NCEA overhaul: NZ principals predict short-term Cambridge boost amid curriculum changes
He expected uncertainty caused by the NCEA's scrapping could lead more parents to choose Cambridge's 'stability' in the short term.
That was until the new NZ Certificate of Education qualification was fully up and running.
'I think our students will keep opting into Cambridge probably in slightly bigger numbers for the next few years at least,' Hargreaves said.
The overhaul, which could affect students for decades to come, is open for public feedback for the next six weeks.
Macleans College principal Steven Hargreaves says parents may opt for the Cambridge exams in the short term while the details of New Zealand's education overhaul are being thrashed out. Photo / Macleans College via RNZ
It follows years of criticism that the NCEA's flexibility meant students across the country were being held to different standards and learning varying lessons despite supposedly studying the same subjects.
It also led some schools to abandon the NCEA entirely.
More than 40 schools over the past year offered the Cambridge curriculum either in place of the NCEA or alongside it as another alternative.
Popular inner Auckland school, Epsom Girls Grammar, was among the latest, telling parents it would be offering it as a choice from 2026 after 'overwhelming community demand'.
Auckland Grammar offers students the NCEA and Cambridge pathways, with headmaster Tim O'Connor a long-time critic of the homegrown system.
Epsom Girls Grammar is offering a pilot Cambridge exams pathway in 2026, with a full rollout to follow after that. Photo / Alex Burton
He said many students had coasted under NCEA rather than striving for excellence, which 'tarnished' it as a 'flexible anything qualification' and led to more than 250,000 skipped exams last year.
Despite that, O'Connor questioned whether the Cambridge pathway would be needed if the homegrown education system was revamped.
'We're a proud state school and we would support a nationwide qualification if it was going to be rigorous enough,' he said.
Hargreaves, who was on the Government's reform advisory group, said moves under the proposed reform to have all assignments and exams marked by outside assessors rather than teachers was a positive step towards ensuring fair grading.
He also backed a homegrown pathway but thought it would take time to convince parents to have faith in it.
Mike Waller, principal of private secondary Pinehurst School, which only teaches Cambridge, was another to back the reforms.
However, his school was firmly established in the Cambridge system and had no plans to change.
He believed it was rigorous and as an international pathway serving schools in many countries, was more stable and less susceptible to political changes that homegrown curriculums could be.
The proposed NCEA changes
The Government proposes axing NCEA Level 1, giving students respite from high-pressure exams in Year 11.
They will instead focus on literacy and numeracy in a 'Foundational Skills Award' to build a base for their senior studies.
Year 12s will then seek the New Zealand Certificate of Education (NZCE) and Year 13s the NZ Advanced Certificate of Education (NZACE).
The Government said common-sense grading, such as As and marks out of 100, will be clearer for parents, employers, and universities.
The changes kick in for Year 11s in 2028, who will then move into the new senior qualifications in 2029 and 2030.
It comes as the Cambridge pathway's popularity hit a high point last year with 8000 Kiwi students sitting its November exams and scoring 25 Top in the World awards for being the best in their subject anywhere in the globe.
Despite Cambridge's success at his school, Hargreaves believed that in a perfect world all local schools would be delivering a national qualification rather than international.
That made the current feedback period critical, given it was concerns over education two decades back that led to the arrival in the country of the Cambridge system.
'If there'd never been any concerns about it 25 years ago, Cambridge would never have arrived on our shores,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Opinion: NCEA overhaul falls short, top school headmaster James Bentley argues
There are many positives about the new qualification – the New Zealand Certificate of Education (NZCE) and the New Zealand Advanced Certificate of Education (NZACE). To be taken by Year 12 and Year 13 students respectively, it will be clearer to understand and students will be forced to take entire courses, no longer able to dip in and out of various subjects. But what has been proposed to replace the NCEA still falls short. While it is a step up from the current system, it is not the bold reset many had believed was coming. Its architects have been unable to deliver the required high-calibre model that is essential if we are to begin rebuilding trust in our national qualification. It is therefore unlikely that the many schools that abandoned the NCEA system years ago will now reconsider and return to its newly announced replacement. Then there will be a group that will defend the NCEA, who will argue that it has served our students well and that any change is unnecessary. But we have to be honest with ourselves. The NCEA has not delivered the outcomes its champions promised. Huge achievement gaps have persisted, especially for Māori and Pasifika students. Many young people have been buried under a mountain of assessments, where chasing credits has often mattered more than learning the knowledge and skills of their subjects. In order to improve pass rates, some schools have developed a habit of offering too many low-value in-school assessments, undermining the integrity of the qualification itself. The relentless pressure to gain assessments has amplified stress levels for both students and teachers. There was nothing especially wrong with the original NCEA vision; a flexible, standards-based system that could cater to different learning styles and pathways. But over time, it has become so complex and so distorted that it has lost both clarity and credibility. The flexibility that was once its strength has become a weakness, which has allowed for wildly different student outcomes, to the point that it can be unclear what a student's qualification can actually signify. Students on vastly different pathways can end up in essence with the same qualification, yet the underlying depth and quality can vary dramatically, depending on what subjects or courses they took. This has made it increasingly difficult for employers, universities and even families to understand what the NCEA actually represents. However, the New Zealand Certificate of Education (NZCE) that has been announced seems uncertain about what it wants to be. Many New Zealand schools now prefer Cambridge or the International Baccalaureate over NCEA. Photo / 123rf It has replicated the same flaw found in the NCEA system, an insistence that vocational and traditional academic subjects are equitable. While it is vital that vocational subjects are taught to our students, to continue the pretence that they are all equally rigorous and as academically demanding as, say, physics or calculus is bewildering. The NZCE does go some way to resolve the NCEA's long-standing imbalance between internal and external assessment; something further exacerbated by the rise of artificial intelligence (AI). When assessments can be completed outside the classroom with the help of AI tools, the reliability of internal assessments will invariably be questioned. While exams aren't perfect, they do offer a more secure and fair measure of a student's learning. The qualification designers recognised this and have rightly proposed more emphasis on external assessment. Nonetheless, it remains unclear how much weighting exams will have on a final subject grade and whether this will be consistent across all subjects. No doubt, there will be those who claim that advocating for a qualification that is more exam-focused and with a clear distinction between vocational and traditional academic subjects is an attempt to turn back the clock. But perhaps going back in time is not such a bad place to be. New Zealand was once among the top performers in global education rankings. Teenagers turned up to school regularly, teacher workload was more manageable and students left school with a qualification that, while not without its drawbacks, carried weight and was understood by the wider public. The current reform aims to restore rigour, fairness and clarity to our national qualification. It is a step in the right direction, but more is required. If we are serious as a nation about giving our young people the tools they need for future success, we must go further. Our students deserve more than NCEA as it stands, and more than what the new qualification is offering. We have one chance to get this right. Let us not squander this opportunity.
NZ Herald
3 days ago
- NZ Herald
A turning of the education tide? Latest school data shows improvements at all levels – except for NCEA 1
The exception was the proportion of school leavers (84.2%) with NCEA Level 1 or above, which dropped slightly from 2023 (84.6%). This was the lowest rate in a decade. All other measures increased: 76.1% left with NCEA Level 2 or above, up from 75.5% in 2023 but below the peak of 82.2% in 2020. left with NCEA Level 2 or above, up from 75.5% in 2023 but below the peak of 82.2% in 2020. 55.5% left with NCEA Level 3 or above, up from 52.8% in 2023. The peak was also in 2020 (60.7%). left with NCEA Level 3 or above, up from 52.8% in 2023. The peak was also in 2020 (60.7%). 40.2% left with University Entrance, up from 38.6% in 2023. left with University Entrance, up from 38.6% in 2023. 81% of school leavers stayed at school to the age of 17 or above, up from 79.3% in 2023. of school leavers stayed at school to the age of 17 or above, up from 79.3% in 2023. 11.8% of school leavers achieved a Vocational Pathways Award, a slight improvement on 2023 (11.3%). It's possible a greater tendency for schools to drop NCEA Level 1 had an impact on last year's results, potentially increasing the likelihood of more students failing to reach NCEA Level 1. 'We can't be certain whether the decision by some schools to no longer offer NCEA Level 1 is having a significant impact on the proportion of school leavers attaining that qualification,' said Curriculum Centre manager Rob Mill. 'However, many of the schools that have moved away from offering Level 1 tend to be schools with students facing fewer socio-economic barriers (schools with lower equity index numbers), which may influence patterns in the data.' A turning of the tide? After new NCEA standards came out in 2013, only 45% of students leaving a state school had NCEA Level 3. This rose to 50% in 2016, 51% in 2019 and 57% in the first year of the pandemic, when Covid disruption enabled students to receive bonus credits. It was all downhill from then and across the board – until 2024. An Education Review Office report in 2023 said New Zealand is not alone in experiencing a post-Covid collapse, while a 2024 academic paper called A Generation At Risk estimated the impact of Covid was up to six months of 'learning loss', and up to eight months for students with higher socio-economic barriers. NCEA Level 1 attainment for school leavers in 2024 was the lowest since new standards were introduced in 2013. Photo / 123 rf The 2024 results buck the trend of post-Covid collapse. 'The data does suggest a potential turning point,' said Stuart Deerness, senior lecturer in teacher education at the Auckland University of Technology. 'The improvements across higher qualifications [from NCEA Level 2 to UE] are genuinely encouraging and show that teachers' dedicated work to reverse post-pandemic learning disruption is paying off for the majority of senior students. 'Combined with more students staying to age 17-plus, this indicates we are becoming more effective at moving engaged learners through to meaningful qualifications.' This contrasts with the drop in NCEA Level 1 achievement, with nearly one in six school leavers with no formal qualification. 'The recovery is real but unevenly distributed, with a widening equity gap where students from poorer areas and those struggling with issues like chronic absence are being left further behind,' he said. 'Our most vulnerable learners are disengaging from the system entirely. While the mainstream improves, a marginalised group requires urgent, targeted support to prevent them from leaving school empty-handed.' Māori falling further behind A far greater proportion of students with few socio-economic barriers (as measured by the equity index) left school in 2024 with NCEA Level 1 (96.3%) compared with those facing the most barriers (72.3%). This was also the proportion (72.3%) of Māori school leavers in 2024 with NCEA Level 1 or above, lower than for Pacific school leavers (81.4%). 'The gap in NCEA Level 1 attainment rates between Māori school leavers and all school leavers increased in 2024 to 11.9 percentage points, up 0.5 percentage points from 2023,' the Ministry of Education report on the results said. 'This was the largest gap since 2014, and 3.8 percentage points more than in 2017 when the gap was smallest.' The difference between rich and poor was far more pronounced at NCEA Level 3 or above: 84% of school leavers with few socioeconomic barriers gained this level, more than double the proportion of those who faced the highest barriers (36.2%). Only 37.1% of Māori school leavers had NCEA Level 3 or above, while for Pacific school leavers it was just shy of half of them (49.5%). Since 2020, the proportion of Māori school leavers with NCEA Level 3 or above has decreased across all school equity index bands. Female students are still doing better than their male counterparts, but the achievement gender gap is shrinking over time. In 2024, 59.5% of female leavers attained NCEA Level 3 or above, compared with 51.6% of male leavers. The office of Education Minister Erica Stanford did not respond to a request for comment. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Education Minister Erica Stanford announced plans to scrap NCEA last week. Photo / Dean Purcell 'Overused' flexibility Last week, Stanford announced plans to replace the NCEA system, saying it was enabling students too much flexibility at the expense of credibility. Under the new scheme, Year 11 students will face what is being called a Foundational Skills Award with a focus on literacy and numeracy. English and mathematics will be required subjects for students at this year level. Year 12 and 13 students will seek to attain the New Zealand Certificate of Education (NZCE) and the New Zealand Advanced Certificate of Education (NZACE) respectively. This will replace the current system with a structured approach that requires students to take five subjects and pass at least four to receive the Year 12 and 13 certificates. Feedback on the proposed new scheme is open until September 15, with Cabinet making final decisions in December. Derek Cheng is a senior journalist who started at the Herald in 2004. He has worked several stints in the press gallery team and is a former deputy political editor.
NZ Herald
5 days ago
- NZ Herald
NCEA overhaul: NZ principals predict short-term Cambridge boost amid curriculum changes
His school allows senior students to study either the local NCEA programme or the British-headquartered Cambridge exams, taught in schools around the world. He expected uncertainty caused by the NCEA's scrapping could lead more parents to choose Cambridge's 'stability' in the short term. That was until the new NZ Certificate of Education qualification was fully up and running. 'I think our students will keep opting into Cambridge probably in slightly bigger numbers for the next few years at least,' Hargreaves said. The overhaul, which could affect students for decades to come, is open for public feedback for the next six weeks. Macleans College principal Steven Hargreaves says parents may opt for the Cambridge exams in the short term while the details of New Zealand's education overhaul are being thrashed out. Photo / Macleans College via RNZ It follows years of criticism that the NCEA's flexibility meant students across the country were being held to different standards and learning varying lessons despite supposedly studying the same subjects. It also led some schools to abandon the NCEA entirely. More than 40 schools over the past year offered the Cambridge curriculum either in place of the NCEA or alongside it as another alternative. Popular inner Auckland school, Epsom Girls Grammar, was among the latest, telling parents it would be offering it as a choice from 2026 after 'overwhelming community demand'. Auckland Grammar offers students the NCEA and Cambridge pathways, with headmaster Tim O'Connor a long-time critic of the homegrown system. Epsom Girls Grammar is offering a pilot Cambridge exams pathway in 2026, with a full rollout to follow after that. Photo / Alex Burton He said many students had coasted under NCEA rather than striving for excellence, which 'tarnished' it as a 'flexible anything qualification' and led to more than 250,000 skipped exams last year. Despite that, O'Connor questioned whether the Cambridge pathway would be needed if the homegrown education system was revamped. 'We're a proud state school and we would support a nationwide qualification if it was going to be rigorous enough,' he said. Hargreaves, who was on the Government's reform advisory group, said moves under the proposed reform to have all assignments and exams marked by outside assessors rather than teachers was a positive step towards ensuring fair grading. He also backed a homegrown pathway but thought it would take time to convince parents to have faith in it. Mike Waller, principal of private secondary Pinehurst School, which only teaches Cambridge, was another to back the reforms. However, his school was firmly established in the Cambridge system and had no plans to change. He believed it was rigorous and as an international pathway serving schools in many countries, was more stable and less susceptible to political changes that homegrown curriculums could be. The proposed NCEA changes The Government proposes axing NCEA Level 1, giving students respite from high-pressure exams in Year 11. They will instead focus on literacy and numeracy in a 'Foundational Skills Award' to build a base for their senior studies. Year 12s will then seek the New Zealand Certificate of Education (NZCE) and Year 13s the NZ Advanced Certificate of Education (NZACE). The Government said common-sense grading, such as As and marks out of 100, will be clearer for parents, employers, and universities. The changes kick in for Year 11s in 2028, who will then move into the new senior qualifications in 2029 and 2030. It comes as the Cambridge pathway's popularity hit a high point last year with 8000 Kiwi students sitting its November exams and scoring 25 Top in the World awards for being the best in their subject anywhere in the globe. Despite Cambridge's success at his school, Hargreaves believed that in a perfect world all local schools would be delivering a national qualification rather than international. That made the current feedback period critical, given it was concerns over education two decades back that led to the arrival in the country of the Cambridge system. 'If there'd never been any concerns about it 25 years ago, Cambridge would never have arrived on our shores,' he said.
