How the Myanmar earthquake could hasten the release of Aung San Suu Kyi
Aung San Suu Kyi, the elected leader of Myanmar, is reported to have survived last week's devastating earthquake unharmed in the prison cell where she is serving long terms in solitary confinement. But could the disaster prove the prelude for her return to power?
If it did, it would be only the latest of the stunning reversals of fortune that have dotted her career.
The former Oxford housewife – who, with her National League for Democracy (NLD), has won the only three fair general elections held in Myanmar in the past 65 years – was jailed on trumped-up charges in 2021. Now aged 79, it is feared she could die in prison.
Suu Kyi's return to official favour is not on anyone's list of probable outcomes of the disaster. Her present situation is substantially worse than any she has endured in more than 20 years of official persecution.
Her long years of house arrest after 1990 were punctuated by occasional peace overtures from the ruling generals, but this time around there has been nothing of the sort. She is not locked up in the modest comfort of her home, but a squalid jungle jail, and if there have been any approaches by the military, they have not been publicised. Everything possible has been done to turn her into an unperson.
Two factors, however, make her dramatic rehabilitation possible.
One is her legitimacy in power. Despite the generals' baseless claims to the contrary, Suu Kyi won the elections of 1990, 2015 and 2020 by landslide margins, results recognised by foreign monitors as fair.
The other factor is the suddenly increased vulnerability of the ruling generals in the aftermath of the disaster.
Legitimacy is the philosopher's stone for Myanmar's generals, the goal which eluded them for so many years after the great uprising of 1988.
One military leader, Senior General Thein Sein, crafted a route for his country back into the company of nations. He set up a sort of Potemkin democracy in which the army's dominance was guaranteed but which permitted a token role for democracy and civilian politicians. The result was Suu Kyi's release from house arrest in 2010, her election to parliament the following year, the lifting of sanctions and Myanmar's return to some degree of respectability.
All that was junked in February 2021 when Thein Sein's successor, Min Aung Hlaing, seized power. Today, Myanmar has never been more painfully isolated. China gives grudging support to the regime as the alternative to outright anarchy on its border; Russia's support seems more sincere. But otherwise Myanmar is as much of an international pariah as it was in the dark days after the suppression of the Buddhist monks revolt in 2007.
There is no doubt that the army craves a return to international respectability. Military sources wax lyrical about the good old days of the 2010s when the economy was relatively buoyant and the army savaged the Rohingya minority in Rakhine state but, thanks to its democratic fig-leaf, was able to shrug off international criticism.
Today, everything about the regime stinks – and there seems no way out of the mess.
More than half the country is beyond the army's control. The civil war which started in 2021 rages unabated, prompting new air strikes in recent days on rebel-held areas, even those such as Sagaing, west of Mandalay, which were crippled in the earthquake.
Why should Min Aung Hlaing care? On account of a little factor called karma.
Myanmar is the most devoutly Buddhist nation on earth; the generals' regular attendance at temples and monasteries is their way of attempting to buy off the forces of divine disfavour. The earthquake, in which at least 10,000 have died, is the latest sign that it's not working.
In 2007, the army waded in to crush the mass revolt of monks, killing many of them – an onslaught rapidly followed by Cyclone Nargis, which killed more than 130,000 in the south of the country.
To western scientists, the cyclone's cause was meteorological; to superstitious Myanmar Buddhists, it was caused by the army's reckless killing of monks. It was karmic payback.
And it's happened again. The earthquake struck only hours after the pomp and ceremony of the 80th Armed Forces Day. Many in Myanmar will have seen it as unmistakable sign that the regime is doomed. Desperate measures, the generals may decide, will now be required to cling to power.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economist
30-05-2025
- Economist
China calls the shots in Myanmar's civil war
The next year the AA led the Rakhine, the largely Buddhist local majority, in an uprising against the Tatmadaw. Fearing this to be the first step in the disintegration of Myanmar, the army and the then civilian government, led by Aung San Suu Kyi, sought to crush it. A ceasefire was negotiated in November 2020. After the coup three months later, other ethnic armies across Myanmar rose against the junta, in collaboration with pro-democracy forces. But the AA bided its time. In late 2023, as the Tatmadaw came under pressure elsewhere, the AA broke the ceasefire. The junta, short of men, then did the unthinkable: it began arming Rohingya to fight for it against the AA. This did it little good: within a year the Tatmadaw had lost most of Rakhine state. Not since the years immediately after independence in 1948 has the military suffered such a string of defeats anywhere in Myanmar. You might suppose this would concern China, considering its strong relationship with the Tatmadaw and its investments in the state. But no. China has long also cultivated the AA. It has been relaxed about the AA's rapid progress, and the AA has reassured China that it supports the investments. It has taken care to avoid using heavy weapons near the pipeline; and as it has captured a series of pumping stations, it has allowed oil and gas to flow unimpeded.
The Independent
16-05-2025
- The Independent
UN agency, Rohingya refugees allege Indian authorities cast dozens of them into the sea near Myanmar
Indian authorities allegedly forced dozens of Rohingya refugees off a naval vessel into the sea near Myanmar last week after providing them with life jackets, a United Nations agency, family members of the refugees and their lawyer said. The Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, in a statement on Thursday, said at least 40 Rohingya refugees were detained in New Delhi and cast into the sea by the Indian navy near the maritime border with Myanmar. The refugees — including children, women and older people — swam ashore, but their whereabouts in Myanmar remain unknown, the agency said. Five Rohingya refugees on Friday confirmed to the Associated Press that their family members were part of the group that were detained by Indian authorities on May 6. The group, including 15 Christians, were flown in an aircraft and later cast into the sea by Indian navy authorities on May 8, they said. Dilawar Hussain, a lawyer representing the refugees, said the families have filed a petition in India's top court, urging the Indian government to bring them back to New Delhi. India's navy and foreign ministry declined to comment. In its statement Thursday, the rights office said it had appointed a U.N. expert to probe into what it called were 'unconscionable, unacceptable acts." The U.N. agency urged the Indian government to refrain from 'inhumane and life-threatening treatment of Rohingya refugees, including their repatriation into perilous conditions in Myanmar.' Tom Andrews, U.N. Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, called the incident 'blatant disregard for the lives and safety of those who require international protection' and 'nothing short of outrageous.' 'Such cruel actions would be an affront to human decency and represent a serious violation of the principle of non-refoulment, a fundamental tenet of international law that prohibits states from returning individuals to a territory where they face threats to their lives or freedom,' Andrews said in the statement. India does not have a national policy or a law to deal with refugees. It is also not party to the 1951 Refugee Convention or its 1967 Protocol. But hundreds of thousands of Muslim Rohingya refugees have fled persecution in Myanmar after suffering oppression in Myanmar's Rakhine state, where officials have been accused of genocide. According to Refugees International, of the estimated 40,000 Rohingya refugees living in India at least 22,500 are registered with the UNHCR. Many of them live in squalid camps in various Indian states. One of those refugees, who has not been identified by AP due to safety concerns, said his brother was among those returned. He said he received a call from his brother on May 8 after he managed to borrow a phone from a local fisherman after making landfall on an island in Myanmar. He told him Indian authorities removed their restraints and blindfolds, gave them life jackets and told them swim to an island in Myanmar territory. 'My parents were taken from me and thrown into the waters,' said the man, whose two brothers, parents and a sister-in-law were part of the group, according to his brother. 'It would be enough if I am reunited with my parents. I just want my parents, nothing else.' Thet Swe, a spokesman for Myanmar's military-led government, did not immediately respond to an email asking for comment. The refugee in India said most of those returned were registered with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in India and were detained by Indian authorities under the pretext of collecting their biometric data. He also shared with the AP pictures of his brother while he was detained by Indian authorities and taken in a police vehicle. AP also reviewed a recording of another phone call made by a refugee to his brother in New Delhi. The man who made the call is heard saying some people from the group were beaten by Indian navy authorities. It was not possible to independently verify these claims. In recent years, Rohingya refugees have faced persecution and attacks from India's Hindu nationalist groups, who have demanded their expulsion from India. Many of them have also been held in various detention centers across India and are viewed as illegal immigrants. Some have been deported to neighboring Bangladesh and Myanmar. Last year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government implemented a controversial citizenship law that critics say discriminates against Muslim migrants, including Rohingyas. ——
ITV News
14-05-2025
- ITV News
Student branded 'terrorist sympathiser' by Trump administration fighting deportation from US
Words by US Correspondent Dan Rivers and video journalist Maral Shafafy Mohsen Mahdawi says he has fallen in love with the land in Vermont. He describes the cabin he built here during lockdown as his 'nest'. Since his release from detention two weeks ago, he has a new appreciation for his liberty in this bucolic corner of northeastern America. He has lived here on and off for a decade, during a long stint as a student. Next month he will graduate from Columbia University, where pro-Palestinian protests paralysed parts of the campus last year. Although he stood back from these noisy encampments, he was still a leading voice among students on the issue of Gaza. His background as a third-generation refugee from the West Bank informs his opinions. The Trump administration views him not as a disciple of peace and understanding, but as a trouble-maker whom they are determined to kick out of the country. He is one of a growing number of high-profile students who have been arrested, often by plain-clothed officers, and detained at immigration centres hundreds of miles from where they are studying. Another, Mahmoud Khalil, is being held in Louisiana at the other end of the country and is due in court next week as he continues to fight his deportation. In his first interview with British TV, Mahdawi told me about how he coped with being put behind bars for two weeks. He is determined not to be silenced, even as his legal battle to stay in the United States continues to play out. He is also very adamant that the protests were in no way anti-semitic or pro-Hamas. When I asked about some Jewish students on campus who claimed they felt unsafe or were threatened during the sit-ins, he invited them to take part in the movement, saying it is focused on human rights and equality. He also dismissed suggestions he had made anti-semitic remarks in the past, claiming his comments had been twisted '180 degrees' from campaigning against anti-semitism. Despite everything he has been through, he remains tranquil. He says he is now a Buddhist and meditated before our interview to 'centre himself'. Speaking calmly and often with a smile, he set out his beliefs and tried to tackle some of the accusations levelled at him about his past views and social media posts. He remains determined to continue delivering a message of equality and human rights on the Middle East. He recently won a legal victory securing his release from detention, but his battle to stay in the US is far from over. Along with other prominent student activists, he is embroiled in a tussle with the US government over his rights to stay in America. Mahdawi has a green card giving him the right to live and work here, but earlier this year US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has suggested that green cards are not a right and can be revoked. The issue will be fought out in the courts over the next few months, with Mahdawi's supporters claiming freedom of speech is on the line, as Donald Trump tries to crack down on those who they see as hostile actors. Who is Mohsen Mahdawi? Mahdawi has been a green card holder for the past 10 years and is due to finish his undergraduate degree in philosophy at Columbia University in New York this month. The 34-year-old, who was born and raised in a refugee camp in the West Bank, became a prominent organiser of pro-Palestinian demonstrations on campus, speaking out about Israel's military campaign in Gaza. He co-founded 'Dar: the Palestinian Student Society' at Columbia alongside Mahmoud Khalil, after the October 7th, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel. Khalil is also facing deportation proceedings and is currently in detention at a Louisiana prison. According to submissions made by Mahdawi's lawyers, he took a step back from protest organising in March 2024, before the student encampments at Columbia University began. Mahdawi's lawyers argue that his arrest and detention by the Trump administration is an attempt to retaliate and punish him for his activism on the war in Gaza. They submitted a petition challenging the lawfulness of his arrest, called a habeas petition, as soon as he was detained, as well as a later motion for his release on bail. On April 30, US District Court Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford in Vermont released Mahdawi on bail while the lawfulness of his deportation is decided in the courts. He agreed with Mahdawi's lawyers that keeping him in detention would 'likely have a chilling effect on protected speech, which is squarely against the public interest'. Among the filings made by the US government against Mahdawi is a two-page letter from Secretary of State Marco Rubio arguing that the 'activities and presence of Mahdawi in the United States undermines US policy to combat anti-semitism' and that the protests which Mahdawi led on campus had the potential to 'undermine the peace process underway in the Middle East.' Additional exhibits the government submitted under seal is a 2015 report from the Windsor Police Department in Vermont. The filing details an incident where a gun shop owner told police officers that Mahdawi had visited the shop, showed an interest in guns and told him that he used to build guns 'to kill Jews while he was in Palestine'. Mahdawi admitted to the court having visited the gun store but vehemently denied making those statements. Judge Crawford noted that the FBI investigated claims, but that they did not take any further action on them. The Trump administration has remained steadfast in its criticism of Mahdawi, describing him since his release as a 'terrorist sympathiser and national security threat who does not belong in this country.'
