Ministers trying to drum up interest in Alexander Dennis orders, says Robison
The bus manufacturer is currently consulting on proposals to close operations in Scotland and move to a single site in Yorkshire due to financial concerns, with 400 jobs potentially at risk.
Appearing before MSPs last month, Alexander Dennis managing director Paul Davies said the decision was not a 'done deal', but the company would need to see a significant rise in bus orders – between 70 and 100 by the end of the year and 300-400 next year – to remain open.
In a letter to Colin Smyth, the convener of Holyrood's Economy and Fair Work Committee, Finance Secretary Shona Robison said the Government is committed to looking at 'all viable options' and ministers are working with private bus companies.
'I agree about the importance of securing a short-term pipeline of orders,' she said.
'Please be assured that we are therefore liaising with commercial bus operators and local transport authorities to establish the current demand for double-deck buses in Scotland and are working alongside UK Government to identify demand in other parts of the UK.
'I am in full agreement with you about the importance of Alexander Dennis to Scotland and of retaining the jobs of the highly-skilled workers.
'That is why we are continuing to work at pace with Scottish Enterprise and UK Government, and alongside the company and trade unions, to explore all viable options to support ADL to retain bus manufacturing in Scotland.'
Ms Robison also suggested ADL could be forced to pay back money it has been given by the Government's commercial arm Scottish Enterprise for skills and technological development, though it would be for the agency to decide how to proceed.
The Finance Secretary also stressed the issues the Government faces due to UK-wide state aid regulations, which govern the level to which ministers can intervene in private businesses.
She said the Subsidy Control Act does not allow for subsidies which enforce the use of domestically-made goods and services, which would hamper the Scottish Government's efforts to force bus firms to use Alexander Dennis.
'Scottish ministers and officials consistently make representation on the development of the subsidy control regime for the benefit of Scottish businesses,' she said.
'However, as this is a reserved matter, it is ultimately for UK Government to make the final decision on any changes to the regime.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
BP replaces chairman amid return to oil and gas
BP has replaced its chairman as the FTSE 100 oil giant faces pressure from shareholders to switch its focus away from renewables and back to fossil fuels. Albert Manifold, who was chief executive of the building materials company CRH for a decade, will take over from Helge Lund, who announced his departure three months ago. Mr Manifold will take charge in October at a crucial for the company – as it struggles with a debt mountain, poor share performance and a reputation tarnished by its disastrous 2020 commitment to cut fossil fuel output by 40pc. Mr Lund had strongly backed the drive towards renewables led by disgraced former chief executive Bernard Looney, who abruptly resigned in September 2023 after failing to disclose relationships with employees. Mr Lund has been under increasing pressure over that debacle, announcing plans to step down in April but remaining in place pending the appointment. Dame Amanda Blanc, an independent director at BP, said incoming chairman Mr Manifold had shown as 'impressive track record of shareholder value creation at CRH'. She said: 'Albert has a relentless focus on performance which is well suited to BP's needs now and into the future. He transformed and refocused CRH into a global leader by building on its rich heritage to deliver superior growth, cash generation and returns.' Mr Manifold said the job would give him the 'the opportunity to help the company reach its full potential'. Mr Manifold is currently a non-executive director at chemicals producer LyondellBasell Industries and at consultant Mercury Engineering. Turbulent times for oil giant The uncertainty over BP's leadership comes amid wider turbulence, including unrest among shareholders and a targeted campaign by activist US hedge fund Elliott for more change at the company. It has also had to deal with weeks of speculation over a potential takeover by rival Shell. The energy giant was forced to issue a public denial, ruling itself out of a bid for BP for six months. Mr Manifold's appointment is like to stoke further speculation about BP's future as a UK listed company. In September 2023 during his tenure as CRH boss, Mr Manifold moved the company's primary stock market listing from London to New York. BP is also in the middle of a fire sale of $20bn (£14.8bn) worth of assets by 2027, including as much as $4bn this year. This month alone has seen BP announce the sale of its 300 Dutch petrol stations and its entire US wind farm business. The sale of its Austrian retail network also progressing. Finding a new chairman had proved challenging for BP after approaches were understood to have been turned down by Sam Laidlaw, the former Centrica chief executive, and Ken Mackenzie, the former BHP chairman. Mr Laidlaw was reported by the Financial Times as having withdrawn because he thought BP would either have to be sold to a rival or undergo painful restructuring. Mr Lund was appointed chairman of the BP board in January 2019. He was previously president and chief executive of Equinor, the Norwegian state oil company. He oversaw BP's 2020 appointment of former chief executive Mr Looney, together announcing plans to shift away from oil and gas, proposing a tenfold increase in green energy investment and a 40pc reduction in fossil fuel production by 2030. Mr Lund said at the time: 'We are confident that the decisions we have taken and the strategy we are setting out today are right for BP, for our shareholders, and for wider society.' But shares have since BP underperformed as its competitors instead bet on rising demand for oil. At BP's capital markets day in February, chief executive Murray Auchincloss formally reversed the controversial policy and announced a complete reset – including halting investments into renewable energy and selling green assets. However, Mr Lund left investors worried when, at the same event he said the decision to move back towards fossil fuels was 'a new chapter for the company … but not a new direction'. He announced his departure in April just two months later.
The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Tories are on the brink of annihilation in Wales – and it holds a lesson for Westminster politicians
By any measure, Kemi Badenoch's leadership of the Conservative party is not in a good place. In the last few months alone, she has been told 'her days are numbered', that she is in 'Liz Truss territory' and that she is 'hitting a new record low'. This is not a hostile audience. These criticisms come from the Telegraph, the Spectator and the Daily Express, outlets that have traditionally turned a blind eye to the most egregious Conservative leadership failings, like a blinkered parent who refuses to accept the repeated reports from teachers that their child is a bully. It's clear that what Badenoch is doing is not working. She needs to change course, not just for her own sake, but for the continued existence of her party as a political entity. In case this isn't obvious to her already (just 10% of people in the UK see her as a PM in waiting), there is a really handy example of what will happen to the Conservative party if it keeps being a Reform tribute act – the Welsh Conservative party. If you haven't paid any attention to the Welsh Conservative party, don't blame yourself, because hardly anyone in Wales has either. I have had the privilege of reporting on the Welsh Tories for a decade and they are the embodiment of all the challenges and failings of the current UK party. And when I say 'privilege', I mean it. Journalistically, it has been like shooting fish in a barrel, such is the level of incompetence exhibited by the Welsh Conservatives. But a gain for the humble hack is a loss for the people of Wales. Since devolution, Wales has been desperate for a sensible centre-right alternative that could genuinely challenge Welsh Labour, whose record is more patchy than Boris Johnson's account of Partygate. Instead, the people of Cymru have been condemned to a Welsh Conservative party that has preferred to dabble in Nigel Farage cosplay rather than genuine opposition. A party that could soon be all but wiped out in Wales. So what lessons can Badenoch learn from the situation her colleagues find themselves in across Offa's Dyke? Well, the first concerns demographics. The Welsh Conservative party is literally dying out. According to a study by Cardiff University's Wales Governance Centre, in 2024 fewer than 10% of people aged under 65 in Wales voted for the Conservatives. In fact, 10% of the party's 2019 voters had passed away by the time of the 2024 election (the figure for Labour was 3%). If this trend continues, 40% of Tory voters in Cymru will have died by the next election. But surely these voters are being replaced? Well, no. If you want to see how hard the Welsh Conservatives are finding it to recruit younger people, then look no further than a fringe meeting that was held at their party conference in May. I remember looking through the programme and seeing that an event by the Welsh Young Conservatives was discussing how to attract more young people. They defined 'young' as under 45. That same conference underlined another problem: that the Conservatives scream incompetence right now. For one thing, Badenoch herself began her speech by saying how 'wonderful' it was 'to meet so many MSPs'. In Wales we have MSs (Senedd members); not MSPs (members of the Scottish parliament). The auto captions all over the hall also wrote 'whales' rather than 'Wales' throughout all of the speeches. And the lack of compassion and hope from the current Conservative party was hilariously encapsulated in the subtitles to the speech of Darren Millar, the Welsh Tory leader in the Senedd, which translated 'We are pro-roads, not just cycle paths' into 'We are pro-roads, not just psychopaths'. It also doesn't help that the Conservatives can't agree about who their Welsh leader is. In the constitution of the Conservative party, Badenoch is technically the leader of the Welsh Conservatives. However, Mims Davies (an MP in Sussex) is the leader of the Welsh Conservatives in Westminster, and Millar is the leader of the Welsh Conservatives in the Senedd. But if we accept that, for all intents and purposes, Millar is the leader in Wales (given he is the only one actually in Wales), we can see how his failure of leadership (and the failures of his predecessors) offer Badenoch a stark warning. The lesson here is that trying to mirror Reform is a losing play. Millar has continued the strategy put in place by his predecessor, Andrew RT Davies, and tried to be more Farage than Farage himself in rhetoric. Davies was investigated by the Welsh parliament's standards commissioner after he told GB News: 'Welsh Labour are dishing out £1,600 to anyone who wants to rock up and claim they are crossing the Channel illegally.' To be clear, the figure he was referring to was the Welsh government's basic income pilot, which will give £1,600 a month to care leavers and included about a dozen migrant children who came to the UK alone with no family. The Welsh Tories also show what happens when you fail to put forward any credible plans for actually governing the country. Regarding the biggest challenge facing Wales, which is the NHS, the Welsh Conservatives issued a statement saying they would 'properly fund the health service'. When asked where the money would come from, they listed a string of 'Labour vanity projects' which they would cut. Unfortunately, some of these ended in 2003. In the Senedd right now, the Welsh Conservatives are the official opposition. They constitute 15 of the 60 members (25%). Polling suggests that in the Welsh election next year they will receive between 10% and 13% of the vote. The electoral system in Wales means that any party that dips under 12% could be totally wiped out. An MRP poll in May suggested that they could have as few as three seats (and this is after the Senedd will have expanded to 96 members). These projections could be Badenoch's Welsh canary in the coalmine. I suspect she will simply say the canary wasn't determined enough, and keep on tunnelling. Will Hayward is a Guardian columnist. He publishes a regular newsletter on Welsh politics and is the author of Independent Nation: Should Wales Leave the UK?
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Nationwide faces member backlash over boardroom cronyism
Nationwide is facing a backlash over boardroom cronyism after claims it has rebuffed attempts to allow ordinary members of the building society join its board. The mutual, which has 16m members, is holding its annual meeting on Friday when customers will be asked to re-elect 13 board directors, including Dame Debbie Crosbie, the chief executive. It has provoked a backlash because none of the directors have been nominated by members, who believe they lack the experience of running a mutual. Nationwide has become mired in controversy after it bought Virgin Money last year, stoking fears it wanted to act like a commercial lender. A pay deal of almost £7m for Dame Debbie, which will be voted on by members on Friday, has also raised concerns over its direction, with critics saying the award mirrors the worst of bonus culture at big banks. James Sherwin-Smith, who led an unsuccessful campaign to become a non-executive, said the board did not have enough people with a mutual background and that nominees were chosen without members' involvement. He added: 'It's unclear to members where the representation for us is. It feels to us that the board is doing what the board wants, not what the members want.' Mr Sherwin-Smith said the board was stifling attempts to allow more member representation, and that Nationwide had not included a member-nominated representative since 2002. While Nationwide's board is nominated by existing directors, members can put forward candidates if they obtain 250 backers to endorse them. Mr Sherwin-Smith said he received 600 signatories for his attempt but was rebuffed. Nationwide has disputed the claim saying the number of valid nominations received fell 'substantially short of the threshold'. Members weigh in Unlike a bank, Nationwide is a mutual run for the benefit of members and not shareholders. While some members say they are happy with its service, they say they feel let down by the society's corporate governance standards. Daniel Peck, a 26-year old software engineer from Worcester, said he was 'extremely dissatisfied' with board structure and wanted more members represented. He added: 'It feels like normal members don't have any sort of say whatsoever. They need to make it easier for the members to get the people that they want on the board. 'It would make the members feel like they actually have a voice. It does feel like the board are just a force unto their own.' Pauline Mead, a retired secretary from Watford, joined Nationwide after five decades as a Barclays customer because of its mutual status. She says she is concerned the society is becoming 'like a bank'. She added: 'There's 13 directors running the show and I thought I could vote them out – but all of them are people re-applying rather than new candidates. I would like the whole lot off actually and let's start with somebody that I might like to vote in. I don't know how they justify all those people on the board'. Nationwide said that while it was aware of 'small amounts' of criticism, it could not see any evidence that the concerns were widely shared among the wider membership. The group holds regular consultations to gauge member views, including its Member Voice panel which has 6,500 members as well as an annual survey of 5,000 other members. It said the board was the 'right size' for its responsibilities. A Nationwide spokesman said: 'Nationwide has become the second largest provider of mortgages and retail deposits, and remains first for customer satisfaction, because it can attract, retain and motivate talented leaders to run a business of this scale and prioritise member value.'
