logo
Can you still own multiple properties in Singapore? Here's what you need to know in 2025, Money News

Can you still own multiple properties in Singapore? Here's what you need to know in 2025, Money News

AsiaOne25-05-2025
It's hard to argue that multiple property ownership is much tougher today, compared to the property heydays of the early '00s.
For those who haven't been in the property market for some time, the regulatory environment in 2025 can come as a shock: cooling measures have made owning more than one property a lot tougher, and potentially less lucrative, for investors.
Whether you're new or just returning to the Singapore property market, here are the key changes to consider today: 1. Impact of the ABSD on multi-home ownership
As of 2025, the Additional Buyers Stamp Duty (ABSD) is 20 per cent of the price or valuation (whichever is higher) on the second property, and 30 per cent on the third property or subsequent. For Permanent Residents (PRs), it's 30 per cent on the second property and 35 per cent on the third or subsequent property.
Note that this still has no bearing on a "sell one, buy two" strategy, though. This is because using such an approach, each buyer has a property count of only one (e.g., after a family sells the property, each spouse has one home under their own name, thus having separate mortgages but not incurring ABSD).
But the extent of the ABSD is such that, if you cannot avoid it (such as decoupling a condo unit to buy two), it becomes much more discouraging. One example of this is choosing to retain your HDB flat, while buying a condo to rent out (or vice versa).
The price of the typical resale condo (as of April 2025) averaged $1,734 psf. Assuming you purchase a 900 sq ft resale unit, this would be about $1.56 million. The 20 per cent ABSD would come to about $312,000.
Assuming the 900 sq ft unit is rented out for around $4,000 to $4,500 per month (typical for most non-central condos in 2025), this could come to over five or six years of rental income just to cover the ABSD alone; a number that's clearly not viable or attractive to most investors.
There are, to be blunt, few reasons to retain your flat while purchasing a condo in 2025 — even if you can rent one out. If there are reasons, it will likely be due to factors such as wanting to provide housing for children (e.g., a one-bedder near NUS if they're studying) or having to retain the flat because you may need to move back one day.
One possible way to bypass ABSD is to purchase a dual-key unit, but this doesn't seem to be catching on.
A dual-key unit is a single unit that is subdivided into two. This still counts as a single unit, so there's no ABSD involved. In theory, you could rent out one side, whilst living in the other, with no loss of privacy.
However, this doesn't seem to be catching on, perhaps because dual-key units also tend to be larger. This raises their quantum which, coupled with having only one tenant, could be seen to balance out the advantages of avoiding ABSD.
As an aside, the higher ABSD rates indirectly constrain resale supply as well
If you purchased your second or subsequent home before the ABSD rates were raised, you can probably sense why fewer people in your position would want to sell.
There's definitely an emotional barrier if you didn't incur ABSD (or much lower ABSD) when you bought in earlier times, but would incur a 20 per cent ABSD if you sold and bought another second property today.
This can also impact en-bloc sales, as those who have rental units in the development may not feel the sale proceeds cover the ABSD, on a replacement investment property. 2. Impact of Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio limits on multi-home ownership
LTV limits have shrunk over the years, now capped at 75 per cent even for the first property.
If you have an outstanding home loan, the second property has an LTV of just 45 per cent; and this falls further to 35 per cent on the third or subsequent outstanding loan. In addition, the minimum cash downpayment falls to 25 per cent, if you have one or more outstanding home loans.
So if you haven't finished paying off your existing condo unit, the minimum down payment for your second property — assuming a price of around $1.8 million for a two-bedder — would be $990,000. Of this amount, $450,000 has to be in cash.
This is another reason some families place the entire mortgage on one spouse, when they first purchase a home — it frees up a chance for the other spouse to take the full 75 per cent LTV on a second property. 3. Impact of the TDSR on multi-home ownership
The Total Debt Servicing Ratio (TDSR) was introduced in 2013, and is one of the most significant changes from the prior decade. Under the TDSR, your monthly loan repayments — inclusive of other debts (personal loans, car loans, etc.) — cannot exceed 55 per cent of your monthly income.
TDSR is calculated based on a floor rate of four per cent per annum (regardless of the actual interest rate, even though the actual rate tends to be lower), and sources of variable income count as being 30 per cent lower for TDSR calculations.
The latter fact is important for those who are already landlords. If your current rental income is $4,000 per month, for instance, it only counts as $2,800 per month for the purposes of TDSR calculations. If you're purely a landlord and only have rental income, this does make it a lot tougher for you to secure financing on another property.
Consider an existing landlord making $8,000 a month from rent (for simplicity's sake, let's say he has no other income, and no other sources of debt): Gross Monthly Rental Income: $8,000
Adjusted Income (after 30 per cent haircut): $8,000 × 70 per cent = $5,600
TDSR limit (55 per cent of adjusted income): $5,600 × 55 per cent = $3,080
Assuming he could still get a 25-year loan (this is dependent on his age), and a floor rate of four per cent, this would cap his maximum loan amount at roughly $583,500.
Given that resale non-landed homes average $1,734 psf and new launches average $2,626 psf, the quantum of even a 700 sq ft two-bedder is about $1.21 million (resale) and $1.83 million (new launch). This makes expanding into a third property quite challenging, especially after you add in the 20 per cent ABSD. 4. Real cash-flow considerations in multi-home ownership
Non-owner occupied properties (i.e., anything rented out) have higher property tax rates. This is on a tiered system based on your property's Annual Valuation (AV), which is determined by IRAS and the Chief Valuer: Annual Value Tax rate First $30,000 12per cent Next $15,000 20per cent Next $15,000 28per cent Any subsequent amount above $60,000 36per cent
Assuming the government decides your property can make $4,500 a month* and it's rented out, you'd pay: $3,600 + $3,000 + $2,520 = $9,120 per year, or about $760 per month in property tax.
This has to be coupled with condo maintenance fees (roughly $400 per month in most mass-market condos), as well as the costs of own-unit maintenance (fixing broken kitchen appliances, replacing sagging doors, etc)
*Remember the AV is not the literal amount you rent out the property for — it's set by the government. Usually it's generous, and set lower than real rental income, though.
Example of cash flow assuming $4,500 per month in rent: Gross Rental Income: $54,000 per year
Less Property Tax: $9,120 (we'll assume the AV matches the real rental income, for simplicity's sake)
Less Maintenance Fees: $4,800
This is a net cash flow of about $40,080 per year, or about $3,340 per month. This is if you don't also have any mortgage repayments. If you still have mortgage repayments, however, it's unlikely that you'll be cash flow positive.
Multiple property ownership is definitely more challenging in Singapore in 2025
This doesn't make it impossible, but it does mean you need to start earlier if you can — once age begins to limit your maximum loan tenure, for example, the monthly loan repayments will rise, and make it harder to meet the TDSR.
It also means you should work out with your spouse, earlier on, the manner of holding for each property. Remember that you cannot decouple for HDB flats (i.e., transfer ownership fully to just one spouse) just to buy a second property for the family, so it can sometimes make sense for the flat's mortgage to be under just one name.
This may also necessitate starting with a smaller flat, such as a 3-room instead of a 4-room, so that it's viable on one person's income.
Finally, a sense of realism is needed in the current market. Depending on your finances, it sometimes makes sense not to own multiple properties, and simply share the load of upgrading to a single larger home.
[[nid:717813]]
This article was first published in Stackedhomes.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Only 4 out of 11 stalls are open: This Bukit Batok food court has been dubbed the 'saddest' in Singapore, Singapore News
Only 4 out of 11 stalls are open: This Bukit Batok food court has been dubbed the 'saddest' in Singapore, Singapore News

AsiaOne

time2 days ago

  • AsiaOne

Only 4 out of 11 stalls are open: This Bukit Batok food court has been dubbed the 'saddest' in Singapore, Singapore News

With just four out of the 11 available stalls open, a food court at Le Quest Mall in Bukit Batok has been dubbed on social media as 'saddest Koufu in Singapore'. Already grappling with low footfall, its remaining stall owners' fortunes took a further hit after a new hawker centre opened next door in March. Jenny Lim's mixed rice stall, which she runs with her husband, has been a mainstay at the Koufu food court since it opened five years ago. When asked by AsiaOne on Friday (Aug 15) how much they make in a month, Lim, 57, said: 'Why don't you ask us what our losses are like instead?' Her answer? A staggering $8,000 in losses each month. She declined to reveal the cost of renting the stall and other operating costs. A video posted on TikTok on Aug 14 showed the near-empty food court with seven vacant stalls — some of them still bearing their signboards. 'Only drinks, cai fan (economy rice), western and chicken [rice stalls]. The saddest Koufu in Singapore,' said user yokey017 in the caption. The video has since garnered over 157,000 views and 1,000 likes. @yokey017 saddest koufu in sg. #singapore ♬ original sound - Gian Hakdog - Raymark When AsiaOne visited on Aug 15 and 16 during the lunch hour, fewer than 30 diners were seen there. In contrast, the nearby Bukit Batok West Hawker Centre next door was buzzing with patrons. Lim told AsiaOne that while business started slow in the first year, it gradually improved as residents from the newly built HDB blocks in Tengah and Bukit Batok began moving in. But her stall has been making substantial losses since early this year. While the opening of another food court drew diners away, Lim believes the desolate atmosphere of the food court did not help either. 'There are more flies than people here,' she said. 'No one likes to eat in an empty food court.' As the longest-surviving stall owners at the food court, Lim and her husband have witnessed a constant turnover of other stalls. Likening it to a revolving door of vendors coming and going, she said: 'The (Japanese/Korean) stall changed hands more than five times. 'There were also some stalls that choose to continue paying renting, but prefer not to open for business.' Asked about the future of their stall, Lim said that it is up to Koufu management to decide. While their lease ends next year, she added that 'if the management ask us to shut, we will shut'. Tao, who has been managing the Japanese/Korean stall for over a year, is not bothered by the foodcourt's 'saddest' reputation. 'It's true that it has been really quiet here', he said. 'But it can't be helped, we will just continue to run our stalls the best we can.' Responding to AsiaOne's queries, a spokesperson for Koufu said that lease for its food court at Le Quest Mall is ending in October. 'We remain committed to serving our customers until the lease concludes,' it added. Chingshijie@

Snap Insight: NDR 2025 – ‘ulu' no more, northern Singapore is set to be central in its own way
Snap Insight: NDR 2025 – ‘ulu' no more, northern Singapore is set to be central in its own way

CNA

time2 days ago

  • CNA

Snap Insight: NDR 2025 – ‘ulu' no more, northern Singapore is set to be central in its own way

SINGAPORE: It is the morning peak hour, but people crossing green spaces and an open plaza to get to tall office blocks do not look particularly harried. Some stroll over from the Housing and Development Board (HDB) estate, others stream out from the MRT station – one could think this is a scene out of the city centre or a satellite business district such as Tampines or Jurong East. But in time to come, this could just as easily be in Woodlands. In his National Day Rally speech on Sunday (Aug 17), Prime Minister Lawrence Wong announced plans to transform the northern region of Singapore, from what some call an 'ulu' - Malay word for remote - area into vibrant and connected neighbourhoods. In a global city, there should be no real ulu districts, only differently central districts. SINGAPORE'S 'NORTHERN GATEWAY' FROM MALAYSIA In particular, Mr Wong highlighted the significant role that Woodlands will play as Singapore's 'northern gateway' from Malaysia. To support the upcoming Johor Bahru-Singapore Rapid Transit System (RTS) Link, flexible industrial spaces will be developed around the RTS Link station in Woodlands to provide more space for homes and businesses. The formal signing of the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ) deal between Mr Wong and Malaysia's Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has further reinforced the important role that Woodlands will play as a key node in economic activity between Singapore and Malaysia. More than simply an industrial or business hub, the Woodlands Regional Centre is expected to become a vibrant district that incorporates homes, amenities and lush green spaces into its urban fabric. These plans to develop Woodlands as Singapore's northern economic hub have been some time in the making. They have been announced in the Urban Redevelopment Authority's (URA) past master plans, including the last one gazetted in 2019 and the Draft Master Plan 2025 unveiled in June. FROM 'ULU' TO CENTRAL HUBS IN THEIR OWN RIGHT These plans build on efforts to create more decentralised satellite business districts that bring jobs closer to homes. Districts like Changi Business Hub, Jurong Lake District, Punggol Digital District and Tampines Regional Centre were once seen as 'ulu' too. Importantly, each of these hubs has its own specific economic focus. And they have over time established themselves as key nodes of economic activity in their own right. For instance, the Punggol Digital District is an increasingly attractive base for technology and digital economy players while Changi Business Hub serves the aviation and banking sectors. Woodlands will have its own signature focus. Aside from the JS-SEZ, Woodlands will also serve as a strategic centre for the Northern Agri-Tech and Food Corridor. While we typically associate business activity in most cities with one central business district, Singapore's highly diversified and globalised economy will require a different notion of centrality, with overlapping districts that are central to different sectors and businesses. From this perspective, it is more than 'decentralisation'. Woodlands will not just be a satellite business district but a central economic hub in its own right that complements the many others across Singapore.

N(T) students more likely to finish school, do as well in job market as N(A) peers: Study
N(T) students more likely to finish school, do as well in job market as N(A) peers: Study

Straits Times

time2 days ago

  • Straits Times

N(T) students more likely to finish school, do as well in job market as N(A) peers: Study

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Mr Anders Tan, 40, who was from the Normal (Technical) stream, progressed through ITE, Nanyang Polytechnic and eventually Singapore Management University after his N levels. SINGAPORE - Students from the Normal (Technical) stream fared the same as their peers from the Normal (Academic) track in the labour market, with little difference in employment, earnings or wealth accumulation outcomes, a long-running cohort study has found. The joint study by a former Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) economist and an NUS academic also showed that N(T) students were more likely than N(A) students to complete secondary school and attain a post-secondary qualification. The study was published on May 22 as part of MTI's quarterly economic survey report. It tracked between 17,000 and 21,600 students who sat the PSLE from 1993 to 1997, the years when the N(A) and N(T) courses were first offered. Among other things, it looked at their annual income data for 2015, when they were between 30 and 34 years old. The findings challenge common perceptions about disparities between educational courses, and show that choosing a course based solely on perceived benefits might lead to adverse individual outcomes in some instances, said researchers. For the study, researchers compared the outcomes of students whose PSLE scores were just below the cut-off for the N(A) stream with those of students who scored above the threshold and therefore could choose between N(A) and N(T). For instance, researchers included in their study students who took their PSLE in 1993 and 1994 and scored below 149, thus qualifying for the N(T) stream, as well as students who scored between 150 and 159, who could choose between N(T) or N(A). The key assumption in this approach was that students in both groups had similar individual abilities. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore NDR 2025: New govt-funded traineeship scheme for ITE, poly, university graduates Singapore NDR 2025: CDCs to spearhead new effort to match job seekers to roles nearer to home, says PM Wong Singapore NDR 2025: US baseline tariff of 10% on Singapore offers 'little comfort', says PM Wong Singapore NDR 2025: More avenues for S'poreans to be heard, get involved will be opened up, says PM Wong World European leaders to join Zelensky for Ukraine talks with Trump Sport Third time's the charm as Aaron Liang dethrones Samuel Kang en route to national squash title Asia Mandarin with Taiwanese characteristics: Taipei leverages language as soft power tool Asia 'Rats from the sky': Urban India finds itself divided on pigeons The study, conducted by Dr Siddharth George, assistant professor of economics at the National University of Singapore (NUS), and Ms Afiqah Suhaiemi, former lead economist at MTI, controlled for other variables such as gender, race, household income and age at time of the PSLE exam. It found that students who just missed the N(A) cut-off and enrolled in N(T) were 3.2 percentage points more likely to complete secondary school. Given the baseline dropout rate of 7 per cent, this meant the N(T) course nearly halved the proportion of students that did not complete primary school – a significant achievement consistent with the course's policy goals, said researchers. These students were also 7.6 percentage points more likely to attain a post-secondary qualification, typically an ITE certificate or Higher Nitec, compared with students who chose the N(A) stream. N(T) students were as likely as their N(A) peers to earn a diploma, but they were 3.1 percentage points less likely to obtain a bachelor's degree from a publicly funded university. 'This suggests that while the N(T) course was effective in preventing adverse educational outcomes, it may have simultaneously reduced the likelihood of achieving the highest levels of academic qualification,' said Dr George. Overall, the N(T) track helped students reach a higher minimum level of education and reduced the risks of negative outcomes like dropping out or leaving school without any post-secondary qualification, the study found. Labour market outcomes studied included employment and earnings, as well as Central Provident Fund Special Account balances as a proxy for wealth accumulation. N(T) and N(A) students on average performed similarly, suggesting that either secondary school track had limited influence on longer-term labour market outcomes. 'N(T) students were less likely to have low earnings than N(A) students, perhaps reflecting the lower odds of dropping out, but also less likely to have very high earnings, perhaps reflecting the lower odds of acquiring a university degree,' said Dr George. Streaming, first introduced in 1981, grouped students into Normal, Express and Special courses, and was criticised by some for reinforcing stigma. In 1994, the Normal course was split into N(A) and N(T), the latter catering to students more inclined towards vocational subjects. The Ministry of Education (MOE) began replacing this system in 2020 with full subject-based banding (SBB), which was fully implemented in 2024 . Under SBB, students are placed in mixed form classes and take subjects at three levels – G1, G2 and G3 – based on their strengths. MOE said the study's findings – that it is more important for students to choose an academic programme or subject level suited to their strengths, interests and learning needs – support its full SBB policy. 'We believe that such an approach will enable our students to maximise their full potential by providing them with multiple pathways to success to achieve better educational and life outcomes,' said an MOE spokesman. NUS Associate Professor of Sociology and Anthropology Vincent Chua said the parity in outcomes can also be attributed to 'good matching' and 'front-loading' of skills. 'Students with strengths in hands-on, technical work are selected into courses that play to their strengths, keeping them engaged, helping them finish school, and setting them up for better outcomes afterwards,' he said. He added that the N(T) track equips students with practical skills and work experience early, making them competitive when they enter the job market. But stigma has not disappeared, with society still viewing technical workers through a biased lens because these workers lack academic qualifications, he noted. Additionally, academic pathways may also lead to broader alumni networks and access to exclusive leadership programmes, while some firms still use academic credentials to screen for promotion bands, even when skills are similar, added Prof Chua. Students who were from courses under the old streaming system told ST that, in hindsight, their stream mattered less than finding the best fit for them to learn and grow. For Mr Anil Raj, dropping into the N(A) stream from Express in 1999 was less about the loss of career prospects than finding his own rhythm. He knew completing his O levels was always part of the plan, and just a matter of when. Mr Anil Raj, pictured here with his mother, earned a diploma in engineering design with business from Republic Polytechnic in 2025. PHOTO: REPUBLIC POLYTECHNIC Mr Raj completed his O levels in 2003, before enrolling in polytechnic the following year. He dropped out in 2005, served national service, and began working in 2007. Over the next 12 years, he tried his hand at food and beverage, banking, sales and travel, gravitating towards roles in which he could work with his hands and see the results of his effort. '(This journey) really led me to discover my strengths and weaknesses, what I like doing and what really motivates and drives me,' said Mr Raj, now 40. He earned a diploma in engineering design with business from Republic Polytechnic in 2025, and is now preparing to start a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering at the Singapore Institute of Technology. One of his counterparts from the N(T) stream, 40-year-old Anders Tan, took a different but equally circuitous path. After his N levels, he progressed through ITE, Nanyang Polytechnic and eventually Singapore Management University, where he graduated at 28 with a degree in information systems management. But he remembered what it felt like starting out. 'Back then... I thought that I would end up sweeping the floor (as a job). That was really the mentality,' he said, adding that it was unclear how his education journey would lead to a good career. Today, he is the founder of Inclus, a social enterprise that helps people with disabilities transition into the workforce. 'I'm two, three years later than my peers. To me, that's fine,' Mr Tan said. Both men said students should not feel pressured to rush their learning. 'If you need a longer time to learn, then let it be,' said Mr Tan. Mr Raj said: 'Comparison is the thief of joy. Know your own strengths and appreciate them.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store