I was sacked by NASA for telling TRUTH about alien mission – now I fear Mars astronauts won't come home alive
MARS ATTACKS I was sacked by NASA for telling TRUTH about alien mission – now I fear Mars astronauts won't come home alive
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A TOP scientist claims she was sacked by Nasa after raising concerns about alien life on Mars.
Catharine Conley, the agency's Planetary Protection Officer from 2006 to 2017, also fears SpaceX astronauts won't come home alive.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
10
Conley claims the Mars 2020 rover Perseverance was not cleaned properly
Credit: Getty
10
An image of Mars's surface taken by the Mars 2020 rover Perseverance
Credit: AP
10
Catharine Conley worked as Nasa's Planetary Protection Officer for over a decade until she was sacked
Credit: NASA/GSFC/BILL HYRBYK
Conley first accused officials at the Jet Propulsion Lab (JPL) in California of failing to clean the Mars 2020 rover correctly before its launch.
Mars 2020 is Nasa's mission sent to search for samples of the Red Planet to bring home and test for evidence of past or current alien life.
The rover, Perseverance, is still crawling around the surface after landing in February 2021.
Its job is to obtain the samples which will then be collected by a future Mars Sample Return Mission.
But Conley feared any material eventually flown home could be contaminated - and the whole mission scuppered.
She claims she was suddenly removed from the position after speaking out - and suspects it was to silence her concerns.
Conley told The Sun: 'Nasa decided they didn't want to do the kind of work that I had been doing.
'They didn't want to continue with the kinds of implementation that they had been doing historically.
'That was not something I thought was a good idea, so they decided they needed someone else for the job.
"This was basic planetary protection as it had been done for the prior 50 years or so."
Mystery space rock blazing through solar system 'may be oldest comet ever seen'
Conley, who now works as a researcher, added: 'The Mars 2020 rover was cleaned in a way that was not compatible with prior levels of cleanliness, in particular regarding the amount of contamination that was getting introduced into the samples that were being collected for return.
'I pointed out that having a 0.1% chance of contaminating any individual sample, when you have 40 samples in total, comes out to a 4 per cent chance of having Earth contamination in the samples you're looking at.
'That makes it fairly difficult to be confident that you can distinguish between Earth life and Mars life.
'That was not something that the people at headquarters management wanted to hear and they took the steps that they thought were appropriate.'
10
Mars is the fourth planet away from the sun
Credit: Getty
10
Retrieving samples from Mars is one of the most pressing priorities in space exploration
Credit: Getty
Conley claims she had been told of staff being careless when using gloves and protective equipment.
She also claimed to have been told of staff bringing equipment into assembly rooms that was not properly cleaned, along with an 'attitude of skepticism I encountered regularly at JPL'.
Nasa states on its website that Mars 2020 Perseverance Rover remains an active mission.
It landed in February 2021 as part of Nasa's Mars Sample Return (MSR) campaign.
In January the agency said it was hoping to announce plans for the returning of samples in the second half of 2026.
But that has been thrown into doubt following Donald Trump's proposed cuts to Nasa, with MSR a casualty.
10
A photo taken by the Mars Perseverance rover of the Malgosa Crest abrasion patch
Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech
10
Nasa intends to send a manned mission to Mars some time in the 2030s
Credit: Getty
China is preparing to press ahead with their own plans to return Mars samples.
It has scheduled the Tianwen-3 Mars mission for launch in 2028, collecting and bringing samples back by 2031.
But Conley still fears the same problem.
She said: 'The concerns are similar. I've been looking at some of the reports that have come out about the Chinese proposed missions, and they're saying all the right things to the extent that I can obtain information.
'But it is difficult to follow up on what they are actually saying they're doing.
'I certainly had experience within my duties at Nasa of engineers saying one thing and doing something else.
'So it's difficult to know. But if other space agencies are not doing anything more than Nasa did, then I would be surprised if their contamination levels are low enough that you could detect the Mars signal underneath the background from Earth.'
Despite the cuts, Trump has proposed no savings on Nasa's plans to send astronauts to Mars in the 2030s.
Nasa's mission to Mars
Nasa hopes to send astronauts to Mars as early as the 2030s.
The space company has been working to advance its technologies in a bid to send a human crew to the Red Planet.
It would take astronauts up to nine months to reach Mars - which even at its closest is 33.9 million miles away.
Astronauts could then spend up to 500 days on the planet's surface before returning to Earth - which would take another nine months.
The crew would spend their time on the planet collecting data and assessing the planetary alignment that would allow the spacecraft to land and depart from Mars on the same orbit.
Last year, the agency completed a year-long simulated mission that saw four crew members out in a replica habitat in Houston, Texas.
They logged 378 days in the 1,700-square-foot, 3D-printed habitat called Mars Dune Alpha.
But Conley fears that doing so without a sample return mission means a gaping hole in knowledge for what astronauts will encounter.
She also questions if astronauts will be allowed home if they fall sick.
Conley added: 'Not doing a robotic sample return means we don't have detailed information about what kinds of materials the astronauts are likely to encounter, and possibly bring back to Earth, which could be quite problematic if there is something hazardous in Mars regolith, even if it's not biological.
10
The Mars 2020 mission is collecting samples which will ultimately return to Earth for tests for evidence of alien life
Credit: Getty
10
The image was captured by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter in 2008
Credit: NASA
'A question that didn't get answered during Apollo and certainly hasn't been addressed since is: if astronauts get sick after contacting Mars and we can't figure out why, should they be allowed to return?
'The fundamental problem, from my perspective, is overconfidence in thinking that we already know everything we need to know about what could happen, when we don't."
Conley also warned of Elon Musk's plans to send a manned crew to Mars through his company, SpaceX.
She added: 'SpaceX say they're planning to launch humans to Mars, but I have serious doubts about whether anyone would be alive when the spacecraft gets there since SpaceX doesn't seem to be developing long-term life support systems along with their rockets.
'Musk has made numerous claims about when he'll land humans on Mars that are distinctly implausible, at least if he wants the humans to be alive when they get there.
'Nasa is much more likely to be careful about preserving astronaut health but, ironically, seems not similarly concerned about protecting the Earth from possible Mars contamination.'
The Sun has approached Nasa for a response to Conley's allegations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Nasa astronaut Butch Wilmore retires after nine months in space
Nasa astronaut Butch Wilmore, who spent nine months in space with fellow crew member Suni Williams after their spacecraft experienced technical problems, has retired after a 25-year US space agency paid tribute to Mr Wilmore's service and praised his commitment as "truly exemplary", Nasa said in a Wilmore is a decorated US Navy captain who has flown in four different spacecrafts and accumulated 464 days in space during his saga captivated the world after what was meant to be an eight-day mission to the International Space Station (ISS) in June 2024 was dramatically extended, with the pair finally returning to Earth in March this year. Stephen Koerner, Acting Director of Nasa's Johnson Space Center, thanked Mr Wilmore for his dedication to space exploration."His lasting legacy of fortitude will continue to impact and inspire the Johnson workforce, future explorers, and the nation for generations," he Wilmore served as a test pilot before being selected by Nasa to become an astronaut in last mission was taking part in the first crewed test flight of the Starliner spacecraft with Ms Williams last year before the capsule suffered technical problems as it approached the ISS."Docking was imperative," Mr Wilmore told BBC News in May. "If we weren't able to dock, would we be able to make it back? We didn't know." They finally managed to dock after Mission Control on the ground helped them restart the craft's the spacecraft was deemed too risky to transport the astronauts home and the pair had to wait for a new ride to take them back to several delays over the next nine months, Mr Wilmore and Ms Williams finally made their homecoming aboard a SpaceX capsule. In his parting remarks, Mr Wilmore cited an "insatiable curiosity" that propelled him into space while always maintaining a connection to his home."Even as I ventured beyond Earth's limits, I remained attuned to the beauty and significance of the world below," he after retirement, astronauts often participate in studies to monitor their physical and mental health for the long-term effects of space travel on their Mr Wilmore and Ms Williams were given an extensive exercise regime after returning home as their bodies re-adapted to living with gravity.
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Trump moves to shut down NASA missions that measure carbon dioxide and plant health
The Trump administration is moving to shut down two NASA missions that monitor a potent greenhouse gas and plant health, potentially shutting off an important source of data for scientists, policymakers and farmers. President Donald Trump 's budget request for fiscal year 2026 includes no money for the Orbiting Carbon Observatories, which can precisely show where carbon dioxide is being emitted and absorbed and how well crops are growing. NASA said in an emailed statement Wednesday that the missions were 'beyond their prime mission' and being terminated 'to align with the President's agenda and budget priorities.' But the missions — a free-flying satellite launched in 2014 and an instrument attached to the International Space Station in 2019 that include technology used in the Hubble Space Telescope — still are more sensitive and accurate than any other systems in the world, operating or planned, and a 'national asset' that should be saved, said David Crisp, a retired NASA scientist who led their development. They helped scientists discover, for example, that the Amazon rain forest emits more carbon dioxide than it absorbs, while boreal forests in Canada, Russia and places where permafrost is melting absorb more than they emit, Crisp said. They also can detect the 'glow' of photosynthesis in plants, which helps monitor drought and predict food shortages that can lead to civil unrest and famine, he said. 'This is really critical,' Crisp said. 'We're learning so much about this rapidly changing planet.' The decision to end the missions is 'extremely shortsighted,' said Jonathan Overpeck, a climate scientist at the University of Michigan. 'The observations provided by these satellites ... (are) critical for managing growing climate change impacts around the planet, including in the U.S.," he said. Looking to Congress Crisp and others hope Congress will vote to preserve funding for the missions, which are funded through the fiscal year that ends Sept. 30. A bill in the House closely aligns with the president's request and would eliminate the missions, while a Senate version preserves them. But with Congress in recess, it is unclear whether a budget will be adopted before the new fiscal year begins Oct. 1. If it doesn't, Congress could adopt a resolution to continue current funding until a budget is passed, though some lawmakers fear the Trump administration could try to delay or withhold that money. Congressional Democrats warned acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy last month that it would be illegal to terminate missions or impound funds already appropriated by Congress. Experts said the administration's move to eliminate funding aligns with other actions to cut or bury climate science. 'The principle seems to be that if we stop measuring climate change it will just disappear from the American consciousness,' said University of Pennsylvania climate scientist Michael Mann. Backup plan Crisp and others also are trying to put together a coalition of outside partners — including from Japan and Europe — that could fund and operate the instrument attached to the space station. NASA said it will accept outside proposals through Aug. 29. The free-flying satellite, though, is at risk of being brought down, meaning it would burn up in the atmosphere. National Public Radio first reported that NASA employees were making plans to end the missions. Crisp said advocates are hoping NASA also allows outside control of that satellite, which covers more of the globe, but there are legal hurdles to overcome because it would mean giving control of a U.S. satellite to a group that could include foreign partners. 'We're going out to billionaires. We're going out to foundations,' Crisp said. 'But ... it's a really, really bad idea to try and push it off onto private industry or private individuals or private donors. It just doesn't make sense.' ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
The Independent
8 hours ago
- The Independent
Stuck astronaut Butch Wilmore retires from NASA less than 5 months after extended spaceflight
One of NASA's two previously stuck astronauts has retired from the space agency, less than five months after his unexpectedly long spaceflight came to an end. NASA announced Butch Wilmore's departure on Wednesday. Wilmore and Suni Williams launched last summer as test pilots on Boeing's first astronaut flight. What should have been a weeklong trip to the International Space Station turned into a stay of more than nine months because of Boeing's malfunctioning Starliner. Starliner came back empty, and Wilmore and Williams returned to Earth in March with SpaceX. Wilmore, 62, had already retired from the Navy. Williams, 59, also a retired Navy captain, is still with NASA. She joined Second Lady Usha Vance at Johnson Space Center in Houston earlier this week, taking part in a summer reading challenge for schoolchildren. Selected as an astronaut in 2000, Wilmore logged 464 days in orbit over three missions. His final spaceflight made up nearly two-thirds of that total: 286 days. 'Throughout his career, Butch has exemplified the technical excellence of what is required of an astronaut," NASA's chief astronaut Joe Acaba said in a statement. 'As he steps into this new chapter, that same dedication will no doubt continue to show in whatever he decides to do next.' ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
