
Acadians in Chéticamp area a step closer to getting new provincial riding
Jules Chiasson, who is originally from Chéticamp and is director general of the Fédération acadienne de la Nouvelle-Écosse in Halifax, said the French-speaking people of northern Inverness County deserve their own representative in the legislature.
"We didn't have anybody for the past 100 years, so it's time to give justice to Chéticamp for all the injustice that was done throughout the years," he said Wednesday after a public hearing by the boundaries commission.
He said Chéticamp used to have its own hospital and several banks, service stations and fish plants, and being part of the larger riding of Inverness has hurt the community's economy.
"If we had had an effective representation at the [legislature], I think we could have at least kept some of that economic boom that we had at the time," he said.
"I think we lost all that because nobody was there to speak for Chéticamp."
One presenter said the community landed $85 million worth of lobster and snow crab in the past year, but Chiasson said that money does not get reinvested in the community.
He said that's one economic reason why the region needs its own representative in provincial affairs.
Darlene Doucet said Chéticamp used to have its own large hospital and has had to struggle to keep its long-term care facility in the community.
When those are lost, the community loses access to French-language services, she said.
"We're looking for somebody who can fight for the needs that we have and health care," said Doucet.
The ridings of Argyle, Clare and Richmond have been set aside for Acadians for years and Preston has been designed to ensure effective representation for Black Nova Scotians.
Despite requesting a protected riding since 1992, French-speaking people around Chéticamp have been lumped in with the rest of the Inverness constituency.
Réjean Aucoin argued and won the case for Chéticamp in Nova Scotia Supreme Court last year.
The boundaries commission has since drawn up four possible scenarios for a new Chéticamp riding running from Meat Cove at the northern tip of Inverness to roughly the Margaree Harbour area.
'It's the only possible one'
Aucoin, who's also a senator from Chéticamp and spoke at the boundaries commission hearing this week, said afterward he was only there as a citizen.
But he said the first scenario, whose southern boundary is at Doyle's Bridge on the Margaree River, is the best one.
"Even with [that scenario], we're under 50 per cent electors that speak French, so it's the only possible one," Aucoin said.
"Every other scenario would have like 25 or 30 per cent."
Aucoin said the Margaree River has historically been a physical boundary between the French and English communities.
He said he expects that first scenario will be recommended to the government, with a slight boundary adjustment to include the mountains and Pembroke Lake in the Acadian territory.
"It's going to happen that we will get a riding for the Chéticamp area," Aucoin said. "The only question to decide is where is the south line going to be."
He and others at the hearing also called on the boundary commission to recommend the Acadian riding be made permanent, and asked the commission to recommend the provincial government call a byelection within six months of its final decision.
Several pointed out that the French-speaking population has declined over the years, saying any further delay in creating the riding makes it more difficult to ensure the elected representative is an Acadian.
Boundaries commission chair Ken Deveau said even if a new riding is carved out to include people of Acadian descent, there's no guarantee the elected representative will be Acadian.
He said that's up to political parties, riding associations and voters.
"The hard part in all of this is not the commission's work," Deveau said. "It's what will come after for the people in the community. That's up to the electors after that."
The commission expects an interim report will be available for public comments next month and its final recommendation to the province is due by the end of January.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Star
4 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Macron admits France's repressive violence in Cameroon's war for independence
DAKAR, Senegal (AP) — French President Emmanuel Macron acknowledged that France waged a war marked by 'repressive violence' in Cameroon before and after the country's independence in 1960 in a letter made public Tuesday. It is France's first official acknowledgment of its repression of Cameroon's independence movement as a war. More from The Star & partners


Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Macron admits France's repressive violence in Cameroon's war for independence
DAKAR, Senegal (AP) — French President Emmanuel Macron acknowledged that France waged a war marked by 'repressive violence' in Cameroon before and after the country's independence in 1960 in a letter made public Tuesday. It is France's first official acknowledgment of its repression of Cameroon's independence movement as a war. The letter sent last month to Cameroonian President Paul Biya, follows a report released in January by a French-Cameroonian commission of historians. The report revealed that France carried out mass forced displacements, detained hundreds of thousands of Cameroonians in internment camps, and backed brutal militias to suppress the country's fight for independence and sovereignty between 1945 and 1971. The commission was established by Macron during a 2022 visit to the capital Yaoundé. It examined France's role leading up to Cameroon's independence on Jan. 1, 1960, and in the years that followed. 'At the end of their work, the historians of the Commission clearly highlighted that a war had taken place in Cameroon, during which the colonial authorities and the French army carried out multiple forms of repressive violence in certain regions of the country — a war that continued beyond 1960 with France's support for actions carried out by the independent Cameroonian authorities,' the letter from Macron read. Macron also acknowledged France's role in the deaths of independence leaders Ruben Um Nyobè, Paul Momo, Isaac Nyobè Pandjock and Jérémie Ndéléné, who were killed between 1958 and 1960 in military operations under French command. Cameroon was a German colony until the end of World War I, when it was divided between Britain and France. The French-administered territory gained independence in 1960, and the southern British Cameroons joined in a federation the next year. The independence war began in the 1950s when the nationalist UPC launched an armed struggle for full sovereignty and reunification. Even after independence, the French-backed government continued to fight the UPC for years, The letter follows earlier moves by Macron to address France's colonial past, including his recognition of French responsibility in the 1994 Rwandan genocide and the massacre of Senegalese riflemen after World War II. However, the French president has so far ruled out an official apology for torture and other abuses committed by French troops in Algeria. The letter comes at a time when France's presence in its former colonies in Africa has become increasingly contested, particularly in the Sahel region. ___ Associated Press writer Sylvie Corbet in Paris contributed to this report.
Montreal Gazette
6 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
Opinion: PQ byelection win means tough choices ahead for anglophones
After years of CAQ mismanagement — a battered health care system, controversial immigration policies, a lack of housing solutions and a sluggish economy — Quebecers are asking: could the PQ be any worse? Most Quebec voters don't want another referendum, but another term of François Legault, with his poor record of late and his thinly veiled targeting of the English-speaking community, is equally unappealing. Political folklore only fuels that perception: tales of a young Legault bullied by anglophones, or of him strolling down Sherbrooke St. with his language minister and remarking there was 'too much English here.' True or not, his policies make them believable. The Parti Québécois's byelection win in Arthabaska is more than a local upset. It confirms what many Quebecers have quietly suspected: the CAQ and the PQ are increasingly interchangeable. And it confirms that the Quebec Liberal Party has a lot of work to do if it wants a shot at forming the next government. The CAQ was born from an improbable union of federalists and separatists — a political marriage dressed up as nationalism. Legault, a former PQ cabinet minister, mastered the art of squeezing as many advantages as possible from Ottawa while keeping Quebec in Canada. But his separatist roots never vanished. The longer he's been in office, the more visible they've become. Some francophone CAQ voters I've spoken with say a Liberal comeback is possible, but there are obstacles before that can happen. There's no appetite for a referendum, they say, though polls show separatist sentiment is rising among Quebecers in their 20s. And they give PQ leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon high marks: Oxford and McGill educated, bilingual, policy-savvy. Many have told me, 'if he were Liberal leader, he'd likely win a majority.' In Quebec politics, the best-qualified leader often wears the wrong colours. That leaves voters with a familiar, unappealing choice: a capable PQ leader whose main goal — independence — most reject, or a Liberal leader with a federal aura. Pablo Rodriguez is competent, but he comes with Trudeau-era baggage that may haunt him unless he can shed it before Election Day — and he has a lot of work to do to make that happen. The Liberals remain Montreal-centric and branded as the party of the anglophone. If Rodriguez can't shatter that image and win over francophones beyond the city, his party's chances collapse. And the clock is ticking. One thing is certain: the CAQ's shine is gone. After an expected cabinet shuffle by Labour Day, Legault may well take his 'walk in the snow' before winter, leaving his party scrambling for a saviour — maybe even someone from outside its ranks, their own, quote-unquote, 'Mark Carney.' Stranger things have happened. The Arthabaska result doesn't mean Quebec is racing back toward independence. But it does mean voters are restless, and the CAQ's grip on power is broken. And for anglophone Quebecers, the calculation is even more complicated. We've ridden the PQ roller coaster before. St-Pierre Plamondon is no Pauline Marois — but does his pedigree inspire enough confidence that he would shelve a referendum in his first mandate? Is that something we can truly trust? The alternative is voting Liberal, a party many say has long taken the English community for granted. Either way, it's a risk — one we have to weigh carefully. The real question is which party, the PQ or the Liberals, will actually pay attention to us? The fact that we're even asking is disappointing, and frankly, sad for our community. This story was originally published