Apple may finally open its wallet for AI, with data centre spending and big deals on the table
Apple has struggled to keep pace with rivals such as Microsoft and Alphabet's Google, both of which have attracted hundreds of millions of users to their AI-powered chatbots and assistants. That growth has come at a steep cost, however, with Google planning to spend US$85 billion (RM364 bilion) over the next year and Microsoft on track to spend more than US$100 billion, mostly on data centres.
Apple, in contrast, has leaned on outside data centre providers to handle some of its cloud computing work, and despite a high-profile partnership with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for certain iPhone features, has tried to grow much of its AI technology in-house, including improvements to its Siri virtual assistant. The results have been rocky, with the company delaying its Siri improvements until next year.
During a conference call after Apple's fiscal third-quarter results, analysts noted that Apple has historically not done large deals and asked whether it might take a different approach to pursue its AI ambitions. CEO Cook responded that the company had already acquired seven smaller companies this year and is open to buying larger ones.
'We're very open to M&A that accelerates our roadmap. We are not stuck on a certain size company, although the ones that we have acquired thus far this year are small in nature,' Cook said. 'We basically ask ourselves whether a company can help us accelerate a roadmap, and if they do, then we're interested.'
Apple CEO Tim Cook signalled on Thursday the iPhone maker was ready to spend more to catch up to rivals in artificial intelligence by building more data centres or buying a larger player in the segment, a departure from a long practice of fiscal frugality. — Reuters pic
Apple has tended to buy smaller firms with highly specialised technical teams to build out specific products. Its largest deal ever was its purchase of Beats Electronics for US$3 billion in 2014, followed by a US$1 billion deal to buy a modem chip business from Intel.
But now Apple is at a unique crossroads for its business. The tens of billions of dollars per year it receives from Google as payment to be the default search engine on iPhones could be undone by US courts in Google's antitrust trial, while startups like Perplexity are in discussions with handset makers to try to dislodge Google with an AI-powered browser that would handle many search functions.
Apple executives have said in court they are considering reshaping the firm's Safari browser with AI-powered search functions, and Bloomberg News has reported that Apple executives have discussed buying Perplexity, which Reuters has not independently confirmed.
Apple also said on Thursday it plans to spend more on data centres, an area where it typically spends only a few billion dollars per year. Apple is currently using its own chip designs to handle AI requests with privacy controls that are compatible with the privacy features on its devices.
Kevan Parekh, Apple's chief financial officer, did not give specific spending targets but said outlays would rise.
'It's not going to be exponential growth, but it is going to grow substantially,' Parekh said during the conference call.
'A lot of that's a function of the investments we're making in AI.' — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
AI search pushing an already weakened media industry to the brink
GENERATIVE artificial intelligence assistants like ChatGPT are cutting into traditional online search traffic, depriving news sites of visitors and impacting the advertising revenue they desperately need, in a crushing blow to an industry fighting for survival. "The next three or four years will be incredibly challenging for publishers everywhere. No one is immune from the AI summaries storm gathering on the horizon," said Matt Karolian, vice-president of research and development at Boston Globe Media. "Publishers need to build their own shelters or risk being swept away." While data remains limited, a recent Pew Research Centre study shows that AI-generated summaries now appearing regularly in Google searches discourage users from clicking through to source articles. When AI summaries are present, users click on suggested links half as often compared with traditional searches. This represents a devastating loss of visitors for online media sites that depend on traffic for advertising revenue and subscription conversions. According to Northeastern University Professor John Wihbey, these trends "will accelerate, and pretty soon, we will have an entirely different web". The dominance of tech giants like Google and Meta had slashed online media advertising revenue, forcing publishers to pivot toward paid subscriptions. But Wihbey said that subscriptions also depend on traffic, and paying subscribers alone aren't sufficient to support major media organisations. The Boston Globe group has begun seeing subscribers sign up through ChatGPT, offering a new touchpoint with potential readers, Karolian said. However, "these remain incredibly modest compared with other platforms, including even smaller search engines". To survive what many see as an inevitable shift, media companies are increasingly adopting GEO (Generative Engine Optimisation) — a technique that replaces traditional SEO (Search Engine Optimisation). This involves providing AI models with clearly labelled content, good structure, comprehensible text and strong presence on social networks and forums like Reddit that get crawled by AI companies. But a fundamental question remains: "Should you allow OpenAI crawlers to crawl your website and your content?" asks Thomas Peham, CEO of optimisation startup OtterlyAI. Burned by aggressive data collection from major AI companies, many news publishers have chosen to fight back by blocking AI crawlers from accessing their content. Some progress has been made on this front. Licensing agreements have emerged between major players, such as the New York Times and Amazon, Google and Associated Press, and Mistral and Agence France-Presse. But the issue is far from resolved, as major legal battles are underway, most notably the New York Times' suit against OpenAI and Microsoft. Publishers face a dilemma: blocking AI crawlers protects their content but reduces exposure to potential new readers. Faced with this challenge, "media leaders are increasingly choosing to reopen access", Peham observed. Yet even with open access, success isn't guaranteed. According to OtterlyAI data, media outlets represent just 29 per cent of citations offered by ChatGPT, trailing corporate websites at 36 per cent. And while Google search has traditionally privileged sources recognised as reliable, "we don't see this with ChatGPT", Peham said. The stakes extend beyond business models. According to the Reuters Institute's 2025 Digital News Report, about 15 per cent of people under 25 use generative AI to get their news. Given questions about AI sourcing and reliability, this trend risks confusing readers about information origins and credibility, much like social media did before it. "At some point, someone has to do the reporting," Karolian said. "Without original journalism, none of these AI platforms would have anything to summarise."
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Australia regulator says YouTube, others 'turning a blind eye' to child abuse material
FILE PHOTO: Children playground miniatures are seen in front of displayed Youtube logo in this illustration taken April 4, 2023. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo SYDNEY (Reuters) -Australia's internet watchdog has said the world's biggest social media firms are still 'turning a blind eye' to online child sex abuse material on their platforms, and said YouTube in particular had been unresponsive to its enquiries. In a report released on Wednesday, the eSafety Commissioner said YouTube, along with Apple, failed to track the number of user reports it received of child sex abuse appearing on their platforms and also could not say how long it took them to respond to such reports. The Australian government decided last week to include YouTube in its world-first social media ban for teenagers, following eSafety's advice to overturn its planned exemption for the Alphabet-owned Google's video-sharing site. 'When left to their own devices, these companies aren't prioritising the protection of children and are seemingly turning a blind eye to crimes occurring on their services,' eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said in a statement. 'No other consumer-facing industry would be given the licence to operate by enabling such heinous crimes against children on their premises, or services.' Google has said previously that abuse material has no place on its platforms and that it uses a range of industry-standard techniques to identify and remove such material. Meta - owner of Facebook, Instagram and Threads, three of the biggest platforms with more than 3 billion users worldwide - says it prohibits graphic videos. The eSafety Commissioner, an office set up to protect internet users, has mandated Apple, Discord, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Skype, Snap and WhatsApp to report on the measures they take to address child exploitation and abuse material in Australia. The report on their responses so far found a 'range of safety deficiencies on their services which increases the risk that child sexual exploitation and abuse material and activity appear on the services'. Safety gaps included failures to detect and prevent livestreaming of the material or block links to known child abuse material, as well as inadequate reporting mechanisms. It said platforms were also not using 'hash-matching' technology on all parts of their services to identify images of child sexual abuse by checking them against a database. Google has said before that its anti-abuse measures include hash-matching technology and artificial intelligence. The Australian regulator said some providers had not made improvements to address these safety gaps on their services despite it putting them on notice in previous years. 'In the case of Apple services and Google's YouTube, they didn't even answer our questions about how many user reports they received about child sexual abuse on their services or details of how many trust and safety personnel Apple and Google have on-staff,' Inman Grant said. (Reporting by Christine Chen in Sydney; Editing by Hugh Lawson)
The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
Financial service providers increasingly adopting AI: Bank Negara survey
KUALA LUMPUR: Financial service providers in Malaysia are increasingly adopting artificial intelligence (AI), according to the central bank's AI Survey 2024. The survey found that in 2024, 71% of banking institutions and development financial institutions, and 77% of insurance and takaful operators had implemented at least one AI application. 'Notably, in 2024, 71% of banking institutions and DFIs had implemented at least one AI application, an increase from 56% in the previous year. Similarly, 77% of ITOs had adopted at least one AI application, compared to 58% in the previous year,' according to Bank Negara Malaysia's (BNM) discussion paper on 'Artificial Intelligence in the Malaysian Financial Sector' today. BNM said over 60% of banking institutions and insurers view AI as a strategic priority over the next one to three years. 'This trend looks set to continue in the coming years, as over half of the respondens agreed that AI has the potential to generate significant new value for both their organisations and consumers.' The central bank stressed it remains vigilant to developments in AI and closely monitors its usage across financial service providers. 'As AI technologies and the state of adoption in financial service providers continue to grow and evolve, we recognise that AI use may introduce new risks that are not adequately addressed by the existing regulatory framework.' BNM said an escalation in supervisory focus may be considered if AI-related risks become more material, in line with the principles of parity, proportionality, and neutrality. 'For example, due to widespread use of AI applications in critical functions or to replace human decision making. Where relevant, we may explore the need to introduce new regulatory expectations should the need arise in the future,' it said. The central bank said it closely monitors five technological developments and innovation in the financial sector to shape its future regulatory and supervisory approach on AI. The discussion paper seeks to share and obtain feedback on BNM's posture on responsible AI innovation in the financial sector; the proposed regulatory approach for AI, as well as industry guidelines on responsible use; and general development approach including priority areas for greater innovation and industry-led collaboration. BNM said it aims to facilitate and encourage responsible adoption and use of AI across the financial sector in a manner that will advance better consumer outcomes and its broader policy objectives. 'This means that while new innovations, such as AI, are given the opportunity to flourish, associated risks that may negatively impact system-wide stability, consumer outcomes, and confidence in the financial sector will need to be managed effectively.' BNM interviewed select local financial industry players throughout 2024 and issued an updated industry-wide survey to gain insights into recent advancements on AI within the Malaysian financial sector. The AI Survey 2024 received responses from 1,207 financial service providers.
