up to three cuts this year, citing a softer labor market, limited tariff pass-through to consumers, and the appointment of Trump's temporary Fed board pick. But those forecasts were questioned Thursday when PPI, which tracks wholesale price trends, came in hotter than expected, denting sentiment and clouding the Fed outlook. Other economic reports pulled markets in opposing directions: July's industrial production was lackluster – although not recession-bellwether weak – while retail sales beat forecasts, underscoring resilient consumer demand despite high borrowing costs. Meanwhile, the UoM consumer sentiment unexpectedly slipped and inflation expectations rose, muddying the outlook for Fed cuts in September. With mixed inflation and consumer data re-injecting uncertainty into the Fed policy outlook, all eyes now turn to Jackson Hole for the annual confab. Jerome Powell's speech on August 22 is the marquee event, expected to instantly influence markets. A dovish tone could broaden the rally, boosting small caps, rate-sensitive areas, and tech. A hawkish stance – highlighting inflation risks or caution – could trigger sharp corrections and volatility, especially in growth and rate-sensitive sectors. Three Economic Reports Here are three key economic reports that could affect your portfolio this week, in addition to the widely anticipated speech by Jerome Powell at the Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium. For a full listing of additional economic reports, check out the TipRanks Economic Calendar. » August Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Survey – Thursday, 8/21 – This report measures manufacturing conditions in the survey area (Philadelphia, New Jersey, and Delaware) and is considered an accurate leading indicator for two nationwide reports: the Manufacturing PMI and ISM Manufacturing Index. » August S&P Global Manufacturing PMI and Services PMI (preliminary readings) – Friday, 8/22 – PMI indices are leading economic indicators used by economists and analysts to gain timely insights into changing conditions, as the direction and rate of change in PMIs usually precede shifts in the broader economy. » July Existing Home Sales – Friday, 8/22 – This report tracks sales volumes and prices of existing single-family homes, condos, and co-ops nationwide. Existing homes account for over 90% of total U.S. home sales, making this a key measure of housing market health and its influence on overall economic activity.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Media's $2 Billion Bitcoin Purchase Creates Stock Surge
President Donald Trump's media group, Trump Media, made headlines in July when it purchased a staggering $2 billion in bitcoin and securities. I Asked ChatGPT To Explain TRUMP Crypto to Me Like I'm 12: Read Next: Trump Media made the bold move as a follow-up to its announcement made in May, when the company declared it had raised $2.5 billion in funding to make the purchase — all part of a plan for Trump Media to become a bitcoin treasury company, as reported by Yahoo Finance. Trump Media's Plan Devin Nunes, CEO and president of Trump Media, described the purchase as a means to '[rigorously implement] our publicly announced strategy and fulfilling our bitcoin treasury plan. These assets help insure our company's financial freedom, help protect us against discrimination by financial institutions, and will create synergies with the utility token we're planning to introduce across the Truth Social ecosphere.' Trump Media's massive bitcoin purchase not only shored up enough crypto to facilitate the company's bitcoin treasury plan, it also gave shares of Trump Media a boost in the stock market. Following the $2 billion acquisition, shares of Trump Media increased by 5.6% — or $1.04, to an overall total of $19.71 — after a bumpy 2025 that has seen the company's stock dip by 42%, per CBS News. Learn More: What It Means for You Considering investing in Trump Media? Despite its previously-rocky standing on the stock market, having its own bitcoin treasury could radically benefit the company for investors. Specifically, if bitcoin values continue to rise, so too would Trump Media's holdings, thus benefitting Trump Media shareholders. Additionally, having that massive level of liquidity helps to protect (in some degree) Trump Media investors from the kind of significant loses it had suffered earlier this year, per AInvest. Also, as Fortune noted, purchasing shares of Trump Media allows for a kind of indirect exposure to the crypto and digital-asset market, in case you're a skittish investor who doesn't want to take the full dive into the world of crypto. It's important to remember that Trump Media, President Trump and bitcoin remain volatile entities, especially in this era of economic and regulatory uncertainty. Investing in Trump Media would definitely be a speculative move — you should be aware of yours risk tolerance before betting on such combustive (but potentially rewarding) investments. What this means for investors is that while Trump Media will continue to be a high-risk investment, its level of high-reward has increased significantly with its efforts to create its own bitcoin treasury — and the financial independence that level of liquidity provides. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 5 Ways Trump Signing the GENIUS Act Could Impact RetireesMark Cuban Tells Americans To Stock Up on Consumables as Trump's Tariffs Hit -- Here's What To Buy This article originally appeared on Trump Media's $2 Billion Bitcoin Purchase Creates Stock Surge Sign in to access your portfolio


Los Angeles Times
6 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Why each spouse should have a credit card in their own name
Dear Liz: My husband was the primary account holder on our credit cards and I was the authorized user. When he recently passed away, I was told I had to close the cards. I have tried to open my own credit cards and have been declined by two banks because my debt is too high. I am the co-signer for my two daughters' mortgages, making it look like I owe more than $1 million. My daughters have always made the monthly payments and have done so for six years. I also have almost $1 million in investments. I told the bankers I could bring in these documents as proof I'm credit card worthy and they said they don't look at outside evidence, only the credit reports. So here I am, in my 60s without a credit card. Should I just settle and be an authorized user on my daughters' cards? What can I do? Answer: Thank you for providing another vivid example of why it's important for each spouse to have one or two credit cards in their own names. Many people don't realize that credit cards typically aren't jointly held, and the death of the primary account holder can leave them cut off from credit. Being added as an authorized user to your daughters' cards is a good first step. You also might consider approaching a credit union, since these member-owned financial institutions are often more flexible about granting credit than the typical big bank. Unfortunately, these mortgages will continue to affect your debt-to-income ratio until they're paid off or your daughters refinance — and given the low rate they presumably got, refinancing is not likely to be an attractive solution. Dear Liz: My mother passed away two years ago. She left a small mountain of paperwork which my brother, sister and I have finally started to sort through. Among the surprises that we have found is a receipt from a bank for the purchase of $4,500 of U.S. government savings bonds. The date of purchase is one month after the birth of her grandson in March 1992. We suspect that the bond was intended as a gift for the grandson. Is there a way to track down these bonds? Would a receipt from a bank be sufficient to satisfy the Treasury that the bond purchases were valid? Answer: Savings bonds purchased in 1992 would have already matured and are no longer paying interest. If your mom didn't cash in these bonds, you may be able to find them through the U.S. Treasury Department's Treasury Hunt tool. You can find it at Dear Liz: Please consider mentioning employers who haven't forgotten long-time employees in their estate planning. Caregivers and domestic workers may work for families, the elderly or seriously ill patients for decades. When there is a death, the estate or family members rarely remember these workers who feel their effort must have meant very little not to have been acknowledged in some small way. I did hear about an employer who put away $10,000 a year in a savings account for an hourly paid employee who retired after 30 years of service. By the way, the employee never asked for anything. She was just grateful to have been of service for so many years. Answer: You're right that a bequest could be a meaningful acknowledgment of a longtime domestic employee's faithful service. Such bequests also can trigger huge family fights, accusations of undue influence and court challenges that drag on for years. The size of the bequest, the size of the estate and the contentiousness of the family are all factors that need to be considered. Also keep in mind that while most bequests aren't taxable, bequests from an employer often are since the IRS views such transfers as compensation. Anyone contemplating including an employee in their will would be wise to consult an estate planning attorney as well as a tax pro. Liz Weston, Certified Financial Planner, is a personal finance columnist. Questions may be sent to her at 3940 Laurel Canyon, No. 238, Studio City, CA 91604, or by using the 'Contact' form at