No armed groups allowed in Lebanon, president tells Hezbollah's ally Iran
By Jana Choukeir and Ahmed Elimam
No group in Lebanon is permitted to bear arms or rely on foreign backing, its president told a visiting senior Iranian official on Wednesday after the cabinet approved the goals of a U.S.-backed roadmap to disarm the Iran-aligned Hezbollah group.
During a meeting in Beirut with Ali Larijani, secretary of Iran's top security body, Joseph Aoun warned against foreign interference in Lebanon's internal affairs, saying the country was open to cooperation with Iran but only within the bounds of national sovereignty and mutual respect.
Larijani said the Islamic Republic supports Lebanon's sovereignty and does not interfere in its decision-making.
"Any decision taken by the Lebanese government in consultation with the resistance is respected by us," he said after separate talks with Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, whose Amal movement is an ally of Hezbollah.
By "resistance", Larijani was alluding to the Shi'ite Muslim militant Hezbollah, which was founded in 1982, grew into a "state-within-a-state" force better armed than the Lebanese army and has repeatedly fought Israel over the decades.
"Iran didn't bring any plan to Lebanon, the U.S. did. Those intervening in Lebanese affairs are those dictating plans and deadlines", said Larijani.
He said Lebanon should not "mix its enemies with its friends - your enemy is Israel, your friend is the resistance ... I recommend to Lebanon to always appreciate the value of resistance."
Later on Wednesday, Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said after meeting Larijani that recent remarks on Lebanon by Iranian officials including Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi were totally rejected by his government. He said the comments constituted a "violation" of the principle of mutual state sovereignty.
Last week, Araqchi said Tehran supported any decision Hezbollah made and this was not the first attempt to strip the group of its arsenal.
Ali Akbar Velayati, top adviser to Iran's supreme leader, also criticised the Lebanese government's move on disarmament. "If Hezbollah lays down its weapons, who will defend the lives, property, and honour of the Lebanese?" he said.
The U.S. submitted a plan through President Donald Trump's envoy to the region, Tom Barrack, setting out the most detailed steps yet for disarming Hezbollah, which has rejected mounting calls to disarm since its devastating war with Israel last year.
Hezbollah has rejected repeated calls to relinquish its weaponry although it was seriously weakened in the war, with Israel killing most of its leadership in airstrikes and bombings.
It was the climax of a conflict that began in October 2023 when the group opened fire at Israeli positions along Lebanon's southern frontier in support of its Palestinian Islamist ally Hamas at the start of the Gaza war.
Aoun also said recent remarks by some Iranian officials had not been helpful, and reaffirmed that the Lebanese state and its armed forces were solely responsible for protecting all citizens.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
13 hours ago
- Japan Today
Israel in talks to resettle Gaza Palestinians in South Sudan, sources say
FILE PHOTO: Palestinians carry aid supplies they collected from trucks that entered Gaza through Israel, in Beit Lahia, in the northern Gaza Strip August 10, 2025. REUTERS/Dawoud Abu Alkas/File Photo South Sudan and Israel are discussing a deal to resettle Palestinians from war-torn Gaza in the troubled African nation, three sources told Reuters - a plan quickly dismissed as unacceptable by Palestinian leaders. The sources, who have knowledge of the matter but spoke on condition of anonymity, said no agreement had been reached but talks between South Sudan and Israel were ongoing. The plan, if carried further, would envisage people moving from an enclave shattered by almost two years of war with Israel to a nation in the heart of Africa riven by years of political and ethnically-driven violence. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office and Israel's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the information from the three sources. A spokesperson for the U.S. State Department said, "we do not speak to private diplomatic conversations," when asked about the plan and if the United States supported the idea. Netanyahu said this month he intends to extend military control in Gaza, and this week repeated suggestions that Palestinians should leave the territory voluntarily. Arab and world leaders have rejected the idea of moving Gaza's population to any country. Palestinians say that would be like another "Nakba" (catastrophe) when hundreds of thousands fled or were forced out during the Arab-Israeli war of 1948. The three sources said the prospect of resettling Palestinians in South Sudan was raised during meetings between Israeli officials and South Sudanese Foreign Minister Monday Semaya Kumba when he visited the country last month. Their account appeared to contradict South Sudan's foreign ministry which on Wednesday dismissed earlier reports on the plan as "baseless". The ministry was not immediately available to respond to the sources' assertions on Friday. News of the discussions was first reported by the Associated Press on Tuesday, citing six people with knowledge of the matter. Wasel Abu Youssef, a member of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization, said the Palestinian leadership and people "reject any plan or idea to displace any of our people to South Sudan or to any other place". His statement echoed a statement from the office of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Thursday. Hamas, which is fighting Israel in Gaza, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel, who visited the South Sudanese capital Juba this week, told reporters that those discussions had not focussed on relocation. "This is not what the discussions were about," she said when asked if any such plan had been discussed. "The discussions were about foreign policy, about multilateral organizations, about the humanitarian crisis, the real humanitarian crisis happening in South Sudan, and about the war," she said, referring to her talks with Juba officials. Netanyahu, who met Kumba last month, has said Israel is in touch with a few countries to find a destination for Palestinians who want to leave Gaza. He has consistently declined to provide further details. © Thomson Reuters 2025.
The Mainichi
a day ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: 80 years after World War II, now is the time for Japan to act for global peace
Eighty years have passed since the end of a war that brought Japan to the brink of destruction and claimed countless lives in the Asian countries it invaded. It is time to reaffirm the weight of the peace built on such immense sacrifices. The journey of postwar Japan, marked by reconstruction and economic growth while upholding a vow to never wage war again, is something to be proud of. This was made possible by the postwar international order, underpinned by the rule of law and free trade. However, this foundation is on the verge of collapse. The international community has failed to stop the two wars continuing in Europe and the Middle East, while the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is disrupting the global economy with coercive high tariffs. The risk of nuclear weapons being used is increasing, and natural disasters caused by climate change are unending. The "Doomsday Clock," which warns of how close humanity is to its final hour, is set at its shortest time ever at 89 seconds to midnight. The logic of the powerful prevails In these turbulent times, the arrogance of powerful nations is rampant. The Israeli military is destroying the Gaza Strip in the Palestinian territories, while Russia is pressuring Ukraine, once referred to as "Little Russia," to surrender. This is a structure where the weak are suppressed. Nazi Germany incited hostility toward Jews and drove its people into World War II. As the number of people who experienced the war dwindles and the preservation of their memories becomes challenging, there is concern about the rise of distorted nationalism and exclusionism. Japan is no exception. Politicians have made remarks denying the historical facts about the Battle of Okinawa and the Nanjing Massacre. During the recent House of Councillors election, false rumors such as "foreigners are being given preferential treatment" and "crime rates are high" were rampant. "It is tough for us, though we're the ones supporting Japan's convenient lifestyle." This was a comment received by Jiho Yoshimizu, the representative director of the nonprofit Nichietsu Tomoiki Shienkai (the Japan Vietnam Mutual Support Association), which supports Vietnamese residents in Japan. Intolerance that excludes minorities is continuous with the logic of "survival of the fittest." We must not allow the clock to be turned back to an era of war. Postwar Japan has maintained war-renouncing Article 9 of its Constitution and bases its security on the Japan-U.S. alliance to avoid direct involvement in armed conflict. By relying on the U.S. military for security, rapid economic growth was also possible. However, there is no denying that postwar Japan's societal trend was strongly influenced by the idea of "one-country pacifism," or a desire never to be caught up in war again, as noted by University of Tokyo professor Tadashi Karube. Now that the Trump administration has turned its back on global stability, Japan's ability to devise and create peace on its own initiative based on its postwar experience is put to the test. The most urgent task is to rebuild order. Japan must listen to the voices of the Global South and help create fair international rules. Instead of lamenting its declining national power, Japan should work to strengthen the function of the United Nations as "a forum where middle powers can join hands with small countries to exert their presence," as stated by U.N. Under-Secretary-General Izumi Nakamitsu. The free trade system must be protected. Deepening dialogue with Southeast Asian countries and the European Union, and expanding the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), is a logical step. The creation of an environment that brings stability to East Asia is also urgent. Japan is in a position to propose the establishment of a regional framework for dialogue aimed at building trust. It is crucial not to impose "Japan-centric Asianism" as seen before the war, but to work as equal partners. Breaking away from 'own country first' policy According to a public awareness survey by the Japanese Red Cross Society, more than half of respondents believe "Japan is peaceful," while less than 20% feel "the world is peaceful." How can this gap be bridged? Professor Toshikazu Inoue of Gakushuin University, an expert on Showa-era (1926-1989) history, pointed out, "Japan must fulfill its fair share of responsibility in building world peace." There are notable citizen efforts. The Kyoto-based nonprofit Terra Renaissance sends staff to countries including Uganda in East Africa to help children, who were abducted by anti-government forces and forced to become soldiers, return home and reintegrate into society. Founder Masaya Onimaru explained, "We want to reclaim child soldiers and dismantle armed rebel groups. What is needed is to end conflicts through means other than violence." Now is the moment for Japan's political leadership to reflect on history and present a vision for a "world without war." It is perplexing that Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba chose not to issue a statement to mark the anniversary of the end of WWII. Diplomatic critic Kiyoshi Kiyosawa, who was slammed as a "pacifist" during wartime, lamented the narrow, self-centered nationalism in his "A Diary of Darkness," writing, "Japan sees only its own position." His words still strike at the heart of the issue, even 80 years later. We must not shut ourselves off from the world and be bystanders to others' plights. At this 80-year postwar milestone, what is required of Japan is action that spreads the practice of peace across the globe.
Asahi Shimbun
a day ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: Japan's role as a protector of peace now called into question
Eighty years ago following the end of World War II, the victors, mindful of the dreadful loss of life, sought to create a rule-based system rather than rely on the strength of nations to maintain international order. But that principle has grown weaker and domination by force has again reared its ugly head. The International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Netherlands was established in 2002 to prosecute those responsible for the gravest crimes against humanity from an independent perspective rather than having victors in war make those judgments. But the ICC now faces relentless pressure from both the United States and Russia, two permanent members of the U.N. Security Council. SUPERPOWERS NOT FULFILLING THEIR ROLES Last year, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and a former defense minister, together with a former Hamas commander, citing war crimes committed in Gaza. U.S. President Donald Trump retaliated in June by implementing economic sanctions that froze the assets of four ICC judges. An emergency meeting of ICC judges was convened at which one of those targeted by the sanctions said tearfully: 'I have undertaken my work to bring about justice for crime victims. But I have been placed on a sanctions list next to terrorists for an extremely irrational reason given unilaterally by the United States, which is not even a member. Is there anything that is more humiliating than this?' Other ICC judges, including President Tomoko Akane, were reportedly moved by the appeal. Akane has been placed on Russia's most wanted list after the ICC issued an arrest warrant for President Vladimir Putin over reported mass abductions of Ukrainian children by Russian forces. This is the situation that prevails 80 years after the end of World War II. By invading Ukraine, Russia ignored the provisions of international law which state that a nation's territory is inviolable. For his part, Trump has called for annexing the territory of other nations, Canada, for example. The United States also turned a blind eye to the international order by bombing nuclear facilities in Iran. China is also applying greater military and economic pressure on other nations. The U.N. Charter calls on its members to maintain international peace and security by upholding international law. Based on the lesson that the cooperation of major powers was needed to maintain order, five nations were named as permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and given veto power. But the United States and Russia, which created the United Nations and the Security Council, have flouted international laws, threatened to use nuclear weapons and repeatedly vetoed resolutions not to their liking. THE COURSE AHEAD FOR JAPAN Japan has prospered due to the benefits arising from the rule of law. With scarce food and other resources and limits to strengthening its defense because of a tight fiscal situation, Japan's lifeline for prosperity and national security is free trade and international law. If its key ally the United States acts in a way that undermines the existing international order, it could lead to a reassessment of Japan's reliance on Washington, which could have been excessive in the past. Japan took the initiative for the Trans-Pacific Partnership and must continue to shoulder the role of promoting free trade. Given the current security environment, defense capability based on the alliance with the United States is necessary, but diplomacy plays a much greater role than military force. There will be a need to deepen cooperation with nations that share the belief in the rule of law, such as South Korea, Australia and those in Europe, as well as occasionally take a stance critical of Washington. In explaining how she, as a Japanese, became the ICC president, Akane said, 'It reflects the fact Japan has maintained a pacifist stance throughout the postwar era as well as transmitted to the world the importance of rule of law.' Eighty years after the end of World War II, Japan's role as a protector of that rule of law is being called into question. --The Asahi Shimbun, Aug. 15
