Motsoeneng is ‘abusing the legal process' with latest ConCourt appeal, believes SIU head Mothibi
Is former SABC executive Hlaudi Motsoeneng abusing the legal process by appealing against a ConCourt decision ordering him to pay back money to the entity? The SIU's Andy Mothibi told Parliament he firmly believed this was the case.
'We are of the view that Mr Motsoeneng is really abusing the legal process,' said Andy Mothibi, the head of the Special Investigating Unit (SIU), about the latest appeal by Hlaudi Motsoeneng against paying back money he unlawfully gained during his tenure as a chief executive at the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC).
The SIU briefed Parliament's Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) – the public purse watchdog – on its investigations into the SABC and the State Information Technology Agency. Wednesday was the second day of hearings into the affairs of both agencies.
On Wednesday, MPs kept raising issues around Motsoeneng and his court attempts to not pay back a 'success fee' for his role in securing a MultiChoice deal. In August 2016, Motsoeneng was paid R11.5-million by the SABC.
Eventually, the high court would declare this transaction as unlawful and invalid. Motsoeneng was ordered to repay the R11.5-million – plus interest. This brought the total to about R18-million.
Motsoeneng lost an appeal at the Supreme Court to overturn the ruling, as Daily Maverick reported in May 2024.
News24 reported in 2024 that an attempt by Motsoeneng to bring the case to the Constitutional Court was rejected on a jurisdictional basis.
In Parliament on Wednesday, 23 April 2025, the SIU revealed that Motsoeneng has now applied for leave to appeal against the ConCourt decision, which is being opposed by the SABC and the SIU.
According to the SIU, Motsoeneng brought an urgent interdict to stop the SIU and SABC's execution and attachment of his assets. In October 2024, when the SIU's attorneys arrived at court, they found that Motsoeneng's attorneys had not issued and enrolled the urgent stay application.
The SIU also said in its presentation to Parliament that on 13 November 2024, it submitted its input on the draft affidavit in Motsoeneng's second application to the ConCourt.
During Wednesday's briefing, several MPs raised questions around the issue – even questioning how Motsoeneng could be appointed at the public broadcaster.
Ultimately, Mothibi said the SIU was of the view that Motsoeneng was abusing the legal process.
Mothibi said while everyone had the right to legal recourse, 'I am of the view that he is abusing the legal process' by going back to the ConCourt, even after the country's highest court had already ruled against him.
'It baffles me,' said Mothibi.
He told MPs that he hoped the courts issued 'appropriate costs in that regard'.
Daily Maverick tried to contact Motsoeneng – who has now turned to politics, forming his own party called the African Content Movement – for comment, but he did not respond to our communications on Wednesday.
This isn't the first time that Mothibi has told Parliament about frustrations with Motsoeneng. In November 2024, News24 reported that Mothibi expressed his frustrations in Parliament with attempts to have Motsoeneng pay back the money. DM
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
29 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell: Scamming is a big business — be alert and make sure you're safe
The world is awash with people trying to steal your assets. Even big-name investors have been duped. Be careful out there. I am sure that whatever money you have wasn't easy to get – you and your family worked really hard for it. But have you ever noticed how so many people are trying to steal it from you? There are some days when it seems that literally everyone is out to take it. So often, there is a news report of someone who has fleeced people of their money. The latest was a News 24 report about Mark Kretzschmar, who claimed he could make money for people and who was able to run away with about R30-million. Moneyweb has done important reporting about the company Kleuterzone and its founder, former singer Anthonie Bougas. He now appears to be in Thailand, but is not paying the money owed to investors. Like so many of these cases, he makes certain claims that always amount to the same thing: someone else is responsible, not him. If you have been paying attention to this sort of thing, you will know about Banxso, which was a scam from the start. There are so many ways our society enables this. For a start, regulators find it tough to take any action, or to do it early enough to stop people from losing their money. I have some sympathy for the Financial Sector Conduct Authority here. I mean, no one will complain about losing their money until they've lost it. And by that point, it is usually too late. This means that in some cases, a group of people are giving money to someone, all at the same time, and it's only when one of them realises it's gone that they lodge a complaint. There would have to be an investigation of some kind, and only after that can the FSCA say anything. But I have no time at all for the digital platforms that allow themselves to be used to market these thieves. For several months, there were videos on YouTube of SABC TV presenters supposedly talking about a new investment product. Elon Musk was another who was deep-faked. Now, YouTube e arns more than $30-billion in revenue every year. Is it too much to ask that it does some checking to see if it is taking money from a thief? And to have a proper complaints mechanism where a TV presenter who is being deep-faked can make sure her image is removed immediately? I do wonder how much revenue for YouTube is from simple scams, whether it be a lose-your-money-quick scheme, or that guy who clearly can't sleep at night because he's so worried about my belly fat. If this has happened to you, you shouldn't think it was because you were stupid. Recently, big-name investors, including Sanlam Investments and Old Mutual Alternative Investments, lost up to R700-million after being conned by a company called Enable Capital. The Public Investment Corporation lost another R100-million in the same scam. The person behind it, Reuben Oliphant, seems to have… you guessed it… disappeared. And sometimes, someone appears to have almost found a way to scam someone out of their money legally. Last week, the JSE publicly censured Iqbal Surve's AYO Technology Solutions and issued a suspended fine of R500,000. This was because AYO had withheld information from shareholders about its settlement with the PIC that involved it re-purchasing some of its shares. But it seems the people, sorry person, behind AYO will get away with it. Much of the money the PIC put into AYO through its investment was taken out in the form of dividends. Dividends that make no sense compared with what the company has actually produced. As a result, the money is gone. The PIC will never get it back and someone has clearly benefited. The real poison of this kind of thing is that it makes the scheme look almost legitimate. In a society where so few understand how markets, capital and investments work, it's easy to simply think people are rich because they were born rich – or because they stole their money from someone else. This kind of incident, where someone can literally lie to shareholders (thus possibly depriving them of money) and get away with it, will consolidate that view. Scamming is now big business. In Myanmar alone, there are thought to be around 150,000 people being held against their will in what amounts to prison camps, and forced to try to scam people online. Just think about that number for a moment. It is simply unbelievable how big this industry has become. To run prison camps for that many people requires capital. They wouldn't do it if they weren't making serious cash out of it. Can you imagine the nightmare of being a person who has been, you guessed it, scammed into going there, and finding themselves in one of these camps? I'm not qualified to tell you how to keep your money safe. But please. Please, please, please, make sure that you do. DM
The Citizen
9 hours ago
- The Citizen
Giyani mayor tables infrastructure-focused 2025/26 budget
LIMPOPO – Giyani Mayor Thandi Zitha has officially tabled the municipality's budget for the 2025/26 financial year, focusing on infrastructure development, improved service delivery, and financial sustainability. In her address, Zitha outlined a range of capital projects aimed at uplifting various communities within the municipality, some of which have previously made headlines due to delays or stalled progress. These include the Section E Sports Centre, which has been allocated R10 million for the refurbishment of its vandalised infrastructure, and the Mageva Sports Centre, which also received R10 million for the extension of its pitch. Additionally, R14 million has been set aside for the upgrading of streets from gravel to paving in Section E. A further R5 million has been allocated for the construction of market stalls in Sections A and C, areas situated near Nkhensani Hospital and Letaba TVET College. A significant portion of the budget includes R30.4 million for street upgrades in Khakhala village, R21.9 million for internal street upgrades in N'wamankena village, and R26.5 million for similar projects in Babangu village. 'We have also set aside R11.5 million for basic electricity infrastructure to ensure that households without access to electricity are provided with an essential power supply,' explained the mayor. However, despite these ambitious development plans, the municipality projects a slight decline in income for the 2025/26 financial year, with projected revenue decreasing from R687.8 million in 2024/25 to R673 million in the current financial year starting in July. Nevertheless, revenue from property rates and refuse services continues to play a vital role in the municipality's finances. Meanwhile, for the 2025/26 financial year, income from these sources is expected to total R101.8 million, with a steady increase to R106.4 million in 2026/27 and R111.1 million in 2027/28, as outlined in the Medium-Term Revenue and Expenditure Framework. The mayor emphasised the importance of adjusting tariffs to reflect the actual cost of delivering municipal services in line with the Local Government Municipal Systems Act. According to her, this approach will enable the municipality to generate sufficient revenue to fully cover service costs, ensure sustainable delivery, and invest in critical infrastructure. She also urged residents to settle their outstanding municipal accounts, stating that doing so plays a vital role in enabling the municipality to provide improved services such as water, sanitation, and waste management. 'We have incentives that we give to individuals that settle their accounts with the municipality, such as massive discounts and others, so please use this opportunity to clear your debts and assist in stabilising the municipality's financial position,' she said, urging all residents to pay for municipal services. Meanwhile, the total budget expenditure for the 2024/25 financial year was recorded at R916.8 million. However, this amount has been reduced by R10 million in the following year, bringing the total projected expenditure for the 2025/26 financial year down to R906.8 million. This was welcomed by several opposition parties as a step towards achieving sustainable and cost-saving operations. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Eyewitness News
10 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Still unknown if Meyiwa judge will apologise for rebuke directed at a defence lawyer
JOHANNESBURG - It remains to be seen if the judge presiding over the long-running Senzo Meyiwa trial will heed calls to apologise for a harsh rebuke directed at one of the defence lawyers. Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng came under fire during proceedings last week when he criticised Advocate Charles Mnisi for excusing himself from Monday's sitting. Mnisi sent a message to the court's registrar that he would be returning from KwaZulu-Natal after running Sunday's Comrades Marathon. In SABC footage from last week's proceedings, a frustrated Mokgoatlheng pulled no punches. "This is South Africa, run by blacks. I can tell you now, even if you call me an Uncle Tom, I don't think a white advocate would have the gall to ask me that. Never." Some legal analysts have since labelled the judge's comments as racial profiling. The chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Justice in Parliament, Xola Nqola, said the comments border on racism. READ: Long-running Senzo Meyiwa murder trial expected to resume in court Nqola said while the judge's concerns about continued delays are warranted, 'it is totally unacceptable to imply black legal professionals act unprofessionally compared to their white counterparts,' calling for Mokgoatlheng to refrain from such gross generalisations. The justice committee is now calling for a withdrawal of the comments and a public apology from the judge. Despite the judge's refusal to push proceedings out by a day, Mnisi ran the Comrades Marathon and could be seen on social media posing after crossing the finish line in his J37137 race tag. Mnisi is representing two of the five men on trial for the 2014 murder of the Bafana Bafana captain.
