The Ice alert app founder sparking fury in Trump officials: 'Pam Bondi said I better watch out? Please.'
It's a problem that Joshua Aaron wanted to tackle. A former indie musician (he played bass in 2000s buzz band The Rosenbergs and later fronted his own group Stealing Heather) turned app entrepreneur, he set about making an app that could spot Ice and alert people, the same way drivers let other drivers know about traffic stops on Waze.
Launched without fanfare and with no intention of profit in April 2025, IceBlock offers real-time alerts about the presence of agents – while, Aaron claims, fiercely guarding the anonymity of its users. Within two months, the app had soared on the charts in Apple's app store – prompting US homeland security secretary Kristi Noem to attack the app and its founder, claiming they were 'obstructing justice'. She claimed she wanted to work with the Department of Justice to try to prosecute CNN for reporting on the app.
Noem's intervention ensured the app topped the charts for a number of days (although it has since fallen out of the top 100). Then last month Aaron's wife, Carolyn Feinstein, was fired from her Department of Justice job in Austin, Texas. The couple believe it was clear 'retaliation' for the app, despite Feinstein not being involved in the app's creation or promotion.
Aaron is an unlikely figure in this space – he has a brash, rock'n'roll demeanor and not much experience in immigration activism. His background has led to some questions about how well the app protects its users, especially as it asks you to keep your location data on at all times. But a number of independent investigations have shown he is managing to keep users anonymous.
Aaron spoke with the Guardian a week after his wife's arrest.
First of all, what happened to your wife? Why was she fired?
They fired her as retribution against me. They can't do shit to me. I'm not going to be afraid. So they fired her.
Were they explicit in in why they were firing her?
No, that's the crazy part, in her termination letter, she got accused of lack of candor but they didn't mention the app. But the Department of Justice responded to every journalist that reached out in, like, five minutes. They had a prepared statement for an auditor in Austin? In the US trustee department? They have nothing to do with immigration. They have nothing to do with anything else with the DoJ, they're a whole separate division that handles bankruptcy.
What did they say?
They had this prepared statement, they accused her of threatening law enforcement officers and endangering the lives of Ice agents and all this horrible shit. It was very different from her termination letter. The whole thing started when Laura Loomer doxed her on X and then said that she spoke to Tom Homan. Homan goes on Newsmax and says that he spoke to the DoJ, which obviously is [headed by] Pam Bondi. Twenty-four hours later, my wife gets a termination letter from the deputy director of the DoJ. It was pretty obvious that it went from Loomer to Homan and to Bondi to 'You're fired.' That was it.
It must be tough for your family.
She worked there for almost a decade. She has decades of experience in the private sector, and she's really, really good at what she does, and was honestly beloved by everyone she worked with. They just basically fired her and accused her of all this horrible stuff, and none of it's true. It really, really sucks. She misses it terribly.
Are you worried about other ways the Trump administration might retaliate?
Well, you have Pam Bondi accusing me and saying, I better 'watch out.' Please, come on. I better watch out? Why? I'm protected under the first amendment. This is perfectly legal, and I made sure of that – I checked with multiple constitutional attorneys and criminal attorneys before I released this app, because I was concerned about whether I'm protected. And everyone agreed 100% this is protected speech.
Can you explain briefly how IceBlock works?
Well it can only be downloaded from the US app store, and people can only report sightings within a five-mile radius of where they are currently. Then all sightings get deleted after four hours. So let's say there are 100 people in a five-mile area, and one person sees Ice – they're walking down the street, whatever – and they go, 'Oh, shit.' And they report it. All the other users in that five-mile radius get an immediate notification that shows up on their phone.
The app has been live for quite a few months. Do you get the sense it's actually being used to by people who are worried about Ice?
I have no idea, because it's 100% anonymous. We don't track those metrics. I get asked all the time: 'Where are most of your users?' I have no fucking idea. 'How many sightings do you get per hour?' I don't know. We don't track this. It's so hard to answer these basic questions that normal apps would be able to answer because there is the whole core principle of anonymity. We don't have that data, and I don't want it. The only thing I can tell you is that currently on the app we have 445 sightings nationwide [likely over a four-hour window due to the fact that sightings stay up for four hours once reported] and we have just about 1 million users that have this installed on their phones right now.
But is it being downloaded by well-meaning liberals who support what you're doing? Or is it doing its practical job and helping undocumented people as a practical tool in their lives? Maybe we just can't know that yet?
I would say this, most people who download the app are doing it to keep themselves safe, so they want to know what's going on around their five-mile radius. So yes, I think it's very much being used for how it's intended to be used. I didn't want to have to build this, but it is a necessity. It is a tool as this early warning system that does keep people safe, and it is, I think, giving people peace of mind, especially those who are most affected by it or most at risk. It allows them to go to that restaurant or walk around that neighborhood with a little bit of peace of mind.
What were the initial fears and challenges? Did you worry about whether the Apple app store was going to allow it on?
How confident was I could do it? I don't want to sound egotistical – and don't print this so I sound like a fucking asshole – but, dude, I can fucking do it. Of course, I could do it. Even with my music career, I built audio studios, and I was a producer and a mix engineer, and I designed gear. So I've always kind of been on that tech engineering side of things like, that's just how my brain works. And I've been coding a healthcare app for the past four and a half years. So as far as could I write the code? Could I make it happen? This is a crazy easy app. Would it be approved by Apple? That was an interesting one, because nothing like it has ever been done before.
When I brought it to Apple and I submitted it to the app store, it got pushed back, and it took three weeks of going back and forth with Apple's legal department and higher ups in Apple's app review, and there were conversations almost on a daily basis with senior people there saying: 'Is this even legal? Can we do this? Are we going to get in trouble for having this?'
Apple had a hard time wrapping their head around it, because they were like, 'What do you mean you're never going to make money? What do you mean you're never going to track anything?' I was like, 'Yeah, that's the point. I don't care.' I don't care about people's data as far as, like, being able to get analytics or track them or sell their data. I don't care about any of that. I care about keeping people safe. That is literally the whole point. Eventually they allowed it on. (Apple and the Department of Justice did not return requests for comment.)
Because there are no user accounts, and no way of you seeing what's happening on the app, there's no way to block bad actors. Does that mean there is a possibility of people reporting false sightings?
I can't verify the sightings without driving to rural Indiana and seeing if they're there. I've put in safeguards: you can only report a sighting once every five minutes so you can't just spam the database; all sightings are deleted after four hours; it has to be a real address – you can't type in 123 Main Street; and you can only report within your own five-mile radius. So with all of those safeguards – are there any false sightings? Yes, of course there are. Are they prevalent? No, because it would be too time consuming. And what's the worst case scenario for a false sighting anyway? That a user gets a notification on their device and says: 'Hey, I'll stay away from that address for a couple hours?' Who gives a shit.
So beyond helping people – what's your personal interest in developing these apps? You're also working on a healthcare app which is also focused on keeping patient data private.
Yes, my whole thing is very, very privacy focused. I don't use Gmail. I run my own mail servers. I run my own web servers. I have always done that because I just don't trust these companies who are reading all of your messages, and they're doing it to harvest your data and market to you. I want myself to be private. I'm an individual. I think that lent quite a bit to the way that I thought about IceBlock.
I've had my IceBlock open while we've been on the phone, and there's been one reported sighting in my area.
Yeah, isn't that nice to know that? I mean, you're British right, obviously you are not a native-born American. So now you know maybe don't go over in that area for the next couple hours. Not a big deal.
This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Mormon missionary president is shot during violent home invasion in Mexico City
The president of a Mormon mission in Mexico City was shot at point-blank range during an early morning robbery attempt at his house. Ohio-born Tyler Wallis, 57, and his wife Elizabeth Wallis, 54, were at their home in Mexico's capital when an intruder broke in around 2am and attacked him. The burglar shot Wallis with a 9mm pistol just below the sternum and the bullet penetrated two inches without hitting any organs or arteries, family members shared in a Latter Day Saints Facebook group. 'An undeniable miracle that he is not dead,' they added. According to another relative, Elizabeth texted the family group chat immediately after the shooting, begging for prayers. 'We need prayers immediately. We've had a robber break in our house and Tyler has been shot two times please see this and wake everyone up and have them pray for him,' she allegedly texted. Elizabeth was left unharmed in the violent robbery. Wallis was treated at a nearby medical center in Mexico City and is in stable condition, church spokesperson Sam Penrod said. 'The Church is cooperating with local authorities as they investigate the incident. All missionaries are safe,' an announcement the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints website reported. One of their daughters shared an update on Wallis's health: 'My dad is doing well - we appreciate all the prayers and rejoice in miracles,' their daughter Madeleine shared on Facebook. The post was flooded with comments promising to pray for Wallis. Wallis had moved to Mexico City less than two months ago and began serving as mission president on July 1. 'A new chapter of our life has begun,' Elizabeth said in a Facebook post announcing their move, adding, 'We are excited to serve the Lord in this capacity.' The couple are originally from Orlando, Florida, and have four children. Elizabeth works as a life coach for parents of children with anxiety. 'My husband and I raised our four children in 6 cities. I am a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. I am a woman trying to reduce anxiety in the world,' she shared on her website. While Mexico City has become safer in recent years, there is still a high rate of robbery, according to data from Dow Jones. Violent robberies remain a risk in many neighborhoods close to central areas, especially in the central Cuauhtemoc borough.
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Air Canada flight attendants to defy back-to-work order and remain on strike
Air Canada's flight attendants plan to remain on strike, their union has said, defying government efforts to force them back to work and into binding arbitration over a dispute that has left more than 100,000 travellers stranded around the world during the peak summer travel season. About 10,000 flight attendants who work for Canada's largest airline walked out on the job early on Saturday amid an increasingly bitter dispute over what the union has described as 'poverty wages' and unpaid labour. Around the same time, Air Canada, which operates about 700 flights a day, said it would begin locking flight attendants out of airports. Less than 12 hours later, the Canadian government said it had ordered an end to the work stoppage, leading Air Canada to announce plans to resume flying by Sunday evening. However, that timeline was thrown into question after the union told Reuters it would challenge the return-to-work order, which it described as unconstitutional. It was the latest twist in talks that have dragged on since March as the flight attendants seek to address the fact that they are not compensated for work carried out when planes are not in the air, whether it is time spent on the ground between flights and or helping passengers to board. On Saturday, Canada's federal jobs minister, Patty Hajdu, said it was clear the talks had reached an impasse and that the impact was being felt by Canadians and visitors across the country. 'The talks broke down,' said Hajdu as she told reporters that she had asked the Canada Industrial Relations Board to order an immediate end to the strike and to impose binding arbitration. 'It is clear that the parties are not any closer to resolving some of the key issues that remain and they will need help with the arbitrator.' She appeared to link her actions to the toll that US tariff increases had taken on the Canadian economy. 'In a year in which Canadian families and businesses have already experienced too much disruption and uncertainty, this is not the time to add additional challenges and disruptions to their lives and our economy,' she said in a statement. Hajdu's power to halt the strike stems from a section of the Canada Labour Code, which gives the minister unilateral authority to end work stoppages in order to 'maintain or secure industrial peace'. While the section was rarely used by previous governments, the Liberal government has invoked it several times in the past year, quelling strikes by workers at Canadian ports, the post office and railway companies, prompting analysts to voice concerns that the use of the clause may be undermining workers' rights. The union representing the flight attendants decried the Liberal government for stepping in within hours, accusing it of violating their right to take job action. Air Canada had reportedly previously requested that the government intervene to impose binding arbitration. Wesley Lesosky, of the Canadian Union of Public Employees, said the government was giving 'Air Canada exactly what they want – hours and hours of unpaid labour from underpaid flight attendants, while the company pulls in sky-high profits and extraordinary executive compensation'. According to the aviation analytics firm Cirium, the airline had cancelled 671 flights by Saturday afternoon, leaving some travellers stranded overseas and others scrambling to find alternatives during the busy summer travel season. About 130,000 customers a day could be affected by a disruption, according to the airline. The airline said earlier it had offered its flight attendants 'an increase of more than 38% on global compensation', but the union said the figure failed to fully account for inflation. Air Canada also said it was willing to pay flight attendants 50% of their wage for work done before planes take off, leading the union to reply that its members should be fully compensated for their labour. About 70% of the airline's flight attendants are women, said Natasha Stea, a local union president and flight attendant. She questioned whether they were being treated fairly, given that Air Canada pilots, the vast majority of whom are men, received a significant raise last year. 'We are heartbroken for our passengers,' she told the Associated Press late last week. 'Nobody wants to see Canadians stranded or anxious about their travel plans, but we cannot work for free.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The leaked WhatsApp messages that expose Tory splits over ‘silly' asylum policy
Tory MPs are split over the party's asylum policy and 'silly' messaging on migrant hotels, leaked WhatsApp messages reveal. Members of the 2024 Conservative intake heavily criticised their party's line of attack against Labour in light of its own record on the issue. Kevin Hollinrake, the Tory chairman, agreed an advert shared by Conservative Campaign Headquarters last week was 'of concern' but insisted that it would not be deleted. The WhatsApp exchange, which was first reported by ConservativeHome, came after the Tories shared an advert featuring a 'list of perks' received by Channel migrants housed in asylum hotels. It included housing and food 'provided directly by the state', three-star accommodation, free PlayStation consoles, bus travel and a weekly allowance of £49.18 per person. But Tory MPs reacted with disbelief because asylum hotels first opened when their party was in government, peaking at 400 in 2023 at a £3bn cost to the taxpayer. Lewis Cocking, the MP for Broxbourne, shared the advert to a group chat containing all current Conservative MPs and said: 'This makes us look silly as we gave them all this too, which is why we are in the mess we are in today. Completely unacceptable – they should be put in detention centres and deported.' Ben Obese-Jecty, the MP for Huntingdon and a parliamentary private secretary, then shared a social media post by Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, criticising the advert. He said Mr Farage's attack was 'as predicted', reportedly going on to call it 'another example of p--- poor comms from CCHQ that cause unnecessary media embarrassment'. The Conservatives have been criticised for their record on both legal and illegal immigration during their 14 years in power. Net migration peaked at almost one million in the year to June 2023 while tens of thousands of people reached the UK in small boats, a crisis that has worsened further under Labour. The party has also been outflanked on the issue by Reform, which has vowed a 'one in, one out' migration policy. Conservative Party on immigration Kemi Badenoch is widely expected to confirm her final position on the European Convention on Human Rights at the Tories' annual party conference in October after saying she is 'minded to leave' the convention. In her first major speech as leader of the opposition in November, she admitted the Conservatives 'got it wrong' on immigration and pledged to 'rebuild trust' with voters. She has vowed to bring in an annual cap on the number of new visas and said that all illegal migrants to arrive under a Tory government would be deported. Mrs Badenoch also pledged last week to reduce the number of small boat crossings to zero, insisting that this could be done 'pretty quickly' after an election if she were to enter No 10. A Conservative spokesman said: 'Kemi Badenoch has been clear that under her leadership this is a changed Conservative Party. 'She has set out where we failed on immigration, and delivered bold new plans to set it right including our Deportation Bill, which would take back control of our borders. 'We will continue to hold Labour to account for their total failure to tackle the small boats crisis.'
