South Africa records R22 billion trade surplus for June 2025
Image: File
The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has released preliminary trade statistics revealing that the country achieved a trade balance surplus of R22.0 billion for June 2025.
This positive balance is attributed to robust export performance amounting to R170.7 billion, contrasted against imports totalling R148.6 billion, which includes trade activities with Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, and Namibia (BELN).
Despite this surplus, year-to-date figures from January to June 2025 indicate a preliminary trade balance surplus of R80.2 billion—lower than the R92.0 billion recorded for the same period in 2024. On a year-on-year comparison, exports for June 2025 reflected a decline of 2.9%, decreasing from R175.8 billion in June 2024 to R170.7 billion.
Conversely, import flows saw a marginal uptick of 0.6% from R147.7 billion to R148.6 billion during the same period.
The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has released preliminary trade statistics revealing that the country achieved a trade balance surplus
Image: SARS
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
In a month-on-month analysis, exports fell by R3.3 billion (-1.9%) from R174.0 billion in May to R170.7 billion in June. Imports also declined, dropping by R5.3 billion (-3.5%) from R153.9 billion to R148.6 billion.
Major contributors to the export decline included Gold, Coal, and Motor Vehicles, while decreases in petroleum oils, crude oil, and telephone sets, including smartphones, significantly influenced the drop in import figures.
Notably, the trade balance surplus reported for May 2025 was revised downwards from R21.7 billion to R20.0 billion, a result of ongoing Vouchers of Correction (VOCs) affecting statistical accuracy.
Breaking down the numbers by world zone
Excluding the BELN trade impact, South Africa's trade with the rest of the world for June 2025 showed a trade surplus of R11.9 billion, driven by exports summing to R154.2 billion against imports of R142.3 billion. In this context, exports saw a decrease of R2.5 billion (-1.6%), while imports similarly fell by R6.1 billion (-4.1%) between May and June 2025.
In terms of trade with the BELN countries, South Africa managed a preliminary trade surplus of R10.1 billion for June 2025, resulting from R16.5 billion in exports and R6.3 billion in imports. This trade segment experienced a slight decrease in exports of R0.8 billion (-4.4%) and an increase in imports of R0.8 billion (13.7%) over the month.
This positive balance is attributed to robust export performance amounting to R170.7 billion, contrasted against imports totalling R148.6 billion
Image: SARS
The cumulative trade balance for 2025 now sits at R65.1 billion, marginally higher than the R64.8 billion surplus recorded in the equivalent period of 2024.
As South Africa navigates these economic fluctuations, this latest trade data illustrates both challenges and opportunities within its export and import strategies moving forward. Effective management and adaptation to these changing patterns will be essential for sustaining economic growth and bolstering trade relationships.
IOL Business
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
20 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Government guilty of double standards when it comes to banning corrupt companies
The government has an inconsistent and deeply troubling approach when it comes to sanctioning companies that betray the public trust through corruption and poor standards of service delivery. One need only look at the Bain & Company debacle to see this in stark relief. Bain's role in the hollowing out of the SA Revenue Service (SARS) under Tom Moyane's leadership during the State Capture years is now well documented. For a long time, nothing was done locally. It took the actions of the UK government, driven by Lord Peter Hain, to finally impose real consequences. Under that international pressure, the SA Treasury decided to place Bain & Co on the government's Database of Restricted Suppliers, which essentially banned Bain & Co from doing business with any level of the state, including local government. This ultimately gave rise to Bain closing its local advisory practice in South Africa in July. Bain paid the ultimate price for its outrageous and unacceptable conduct during the height of the State Capture years, and it was a long-overdue outcome. But let's be clear: this decision to ban Bain didn't come from decisive action by our authorities. It came under pressure from the UK government, which banned Bain in August 2022 from doing business with it (the UK government) for three years, on account of its actions in South Africa. Yet Bain was not alone in its misconduct. Other global giants like SAP, ABB, McKinsey & Co, and KPMG also acted out of line, aiding and abetting the siphoning of billions of rands from Eskom, Transnet, SARS and other state entities. Their transgressions were no less damaging. Like Bain, they apologised. Like Bain, they paid back some of their ill-gotten gains. But unlike Bain, not one of them was barred from doing business with the government. Why the double standard? South Africa has a powerful accountability tool at its disposal: the Database of Restricted Suppliers, managed by the National Treasury. Any company or its directors placed on this list is prohibited from doing business with the state. This sanction can have serious consequences — as Bain's closure demonstrates — but it is not used to the extent that it should be applied. The Treasury will say it only maintains the database, relying on government departments and municipalities to submit the names of companies and their directors that have wronged the state. But this is a weak excuse. If those responsible for reporting misconduct fail to act, the Treasury has a duty to step in, tighten the rules and hold those departments and municipalities accountable for their lack of duty and responsibilities to the country. The reality is that government departments and municipal authorities that collude with dodgy service providers are hardly going to report their partners-in-crime. The question which then arises is: should civil society organisations be allowed to make submissions for blacklisting on behalf of the state, if indeed it has accurate facts and can substantiate its reasons for the listing? Otherwise, the Database of Restricted Suppliers remains a blunt instrument, serving a very limited purpose, while essentially allowing billions to be stolen by repeat offenders. The truth is, the reluctance to use this tool is part of a bigger pattern. It suits those in power to keep the gates open. Real enforcement, whether it's efficient procurement blacklisting or an independent and highly effective criminal justice system, would disrupt the flow of crooked contracts that fund party coffers, line the pockets of connected elites, and feed the political patronage machine. Bain deserved to be banned. But so do SAP, ABB, McKinsey & Co, KPMG and every other company that colluded with state actors to rob South Africans blind. Until there is consistency, political will and decisive leadership, the plunder will continue, and the Database of Restricted Suppliers will remain a powerful but underutilised weapon gathering dust in Treasury's arsenal. It is time for Treasury to show that this country is serious about accountability. Until then, civil society will keep asking: why Bain and no one else? DM
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Types of South African income taxable for non-residents in 2025
more focus is being placed on the types of income taxable for individuals who are not tax residents in South Africa. Image: Supplied Following SARS's recent changes to the 2025 tax return for non-residents earning South African-source income, more focus is being placed on the types of income taxable for individuals who are not tax residents in South Africa. IOL previously reported that the revenue service has moved to make things easier for non-resident taxpayers earning income from South African sources by introducing new enhancements to the 2025 tax return process. These changes include updates to the ITR12 tax return form to help ensure non-residents complete the correct sections and submit accurate returns. Alongside this, the revenue service has clarified the various types of South African-source income that non-residents may be liable to tax on. Types of income Non-resident taxpayers may be subject to tax on various types of South African-source income, including: Employment income Employment income earned by a non-resident in South Africa is generally subject to normal tax. However, if a Double Taxation Agreement (DTA) applies and all of the following conditions are met, the income is exempt: The individual is in South Africa for 183 days or less in any 12-month period. The employer is not a South African resident. The income is not paid from a permanent establishment of the employer in South Africa. Pension and annuities An amount received by a non-resident that constitutes a lump sum, pension or annuity from a pension fund, pension preservation, provident fund or provident preservation fund and the services in respect of which that amount is received or accrued were rendered in South Africa, is subject to normal tax in South Africa. If the amount received or accrued relates to services rendered inside and outside South Africa, only the portion of the amount relating to services rendered in South Africa is subject to tax in South Africa. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Interest Non-resident interest from South African sources is usually exempt from normal tax unless the person is in South Africa over 183 days or connected to a permanent establishment. Exempt interest is subject to 15% withholding tax unless the person exceeds 183 days, in which case normal tax applies with some age-based exemptions. Dividends Dividends tax is payable at a rate of 20% with effect from 22 February 2017 on dividends paid by companies that are residents (other than headquarter companies). Dividends tax is also payable on a foreign dividend to the extent that the foreign dividend does not constitute the distribution of an asset in specie and it is paid by foreign companies in respect of listed shares. This rate is, however, subject to a reduction in terms of the various DTAs. Although dividends tax is part of the Act, it is a separate tax from normal tax. Royalties Non-residents receiving royalties for intellectual property used in South Africa generally face a 15% withholding tax, unless they've been in South Africa over 183 days, the royalties relate to a permanent establishment, or they're paid by a headquarter company. If exempt from withholding tax, the royalties are taxed normally. Rental income The source of rental income is generally regarded to be where the property is used on a day-to-day basis. Rental income which arises in South Africa, received by or accrued to a non-resident will be subject to normal tax in South Africa. Expenses such as rates and taxes, bond interest, insurance, repairs may be claimed as deductions against such rental income, subject to certain conditions. Capital gains tax (CGT) Non-residents are only liable for Capital Gains Tax in South Africa on immovable property, shares or trust interests mainly linked to South African property, and assets tied to any permanent establishment they have in the country For more details on other taxes like estate duty and tax on foreign entertainers and sportspersons, check SARS webisites. IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
South Africa records R22 billion trade surplus for June 2025
The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has released preliminary trade statistics revealing that the country achieved a trade balance surplus Image: File The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has released preliminary trade statistics revealing that the country achieved a trade balance surplus of R22.0 billion for June 2025. This positive balance is attributed to robust export performance amounting to R170.7 billion, contrasted against imports totalling R148.6 billion, which includes trade activities with Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, and Namibia (BELN). Despite this surplus, year-to-date figures from January to June 2025 indicate a preliminary trade balance surplus of R80.2 billion—lower than the R92.0 billion recorded for the same period in 2024. On a year-on-year comparison, exports for June 2025 reflected a decline of 2.9%, decreasing from R175.8 billion in June 2024 to R170.7 billion. Conversely, import flows saw a marginal uptick of 0.6% from R147.7 billion to R148.6 billion during the same period. The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has released preliminary trade statistics revealing that the country achieved a trade balance surplus Image: SARS Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ In a month-on-month analysis, exports fell by R3.3 billion (-1.9%) from R174.0 billion in May to R170.7 billion in June. Imports also declined, dropping by R5.3 billion (-3.5%) from R153.9 billion to R148.6 billion. Major contributors to the export decline included Gold, Coal, and Motor Vehicles, while decreases in petroleum oils, crude oil, and telephone sets, including smartphones, significantly influenced the drop in import figures. Notably, the trade balance surplus reported for May 2025 was revised downwards from R21.7 billion to R20.0 billion, a result of ongoing Vouchers of Correction (VOCs) affecting statistical accuracy. Breaking down the numbers by world zone Excluding the BELN trade impact, South Africa's trade with the rest of the world for June 2025 showed a trade surplus of R11.9 billion, driven by exports summing to R154.2 billion against imports of R142.3 billion. In this context, exports saw a decrease of R2.5 billion (-1.6%), while imports similarly fell by R6.1 billion (-4.1%) between May and June 2025. In terms of trade with the BELN countries, South Africa managed a preliminary trade surplus of R10.1 billion for June 2025, resulting from R16.5 billion in exports and R6.3 billion in imports. This trade segment experienced a slight decrease in exports of R0.8 billion (-4.4%) and an increase in imports of R0.8 billion (13.7%) over the month. This positive balance is attributed to robust export performance amounting to R170.7 billion, contrasted against imports totalling R148.6 billion Image: SARS The cumulative trade balance for 2025 now sits at R65.1 billion, marginally higher than the R64.8 billion surplus recorded in the equivalent period of 2024. As South Africa navigates these economic fluctuations, this latest trade data illustrates both challenges and opportunities within its export and import strategies moving forward. Effective management and adaptation to these changing patterns will be essential for sustaining economic growth and bolstering trade relationships. IOL Business
