
Art of the deal: What drives President Trump and what can India do in the tariff talks?
In fact, his style of deal-making is quite simple and straightforward—aim very high and 'then keep pushing and pushing and pushing to get what you're after'.
This is exactly what's playing out as far as the Indo-US trade pact is concerned. But with India refusing to dance to the beat, Trump decided that sometimes it pays to be a little wild. So, he slapped India with 50% tariffs, making it the most heavily taxed US trading partner in Asia.
Suddenly, India is caught in an awkward moment and is unable to identify itself as friend or foe with the US.
The US tariff on Indian goods now stands at 50%—25% effective August 7, and another 25% to take effect from August 27. Preliminary estimates suggest that some 55% of India's merchandise exports to the US would be covered by the initial 25% tariff, which is expected to cut GDP by 0.2-0.4%. In absolute numbers, the 25% tariff could lead to an erosion of Rs 37,593 crore to Rs 75,188 crore worth of national output. The actual price of the tariffs could be even higher.
But Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his trade team seem to know Trump's negotiation tactics all too well. So, they maintained calm, issuing only a brief statement about protecting national interests at all costs.
Exceptionally, this is minimal and to the point.
That's because, as Trump wrote in his book, 'The worst thing you can possibly do in a deal is seem desperate to make it. That makes the other guy smell blood, and then you're dead. The best thing you can do is deal from strength, and leverage is the biggest strength you can have. Leverage is having something the other guy wants. Or better yet, needs. Or best of all, simply can't do without.'
In fact, Trump insists on not going into deal-making without having leverage.
Unfortunately, India doesn't have that luxury and has only a few bargaining chips at its disposal. Put another way, Modi desperately needs what Trump calls 'imagination and salesmanship' to convince the US that it's in its own interest to get a deal going.
Even after five intense rounds of trade talks, the negotiations failed to yield any results, marking a critical moment in the bilateral relationship between the US and India. Luckily, you don't win or lose in one or a few more rounds. Given that the talks are still ongoing, India is now reassessing its strategy to secure the base tariff of 10-15%, which countries like Japan, the UK and the European Union have all managed to crack.
But that looks like a tall task right now, particularly given Trump's repeated rants about India and its economy. For the government, the problem was what Trump says each day, while for the markets the absurdity of his remarks are like head colds, which come and go. Critics, however, see it as the end of the Trump-Modi bromance.
All said, India has a little over a fortnight to avoid the additional 25% levy for importing Russian oil. India is not the only buyer of Russian oil and there are other guzzlers like China, Turkey and Europe. Still, India unexpectedly landed in Washington's crosshairs and much will depend on whether the US can pressure Russia and Ukraine toward a ceasefire, using the threat of tariffs on India as leverage.
For now, though, India's worst fears have materialised with the latest tariffs, as Urjit Patel, former RBI Governor noted. "One hopes that this is short-term, and that talks around a trade deal slated to make progress this month will go ahead. Otherwise, a needless trade war, whose contours are difficult to gauge at this early juncture, will likely ensue," he wrote recently in his LinkedIn post.
The tariffs on Russian oil are yet to roll out, but Trump has already claimed success in hitting Moscow's economy. According to him, the Russian economy was struggling due to global pressures and the conflict, and he insisted that his tariffs on India for purchasing Russian oil delivered a big blow to Moscow's economy.
The question is whether Modi will abandon trading ties with Russia or stand firm against the US. For now, the government has avoided confrontation and has no intentions of going mob-handed against the US. That said, it's urgently exploring strategic alignments with other trading partners, including China.
Breaking a five-year drought, Modi is all set to visit China for the regional Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit—his first since the 2020 Galwan border clashes—while Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to hunker down in Delhi sometime this year. Brazil, which too is facing punitive levies of 50% on exports to the US, wants to join forces. Its President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva spoke recently with Modi and called for a joint response.
Separately, India has reportedly paused a $3.6 billion deal to acquire Boeing jets and importantly, with the RBI quietly allowing Indian banks to open foreign rupee accounts sans approvals, the government took a rather bold step towards de-dollarisation.
With bilateral trade valued at over $190 billion and India's ambition to increase it to $500 billion by 2030, both sides will have much to lose if the stand-off escalates and the implications of a failed deal will be far-reaching for both.
Most deals do fall out, no matter how promising they seem at first. But the unravelling of what seemed like a historic deal between the world's largest economy and the world's fastest-growing economy only confirms the sensitive nature of dealing with President Trump, who's as obsessive, driven and sometimes almost maniacal.
But as far as his real estate deals are concerned, Trump claimed that he won them by wearing everyone else down. And now, he's hammering the same strategy on trading partners and is expecting a similar victory.
What exactly did Trump's business deals add up to in the end? He doesn't have 'a very good answer', except to claim that he had a very good time making them.
Perhaps for Trump's trade deals, too, the real excitement is playing the game itself.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
21 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Keep alive ideals for which countless lives were given
As we gather once more under the fluttering Tricolour, my heart is filled with both pride and humility. Seventy-eight years ago, our beloved nation broke free from the shackles of colonial subjugation and feudal exploitation. That victory was not merely the transfer of power, it was the awakening of a people, long suppressed, who dared to dream of dignity, equality, and self-governance. Independence did not come to us as a gift, it was wrested through generations of sacrifice by the fearless revolutionaries who challenged imperial might, by the progressive thinkers who dismantled the walls of ignorance and superstition, and by the rationalists who lit the torch of reason and modernity. They imagined an India where justice would not be a privilege but a birthright, where opportunity would not be reserved for the few but extended to every citizen. This day is not only a commemoration of our political liberation, it is a reminder of the unfinished journey towards deeper, truer Independence. True freedom is realised when no child is denied education, when no family sleeps hungry, when the farmer's toil is honoured with fair reward, when women walk without fear, and when every Indian, regardless of caste, creed, gender, or region, has the ability to dream and the means to achieve. It was with this vision that the architects of modern India gave us a Constitution rooted in liberty, equality, fraternity, and justice. These values are not mere words on parchment, they are the living promises we must uphold, protect, and renew with every generation. In an age of rapid technological transformation, we must also nurture the scientific temper our freedom fighters cherished, ensuring that progress serves humanity and strengthens the bonds of our unity. In Karnataka, we have sought to carry forward that mission of true independence through our transformative Guarantee Schemes. By ensuring food security, financial support for women, free bus travel for our sisters, uninterrupted electricity for homes, and direct assistance for youth, we are removing the everyday barriers that prevent people from realising their aspirations. Economic hardship, social discrimination, and identity-based exclusion must never be chains that bind our people. Our goal is to create a society where every citizen, irrespective of their birth, background, or beliefs, can walk forward with confidence, dignity, and equal opportunity. Independence Day must inspire in us not complacency, but commitment and a resolve to confront inequality, to heal divisions, and to build an India where prosperity is shared, the environment is cherished, and every voice is heard. The task before us is immense, but so is the strength of our people. On this sacred day, I extend my warmest greetings to the people of Karnataka and to the team at The Hindu, whose service in upholding democratic discourse and the spirit of inquiry honours the legacy of our freedom struggle. We should pledge to keep alive the ideals for which countless lives were given, and to pass on to future generations a nation more just, more compassionate, and more vibrant than the one we inherited. Jai Hind. Siddaramaiah is the Chief Minister of Karnataka.


The Hindu
21 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Many languages, one India
78 Years of Freedom Linguistic diversity and multilingual ethos are among the fundamental characteristics of India. This feature is nothing new to the country, as, even in the olden times, the territory, encompassing the present India, was home to several languages such as Sanskrit, Tamil, Pali, Prakrit, and Persian, apart from being open to positive influence of many foreign languages. It is quite evident that the country has been having a long and healthy tradition of multilingualism in contrast to the unilingual identity which once shaped the European model of nation-state. Being home to five language families (Indo-European [Aryan, Iranian & Germanic], Dravidian, Austro-Asiatic, Tibeto-Burmese and Semito-Hamitic), India had, by the end of 19th century, 179 languages and 544 dialects, according to Sir George Grierson's Linguistic Survey of India (1903-1923). A document of the Centre's Education Department, citing a 1989 publication, states that 'there are at least 50 Indian languages in which writing and publishing are done in substantial quantity.' The 2011 Census, the last such exercise, assigns 22 scheduled languages, meaning that they figure in the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution, and 99 non-scheduled languages to the five language families. These 121 languages and 270 mother tongues are grouped under different languages as per the Census. Indian literature is a testimony to the country's rich heritage, intellectual, social, historical and cultural. It has also contributed to continuity of the social value system of the people, while keeping in tune with changes that sweep the world. The Sahitya Akademi, India's national academy of letters, preserves and promotes literature in 24 languages, including English. Literary traditions of the different languages are strong and healthy, highlighting the idea of oneness. Backdoor entry Given this backdrop, any attempt by those in power to force a monoculture or monolingualism, overtly or covertly, would not find takers. It is this factor that operates behind fears and concerns of people in the southern region of the country that their language or culture might get subsumed in the pursuit of any political project towards uniformity. The National Education Policy (NEP), 2020, despite clearly avoiding the aspect of mandatory Hindi learning unlike in the previous two policy documents of 1968 and 1986, is still viewed by sections of society in the South as one that seeks to facilitate the backdoor entry of Hindi, as it also subscribes to the three-language formula in school education. In fact, the recent controversy in Maharashtra over making the learning of Hindi mandatory as the third language in the primary classes (Grade 1 to 5) of all English and Marathi medium schools following the State Board stream and the subsequent withdrawal of the move has added to the apprehensions regarding the issue of Hindi imposition. Though political considerations outweighed other reasons for the Maharashtra government's decision to retract its decision, the outburst of opposition in the western State — its capital, Mumbai, is the nerve centre of Hindi cinema — has only highlighted the delicate social equilibrium with regard to the language question. As a matter of policy, Tamil Nadu is the only southern State that has been opposing the three-language formula. Its stand on the issue —continued opposition to the formula that has been stipulated under the NEP, 2020 — is costing the State quite substantially even in monetary terms, as the BJP-led Union government has not released to the DMK-ruled State about ₹2,152 crore under the Samagra Shiksha Scheme (SSS) which includes the Centre's share towards the Right to Education (RTE) component. Despite differing with Tamil Nadu on the formula issue, Kerala, where the LDF regime is in power for the 10th successive year, is, however, opposed to the imposition of Hindi. Even as high-profile representatives of the Central government continue to assure non-Hindi speakers that there will not be imposition, the suspicion arises in the minds of the latter because they use every opportunity not only to project themselves as custodians of the Hindi language but also to run down Western (English) education. There is nothing wrong in making efforts to provide the medium of instruction in the mother tongue of students and getting educational materials written in such languages, but, in the name of any such work, there is no need to demonstrate aversion towards English, whose value as a language has much wider connotations than any other Indian language. Give and take In fact, this principle — no aversion towards any language — holds good for those who complain about Hindi imposition, as some of them do exhibit opposition to Hindi and Sanskrit on the ground that the two languages represent the 'cultural hegemony' of North India. What should not be forgotten is that every language, including those in the Dravidian family, benefits by having constant interactions with one another, apart from influencing one another. In this regard, various forms of fine arts and writing in each language have displayed how they absorb, assimilate and embellish themselves by observing the works of other languages. Indian cinema is one such platform where cross-pollination happens frequently. Ideally, the mother tongue should be the medium of instruction at least in primary education. But, over the years, lack of importance to language studies in schools has produced at least one generation of parents whose knowledge of their mother tongue itself is not sound. Moreover, the policy of making the learning of local language mandatory in some States, including Tamil Nadu and Telangana, up to Grade 10 in all schools, regardless of the stream, creates difficulties for students, whose parents migrate to such States when their children are midway through school education. Under such circumstances, the State governments and school managements need to be flexible, considerate and imaginative in permitting students to continue their studies in the English medium of instruction. No language is a divisive tool. This has to be kept in mind by everyone who should have respect for all other languages, while being conscious of the greatness of their mother tongue. It is time to put an end to weaponising language for political pursuits and the governments, both at the Centre and in States, should take meaningful steps to promote and preserve the Indian languages.


Economic Times
21 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India to set data standards for developed nations to follow: CEA
(You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel New Delhi: India will soon set the global standards and benchmark in data, chief economic adviser (CEA) V Anantha Nageswaran said on Thursday. "We are now going to be able to set the benchmark for developed countries to follow" the CEA said, pointing to concerns over data quality US President Donald Trump fired the labour statistics chief for publishing inaccurate jobs numbers. In the UK, the statistical authority has called for structural reforms within the organisation. Speaking at a sensitisation and review meeting with statistical advisers of ministries and government departments organised by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI), Nageswaran noted the importance of generating timely, credible and user-friendly data."It goes without saying that data and statistics are fundamental to an efficient or informed decision-making process, whether in a corporate setup or government institution," he said. Speaking at the meeting, former Capacity Building Commission chairman Adil Zainulbhai said: "We have an opportunity to upgrade enough for our data systems to become gold standard for the world." He highlighted the need to leverage technology for this purpose across ministries and an aim to make data more robust, the statistics ministry will come up with a Service Production Index , like the Index of Industrial Production (IIP) that tracks industrial activity in India.