US government turmoil stalls thousands of export approvals, sources say
While US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has become a familiar face touting President Donald Trump's tariff and trade deals, sources said the export bureau under Lutnick's command has failed to issue expected new rules, stifled communications with industry representatives, pushed out experts, and lost staff through buyouts and resignations.
Shipments of artificial intelligence chips from Nvidia to China are the most high-profile example of licenses not being swiftly approved.
The company said July 14 the government assured it licenses would be granted for its H20 chip, and it hoped to start deliveries soon.
Lutnick and other officials confirmed sales would be allowed. But sources said this week no licenses have yet been issued, and billions of dollars of AI chip orders are at stake.
One US official said the backlog of license applications is the lengthiest in more than three decades.
A spokesperson for Nvidia declined to comment.
The Commerce Department defended its licensing practices, saying its Bureau of Industry and Security 'will no longer rubber-stamp license applications that raise grave questions of national security,' a spokesperson said.
'BIS is driving forward President Trump's agenda through strong rules and aggressive enforcement,' the person added.
The turmoil and resulting inaction at an agency tasked with promoting overseas trade and safeguarding American technology are alarming both those seeking tougher restrictions on exports to China and companies trying to sell their wares abroad.
'Licensing is how the US does business and competes globally,' said Meghan Harris, who served on the National Security Council in the first Trump administration and has worked at Commerce.
'Delays and unpredictability put us at an unnecessary disadvantage.'
BIS averaged 38 days per export license application in fiscal year 2023, the most recent data available, denying 2 per cent of 37,943 applications.
The license process enforces US export restrictions in an effort to make sure sensitive goods and technology do not reach countries or entities whose use of the items could harm US national security.
Some staff have criticised Jeffrey Kessler, who became BIS undersecretary in March, saying he has micromanaged the bureau and failed to communicate adequately.
At a staff meeting soon after he took office,
Kessler urged BIS staff to limit communications with company representatives and industry officials, according to two additional sources, who said he later asked for all meetings to be entered on a spreadsheet.
Getting approval from Kessler's office to attend meetings with other government agencies has also been tricky, those sources said, speaking anonymously because they were not authorised to speak publicly.
The BIS spokesperson said Kessler 'is restoring integrity' to the bureau and enjoys Lutnick's 'full confidence.'
Frustration among exporters
Frustration is growing within US industry.
'We're seeing whole sectors where there is no movement or indication if or when licenses will be issued,' including license applications for semiconductor manufacturing equipment worth billions of dollars, said Sean Stein, president of the US-China Business Council.
While the clock is ticking on license applications, 'Chinese companies are exploring and doing deals with suppliers in China and other countries,' he said. 'The longer we have the delay, the more market share we're going to lose.'
Jim Anzalone, president of Compliance Assurance, a Florida-based trade consultancy, said he has seen delays in license approvals for sensors, radars, and sonar to Latin America and other parts of the world.
'There's nothing official about what the policy is and when the backlog would be cleared,' he said.
He has received denials sporadically after submitting some two dozen applications months ago to export semiconductor manufacturing equipment to China, including four denials on Wednesday, he added.
Sources stressed that some licenses are getting approved, especially exports to allied countries, and they noted that some communication with companies continues, especially around license applications.
Commerce is also delaying regulatory changes. The agency said in May it would rescind and replace a Biden administration rule before it went into effect that month restricting where AI chips can be exported, but the agency has not done so yet.
Other rules, which sources said have been drafted for months, have not been published, including one to expand export restrictions to subsidiaries of companies already banned from receiving controlled US exports.
Meanwhile, important staff vacancies such as China-based export control officers have not been filled, and high-level career employees have resigned. A retirement party was held this week for Dan Clutch, acting director of the BIS Office of Export Enforcement, the latest experienced staff member to leave. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
EU may have just deepened its reliance on the US, former Chinese envoy says
The latest trade deal between Brussels and Washington may deepen the European Union's economic and security dependence on the US and increase the risks to the bloc's pursuit of strategic autonomy, according to a senior Chinese diplomat. Shi Mingde, who served as China's ambassador to Germany from 2012 to 2019, gave his assessment of Sunday's transatlantic agreement to academics and reporters at an event in Beijing on Tuesday to mark 50 years of China-EU relations. The deal came hard on the heels of last Thursday's one-day EU-China summit in the Chinese capital, which also marked the 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties between China and the 27-member bloc. While Beijing has supported Europe's push for strategic autonomy, it has firmly rejected its de-risking policy – to reduce the EU's reliance on China – as a veiled attempt to contain Chinese growth, particularly in technology and the economy. 'The Europeans have proposed to reduce reliance to mitigate risk, but this reasoning is flawed,' Shi said. 'They claim that greater reliance leads to greater risk, yet their dependence on the United States remains even stronger – both in terms of security and economics – and the recent deal ... further reinforces the EU's dependence on the US in terms of security and the economy. 'So, will this agreement ultimately lead to greater strategic autonomy for Europe? Not yet.' Touted by US President Donald Trump as 'the biggest deal ever made', the agreement puts a 15 per cent tariff on most European imports to the United States, while the average rate on goods in the other direction will drop below one per cent, according to the White House. The EU has also agreed to buy US$750 billion in American energy and make US$600 billion in new investment in the United States – all by 2028. There have been concerns that a transatlantic agreement may increase Trump's leverage in the continuing trade talks with Beijing while allowing the US and the EU to refocus on their alignment in the competition with China. On Monday, EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic said that as part of the deal, Washington and Brussels would develop a metals alliance to mitigate the impact of subsidised Chinese products – notably 'steel, aluminium, copper and the derivatives' – on global markets. Without going into the agreement's details, Shi said that while Beijing's policy with the bloc had been 'consistent' and 'cooperative', it was the EU's own job to shape its future with major powers like the US, China and Russia. How Sino-EU relations develop would depend on how the bloc definef China, 'but the premise is how the EU defines itself in a turbulent world', he said. '[Would Brussels really] want a full-scale confrontation with Russia, comprehensive suppression by the US ... and an increasingly fractious relationship with China?' Despite the frictions in the relationship, China has positioned itself as a partner to Europe and has been encouraging the European Union to do more to assert its strategic autonomy. At last week's summit, expected to set the tone for China-EU relations, President Xi Jinping urged his visitors – European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen and the president of the European Council Antonio Costa – to make 'the right strategic choice'. Speaking before Shi at the same event, Di Dongsheng, professor and associate dean of the Renmin University of China's school of international studies, observed that the EU's policy on China had been largely influenced by Washington rather than Beijing. The results of a 2023 study by his team at Renmin University suggested there was a risk that the EU might use China as leverage if Brussels was pressed hard by the US, he said. The researchers analysed more than 200 million recorded events – including diplomatic engagement and conflicts – related to relations between China, the US and Washington's allies since 2009, when former president Barack Obama took office. 'Our research shows Europe's China policy isn't shaped by Beijing's actions at all – whether we're positive or negative makes no difference in the EU's attitude on China,' Di said. 'The real decider is America's stance towards China and, to a lesser extent, the United States' attitude towards the EU. 'In this sense, when the Europeans talk about cutting dependence on China, in the economy and supply chains, I think they should also be pursuing real political and strategic autonomy.' - South China Morning Post
Malay Mail
6 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Trump's 40pc tariff targets transshipped goods, with China squarely in the crosshairs
WASHINGTON, Aug 6 — As the United States ramps up tariffs on major trading partners globally, President Donald Trump is also disrupting strategies that could be used — by Chinese companies or others — to circumvent them. Goods deemed to be 'transshipped,' or sent through a third country with lower export levies, will face an additional 40-per cent duty under an incoming wave of Trump tariffs Thursday. The latest tranche of 'reciprocal' tariff hikes, taking aim at what Washington deems unfair trade practices, impacts dozens of economies from Taiwan to India. The transshipment rule does not name countries, but is expected to impact China significantly given its position as a manufacturing powerhouse. Washington likely wants to develop supply chains that are less reliant on China, analysts say, as tensions simmer between the world's two biggest economies and the US sounds the alarm on Beijing's excess industrial capacity. But 'it's a little more about the short-term effect of strengthening the tariff regime than it is about a decoupling strategy,' said Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council. 'The point is to make countries worried about it and then have them err on the side of not doing it, because they know that Trump could then jack up the tariff rates higher again,' he added, referring to tariff evasion. The possibility of a sharply higher duty is a 'perpetual stick in the negotiations' with countries, said Richard Stern, a tax and budget expert at the conservative Heritage Foundation. He told AFP that expanding penalties across the globe takes the focus away from Beijing alone. Alternative supplies Experts have noted that Vietnam was the biggest winner from supply chain diversions from China since the first Trump tariffs around 2018, when Washington and Beijing engaged in a trade war. And Brookings Institution senior fellow Robin Brooks pointed to signs this year of significant transshipments of Chinese goods. He noted in a June report that Chinese exports to certain South-east Asian countries started surging 'anomalously' in early 2025 as Trump threatened widespread levies. While it is unclear if all these products end up in the United States, Brooks cast doubt on the likelihood that domestic demand in countries like Thailand and Vietnam rocketed right when Trump imposed duties. 'One purpose of the transshipment provisions is to force the development of supply chains that exclude Chinese inputs,' said William Reinsch, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'The other purpose is to push back on Chinese overcapacity and force them to eat their own surpluses,' he added. But Washington's success in the latter goal depends on its ability to get other countries on board. 'The transshipment penalties are designed to encourage that,' Reinsch said. Lipsky added: 'The strategy that worked in the first Trump term, to try to offshore some Chinese manufacturing to other countries like Vietnam and Mexico, is going to be a much more difficult strategy to execute now.' China response? Lipsky noted that Beijing could see the transshipment clause as one targeting China on trade, 'because it is.' 'The question is, how China takes that in the broader context of what had been a thawing relationship between the US and China over the past two months,' he added. While both countries temporarily lowered triple-digit tariffs on each other's exports, that truce expires August 12. The countries are in talks to potentially extend the de-escalation, although the final decision lies with Trump. It will be tough to draw a line defining product origins, analysts say. Customs fraud has been illegal for some time, but it remains unclear how Washington will view materials from China or elsewhere that have been significantly transformed. The burden lies with customs authorities to identify transshipment and assess the increased duties. 'That will be difficult, particularly in countries that have close relations with China and no particular incentive to help US Customs and Border Protection,' Reinsch added. — AFP
Malay Mail
6 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘War' over US election maps heats up as both Republicans and Democrats redraw lines ahead of 2026 polls
WASHINGTON, Aug 6 — Donald Trump is pulling hard on the levers of power to strengthen Republicans through redistricting in Texas and other states — the latest offensive in escalating moves by both sides to shape the battlefield of US democracy for the midterm elections. The president's efforts have lit a fuse in multiple states, triggering a high-stakes tussle over election law that could upend what is expected to be a fierce fight for control of the House of Representatives in 2026. Partisan redistricting — or gerrymandering — operates under a principle that has become known as 'packing and cracking.' Officials redrawing the districts in any given state 'pack' opposition voters together so that they win big in a tiny number of districts. Then they 'crack' the rest more thinly across the remaining districts to ensure losses there. It isn't inherently illegal at the federal level unless electoral districts are redrawn along racial lines and both parties have been guilty of excessive manipulation to maximise their vote. 'I'd be happy to outlaw gerrymandering,' Democratic strategist Mike Nellis, a former top aide to 2024 presidential candidate Kamala Harris, posted on X. 'I think it's ridiculous for politicians to draw their own maps, but I'm not for unilateral disarmament when Republicans are trying to rig the midterms.' Redistricting typically happens once a decade after the census, but lawmakers have increasingly been inclined to break with that tradition. While Trump coasted to victory in 2024, his success wasn't contagious, and his party was left clinging to the House by a threadbare 219-212 margin. Historically, the party in the White House loses ground in midterms, and Trump's team knows the clock is ticking. To tighten his grip, the president has leaned on Texas to redraw its congressional map to create five new Republican-friendly seats. But Trump and his party are not stopping with the Lone Star State, according to US media. Republicans in Missouri and Ohio are planning their own redistricting to boost their representation in Washington, while Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has made noises about addressing the 'raw deal' conservatives got in the last Sunshine State redistricting round. Democratic counteroffensives Meanwhile, Democratic governors are preparing their own counteroffensives. In California, Gavin Newsom has floated a potential special election to redraw the map — a dramatic reversal in a state where redistricting power has belonged to an independent commission since the 2010s. In Illinois, JB Pritzker recently hosted a delegation of Texas Democrats to talk strategy. And in New York, Kathy Hochul hinted at a redistricting push of her own, telling a Buffalo crowd, 'If other states are violating the rules, I'm going to look at it closely.' Gerrymandering is hardly a new phenomenon in US elections, but the latest escalation has sparked fears of what Hochul cast as a nationwide partisan 'war.' Opponents say gerrymandering entrenches politicians, pushes candidates toward ideological extremes and erodes public trust in the democratic process. It is also a risky business, and even the best-laid maps can collapse under the shifting ground of demographic changes and political overreach that tends to spark a legal backlash. The term 'gerrymandering' dates back to 1812, when Massachusetts Governor Elbridge Gerry approved a salamander-shaped district that sparked the term. As the salamander digs in for 21st century elections, the consequences are more far-reaching. According to the Cook Political Report, just one in 16 House seats were competitive in 2024 — 12 held by Democrats and 15 held by Republicans, out of a total of 435. Democrats believe Trump's latest push may have crossed a legal line by coordinating with local Texas officials, citing the president's July 15 comment that with 'just a simple redrawing, we pick up five seats.' They also point to reports that senior Trump aides met with Texas Republicans to finalise plans. But Daron Shaw, a politics professor at the University of Texas, said it was 'curious' to blame Trump for the problem, given that deeply Democratic California is the country's most 'egregious gerrymander.' Liberal Illinois, Maryland and Massachusetts were also at fault, he told AFP. 'It's especially kind of rich coming from people in California and Illinois that have gerrymander significantly more egregious than exists in Texas,' he added. — AFP
