Parents of aid worker killed in Afghanistan dedicate honour to women there
The couple were both made OBEs for services to women and children abroad and in Scotland.
They set up the Linda Norgrove Foundation in memory of their daughter Linda, an aid worker who was kidnapped by the Taliban in Afghanistan and died in an attempted rescue by US forces in October 2010.
John and Lorna Norgrove meeting Afghan women as they arrived at Edinburgh Airport last year (Andrew Milligan/PA)
The foundation gives grants to fund education, health and childcare for women and children in Afghanistan.
The couple said: 'We are honoured to have received this recognition of the work being carried out by the Linda Norgrove Foundation.
'We are a tiny charity, mostly volunteers, who all share the same goal – to make life better for women and children in Afghanistan.
'Having put a lot of effort into sponsoring women to study medicine in Afghanistan, we were heartbroken when the Taliban stopped them from attending university.
'We were privileged to have the chance to bring some of them here to Scotland last year to continue their studies at Scottish universities.
'We dedicate this honour to all those brave women who remain in Afghanistan, or who have made the decision to leave their homes and families behind to move abroad and continue their studies and careers. Their struggle continues and they are the real heroes of this story.'
Mrs Norgrove said news of the OBE came as a 'big surprise'.
The foundation worked with both the Scottish and UK governments to bring 19 female Afghan medical students to Scotland last year to continue their degrees as they were barred by the Taliban from completing their university studies in Afghanistan.
Linda Norgrove died in 2010 (FCO/PA)
The couple said the charity was set up to help Afghan women and children in their own country and they now plan to focus on that rather than bringing more of them to the UK.
They hope the honour will raise awareness about the work the foundation is doing in Afghanistan, where girls and women are living under severe restrictions imposed by the Taliban.
Mrs Norgrove said: 'Women have been prevented from working, prevented from having education, they're prevented from going out.
'And the loss of jobs is having a severe effect on family life and how they're managing to cope on an everyday basis.'
The couple, who live on the isle of Lewis, said their daughter would have been pleased to know they are carrying on the work that she was doing.
Mrs Norgrove said: 'Linda was very, very much for women's rights, and for looking after women, for giving them jobs – anything to do with women and children, she was all for it.
'She would be absolutely delighted that we've been able to help in the way that we have.'
Mr Norgrove added: 'She was all for women's education. She particularly thought that you don't only educate a woman, but you also ensure a different life for the woman's children as well, you know? So she thought that was the future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Taking difficult decisions on money for healthcare
Last year Agenda for Change trade unions received a 5.5% pay uplift and have recently, unanimously accepted, a two year pay deal of 4.25% in 2025/26 and 3.75% in 2026/27. This pay agreement will benefit almost 170,000 NHS Agenda for Change staff – including nurses, midwives, paramedics, allied health professionals, and porters. This will see a Band 5 nurse at the top of their grade getting a £1,689 pay uplift in 2025/26. I was pleased to reach an agreement with consultants in 2024/25 on a 10.5% uplift which equated to a significant investment of £124.9 million in their pay and reward package. This ensured consultant pay remains competitive with other UK nations. Neil Gray said difficult choices had to be made (Image: PA) As we look to this year's pay settlement, it has been absolutely crucial to ensure that any pay increase is fair, affordable and equitable. I have carefully considered the recommendation of a 4% increase from the independent Doctors' and Dentists' Remuneration Body (DDRB), which advises on these matters at a UK level. I feel this represents a fair and equitable offer and we are implementing the recommendations immediately to ensure uplifts and backpay are received in July salaries. We have had to make difficult decisions to redirect funding from within the health portfolio. Redirecting funding from patient care is never an easy decision, but I have done so to respect the independent DDRB process and set the Scottish Government on a financially sustainable path. I have been clear I am unable to go beyond the DDRB recommendations. In the coming weeks we look to hold discussions with the BMA to explore non-pay elements which could be included in this year's deal. With average CPI inflation forecast to run at 2% over the course of the 2025/26 financial year, a 4% increase means they will receive an above inflation increase which will see consultants raises of between £4,286 and £5,695, meaning at the top of their scale, a consultant will earn a basic pay of £148,064. For specialty doctors, this increase would see their wage rise by between £2,468 and £3,845, with those at the top of their grade earning a basic salary of nearly £100,000. As I travel up and down the country and meet staff working in our hospitals and health centres, I see first-hand the outstanding work staff in our health service are undertaking and I am extremely grateful for their contribution. READ MORE: Neil Gray faces fresh questions over 'limogate' row 'We must tackle racist violence' - Swinney after Police Scotland officers sent to NI However, I also hear about the demands staff are dealing with and impact this can have on morale and wellbeing. We know that teams are facing pressure right across the NHS – from porters to consultants - and I want staff to know; we hear your concerns and we are determined to take action and ensure we are directing resources to the right places to relieve pressure on the system. In recent weeks we announced the allocation of £106 million to tackle waiting times. This investment will help clear the longest waits and I hope demonstrate to staff that we are taking measures to clear the backlog of treatment facing teams currently. The investment is part of the £200 million announced as part of the Programme for Government to build capacity, tackle delayed discharge and improve patient flow through hospitals. We are determined to do more on recruitment - a new project called the Future Medical Workforce will seek to explore issues of workforce planning. This will allow us to hear directly from doctors in order to make improvements to the medical education pipeline, ensuring we can continue to deliver the medical workforce Scotland needs. I have continued to invest significantly in training as we want to have the best qualified people working in our NHS. There are a record high number of Medical & Dental Consultants in Scotland, including Directors. Under this government, the number of Consultants has increased by 70% and our NHS workforce has seen 12 consecutive years of growth. I recognise the challenges that the Health Service faces and I am determined to do more, but I strongly believe that this must be done in a way that treats all staff with fairness and equity. Neil Gray is the Health Secretary and MSP for Airdrie & Shotts
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Doctor leaders warn GP practices ‘on the brink' as demand intensifies
The snap survey ran from 6 May to 21 May this year and received 1,670 responses, with 38% of GP partners in Scotland taking part. Nearly half of GPs in Scotland who responded to the survey said the future of their practice is precarious or not sustainable. A total of 45% of GPs said this was the case, representing a rise of 10% since 2023. Four out of ten GPs (41.61%) said their practice is unable to meet patient demand for access and there is 'no realistic chance of this in the near future'. Most GPs (98.5%) believe urgent and sustained investment into General Practice is necessary. Meanwhile, more than nine out of ten GPs say they would take on additional GPs if they had sufficient funding (95.62%) Nearly all participants indicated that they could take on more General Practitioners (GPs) if they received adequate funding. The BMA found that an additional 160 whole-time equivalent (WTE) GPs could potentially be available, which would provide approximately 700,000 additional appointments annually. READ MORE: Doctors demand 1800 more GPs to improve patient care Scottish Government urged to improve NHS governance to deliver reforms This increase in capacity would be achievable if all sessional GPs seeking more work were able to secure their desired number of working hours. Dr Iain Morrison, chair of the Scottish general practitioners committee (SGPC), said the findings were "stark" in revealing the pressures GP practices are under. Dr Morrison also said the survey showed the 'devastating' impact of years of underinvestment and the results must act as a wake-up call to Government, with an urgent plan needed to see £290m deliver full funding restoration for GP practices and stabilise the position. The chair of the SGPC said: 'The findings of this survey show the crisis that GPs across the country are facing and must act as a wake-up call to government that we need a radical change of approach as to how it supports General Practice. 'At a time when we have record levels of demand, general practices are having to think about reducing services – we simply cannot continue to provide more and more for less and less resource. 'It is a situation which is completely unsustainable and is taking a toll on GPs who are all too aware of the challenges patients can face in accessing services. GPs want to deliver a service they can be proud of, rather than one they need to apologise for. 'This survey has found most practices would be able to take on more GPs if they had the funding available, as well as showing there are GPs who are looking for work. "Patients will rightly be bewildered that there are GPs struggling to find enough work while they can face a struggle to get an appointment. If the required funding was made available, patients would be able to rapidly see the benefits with the equivalent of 160 WTE GPs currently seeking to take on work.' The BMA's Scottish general practitioners committee has recently launched a campaign calling for a £290million funding gap to be addressed, which includes posters in GP surgeries explaining the issues to help patients understand why they may be struggling to get the service or access they want and need. Patients are also being urged to 'Stand with your Surgery' and back the call for general practice to receive more funding. Dr Morrison said: 'The survey also reveals an alarming number of practices are on the brink, with nearly half of GPs expressing concern about the sustainability of their practice in the future. 'Surgeries are at the heart of communities and we simply cannot afford to lose one more as a consequence of erosion of funding and rising cost pressures. That's why we are also calling for everyone to 'Stand with your Surgery' and advocate for General Practice to receive more funding, to be able to better serve their communities. 'This must begin with urgent action to deliver £290m for full funding restoration – around one percent of the Scottish NHS budget - which would initially help to stabilise General Practice and then grow the GP workforce to improve access and services for patients. 'The survey shows the devastating impact of years of lack of action and we cannot allow any more practices to close or GPs to leave the profession as a result. The government must now take the opportunity to support general practice and reverse years of decline before it is simply too late. 'General practice provides 90% of patient contact and can deliver the solution to the perpetual NHS crisis – but only if it is given the resources to do so.' One GP said despite working "harder than ever" she has recently faced more negativity around her line of work. Dr Karen Hopkins, a GP Partner in Stepps, North Lanarkshire, said: 'I used to be proud to tell people I was a GP; it used to be met with respect and appreciation. Now when people ask me, I tell them and brace myself for the barrage of frustration I know is about to be thrust upon me. 'Not out of malice, but because people - my friends, my family, parents in the playground- are increasingly frustrated with the NHS and service that is not fit for purpose. Yet my colleagues and I in primary care are working harder than ever. Longer hours, no lunch breaks, logging on at home on unpaid days off or holidays. 'Primary care is both the first point of access and the backbone of the NHS. Funding restoration would mean better access. It would mean more appointments with GPs and nurses. It would mean your chronic disease checks could be done promptly and on schedule. It would mean being a GP would once again become a more attractive job – 11-hour days with no break is not something any of us thought we were signing up for becoming GPs. 'Our nation has never been more unhealthy-obesity, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease. Preventing and treating this is the bread and butter of general practice, and yet while we are fire-fighting the insatiable demand, this important work cannot be done. Funding restoration needs to happen for the future of General the future of the NHS.' In its report, published in March, Audit Scotland, found Scottish Government ministers were "unlikely" to hit their target of delivering 800 more GPs by 2027. The BMA has previously said £290m is needed to plug a funding gap for GP surgeries and has warned if it is not addressed in the coming months then the "current direction of travel" is leading towards a formal dispute with Scottish ministers. The Scottish government said it has increased investment in general practice and is determined to increase the number of GPs in Scotland. Scotland currently has the highest number of GPs per head in the UK with 82 GPs per 100,000 population, compared with 64 in England. Health Secretary Neil Gray said: 'We want to make it easier for people to see their GP and are taking steps to address the challenges facing general practice. That includes ensuring that a greater proportion of new NHS funding goes to primary and community care. "We are in bilateral discussions with the Scottish GP Committee about core funding for general practice. 'GPs play an incredibly important role and we want to see more of them in Scotland. That is why we are determined to increase the number of GPs by 800 by 2027, with an additional 360 GPs added since 2017."
The Herald Scotland
a day ago
- The Herald Scotland
Tories propose 'Scottish first' approach to medical training
The new proposals were unveiled as party members gathered in Edinburgh for their annual conference. READ MORE 'What we've got is Scottish students not getting jobs in Scotland and they are leaving across the world," Dr Gulhane said. 'The SNP was great at training doctors for Australia. It's an absolute disgrace.' He added: 'We would offer Scottish graduates first because they tend to stay, and more than that, they tend to stay where they're from. So if you're from an island or a rural area, you will want to go back to that place. That creates GPs in areas that we are desperate for.' Dr Gulhane also unveiled a plan for a 'seven-day-a-week GP-led service', supported by targeted investment in the NHS's core funding mechanism for general practices. 'We would create a seven-day-a-week GP service,' he said. 'We have this unique position where we have unemployed GPs, and yet everyone wants to see a GP. 'We literally have unemployed GPs, so we would start actually using the capacity that was there.' He said his party would 'put money into Global Sum specifically ring-fenced for additional GP appointments.' 'So an example I always give is if you've got a urine infection, it's not an emergency, but you need to get seen,' he said. 'If you can't get a GP appointment during the day, you will call up NHS24 because it hurts, it's uncomfortable and whilst you're not desperately unwell, you deserve to get treated. 'But if I've created more capacity in GP, you will get treated in GP, which means you're not calling NHS24, which means urgent and emergency patients get through. And they get seen by a GP.' He added: 'There are going to be people who spill over, and there's going to be people who need to be seen urgently in the evening and I, as a practising GP, understand that, and I'm creating a policy that makes sense. 'So we would put more money into NHS24. And that is, again, ring-fenced, specifically for GP appointments.' Dr Gulhane said he wanted to see a shift toward early intervention in healthcare to reduce pressure on hospitals and specialist services. 'It saves us money because if you're a bit sad and you come to see me and I get on top of that and I help you and I get you into, say, a talking therapy and we solve your being a bit sad, you're not going to be depressed,' he said. 'Depression and sadness are very different things, but I can treat you early and I can get on top of the problem early, which means you don't progress in needing secondary care.'
