A $101,000 knee replacement? Why some hospitals charge far more than others.
A new report from Trilliant Health, a health care analytics company, shows how much prices for the same medical service can vary at different hospitals and surgery centers.
Want a total knee replacement? It can cost as little as $12,870 or as much $101,527. An ankle replacement? An Austin, Texas, hospital charges $22,011 while a New Jersey hospital billed more than $197,000 for the same operation. These wide price swings can leave insured consumers with big bills, loans and medical debt.
Using claims data from two major health insurers, Trilliant Health analyzed inpatient and outpatient rates charged by nearly 2,700 hospitals and 3,500 surgery centers. The report found prices can vary as much as nine-fold for the same operation or procedure. And hospital prices within the same state varied more than three-fold, the report said.
Trilliant also analyzed 10 hospitals listed on multiple best hospital lists and found no link between higher prices and improved health quality.
Allison Oakes, chief research officer for Trilliant Health, said the report aims to inform consumers and employers on health care prices so they can better gauge the value of services they are purchasing. Oakes said health care prices − and the discounted rates negotiated by insurance companies − historically have been a "very well protected industry secret."
"The fact that we now have information related to price, we can hopefully begin to rein in our spending," said Oakes.
Hospital prices drive health spending higher
Research shows said such price variation is a key contributor to why health care costs so much more in the United States than any other nation. The U.S. spent $4.9 trillion in health care in 2023 − or $14,570 for every person. Despite spending more than any other nation, U.S. life expectancy is the lowest among large, wealthy nations, according to the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker.
Employers who pay for health insurance for working-age adults historically didn't have prices when deciding which hospitals and surgery centers to include in their workplace insurance plans' networks.
Consumers with high-deductible health plans often pay thousands of dollars out of pocket before coverage kicks in. Or they often are charged coinsurance, which requires they pay a percentage of a medical bill.
Over the past 25 years, the cost of employer health insurance premiums has nearly tripled the rate of workers pay raises, according to a 2024 study in peer reviewed Health Affairs. A major contributing factor: hospital prices.
Under federal price transparency rules adopted earlier this decade, health insurance companies must disclose prices negotiated with hospitals and other health providers. Trilliant's analysis included prices negotiated by two national health insurers: UnitedHealth Group and Aetna.
Will price transparency spur competition, lower prices?
Researchers not involved in the Trilliant report have analyzed price transparency data and reached similar conclusions about widespread price differences.
One study by Johns Hopkins University found prices of X-rays and CT scans varied more than 10-fold nationwide. The study found prices for the same scan in the same hospital nearly tripled based on different plans from the same insurance company, said Ge Bai, a Johns Hopkins University professor of accounting and health policy and management.
Bai said the study underscores the lack of competition in health services.
"We have a long way to go before we can reach a competitive market for health care prices," Bai said.
Rice University's Baker Institute compared prices of three Houston hospitals and found large price differences negotiated by three health insurers: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, United Health and Humana. The biggest price gap: an overnight stay covered by a Humana PPO plan ranged from an average of $17,628 to $57,898 at different Houston-area hospitals.
Vivian Ho, a Rice University economist who has studied hospital pricing, said employers can use pricing information to tailor their health insurance offerings to workers.
"There is a great deal of opportunity for employers to take this information and start restructuring their benefits," Ho said.
A large New York labor union attempted to steer employees away from New York-Presbyterian to other hospitals as part of a cost-savings move. The union, Local 32BJ of the Service Employees International Union, requested the Justice Department investigate New York Presbyterian over claims that anti-competitive behavior kept hospital prices high. The Justice Department has launched an investigation into the high-profile hospital chain and its insurer contracting practices, according to a subpoena reviewed by the New York Times.
A New York-Presbyterian spokesperson declined to comment.
Another study of Massachusetts health plans that examined the use of tiered pricing that charged consumers higher copays if they chose more expensive hospitals. Consumers could choose copays of $250, $500 or $750, with the higher copays linked to more expensive hospitals.
After three years, overall spending dropped by more than 8%, an indication consumers were willing to choose lower-cost copays and hospitals.
Ho said the tiered copay approach is easier for consumers to understand health prices − and what steps they can take to lower their costs.
"The average consumer doesn't understand the problem," Ho said.
Consumers are quick to blame their insurer when health prices rise, Ho said. And while insurers have been scrutinized for practices such as prior authorization and service denials, the main driver of health insurance premiums are hospital charges for both inpatient and outpatient services, Ho said.
"The hospitals and the consolidated health care systems are charging very high prices," Ho said. "And there's nothing in your health insurance benefit to stop you from going to the highest-priced providers."
Email consumer health reporter Ken Alltucker at alltuck@usatoday.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
11 hours ago
- UPI
Developmental impairments in kids linked to pesticide exposure
Columbia University researchers said exposure to common pesticide chlorpyrifos during pregnancy can impair children's brain development and motor function for years to come. Photo by Adobe Stock/HealthDay News Exposure to a common pesticide during pregnancy can impair children's brain development and motor function for years to come, a new study says. The widely used pesticide chlorpyrifos is linked to altered brain function and poorer fine motor control among children exposed to it while in the womb, researchers report in JAMA Neurology. "The disturbances in brain tissue and metabolism that we observed with prenatal exposure to this one pesticide were remarkably widespread throughout the brain," lead researcher Dr. Bradley Peterson said in a news release. He's chief of child and adolescent psychiatry at the University of Southern California's Keck School of Medicine. For the study, researchers conducted behavioral assessments and MRI scans of 270 kids in upper Manhattan whose mothers had been exposed to CPF during pregnancy when their apartments were fumigated. These assessments occurred between 1998 and mid-2005. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency banned CPF for residential use in 2001, but it's still used as an agricultural pesticide for non-organic fruits, vegetables and grains such as apples, strawberries, asparagus, tart cherries, citrus and peaches, researchers noted. CPF is an organophosphate pesticide, in the same chemical family as nerve gas, researchers note. The chemical can cross the placenta to the fetus, and easily traverse the fetal blood-brain barrier. CPF has been used to control cockroaches, fleas and termites, and has been an active ingredient in some flea and tick collars for pets, according to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. The MRI scans revealed that the children had specific changes in their brain's cortex, white matter, network pathways and nerve insulation, all of which could impair development, motor control and brain function. Further, progressively higher exposure to CPF was significantly associated with increasingly greater alterations in brain structure and function, as well as poorer motor function, researchers said. "More CPF exposure led to more thickening of the cerebral cortex -- the area of the brain that directs functions like thinking, memory and movement," Peterson said. "We don't know the consequences of these brain effects, but we found that CPF exposure most impairs motor functioning." The data strongly suggest that CPF exposure affects the way that neurons develop, Peterson said. "That happens early in pregnancy, when neurons develop in the cortex and differentiate into cortical gray matter -- densely packed nerve cells which process information -- and underlying white matter -- which is mostly nerve fibers that connect neurons," Peterson said. "All these abnormalities can contribute to poor motor function in these kids," he continued. "The contributing mechanisms seem to be the inflammation and oxidative stress that CPF and other pesticides produce." Results also showed that children exposed to CPF had dramatically reduced blood flow to the brain. "To me, this is the most profound finding because it's so powerful and very rare to see something like this," Peterson said. "Blood flow is an important indicator of underlying metabolism -- the energy used by brain tissue. In my opinion, it's maybe the most important finding of the paper, because it says that globally there's a problem with brain metabolism in direct proportion to how much CPF exposure they had." Toxic exposure to CPF continues to be a risk during pregnancy, either through the food supply or from outdoor air and dust near farmland, researchers said. "Current widespread exposures, at levels comparable to those experienced in this sample, continue to place farm workers, pregnant women and unborn children in harm's way," senior researcher Virginia Rauh said in a news release. She's a professor of population and family health at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health in New York City. "It is vitally important that we continue to monitor the levels of exposure in potentially vulnerable populations, especially in pregnant women in agricultural communities, as their infants continue to be at risk," Rauh added. Peterson said pregnant women also should be wary of potential exposure through produce. "It's in our food supply," he said. "And other chemicals used in the home act in similar ways and almost certainly increase inflammation and oxidative stress. This is why it is important to do these studies about the chemicals in our environment to protect children's health." More information The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has more about chlorpyrifos. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
A $101,000 knee replacement? Why some hospitals charge far more than others.
People are usually savvy enough to check whether their hospital or doctor takes their insurance. But it's often a mystery how much a medical procedure or operation will cost, even with coverage. A new report from Trilliant Health, a health care analytics company, shows how much prices for the same medical service can vary at different hospitals and surgery centers. Want a total knee replacement? It can cost as little as $12,870 or as much $101,527. An ankle replacement? An Austin, Texas, hospital charges $22,011 while a New Jersey hospital billed more than $197,000 for the same operation. These wide price swings can leave insured consumers with big bills, loans and medical debt. Using claims data from two major health insurers, Trilliant Health analyzed inpatient and outpatient rates charged by nearly 2,700 hospitals and 3,500 surgery centers. The report found prices can vary as much as nine-fold for the same operation or procedure. And hospital prices within the same state varied more than three-fold, the report said. Trilliant also analyzed 10 hospitals listed on multiple best hospital lists and found no link between higher prices and improved health quality. Allison Oakes, chief research officer for Trilliant Health, said the report aims to inform consumers and employers on health care prices so they can better gauge the value of services they are purchasing. Oakes said health care prices − and the discounted rates negotiated by insurance companies − historically have been a "very well protected industry secret." "The fact that we now have information related to price, we can hopefully begin to rein in our spending," said Oakes. Hospital prices drive health spending higher Research shows such price variation is a key contributor to why health care costs so much more in the United States than any other nation. The U.S. spent $4.9 trillion in health care in 2023 − or $14,570 for every person. Despite spending more than any other nation, U.S. life expectancy is the lowest among large, wealthy nations, according to the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker. Employers who pay for health insurance for working-age adults historically didn't have prices when deciding which hospitals and surgery centers to include in their workplace insurance plans' networks. Consumers with high-deductible health plans often pay thousands of dollars out of pocket before coverage kicks in. Or they often are charged coinsurance, which requires they pay a percentage of a medical bill. Over the past 25 years, the cost of employer health insurance premiums has nearly tripled the rate of workers pay raises, according to a 2024 study in peer reviewed Health Affairs. A major contributing factor: hospital prices. Under federal price transparency rules adopted earlier this decade, health insurance companies must disclose prices negotiated with hospitals and other health providers. Trilliant's analysis included prices negotiated by two national health insurers: UnitedHealth Group and Aetna. Will price transparency spur competition, lower prices? Researchers not involved in the Trilliant report have analyzed price transparency data and reached similar conclusions about widespread price differences. One study by Johns Hopkins University found prices of X-rays and CT scans varied more than 10-fold nationwide. The study found prices for the same scan in the same hospital nearly tripled based on different plans from the same insurance company, said Ge Bai, a Johns Hopkins University professor of accounting and health policy and management. Bai said the study underscores the lack of competition in health services. "We have a long way to go before we can reach a competitive market for health care prices," Bai said. Rice University's Baker Institute compared prices of three Houston hospitals and found large price differences negotiated by three health insurers: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, United Health and Humana. The biggest price gap: an overnight stay covered by a Humana PPO plan ranged from an average of $17,628 to $57,898 at different Houston-area hospitals. Vivian Ho, a Rice University economist who has studied hospital pricing, said employers can use pricing information to tailor their health insurance offerings to workers. "There is a great deal of opportunity for employers to take this information and start restructuring their benefits," Ho said. A large New York labor union attempted to steer employees away from New York-Presbyterian to other hospitals as part of a cost-savings move. The union, Local 32BJ of the Service Employees International Union, requested the Justice Department investigate New York Presbyterian over claims that anti-competitive behavior kept hospital prices high. The Justice Department has launched an investigation into the high-profile hospital chain and its insurer contracting practices, according to a subpoena reviewed by the New York Times. A New York-Presbyterian spokesperson declined to comment. Another study of Massachusetts health plans that examined the use of tiered pricing that charged consumers higher copays if they chose more expensive hospitals. Consumers could choose copays of $250, $500 or $750, with the higher copays linked to more expensive hospitals. After three years, overall spending dropped by more than 8%, an indication consumers were willing to choose lower-cost copays and hospitals. Ho said the tiered copay approach is easier for consumers to understand health prices − and what steps they can take to lower their costs. "The average consumer doesn't understand the problem," Ho said. Consumers are quick to blame their insurer when health prices rise, Ho said. And while insurers have been scrutinized for practices such as prior authorization and service denials, the main driver of health insurance premiums are hospital charges for both inpatient and outpatient services, Ho said. "The hospitals and the consolidated health care systems are charging very high prices," Ho said. "And there's nothing in your health insurance benefit to stop you from going to the highest-priced providers." Email consumer health reporter Ken Alltucker at alltuck@ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: A $101,000 knee replacement? Why hospital charges vary so much. Solve the daily Crossword
USA Today
3 days ago
- USA Today
A $101,000 knee replacement? Why some hospitals charge far more than others.
People are usually savvy enough to check whether their hospital or doctor takes their insurance. But it's often a mystery how much a medical procedure or operation will cost, even with coverage. A new report from Trilliant Health, a health care analytics company, shows how much prices for the same medical service can vary at different hospitals and surgery centers. Want a total knee replacement? It can cost as little as $12,870 or as much $101,527. An ankle replacement? An Austin, Texas, hospital charges $22,011 while a New Jersey hospital billed more than $197,000 for the same operation. These wide price swings can leave insured consumers with big bills, loans and medical debt. Using claims data from two major health insurers, Trilliant Health analyzed inpatient and outpatient rates charged by nearly 2,700 hospitals and 3,500 surgery centers. The report found prices can vary as much as nine-fold for the same operation or procedure. And hospital prices within the same state varied more than three-fold, the report said. Trilliant also analyzed 10 hospitals listed on multiple best hospital lists and found no link between higher prices and improved health quality. Allison Oakes, chief research officer for Trilliant Health, said the report aims to inform consumers and employers on health care prices so they can better gauge the value of services they are purchasing. Oakes said health care prices − and the discounted rates negotiated by insurance companies − historically have been a "very well protected industry secret." "The fact that we now have information related to price, we can hopefully begin to rein in our spending," said Oakes. Hospital prices drive health spending higher Research shows said such price variation is a key contributor to why health care costs so much more in the United States than any other nation. The U.S. spent $4.9 trillion in health care in 2023 − or $14,570 for every person. Despite spending more than any other nation, U.S. life expectancy is the lowest among large, wealthy nations, according to the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker. Employers who pay for health insurance for working-age adults historically didn't have prices when deciding which hospitals and surgery centers to include in their workplace insurance plans' networks. Consumers with high-deductible health plans often pay thousands of dollars out of pocket before coverage kicks in. Or they often are charged coinsurance, which requires they pay a percentage of a medical bill. Over the past 25 years, the cost of employer health insurance premiums has nearly tripled the rate of workers pay raises, according to a 2024 study in peer reviewed Health Affairs. A major contributing factor: hospital prices. Under federal price transparency rules adopted earlier this decade, health insurance companies must disclose prices negotiated with hospitals and other health providers. Trilliant's analysis included prices negotiated by two national health insurers: UnitedHealth Group and Aetna. Will price transparency spur competition, lower prices? Researchers not involved in the Trilliant report have analyzed price transparency data and reached similar conclusions about widespread price differences. One study by Johns Hopkins University found prices of X-rays and CT scans varied more than 10-fold nationwide. The study found prices for the same scan in the same hospital nearly tripled based on different plans from the same insurance company, said Ge Bai, a Johns Hopkins University professor of accounting and health policy and management. Bai said the study underscores the lack of competition in health services. "We have a long way to go before we can reach a competitive market for health care prices," Bai said. Rice University's Baker Institute compared prices of three Houston hospitals and found large price differences negotiated by three health insurers: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, United Health and Humana. The biggest price gap: an overnight stay covered by a Humana PPO plan ranged from an average of $17,628 to $57,898 at different Houston-area hospitals. Vivian Ho, a Rice University economist who has studied hospital pricing, said employers can use pricing information to tailor their health insurance offerings to workers. "There is a great deal of opportunity for employers to take this information and start restructuring their benefits," Ho said. A large New York labor union attempted to steer employees away from New York-Presbyterian to other hospitals as part of a cost-savings move. The union, Local 32BJ of the Service Employees International Union, requested the Justice Department investigate New York Presbyterian over claims that anti-competitive behavior kept hospital prices high. The Justice Department has launched an investigation into the high-profile hospital chain and its insurer contracting practices, according to a subpoena reviewed by the New York Times. A New York-Presbyterian spokesperson declined to comment. Another study of Massachusetts health plans that examined the use of tiered pricing that charged consumers higher copays if they chose more expensive hospitals. Consumers could choose copays of $250, $500 or $750, with the higher copays linked to more expensive hospitals. After three years, overall spending dropped by more than 8%, an indication consumers were willing to choose lower-cost copays and hospitals. Ho said the tiered copay approach is easier for consumers to understand health prices − and what steps they can take to lower their costs. "The average consumer doesn't understand the problem," Ho said. Consumers are quick to blame their insurer when health prices rise, Ho said. And while insurers have been scrutinized for practices such as prior authorization and service denials, the main driver of health insurance premiums are hospital charges for both inpatient and outpatient services, Ho said. "The hospitals and the consolidated health care systems are charging very high prices," Ho said. "And there's nothing in your health insurance benefit to stop you from going to the highest-priced providers." Email consumer health reporter Ken Alltucker at alltuck@
