Letters to The Editor — July 25, 2025
It has been an exceptionally expedition and it has turned out to be fruitful. This new development heralds a new era of innovation, exploration, and opportunities for both nations which have had a complex history.
Balagopal Gopinath,
Keerikkad, Alappuzha, Kerala
Maharashtra Bill
I write this letter as the Deputy Director (News), Directorate General Of Information and Public Relation, Government of Maharashtra. The Editorial ('Danger of thought', July 24) is a gross misrepresentation of a necessary and carefully considered legislative measure. The Maharashtra Special Public Security (MSPS) Bill is aimed at providing the legal framework for handling unlawful activities of unlawful organisations that are a part of the united front of banned CPI(Maoist) and other left-wing extremist organisations. The Government of Maharashtra is steadfast in its commitment to upholding both the security of its citizens and the democratic freedom enshrined in the Constitution. The MSPS Bill does not exhibit police thought. The legislation targets organisations whose actions, whether through the written or spoken word, signs, or other activities, 'constitute a danger or menace to public order, peace and tranquillity'. This is a critical distinction. The Bill is not aimed at commentators, critics, or political opponents engaging in legitimate dissent. It is designed to tackle the insidious, overground network of Maoist front organisations that engage in the recruitment, fundraising, and radicalisation of youth and professionals, thereby fuelling violence and threatening to undermine the constitutional order.
Varsha Andhale,
Mumbai
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
4 minutes ago
- First Post
With 25% tariff & threat of Russia sanctions, Trump dashes hope of being India's top partner
With 25% tariff and the threat of further penalties over the trade with Russia, President Donald Trump has dashed the hope of many in the country that he would be India's best friend in his second term. The all-round progress in the India-US relationship under the past four years now stands at risk of being undone. read more US President Donald Trump stands, after delivering remarks on tariffs, in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, DC, US, April 2, 2025. Reuters With 25 per cent tariff on imports from India amid delay in the much-awaited bilateral trade agreement and the threat of further penalties over Indian imports from Russia, US President Donald Trump has posed a fresh challenge to burgeoning India-US trade ties, effectively creating an environment marked by scepticism and coercion that might undo years of progress in bilateral ties. In a post on Truth Social, Trump on Wednesday announced a two-pronged assault on India. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Firstly, he used the trade deficit as a premise to slap 25 per cent tariff on India. Secondly, using the same language as Senator Lindsey Graham who has threatened to hit the Indian economy with a sledgehammer, he blamed India for funding the Russian war on Ukraine and threatened additional penalties. India remains the largest buyer of Russian energy along with China 'at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine' and India will therefore pay a penalty starting August 1, said Trump. At a time when India is facing an ever-growing Pakistan-China nexus, what India needs is a reliable partner in the Washington DC. Instead, with his actions, Trump has compromised decades of bipartisan efforts to improve the bilateral relationship and replace trust with suspicion and grudges. Trump shakes foundations of India-US ties Trump's two-pronged assault on India is the starkest display of his irreverence to the principle of mutuality that has been one of the defining features of the India-US relationship. For decades, India respected US concerns and US presidents respected India's red lines. Apparently, that tradition ended on January 20. In his second term, Trump has crossed every red line that India has maintained for decades: he has meddled in the Kashmir dispute, hyphenated India and Pakistan, sided with the jihadists in India's extended neighbourhood, and imposed tariffs and threatened secondary tariffs over the trade with Russia. ALSO READ — Beyond Pakistan: Trump's open embrace of jihadist forces across Asia a new headache for India Unlike previous American administrations that pursued a mutually-beneficial relationship with India, there now exists a trust deficit in the bilateral relationship under President Trump as he does not care what India —or any other partner for that matter— wants and pursues a 'my way or the highway' approach, says Prof. Swasti Rao, who teaches geopolitics at the Jindal School of International Affairs, Jindal Global University. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'This is why he has ignored all the sensibilities of India whether it is the Kashmir issue, the India-Pakistan conflict, or the issue of agriculture and dairy in trade talks. He has complicated the India-US relationship that had been on an upward trajectory not just bilaterally but also multilaterally — look at the progress with Quad and IMEC in the past few years. Now, instead of taking the relationship forward, the focus will be on containing the fallout,' says Rao, who is also a Non-Resident Fellow at the Paris-based think tank Eastern Circles. Trump takes India on a bumpy ride Under the previous Joe Biden administration, US officials occasionally expressed concerns about India's purchase of Russian oil and touched issues of human rights. More often than not, those were acts of pandering to the domestic base that did little to slow the progress of the bilateral relationship. Biden joined Prime Minister Narendra Modi to turn Quad into the fulcrum to counter China in the Indo-Pacific. He joined hands with India to float the India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) as an ambitious connectivity and geostrategic initiative. He brought India closer to Israel and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) under the I2U2 initiative. Bilaterally, the two countries expanded ties in security, intelligence, scientific, and defence industrial domains. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While Biden followed the trend set by Barack Obama, George W Bush, and Bill Clinton before him in taking forward the progress in bilateral ties, Trump has threatened to undo that progress by pulling India into a bumpy ride in the upcoming years — and tariffs are just one of the ways. Some of the blame lies with New Delhi as well. 'There has been a misreading of Trump in New Delhi. He was not the one-stop solution that many thought he would be. There is no easy way to manage him,' says Rao, the geopolitical expert at JISA. What's the road ahead for India-US ties? India cannot replicate templates that other countries have followed to handle Trump. India's approach to international relations and standing in the world neither allows it to appease Trump by offering him military bases, natural resources, or the Nobel Prize or Nishan-e-Haidar like Pakistan nor pursue the 'Daddy' approach of Nato chief Mark Rutte. India will have to figure its own template. 'India has been non-confrontational so far and rightly so. The only way to steer the India-US relationship is to not be confrontational, manage President Trump's ego, smoothen any wrinkles in the relations quietly, and stabilise other theatres like Pakistan and China. India, or any country for that matter, cannot manage many crises at once. India will likely need to come up with a lighter version of Mr Rutte's approach where you don't stoop too low but manage his ego just enough to get your interests secured,' says Rao, a consulting editor at The Print. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As for the tariffs, Rao says that nothing is certain with President Trump as he can still make a deal and negotiations are ongoing. 'The best-case scenario will be that India gets a trade deal and tariff comes down and India does not get any secondary tariffs or sanctions over the Russian war on Ukraine. The worst-case scenario will be that the 25 per cent tariff continues and India also gets exposed to secondary tariffs or sanctions under the Graham-Blumenthal proposal. In the short term, the focus should be to avoid this,' says Rao.
The Hindu
4 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Cargo airport aimed to benefit realtors: CPI-M
CPI-M State Secretary V. Srinivasa Rao on Wednesday alleged that the proposed cargo airport is designed only to benefit influential politicians and realtors of Srikakulam district. Along with CPI-M Srikakulam District president D. Govinda Rao, they led a protest rally in Vankaluru of Vajrapukotturu mandal in Srikakulam district opposing the forcible land acquisition for the cargo airport. He said that the public representatives planned to enhance the value of their lands with the support of realtors with the proposed airport. Mr. Srinivasa Rao said: 'There is a clear hidden agenda behind the proposal cargo airport near Mulapadu seaport. The value of the 4,000 acres of lands will go up, though the airport is not required, since the Bhogapuram airport is set to begin functioning soon.' He expressed concerns that cashew groves in Uddanam region would be affected. Rao criticised the local public representatives for neglecting key irrigation projects like the Vamsadhara, while showing enthusiasm for the cargo airport.
News18
12 minutes ago
- News18
Trump's Tariff Tactics Underscore India's Deep-Rooted Defence, Energy Ties With Russia
Last Updated: Trump's decision spotlights India's geopolitical balancing act as it maintains its longstanding relationships with Moscow amid shifting global alliances US President Donald Trump in a social media post on Wednesday announced new tariffs on India, citing its ongoing purchases of Russian military equipment and energy. His decision underscores India's geopolitical balancing act as it maintains its longstanding relationships with Moscow amid shifting global alliances. A legacy of defence ties with Russia India's defence relationship with Russia is deeply entrenched, dating back to the Cold War era when the Soviet Union became India's primary arms supplier due to limited options from Western nations. This partnership was solidified during critical moments, such as the 1971 India-Pakistan War, and has evolved into a 'Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership". Currently, over 50% of India's in-service military platforms are of Russian origin, including Su-30MKI fighter jets, T-90 tanks, and the powerful S-400 Triumf air defence systems. The reliance on Russian defence equipment is not just historical but practical. Russia has consistently provided competitive pricing, flexible payment terms, and essential technology transfer agreements, which Western countries have often hesitated to match. Joint programmes like the BrahMos cruise missile highlight the depth of this collaboration, moving beyond mere buyer-seller relationships to co-production and co-development. However, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine has led to challenges, including delays in deliveries of spare parts and new systems, prompting India to expedite its diversification efforts and enhance domestic defence production under the Make in India initiative. India's stand on Russian oil: Pragmatism and energy security India's substantial intake of Russian oil has also become a significant geopolitical issue, especially since the 2022 conflict in Ukraine. Before the war, Russia accounted for a negligible percentage of India's crude oil imports. As Western sanctions limited Russian energy exports, Moscow began offering substantial discounts, which India, the world's third-largest oil consumer and over 80% reliant on imports, readily accepted. This strategic shift resulted in Russian oil's share in India's imports soaring, at times exceeding 40% by 2024. India has defended this position, emphasising its duty to ensure energy security for its 1.4 billion citizens and stating it will not 'switch off its economy" to appease Western demands. Indian officials, including High Commissioner to the UK Vikram Doraiswami, have highlighted perceived double standards, noting that many European nations continue to engage in other forms of trade with Russia. Despite the EU's sanctions impacting India's Nayara Energy due to its Russian connections, New Delhi has reiterated its opposition to unilateral sanctions not endorsed by the United Nations. The Trump administration's imposition of 25% tariffs on Indian exports, along with an additional penalty specifically targeting purchases of Russian oil and weapons, signals increased pressure from Washington. Despite this, India's stance remains firm: its energy procurement decisions are driven by national interest and the need to secure affordable resources, balancing its long-standing strategic partnerships with its growing global aspirations. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
