ICC Big change in ODI cricket ahead of 2027 World Cup due to......
The ICC has given the green signal to the change in the two-ball rule in One Day International (ODI) cricket. Along with this, changes have also been approved in the concussion-substitute protocol in men's international cricket.
The new rules were proposed by the ICC's Men's Cricket Committee and passed by the Chief Executive Committee. These rules will be applicable in Tests from June 17, in ODIs from July 2 and in T20Is from July 10.
At present, two new balls are used in an innings, one from each end. According to the new rules, two new balls will be used from the start of the innings till the 34th over. After this, one ball will be used from both ends from the 35th over, which will be chosen by the bowling team.
The ICC says that the purpose of this change is to re-establish the balance between ball and bat. There has long been a complaint that batsmen are getting an excessive advantage.
If the match is reduced to 25 overs per innings or less before the start of the first innings, the bowling team will be given only one new ball for the entire innings.
Under the new concussion rules, teams will nominate five substitute players before the start of the match: As per the new concussion-substitute rules, each team will have to name five substitute players before the start of the match, which will include a wicketkeeper, a batsman, a fast bowler, a spinner and an all-rounder.
In January, India included Harshit Rana as a concussion substitute in place of Shivam Dubey in the fourth T20I against England, which led to controversy. Under the new rules, such controversies will be avoided. If the substitute player also gets injured, the referee can approve an out player on a "like-for-like" basis.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
'They Rely Lot On Bumrah In Tests': Ex-England Star's Honest Take On India's Bowling Attack
India will have to rely heavily on their pace spearhead Jasprit Bumrah to win Test matches, but they have the ability to beat every side in 50-over games, given the depth of their talent, feels South African-born England legend Allan Lamb. The ex-cricketer, who now runs 'Lamb Associates', a successful hospitality venture, is happy with the rise of Indian cricket and how the IPL has been life-changing for cricketers around the world, but he is not too happy with the way ICC is running Test cricket. The 71-year-old, who represented England in three Wold Cups and 79 Tests, and witnessed the historic occasion of South Africa winning the World Test Championship final, is far from convinced with how the WTC can survive in its existing format. Forced to move to England from SA in the Apartheid era, he gave his thoughts on the controversial racial quota system in South African cricket. Speaking to PTI, Lamb also spoke passionately about his playing days with Kapil Dev in County cricket and why he rates Sachin Tendulkar over Sunil Gavaskar and Virat Kohli. Excerpts: Q. You toured India for the first time in the 1984-85 series, having made your debut at Lord's in 1982 against India. How would you sum up the rise of Indian cricket? A. I always thought that Indian cricket was going to go up, it was on the gradual climb. And because of the population and being your number one sport, cricket was always going to be the top of the tree. The IPL has changed cricket in India and the world. It's incredible to see these youngsters coming through, the 15-year-olds and the 16-year-olds (like Vaibhav Suryavanshi), and making a name for themselves. In one day cricket, India should win every competition. In Test matches, you're going to rely a lot on Bumrah and you're going to miss Virat Kohli big time. Q. Would you have fancied playing in the IPL and how has it changed the life of an international cricketer? A. It's changed the life of all cricketers that are playing now. They don't have to play Test cricket. They can just have 20-20 contracts all around the world and earn a fortune. I mean, the money we earned was tippings when we played. But good for them. They deserve all the millions; as entertainers they deserve to be paid. And would have I enjoyed the IPL? Yeah, because when I played, I always waited till the last 20 overs or the last 10 overs if we're playing a 50-over game. Q. You played with the great Kapil Dev at Northamptonshire and played against the likes of Sunil Gavaskar and Sachin Tendulkar. Who is your favourite Indian cricketer of all time? A. I love the way Kapil Dev played. We played together at Northampton. I remember him coming over and I saying, 'Kapi, I'm so pleased that you've come over. We need to strengthen our bowling'. He said, 'no I haven't come to strengthen my bowling. I've come to better my batting. I've come here as a batsman, which I always enjoyed that'. Q. Gavaskar, Sachin or Kohli? A. Sachin easily. I played against him when he was 18. I dropped him at slip and he went to get 100 (in a Test match). So I always say to him, it was me that made your name (laughs). Kohli is a brilliant player, he's got all the shots, he can score quickly. But if you want the best player I played against, that Indian player is Sachin, even ahead of Sunny. The only thing I would have liked to see Sachin play the West Indies, where Sunny scored runs against the West Indies. He was probably the only Indian to score runs against those quicks. Q. You are not a fan of the current WTC format. Why is that? A. The ICC is going to have to do something about it because the format they have for international Test matches, people are not too sure what is going on there as it's done over two years. There are some teams, like everyone said, that South Africa qualified due to the fact that they played all the weaker teams. But that wasn't South Africa's problem. That was the ICC's problem. They came up with that. And, I believe, you need a two-tier structure. And that's got to come in very rapidly. The ICC chairman, he's got to sit down, otherwise, cricket's going to be at a loss. You need strong teams playing each other but they've also got to play the weaker teams. Q. South Africa, the country of your birth, has finally won a world title. You must be a happy man? A. Yes, I was there (at Lord's). We had customers, clients there, and it was fantastic. I mean, South Africa are known as the chokers. If you have a look how many times they've blown it. Very proud of the way Aiden Markram batter under pressure. Q. You had to move to England during Apartheid and till date South Africa remains a divided nation in the words of Proteas captain Temba Bavuma. While rugby has no strict quota system at the national level, the cricket team does. Your thoughts? A. Rugby seems to have got it right, but cricket hasn't got it right. The system has been overdone. It's now basically, you are only allowed a certain amount of white players playing (an average of six coloured players including two Africans over the course of a season). South Africa could be a stronger team if they pick players on merit (and not on quota). Those days of Apartheid are long gone. The coloureds, the Indians and the blacks and the whites, they've got to work properly together and say, 'hey, if that guy's good enough, he must play'. We must pick the best team we can have.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Shreyas Iyer would have never made India Test squad in England, says Aakash Chopra: ‘Even Sarfaraz, Jurel are sitting out'
Despite his impressive run on the domestic circuit and India's ODI set-up this year, Mumbai batter Shreyas Iyer would not have made the Test squad in England in any scenario, said former India opener Aakash Chopra. There were questions raised over Iyer's exclusion from India's extensive 18-member squad announced in May, and the situation sparked more questions about the 30-year-old's red-ball future at the international level. Iyer was in blistering form in the IPL, leading Punjab Kings to a runners-up finish with his best season with the bat, scoring 604 runs at a 50-plus average and a staggering 175.07 strike rate with 39 sixes. Iyer also had a productive Ranji Trophy season besides leading Mumbai to the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy win in December 2024. In nine First Class matches, including an Irani Cup triumph, Iyer aggregated 699 runs with two centuries and three fifties. However, that would not be enough to make a comeback to the Test squad for Iyer, who last represented India during the 2024 home series against England. Chopra noted how even Iyer's Mumbai teammate Sarfaraz Khan who is ahead in the pecking order missed out on a berth in England, insisting that the former must patiently wait for his second wind. Save for the returning Karun Nair, debutant Sai Sudharsan and a wobbly lower-order, India's front-line batters all came to the fore during the Headingley Test. Vice-captain Rishabh Pant (2), KL Rahul, skipper Shubman Gill and Yashasvi Jaiswal all struck centuries, making it the first time India tallied five centuries in a Test. 'There is no problem with the batting as such. But he has to wait for his chances; he won't get a chance straightaway right now. He would've never made it to the squad for the England tour. The remaining ones also haven't had their chance,' Chopra said on his YouTube channel. 'If you think about it, Karun Nair has played just now. Sarfaraz Khan is not being given the chances. Dhruv Jurel is sitting outside. The players who are already there, if they aren't only getting the chances, then how can Shreyas Iyer get a look in?' he added. 'I know he had a good first-class season. He had a good IPL, took Punjab Kings to the final. He did well in white-ball cricket, but his time will come. He will have to wait just a little bit,' said Chopra. Chairman of selectors Ajit Agarkar had reasoned that there was no room currently for Iyer in the scheme of things despite his solid form at the domestic level. 'Yes, Shreyas Iyer has played well in domestic cricket, but at the moment, there is no room for him on the Test Team,' he said while speaking to reporters in Mumbai when announcing the Test squad in late May.
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
India's T20 World Cup 2024 Triumph: A year of glory
New Delhi [India] June 29 (ANI): In Barbados, India ended an 11-year-long ICC Trophy drought, beating South Africa by seven runs to capture the ICC T20 World Cup title for the second time on June 29 last year. This was Rohit Sharma's 2nd ICC T20 WC title and his first ICC title as a captain, after the heartbreak of losing to Australia in the final of the ICC Cricket World Cup 2023 at home following a ten-match win streak. India also celebrated the farewell of two giants of Indian cricket, Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli, from the T20 format, as they walked away with their heads held high. Indian skipper Rohit Sharma was the star with the bat for India in the tournament. He slammed 257 runs in eight innings, including three fifties, at an average of 36.71 and a strike rate of over 155. He was also the second-highest run scorer in the tournament. On the other hand, in bowling, Indian seamer Arshdeep Singh grabbed the most number of wickets for India in the T20 World Cup. He took 17 wickets in eight innings at an average of 12.64 and an economy rate of under 8. He was the second-highest wicket-taker in the tournament. India had elected to bat first, but was reduced to 34/3. However, it was another clutch effort from Virat Kohli, who had a relatively dull tournament up to that point, that calmed everyone down. Three boundaries within the first few balls he faced was an ominous sign that Team India's biggest match-winner in past T20 WCs was going to be at his best. He also had a fine 72-run stand with Axar Patel, who played a counter-attacking 47 in 31 balls, with a four and four sixes. Virat clobbered 76 in 59 balls, with six fours and two sixes. India reached a fighting 176/7 in their 20 overs. The match hung in balance with a partnership of 58 runs between Quinton de Kock and Tristan Stubbs and a 15th over onslaught on Axar by Klaasen, during which he hit 24 runs, left the game in favour of the Proteas, who needed 30 in the final 30 balls. But in the 16th over, Hardik Pandya removed Klaasen for a well-made 52 in 27 balls, which had two fours and five sixes. From then on, India continued to apply pressure, with the match-sealing moment being Suryakumar Yadav's stunning catch, which saw him go out of the boundary ropes before pulling the delivery back within the ropes and catching it to dismiss a dangerous David Miller in the final over. SA was reduced to 169/8, despite their best efforts. (ANI)
