Ford Bets on a $30,000 Electric Pickup to Challenge Chinese Rivals
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
The move marks Ford's biggest push yet into the affordable EV market, a space Chinese automakers like BYD (BYDDY) (BYDDF) are rapidly dominating overseas. While tariffs and regulations have kept these brands out of the U.S., they are gaining ground in nearby markets such as Mexico and Latin America. Ford wants to win buyers before Chinese competitors arrive in force.
Ford Focuses on Price and Efficiency
To meet this challenge, Ford says the new EV will start at $30,000. This is a price point it hopes will win over buyers who have been hesitant to switch to electric. The pickup will be built using lighter materials, fewer parts, and a redesigned manufacturing process aimed at cutting costs without compromising quality.
Moreover, Ford is rethinking how its vehicles are assembled. Large single-piece aluminum castings will replace dozens of smaller parts, and the assembly line will be split into three parallel tracks to improve efficiency. These changes will make the process 15% faster, according to Ford.
At the same time, the factory overhaul will result in fewer hourly workers, about 2,200 compared with 2,800 today, but executives say there is room for future hiring if demand grows. The new EV platform is also flexible enough to support multiple vehicle sizes and battery types, allowing Ford to expand its lineup quickly if the market responds well.
Ford Targets Battery Costs
In addition to reworking its production lines, Ford is targeting battery costs to stay competitive. The pickup will run on lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, which are roughly 35% cheaper to make than nickel- and cobalt-based versions.
Ford is investing $3 billion to develop these LFP batteries at a Michigan facility, with production expected to begin next year. By integrating the battery pack into the vehicle's floor, Ford will save space, improve ride comfort, and further cut manufacturing expenses. This approach mirrors strategies used by Chinese automakers, giving Ford a better chance to compete on both price and features.
Why This Is a Risky Move
However, the timing of this push carries real risks. EV sales in the U.S. have slowed after years of rapid growth, and several automakers are scaling back plans or exiting the segment entirely. The federal EV tax credit of up to $7,500 will expire in September, creating another headwind for sales.
Ford's EV business already lost $5 billion in 2024, and executives expect an even bigger loss this year. The company has delayed launches of other models, including a larger electric pickup and a commercial van, as it tries to balance investment with financial discipline.
Even so, CEO Jim Farley insists this is a bet worth making. He believes a low-cost, feature-rich electric pickup could be the product that changes Ford's trajectory in the EV market.
Ford Is Racing against Time and Competition
The urgency is evident because Chinese EV makers are not slowing down. BYD's Sea Lion 07 SUV, for example, offers more range than Ford's Mustang Mach-E at a significantly lower price. Meanwhile, Tesla (TSLA) is contending with falling sales and stronger competition, and General Motors (GM) is pivoting to smaller, more affordable EV models.
Against this backdrop, Ford's strategy is to deliver a $30,000 electric pickup that blends affordability with advanced features, and to do it before foreign rivals can establish themselves in the U.S. market.
Is Ford Stock a Good Buy?
According to TipRanks, over the past three months, 14 analysts have issued ratings on the stock, resulting in 3 Buys, 8 Holds, and 3 Sell recommendations. As a result, the consensus lands at a Hold rating.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
36 minutes ago
- Axios
What investors see in the sale of AI chips to China
Nvidia and AMD can sell their AI chips to China for the low price of 15% of their revenue, paid out to the U.S. government. Investors are unfazed. Why it matters: Shareholders are focusing on the revenue opportunities that come with more access to Beijing, not on the unprecedented involvement of the Trump administration in Nvidia's business dealings. What they're saying: "There's way more upside," Daniel Newman, principal analyst and CEO of The Futurum Group, tells Axios. Catch up quick: The Trump administration previously backed export controls on Nvidia's H20 chips, which are "orders of magnitude" less powerful than Nvidia's Blackwell chips, Newman says. A month ago, the administration signaled that it was shifting course on these controls, but did not issue the licenses required for sales to be possible. That appeared to change after Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang met with President Trump. Nvidia walked away with promises of licenses so long as the chip giant cut the U.S. government a check for 15% of its China revenue. Zoom in: Nvidia stock is up nearly 0.5% since the news broke Monday, with investors and analysts bullish on the deal. The lifting of the export controls could lead to a $15 billion revenue windfall for Nvidia. Both Nvidia and AMD have pricing power, given the strength of demand for AI chips in China, according to a note from Bank of America. That means the 15% expense could be passed on to Chinese customers. Between the lines: While the deal could lead to billions of dollars in additional revenue for the U.S. government, it's not just about the money. It's also about access to rare earth magnets, Newman says. The U.S. has powerful AI chips that China wants. China has rare earth metals the U.S. wants. When the administration first changed course on export controls in July, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC that selling the "fourth best" AI chip to China wasn't material. Lutnick also said the export control rollback was tied to a rare earths deal, though those details have not fully materialized. Yes. but: Export controls are typically put in place for a reason: in this case, national security concerns. The 15% revenue split, first reported by the Financial Times, includes an anonymous source quote that points to the security concerns: "What's next — letting Lockheed Martin sell F-35s to China for a 15% commission?" Situational awareness: Beijing is urging local companies to avoid buying chips from American companies because of its own security concerns. Newman says that may be political theater – an effort for China to keep the upper hand in ongoing negotiations. Chinese companies will likely still want access to the best possible chips. Be smart: In just January of this year, investors feared China outpacing the U.S. in the AI arms race given the reported success of DeepSeek.
Time Magazine
38 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
What to Know About Trump's Nvidia Deal and China's Response
The world's most valuable company is now at the center of President Donald Trump's trade war with China. Trump said Monday that he has cut a deal with chipmaker Nvidia, allowing it to sell certain artificial intelligence chips to China in exchange for a cut of the revenue, which would go to the U.S. government. Trump said he also negotiated a similar deal with chipmaker Advanced Micro Devices (AMD). The deal is a marked departure from an effort by the U.S. to restrict China's access to advanced semiconductors over concerns that they would be used to advance the country's military technology. Washington began restricting exports of some semiconductors to China in 2022, although Nvidia was able to export a specially made-for-China chip, the H20, which is deliberately slowed down. In April, the Trump Administration announced that it would require a license to export the H20 chip, abruptly curbing the shipment of $2.5 billion of H20 revenue from China in the fiscal quarter ending April 27. The announcement spurred months of lobbying by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, who committed a $500 billion investment from Nvidia to make AI servers in the U.S. Last month, Nvidia announced that it would resume sales of the H20 to China after Trump and Huang met in the Oval Office, and the Commerce Department began licensing the chips for export last week. But the unusual deal is not just a return to the previous status quo—rather, analysts and lawmakers warn that it could open the doors to a 'pay-to-play' trade policy. Here's what to know. What the deal means for Nvidia The deal, which was first reported by the Financial Times, involves allowing exports of certain AI processors to China in exchange for Nvidia and AMD paying 15% of the proceeds to the U.S. government. 'I said, 'Listen, I want 20% if I'm going to approve this for you,'' Trump said at a White House press conference on Monday, adding that Huang negotiated that number down to 15%. 'For our country, for the U.S., I don't want it myself,' Trump clarified about the kickback. Trump said the deal was limited to Nvidia's H20 chips, which he said are 'essentially old,' and a similarly slowed down MI308 chip for AMD, but he indicated that a similar deal may be in the works for more advanced chips. 'The Blackwell is super-duper advanced. I wouldn't make a deal with that,' Trump said, referring to Nvidia's most advanced chip for AI. 'Although, it's possible I'd make a deal on a somewhat enhanced in a negative way Blackwell. In other words, take 30% to 50% off of it, but that's the latest and the greatest in the world. Nobody has it. They won't have it for five years.' Nvidia said in a statement to media outlets, 'We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets.' It added, 'While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide.' China urges firms not to use the less-advanced chips The Chinese government has reportedly discouraged local firms from using Nvidia's H20 chips. The guidance did not outright ban use of the chips, but it said that they should not be used in particular for national security-related work. Some Chinese companies have reportedly made plans to reduce their orders of Nvidia chips after the government asked firms to justify why they buy Nvidia H20 chips over domestic chips, such as those by Chinese firm Huawei, which the U.S. has imposed strict export controls on. But analysts have said that the American chips, even in their slowed down form, are world-class and will continue to be sought after by companies. Although Trump characterized Nvidia's H20 chips as 'obsolete' and said that China 'already has it in a different form,' he also noted it 'still has a market.' Beijing in July raised security concerns with Nvidia, while Chinese state media reports in recent weeks have also highlighted these concerns. 'The H20 is not a military product or for government infrastructure,' Nvidia told Bloomberg. Nvidia export controls have also been used as a 'negotiating chip' in U.S.-China trade talks, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in July. The deadline for the U.S. and China to reach a trade deal was Aug. 12, but the two countries extended their truce by 90 days in order to continue negotiations. Should Chinese firms purchase fewer chips from Nvidia, Trump's much-touted deal—and any further attempts to use chips as a bargaining chip—may hold less weight. Deal raises legal concerns Nvidia's H20 chips are believed to have been used in developing Chinese company DeepSeek's open-source AI model, which caused a panic in the U.S. over whether China's AI technology was more advanced than previously believed. It prompted former President Joe Biden to further curb exports of AI chips to China, before the Trump Administration placed an effective ban on the H20 exports in April. The loosening of those restrictions for essentially a sales commission arrangement has drawn criticism over both national security risks and legality concerns. The White House said the details of the deal are still being worked out. 'The legality of it, the mechanics of it, is still being ironed out by the Department of Commerce, and I would defer you to them for any further details on how it will actually be implemented,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday, adding that the deal could be expanded to include other companies. 'I am concerned by reports that the U.S. government will be taking a cut of the proceeds from the sale of advanced H20 and equivalent chips to China,' Rep. John Moolenaar (R, Mich.), the head of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, told the Financial Times. 'By putting a price on our security concerns, we signal to China and our allies that American national security principles are negotiable for the right fee,' said Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D, Ill.), the ranking member of the House select committee on the CCP. Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon said the deal sets a bad 'precedent' for other companies. Rasgon told Bloomberg on Monday that the 15% cut in order to sell to China for the chipmakers makes financial sense for the companies and is better for the U.S. in order not to lose its competitive edge in the Chinese market but also that 'it feels like a very slippery slope.''It raises concerns, certainly for many national security minded folks, of—are we now selling export control licenses?' Owen Tedford, a senior research analyst at Beacon Policy Advisors, told the Hill. 'Is there a way that Nvidia will be able to buy licenses to sell more advanced chips than they're currently able to?' 'It raises questions about how—and I think this gets to some of more general concerns with the Trump Administration—just, policy feels like it's for sale in some ways, like policy outcomes,' Tedford added. 'If companies are big enough or strong enough, they can basically buy the policy that they want from the Trump Administration.'
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Texas Sues Eli Lilly (LLY) for Allegedly Bribing Doctors to Prescribe Its Drugs
The U.S. State of Texas has launched a lawsuit against Eli Lilly (LLY), alleging that the pharmaceutical giant bribed doctors to prescribe its medications. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced the lawsuit on Aug. 12, claiming that Eli Lilly has been 'bribing' doctors and other medical providers to prescribe its medications for their patients. The state further claims that Eli Lilly bribed and illegally induced medical providers to prescribe its most profitable drugs, including the weight-loss medicine Zepbound. 'Big Pharma compromised medical decision-making by engaging in an illegal kickback scheme,' said Attorney General Paxton in announcing the lawsuit that seeks unspecified damages from Eli Lilly. The pharma company did not immediately respond publicly to the Texas lawsuit. Fraud and Abuse The lawsuit states that the Texas Attorney General aims to hold drug manufacturers accountable for fraud and abuse. Last year, the Texas Attorney General's office sued insulin manufacturers, including Eli Lilly, and pharmacy benefit managers alleging that they colluded to artificially raise the price of insulin. The lawsuit in Texas comes as LLY stock has been reeling after the company issued clinical trial results for its new weight-loss pill that came in below Wall Street's expectations. Following the trial results being made public, Eli Lilly's share price fell 15% for its biggest decline since the 2008 financial crisis. Is LLY Stock a Buy? The stock of Eli Lilly has a consensus Strong Buy rating among 21 Wall Street analysts. That rating is based on 17 Buy and four Hold recommendations issued in the last three months. The average LLY price target of $946.89 implies 51.35% upside from current levels.
