Parliament prepares for crucial budget vote debates as scheduling issues arise
Image: Jacques Naude / Independent Newspapers
Parliament gears up to deliberate on the budget votes for various departments, including the Presidency, as pressure is mounting to meet the end-of-July deadline for the finalisation of the Budget.
The budget votes will kick off on Friday with the Small Business Development Department, and the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment being the first to present their policy speeches.
During a briefing to the National Assembly Programme Committee on Thursday, Cameron Dugmore, the committee whip, outlined that the schedule is expected to run until the end of July.
The budget vote for the Presidency will occupy two days of scrutiny between July 16 and 17, and Parliament on July 15, with all deliberations culminating in a vote on the Appropriation Bill in the National Assembly set for July 23.
The National Council of Provinces has its programme that will culminate in the passing of the Budget at the end of July.
However, not all discussions have been smooth.
Dugmore told the MPs that there have been one or two issues the officials were engaging on around scheduling the Sport, Arts and Culture budget vote.
'But we don't need to get into that now, in my view,' he said before outlining some of the budget votes lined up for the week until next Friday.
National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza said they had received a request from the Sports Portfolio Committee to look at the amendment of their budget vote schedule for Tuesday.
'We are still waiting to engage the committee and the minister on the issue because it looks like they are not on the same page. The minister is ready to continue on Tuesday, but the committee feels that there is a new document that they need to bring to the committee, and they would like to have some engagement before the budget debate is taken,' she said.
'I just thought it was important to appraise the members to understand why there might be a need to amend that date,' Didiza said.
MK Party MK Visvin Reddy raised concerns with the way the committees were structured during the days of the upcoming budget votes.
'I want to appeal to the technical staff that when they schedule the debates, try not to have committees that sit on a Monday and Tuesday at the same time,' he said.
'So you find that there are multiple debates that are stacked across two venues, and with some sessions running right until 6pm. Maybe, if you could please allow the people to start to relook and reconfigure these meetings so that they are manageable,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Constitutional Court finds Parliament failed in public participation process
The Constitutional Court overturned the appointment of the new members of the Commission for Gender Equality, saying the process lacked reasonable public participation. Image: Kamogelo Moichela The Constitutional Court, in an unanimous judgment, found that Parliament failed to comply with its constitutional obligation to facilitate a reasonable public participation process in the appointment of new members for the Commission for Gender Equality (CGE). Corruption Watch, which launched this application, submitted that the public participation process was defective due to insufficient information on the shortlisted candidates being made publicly available. Furthermore, they submitted that the opportunity for public participation was restricted to 2,000 character submissions and only 14 days were provided for written submissions. Corruption Watch contended that the opportunity for public participation was unreasonable and inadequate. It also argued that the Portfolio Committee misinterpreted the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA), leading to unnecessary restrictions on candidate information. In doing so, the Portfolio Committee wrongly concluded that POPIA permits only the sharing of minimal information, it said. The Speaker, on behalf of the National Assembly, submitted that the opportunity it provided for public participation in the recommendation process was reasonable and defended the 14-day period as sufficient, citing past appointment processes. The Speaker also submitted that the Portfolio Committee properly considered all public comments before making recommendations and that withholding full CVs of the shortlisted candidates was in line with POPIA, as consent was required before publicly sharing candidates' personal information. The Information Regulator submitted in an explanatory affidavit that consent is not required if the processing of that information is necessary for public duties. It supported Corruption Watch in stating that POPIA does not prevent the Portfolio Committee from fulfilling its constitutional mandate to ensure public involvement in legislative and 'other processes'. Media Monitoring Africa, which joined the proceedings as a friend of the court, submitted that effective media reporting is crucial for transparency and public engagement and also contended that the Portfolio Committee's failure to publish candidates' CVs hindered the media's ability to act as a watchdog, restricting the public's right to access information and meaningfully participate in the appointment process. The court held that the mechanisms adopted by the Portfolio Committee to facilitate public involvement in the appointment of commissioners to the CGE failed to allow for effective public participation. It said that while a court must take due cognisance of what the National Assembly chooses to do to facilitate public involvement, the assessment of what was done is an objective one. In this instance, the National Assembly acted upon an interpretation of POPIA which was manifestly incorrect, rendering the conduct unreasonable. This, coupled with the short period allowed for public comments and the restriction on such comments, materially affected the appointment process as a whole. In the circumstances, the appointment process conducted by the National Assembly did not comply with the obligations imposed by the Constitution and is therefore invalid, the court found.
Eyewitness News
2 days ago
- Eyewitness News
It's all systems go for MPs in ad hoc committee probing police graft allegations
CAPE TOWN - Members of Parliament's ad hoc committee investigating police corruption are ready to get started as early as next week. The National Assembly ad hoc committee investigating the allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi will meet on Tuesday as it races against time to conclude its work within three months. This week, Parliament named the 18-member committee comprising eight parties represented in Parliament. Parliament might be on a lengthy recess, but the multi-party committee is expected to meet during the break from next week. ALSO READ: - National Assembly greenlights establishment of ad hoc committee to probe Mkhwanazi claims - Parties want Mkhwanazi to expose all those implicated in alleged police corruption When the committee meets on Tuesday, the first order of business will be electing a chairperson, who will most likely come from the African National Congress (ANC). But committee member Lisa Schickerling said they're raring to go. 'We do look forward to it. It is going to be a very interesting ad hoc committee, and we really hope that we get clarity for South Africans.' The committee will start its probe in the coming weeks which will look at the nature and implications of relationships between senior police leadership and certain members of the public, among others.
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Parliament announces members of ad hoc committee investigating Mkhwanazi allegations
The EFF's Julius Malema is among those who have called on the public to provide information that will lead to the dismantling of criminality. Parliament has announced the members of the ad hoc committee that will investigate allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal provincial police commissioner Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi about security matters. This after the National Assembly (NA) adopted the joint report of the portfolio committee on police and the portfolio committee on justice and constitutional development on the allegations made by Mkhwanazi on 23 July. The two committees have requested the process to be concluded within 90 days of the committee being instituted, provided that the timeframe may be amended or extended if necessary. ALSO READ: Judiciary requests Mkhwanazi to provide evidence of allegations They also called for the ad hoc committee to be appropriately resourced, including having ready access to external forensic and legal advisory services. There is a further call for the possible need to provide for the protection of potential whistleblowers about the best way to facilitate public participation and transparency. 'As far as possible, meetings should be conducted openly and, whenever possible, broadcast on Parliament TV and its social media channels,' said the two committees during their joint sitting last month. 'Mkhwanazi opened the way' Addressing supporters at the EFFTurns12 rally at Khayelitsha Rugby Stadium on Saturday, EFF leader Julius Malema called on the public to come forward with information. 'People must come to parliament and tell us who the drug lords are and who is protecting them, because we need to start fighting drugs. We want to know where the guns come from in the Cape Flats and Khayelitsha,' Malema said. ALSO READ: 'Get your popcorn factory ready' — McKenzie willing to testify at the commission into Mkhwanazi allegations 'You the people know the truth, this is the time and platform to expose the rot. Do not be scared, the killing of our children must be stopped now. Mkhwanazi opened the way, we must join him and restore peace and order in South Africa. 'As long as the EFF is in that committee, we will make sure that this does not become another Section 89 report they brushed aside. Phala Phala is not dead, we will find a way to bring it into this committee.' Ad hoc committee members These are the members of the committee and their substitutes. Advocate Glynnis Breytenbach Ian Cameron Molapi Soviet Lekganyane Julius Sello Malema Mangaqa Albert Mncwango Sibonelo Nomvalo Xola Nqola Mdumiseni Ntuli Khusela Lwandlekazi Nobatembu Sangoni Ashley Sauls David Mandla Skosana Alternate Dereleen Elana James Dianne Kohler Leigh‐Ann Mathys Lisa‐Maré Schickerling Crossby Vusi Shongwe Thokozile Sokanyile Wouter Wynand Wessels READ NEXT: Julius Malema's message to KZN police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi
