Shreyas Iyer would have never made India Test squad in England, says Aakash Chopra: ‘Even Sarfaraz, Jurel are sitting out'
Despite his impressive run on the domestic circuit and India's ODI set-up this year, Mumbai batter Shreyas Iyer would not have made the Test squad in England in any scenario, said former India opener Aakash Chopra.
There were questions raised over Iyer's exclusion from India's extensive 18-member squad announced in May, and the situation sparked more questions about the 30-year-old's red-ball future at the international level. Iyer was in blistering form in the IPL, leading Punjab Kings to a runners-up finish with his best season with the bat, scoring 604 runs at a 50-plus average and a staggering 175.07 strike rate with 39 sixes. Iyer also had a productive Ranji Trophy season besides leading Mumbai to the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy win in December 2024.
In nine First Class matches, including an Irani Cup triumph, Iyer aggregated 699 runs with two centuries and three fifties. However, that would not be enough to make a comeback to the Test squad for Iyer, who last represented India during the 2024 home series against England. Chopra noted how even Iyer's Mumbai teammate Sarfaraz Khan who is ahead in the pecking order missed out on a berth in England, insisting that the former must patiently wait for his second wind.
Save for the returning Karun Nair, debutant Sai Sudharsan and a wobbly lower-order, India's front-line batters all came to the fore during the Headingley Test. Vice-captain Rishabh Pant (2), KL Rahul, skipper Shubman Gill and Yashasvi Jaiswal all struck centuries, making it the first time India tallied five centuries in a Test.
'There is no problem with the batting as such. But he has to wait for his chances; he won't get a chance straightaway right now. He would've never made it to the squad for the England tour. The remaining ones also haven't had their chance,' Chopra said on his YouTube channel.
'If you think about it, Karun Nair has played just now. Sarfaraz Khan is not being given the chances. Dhruv Jurel is sitting outside. The players who are already there, if they aren't only getting the chances, then how can Shreyas Iyer get a look in?' he added.
'I know he had a good first-class season. He had a good IPL, took Punjab Kings to the final. He did well in white-ball cricket, but his time will come. He will have to wait just a little bit,' said Chopra.
Chairman of selectors Ajit Agarkar had reasoned that there was no room currently for Iyer in the scheme of things despite his solid form at the domestic level.
'Yes, Shreyas Iyer has played well in domestic cricket, but at the moment, there is no room for him on the Test Team,' he said while speaking to reporters in Mumbai when announcing the Test squad in late May.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
31 minutes ago
- NDTV
"It Was Me That Made Your Name": England Great Told Sachin Tendulkar, Shares Epic Story
Sachin Tendulkar, Virat Kohli and Sunil Gavaskar remain three of the finest batters that India has produced. For many, Tendulkar remains the ultimate GOAT, though fans from different eras have varied preferences. For some, it is Virat Kohli who is the greatest batter of all time, at least in the ODI cricketing spectrum. As former England cricketer Allan Lamb was asked to pick between Sachin, Virat and Gavaskar he picked the Master Blaster. Lamb, however, also had an epic tale to share behind his preference. Speaking to PTI, Lamb also spoke passionately about his playing days with Kapil Dev in County cricket and why he rates Sachin Tendulkar over Sunil Gavaskar and Virat Kohli. Excerpts: Q. You toured India for the first time in the 1984-85 series, having made your debut at Lord's in 1982 against India. How would you sum up the rise of Indian cricket? A. I always thought that Indian cricket was going to go up, it was on the gradual climb. And because of the population and being your number one sport, cricket was always going to be the top of the tree. The IPL has changed cricket in India and the world. It's incredible to see these youngsters coming through, the 15-year-olds and the 16-year-olds (like Vaibhav Suryavanshi), and making a name for themselves. In one day cricket, India should win every competition. In Test matches, you're going to rely a lot on Bumrah and you're going to miss Virat Kohli big time. Q. Would you have fancied playing in the IPL and how has it changed the life of an international cricketer? A. It's changed the life of all cricketers that are playing now. They don't have to play Test cricket. They can just have 20-20 contracts all around the world and earn a fortune. I mean, the money we earned was tippings when we played. But good for them. They deserve all the millions; as entertainers they deserve to be paid. And would have I enjoyed the IPL? Yeah, because when I played, I always waited till the last 20 overs or the last 10 overs if we're playing a 50-over game. Q. You played with the great Kapil Dev at Northamptonshire and played against the likes of Sunil Gavaskar and Sachin Tendulkar. Who is your favourite Indian cricketer of all time? A. I love the way Kapil Dev played. We played together at Northampton. I remember him coming over and I saying, 'Kapi, I'm so pleased that you've come over. We need to strengthen our bowling'. He said, 'no I haven't come to strengthen my bowling. I've come to better my batting. I've come here as a batsman, which I always enjoyed that'. Q. Gavaskar, Sachin or Kohli? A. Sachin easily. I played against him when he was 18. I dropped him at slip and he went to get 100 (in a Test match). So I always say to him, it was me that made your name (laughs). Kohli is a brilliant player, he's got all the shots, he can score quickly. But if you want the best player I played against, that Indian player is Sachin, even ahead of Sunny. The only thing I would have liked to see Sachin play the West Indies, where Sunny scored runs against the West Indies. He was probably the only Indian to score runs against those quicks. Q. You are not a fan of the current WTC format. Why is that? A. The ICC is going to have to do something about it because the format they have for international Test matches, people are not too sure what is going on there as it's done over two years. There are some teams, like everyone said, that South Africa qualified due to the fact that they played all the weaker teams. But that wasn't South Africa's problem. That was the ICC's problem. They came up with that. And, I believe, you need a two-tier structure. And that's got to come in very rapidly. The ICC chairman, he's got to sit down, otherwise, cricket's going to be at a loss. You need strong teams playing each other but they've also got to play the weaker teams. Q. South Africa, the country of your birth, has finally won a world title. You must be a happy man? A. Yes, I was there (at Lord's). We had customers, clients there, and it was fantastic. I mean, South Africa are known as the chokers. If you have a look how many times they've blown it. Very proud of the way Aiden Markram batter under pressure. Q. You had to move to England during Apartheid and till date South Africa remains a divided nation in the words of Proteas captain Temba Bavuma. While rugby has no strict quota system at the national level, the cricket team does. Your thoughts? A. Rugby seems to have got it right, but cricket hasn't got it right. The system has been overdone. It's now basically, you are only allowed a certain amount of white players playing (an average of six coloured players including two Africans over the course of a season). South Africa could be a stronger team if they pick players on merit (and not on quota). Those days of Apartheid are long gone. The coloureds, the Indians and the blacks and the whites, they've got to work properly together and say, 'hey, if that guy's good enough, he must play'. We must pick the best team we can have.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
AB de Villiers questions handling of Jasprit Bumrah's workload with Steyn's example, flags possible 'mismanagement'
Jasprit Bumrah has been one of India's primary bowlers across all formats. But managing his workload has become one of the team's most pressing challenges, and in the middle of a crucial five-Test series against England, questions are being raised about how India is handling its most lethal weapon. India's Jasprit Bumrah in action during 1st Test vs England(Action Images via Reuters) Former South Africa captain AB de Villiers believes the series should have been the priority for Bumrah to feature in all five matches, not just three, as pre-planned by the Indian management. 'He is probably the top bowler in the world in all formats right now. So, it's very difficult to decide a way to rest him,' De Villiers said on his YouTube channel. 'But in my opinion, Test cricket is the ultimate form of the game. And this Test series probably would've been the one, in my opinion, to get him ready for all five Test matches.' The 40-year-old, who faced Bumrah during the latter stages of his career, offered a comparison with how South Africa used to handle Dale Steyn, a bowler of similar pedigree and injury history. 'That's what we used to do with Dale (Steyn). Rest him in lesser important T20 and ODI series and get him ready for the big Test series against Australia, England, and India away from home… New Zealand to a certain extent, depending on the rankings at that time,' he explained. AB de Villiers on potential mismanagement Bumrah's potential absence in India's second Test against England at Edgbaston has sparked debate, especially given the scale of the series and the conditions that demand his precision and pace. While De Villiers was unsure about the nature of the call, he didn't rule out that the decision might be coming from medical advice. 'So, I don't know if it was mismanagement or perhaps because he recently got back from injury, sort of saw the IPL as the warmup phase,' he said. 'Maybe, went to the surgeon, who let him know, 'You can't play the five Test matches.' So, I mean you got to respect that, and at the end of the day, it's up to Team India to sort of manage him well,' he added. De Villiers signed off with a piercing observation: 'It doesn't get bigger than that, guys, except for maybe the WTC final.'
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
'Wanted To Step Down After 2023 World Cup..': Rohit Reveals Talk With Dravid
Rohit Sharma revealed that he persuaded Rahul Dravid to stay on as coach after India's 2023 World Cup defeat. India ODI captain Rohit Sharma revealed in a recent interview that he told then-head coach Rahul Dravid after losing to Australia in the final of the 2023 ICC Cricket World Cup in Ahmedabad. Despite remaining unbeaten throughout the tournament, India failed to secure the title against the Pat Cummins-led team at Narendra Modi Stadium. Following India's defeat, Dravid expressed his desire to step down from his coaching role. However, Rohit Sharma, the then skipper, persuaded Dravid to stay on until the T20 World Cup 2024. On the anniversary of India's T20 World Cup victory, Rohit recalled his discussion with Dravid. He said, 'Rahul bhai wanted to step down after the 2023 World Cup. But we said, 'There's another World Cup in six months. We've come this far. Let's give it one more shot.' He agreed-and I'm so glad he did. I'm sure even now he feels that he made the right decision," Rohit was quoted as saying in an interview with JioHotstar. Dravid's last assignment as India's head coach ended up being the final of the T20 World Cup 2024 against South Africa, where India defeated the Proteas by seven runs to win the title. What Rohit Said About T20 World Cup? Rohit also expressed his pride in finally lifting an ICC title as captain in Barbados, calling it the proudest moment of his career. 'For me personally, it was also emotional. My identity as a cricketer began with this format in the 2007 T20 World Cup. To come full circle and lift the trophy again in 2024-it was just fantastic," Rohit said. 'Barbados will forever be in my veins. This is the proudest moment of my cricketing career. To lift that trophy, to be crowned ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2024 Champions-it was surreal. I played in the inaugural 2007 T20 World Cup and we won under MS Dhoni 's captaincy. And now, to win it again with Rahul Dravid as head coach-it meant everything to this group. We've seen heartbreak. We've come so close. That's why this one was so special. We worked and planned relentlessly every day. And when we finally won, all the emotions came pouring out. The younger players, especially those playing their first World Cup, realised how hard it is to win one. Nothing can be taken for granted. It was magical." After India's T20 World Cup win, Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli announced their retirement from the shortest format of the game, and the BCCI appointed Suryakumar Yadav as Rohit's successor to lead India in T20Is. Following Rahul Dravid, the BCCI appointed Gautam Gambhir as the new head coach of Team India. First Published: June 29, 2025, 19:08 IST
