
US government worker, target of exit ban, prevented from leaving China for months: Reports
A source familiar with the matter said that a naturalised US citizen, originally from China, was detained by authorities upon landing in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, in April.
The exact reason for the exit ban, as these restrictions are typically known, could not be confirmed, though the source said it related to actions Beijing deemed harmful to national security.
The Washington Post, reporting on the same incident and citing people familiar, said the employee was being held for failing to disclose on his visa application that he worked for the US government.
The individual, who previously served in the US Army, works for the US Commerce Department's Patent and Trademark Office, but he had been on a personal trip to visit relatives. His wife is believed to live in the US.
The Post is withholding his name out of concern for his safety and privacy while he remains in China.
Since being held in Chengdu, he has travelled to Beijing, accompanied by a US official, though his current whereabouts are unknown. At one point, according to the source, the individual's US passport was taken from him, but it has since been returned.
In a statement on Sunday (Jul 20), the State Department said it has 'nothing to share' regarding the case, adding that its 'highest priority is the safety and security of US citizens'.
Neither the Commerce Department nor the Chinese embassy in Washington immediately responded to a request for comment.
Beijing has in recent years imposed travel restrictions on both Chinese and foreigners. According to the Exit and Entry Administration Law of the People's Republic of China, foreign nationals can be barred from leaving China if they are involved in unsettled civil cases or under criminal investigation or trial.
They may also be subject to on-the-spot interrogation if they are suspected of endangering national security or disrupting public order.
Western officials and human rights groups have criticised the arbitrary enforcement of exit bans.
Most reported bans are not imposed on individuals accused of crimes, but rather on those involved in civil litigation. This marks the first publicly known case of a US government-affiliated individual being targeted.
Exit bans can remain in place for months or even years as the underlying investigations stretch on. Often the target is unaware that they are subject to a ban until they try to leave China.
'These happen with business people relatively routinely,' said Dennis Wilder, a senior fellow for the Initiative for US-China Dialogue on Global Issues at Georgetown University, noting that sometimes they concern 'legitimate business disputes'.
Wilder, who was the CIA's deputy assistant director for East Asia and the Pacific from 2015 to 2016, said that all exit ban cases concerning Americans he was aware of involved individuals of Chinese descent. But he said he had never come across a case involving someone who worked for the US government.
While no specific charge is known to have been brought against the individual, Wilder said that it would be unlikely for someone working at the Commerce Department to be engaged in intelligence-gathering operations. 'That doesn't fit any model,' he said.
Earlier this week, The Wall Street Journal first reported that a Wells Fargo executive of Chinese descent was banned from leaving the country; the US bank has since suspended travel to China.
The use of such measures on foreign businesspeople has heightened concerns about business travel to mainland China in recent years. Some companies have cancelled or delayed trips, while others have implemented safeguards and advised employees to travel in groups rather than alone.
Sometimes targeted individuals have no direct role in the underlying legal dispute. In 2018, two Americans, Cynthia and Victor Liu, the children of a former executive at a Chinese state-owned bank accused of fraud, were prevented from leaving China in a move that their lawyers said was designed to pressure their estranged father to cooperate with police.
Their release in 2021 came hours after a US fraud case against Huawei Technologies executive Meng Wanzhou was resolved, allowing her to leave Canada, where she was under house arrest, and fly to China.
Comprehensive data on exit bans is not readily available.
A 2022 study by two academics at California Polytechnic State University found 128 cases of foreign nationals hit with exit bans between 1995 and 2019, including 29 Americans and 44 Canadians. Around a third of the bans were business-related. Many cases lacked sufficient detail to determine their nature.
During the Joe Biden administration, the State Department said it could not provide a full count of Americans under exit bans. Some cases go unreported, as affected individuals and their families fear that disclosure could hinder efforts to have the bans lifted.
When families do reach out, they typically want quiet assistance, according to Wilder: 'Usually they really are very concerned about publicity because they're business people, and they're planning to do more business in China.'
Wilder, who was involved in the case of the Liu siblings, said such situations are typically resolved only when senior administration officials intervene. For the Liu case, Wilder said, the US government was reluctant to get involved – 'partially because these are messy'.
Official discussions related to the Commerce Department employee have been held, according to the Post's source.
Beijing's use of exit bans has been a flashpoint in the US-China relationship.
In November, the Biden administration eased the travel warning it had placed on China after Beijing released three Americans previously under detention in an apparent prisoner swap.
While the National Security Council then noted there were no longer Americans 'wrongfully detained' in China, the State Department stressed they were still subject to 'arbitrary enforcement' of exit bans – a factor it cited in issuing a level 2 travel advisory, which urges Americans to 'exercise increased caution'.
The advisory for China remains at level 2 today, down from level 3, which had urged Americans to 'reconsider travel'.
China recorded nearly 65 million border crossings by foreign nationals in 2024, according to its National Immigration Administration.
For their part, Chinese authorities in recent years have accused the US of unfairly targeting Chinese nationals at border crossings.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
7 hours ago
- CNA
Thailand-Cambodia tensions: US, China send representatives to join border talks in Malaysia
Defence ministers from Thailand and Cambodia will meet on Aug 7 in Malaysia on the final day of ongoing talks to keep alive a tenuous truce reached late last month. This is their first face-to-face meeting after hostilities broke out two weeks ago. What started as a border conflict between two ASEAN neighbours has now also seen an active interest from both the US and China. Defence ministers from Thailand and Cambodia will meet on Aug 7 in Malaysia on the final day of ongoing talks to keep alive a tenuous truce reached late last month. This is their first face-to-face meeting after hostilities broke out two weeks ago. What started as a border conflict between two ASEAN neighbours has now also seen an active interest from both the US and China.


CNA
7 hours ago
- CNA
India's Modi to visit China for first time in 7 years as tensions with US rise
NEW DELHI: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will visit China for the first time in over seven years, a government source said on Wednesday (Aug 6), in a further sign of a diplomatic thaw with Beijing as tensions with the United States rise. Modi will go to China for a summit of the multilateral Shanghai Cooperation Organisation that begins on Aug 31, the government source, with direct knowledge of the matter, told Reuters. India's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. His trip will come at a time when India's relationship with the US faces its most serious crisis in years after President Donald Trump imposed the highest tariffs among Asian peers on goods imported from India, and has threatened an unspecified further penalty for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil. Modi's visit to the Chinese city of Tianjin for the summit of the SCO, a Eurasian political and security grouping that includes Russia, will be his first since June 2018. Subsequently, Sino-Indian ties deteriorated sharply after a military clash along their disputed Himalayan border in 2020. Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping held talks on the sidelines of a BRICS summit in Russia in October that led to a thaw. The giant Asian neighbours are now slowly defusing tensions that have hampered business relations and travel between the two countries. Trump has threatened to charge an additional 10 per cent tariff on imports from members, which include India, of the BRICS group for "aligning themselves with anti-American policies". Trump said on Wednesday his administration would decide on the penalty for buying Russian oil after the outcome of US efforts to seek a last-minute breakthrough that would bring about a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine. Trump's top diplomatic envoy Steve Witkoff is in Moscow, two days before the expiry of a deadline the president set for Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine or face new sanctions.
Business Times
a day ago
- Business Times
SG60: The future of Singapore's economy
AS SINGAPORE stands on the threshold of a new economic era, the central question is: What must we do today to thrive tomorrow? Over the next decade, the global landscape will be shaped by rapid technological advancement, climate change, demographic shifts, geo-economic fragmentation, and geopolitical polarisation. To remain a leading global hub and a resilient, vibrant society, Singapore must double down on targeted policy innovation, societal adaptability and visionary leadership. A legacy of reinvention Singapore has a long history of transformation. As a small island nation of six million people, its economic ascent has been propelled by strategic location, good governance and pragmatic policymaking. From a bustling trading post in precolonial times to an independent state in 1965, Singapore swiftly industrialised by attracting foreign direct investment and leveraging low-cost labour for export-oriented growth. In the 1970s, tightening labour markets and rising wages prompted a shift towards higher-value industries. Economic setbacks followed – oil shocks in 1975 and 1979, and a recession in 1985 due to eroded competitiveness. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Singapore responded decisively, cutting wages and rebounding swiftly. A similar resilience was seen during the Asian financial crisis in 1997-1998, and the global financial crisis a decade later. Structural reforms in the 2000s diversified the economy into financial and business services, high-tech manufacturing and the biomedical industry. Despite recent shocks – including economic disruptions due to the Covid-19 pandemic, higher global inflation and interest rates triggered by the war in Ukraine, protectionist trade policies and heightened US-China tensions – Singapore has responded by skilfully leveraging its fiscal buffers to turn adversity into opportunity. Embracing technological transformation Singapore now enters a critical phase of economic restructuring, driven by rapid advances in digitalisation and artificial intelligence (AI). The advent of generative AI, process automation and robotics presents a powerful opportunity to boost productivity and efficiency amid rising costs, a tight labour market and an ageing population. However, it also poses risks of widespread disruption to employment – particularly in middle-skill, routine and data-intensive jobs across manufacturing, finance, law, healthcare and transport. New entrants to the workforce will struggle to find employment in traditional sectors. This shift demands a deliberate and inclusive national response. To maintain global competitiveness, the government must support both startups and incumbent enterprises in adopting emerging technologies and reshaping business models. Despite recent shocks, Singapore has responded by skilfully leveraging its fiscal buffers to turn adversity into opportunity. PHOTO: ST Government agencies such as Enterprise Singapore and the Infocomm Media Development Authority should enhance funding and advisory services that help businesses embrace and pivot to digital and AI-augmented operations. Regulatory sandboxes and public-private test beds can help scale innovation while managing risk. At the same time, Singapore must proactively upskill its workforce. SkillsFuture must evolve into a dynamic, AI-enabled platform that offers real-time, individualised reskilling paths aligned with fast-changing job market needs. Workforce Singapore and tripartite partners should coordinate to deliver stackable skill credentials, apprenticeship programmes and career conversion programmes that offer portable skills across sectors. Protecting displaced workers and ensuring that young graduates have meaningful pathways into the new economy are essential for inclusive growth. Leveraging green growth as a strategic advantage The global climate change agenda is not just a moral imperative, but a strategic opportunity for Singapore to lead in green growth. Far from being a compliance exercise, the green transition is a source of innovation, investment and long-term competitiveness. As countries impose carbon pricing, border adjustment taxes, and stricter environmental, social and governance (ESG) mandates, early movers such as Singapore can gain significant strategic advantages. Singapore should aim to be the regional hub for carbon services, including carbon credit trading, emissions verification, and green finance. The Singapore Exchange and Monetary Authority of Singapore have been proactive in developing the regulatory framework and promoting sustainable finance, including green bonds, transition finance and ESG disclosure standards. Regional initiatives, such as Project Greenprint, can serve as models for digital infrastructure that enable reliable tracking of carbon emissions and sustainability metrics. Domestically, Singapore must accelerate decarbonisation by investing in solar energy, green hydrogen partnerships, energy storage systems and circular economy practices. Buildings and transportation – two high-emission sectors – should be fast-tracked for transformation through innovation grants and building codes. Climate resilience is equally critical. Defending coastal infrastructure and adapting to extreme weather must remain top priorities. Policymaking should align green objectives with commercial incentives to drive private-sector innovation and participation in the transition. Strengthening regional integration While Asia will remain the growth engine for the global economy in the coming years, the global trading system is being challenged by protectionist policies and the global supply chains that are reconfiguring in response. As in the past, the supply chain reconfiguration presents an opportunity for Singapore to play a facilitating and coordinating role. Despite rising costs, Singapore remains a premier gateway to Asean and broader Asia. Deepening regional integration can mitigate domestic constraints and broaden opportunities. Singapore should champion seamless cross-border data flows, harmonised standards for e-commerce, and interoperable digital payment systems within Asean. Its leadership in the Asean Digital Economy Framework Agreement can help shape future-ready trade infrastructure. In professional services, Singapore's legal, healthcare and education sectors can be further internationalised by forming partnerships and regulatory bridges with neighbours. Additionally, Singapore can leverage its strengths in governance, dispute resolution and project finance to co-lead regional infrastructure development. Initiatives such as the Belt and Road – if aligned with transparency and sustainability – offer platforms where Singapore can serve as a neutral, trustworthy intermediary. Building an inclusive and resilient society A high-tech economy must not come at the cost of social cohesion. Technological and structural changes will exacerbate inequalities if left unmanaged. As the gig economy grows and traditional employment declines, Singapore must fortify its social compact by revamping and enhancing the social protection framework to reflect new modes of work and emerging vulnerabilities. Singapore must fortify its social compact by revamping and enhancing the social protection framework to reflect new modes of work and emerging vulnerabilities. PHOTO: ST Gig workers, freelancers and part-time workers require access to portable benefits including health insurance, Central Provident Fund-style retirement savings and unemployment support. The rise of platform work necessitates adaptive policy tools – such as centralised benefits administration and universal access to basic protections – while still preserving flexibility. Beyond labour reform, Singapore must address demographic pressures by empowering women, seniors and marginalised communities. Family-friendly policies – including affordable childcare, parental leave and caregiver support – can enhance workforce participation and help reverse declining fertility. Age-inclusive hiring, flexible working arrangements and senior training programmes are critical to extend productive lifespans. The goal is a society that is not just future-ready, but also future-inclusive. Redefining education Singapore's world-class education system has underpinned its economic success, but the education system must now evolve to keep up with the rapid rise of AI and digital technology, and their impact on the workplace. The nature of work is evolving more rapidly than traditional curricula can accommodate. Success in the AI era will depend not only on technical proficiency and knowledge acquisition, but also on agility, creativity and the capacity for lifelong learning. The education system must evolve to keep up with the rapid rise of AI and digital technology, and their impact on the workplace. PHOTO: ST Education must become more experiential, interdisciplinary and learner-centric. Beyond academic rigour, schools should nurture curiosity, collaboration and ethical decision-making. Students should learn to be more discriminating in their consumption of news and information in the age of social media. Tertiary institutions must partner with industry to co-design programmes that equip students with evolving job market skills needed to operate in an AI-augmented environment. Most importantly, learning must continue throughout life. Lifelong learning should be normalised through incentives, digital credentials and recognition frameworks that value all forms of growth. Conclusion Singapore has repeatedly turned challenges and adversity into opportunities and success – through industrialisation, globalisation, and constantly upgrading and moving up the global value chain. The next transformation will be more complex and challenging – balancing technological efficiency with social equity, environmental sustainability with growth, and geopolitical risk with regional cooperation. The nation's small size need not be a weakness, but a strength – enabling agility, precision and unity of purpose. With visionary leadership, an inclusive society and a willingness to adapt and innovate, Singapore can once again defy the odds. The next decade offers not only challenges, but also an opportunity to write the next chapter of resilience, renewal and reinvention. The writer was chief economist of Asean+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (Amro) from 2016 to 2025, where he was responsible for country and regional surveillance, as well as related research activities, of the Asean+3 economies. Prior to joining Amro, Dr Khor was deputy director of the Asia and Pacific department at the International Monetary Fund, overseeing the surveillance work on six Asean and 12 Pacific Island countries. He was previously also assistant managing director at the Monetary Authority of Singapore, where he oversaw economic research, monetary policy, macro-financial surveillance and international relations.