Female prison officer admits inappropriate relationship with inmate
Megan Breen, 23, initially denied the fling with the unnamed prisoner, which happened while she was working at two prisons in Wales.
But she later changed her plea to admit misconduct in a public office and will be sentenced for the offence next month.
Breen was working at both HMP Usk, a category C jail, and nearby HMP Prescoed, an open prison, when the offence was committed. Both jails are in Gwent, South Wales.
HMP Usk is a closed prison for adult male vulnerable inmates, who include sex offenders and convicted police officers.
The charge states: 'While acting as a public officer, namely a prison officer, wilfully and without reasonable excuse or justification, [you] misconducted yourself in a way which amounted to an abuse of the public's trust in the office holder by having a relationship with a prisoner.'
The crime was said to have taken place between February and May 2022.
Merthyr Tydfil Crown Court heard that a second allegation of illegally accessing a computer would not be proceeded.
Breen, of Newport, Gwent, was released on bail but warned she could face jail when she returns to court to be sentenced.
Misconduct in public office is a serious offence which in the most extreme cases carries a penalty of life imprisonment.
Judge Carl Harrison ordered a pre-sentence report but told Breen that 'all sentencing options' remained open.
HMP Usk houses 280 inmates and is managed jointly with HMP Prescoed, which is three miles away and houses offenders serving the final term of their sentences before being released.
Female prison officers have been allowed to work inside male establishments since the early 1980s and there are currently about 15,000 women employed in jails in England and Wales.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Footy great is left in a state of shock as AFL says star has no case to answer over 'inappropriate touching' incident
The AFL has closed the book on the alleged 'inappropriate touching' incident between Sydney Swans and Brisbane Lions stars, but one footy great thinks they made the wrong decision. The AFL 's Integrity Unit has closed its investigation into a 'potential inappropriate touching' incident involving Brisbane's Henry Smith and Sydney's Nick Blakey. The clash occurred late in the first quarter after Blakey took a mark, fell to the ground, and Smith lost balance, making brief contact with Blakey's backside. There is also vision that suggests Blakey could have made inappropriate contact with Smith before that. Both the Lions and Swans were aware of the AFL's inquiries, but no complaint was made by Blakey or his club. The league concluded no further action was required, saying the situation appeared worse in a still image than it did live. 'Following inquiries by the AFLIU into an incident during the Brisbane Lions and Sydney Swans match on Saturday it has been determined that no further action is required,' the league said. On Nine News, chief football reporter Tom Morris chose not to name Smith or include him in footage, and Footy Classified also avoided naming him when it aired later on Monday night. While most accepted it as a non-incident, former Port Adelaide player Kane Cornes expressed disbelief at the AFL's decision to drop the matter. 'That has been cleared tonight by the AFL, I assume they have seen this vision,' host Craig Hutchison said on Channel Seven's The Agenda Setters. 'Well, it was certainly unusual,' veteran journalist Caroline Wilson replied. 'AFL Integrity have had a look at this, I know that Brisbane spent a good two hours on the phone with AFL Integrity and it was dismissed.' Cornes then said: 'I cannot believe the AFL would look at that and say there's no case (for Smith) to answer. 'That's one of the more unusual things I've seen.' 'It couldn't have been just an accident?' Wilson asked. 'Well, it didn't look like one to me,' Cornes replied. 'Both players are absolutely fine with it,' Wilson added. The Daily Mail does not suggest either player has engaged in appropriate contact. The footage of the incident generated waves of comments from footy fans on social media, the vast majority of which are too indecent to be published. It's not the first time the AFL has had to deal with allegations of a player making contact with a rival's private parts. In 2023, Gold Coast's Touk Miller was suspended for one game for executing a 'squirrel grip' on the genitalia of Brisbane's Dayne Zorko. In 2020, Richmond's Nick Vlastuin and Jayden Short were forced to apologise for inappropriately touching teammate Mabior Chol during a team song celebration. AFL 360's Gerard Whateley and Garry Lyon also discussed the Smith and Blakey incident and agreed it warranted further investigation. Touk Miller has receiving a one-match ban for making contact with the groin region of Dayne Zorko in a manner that caused pain and discomfort and ultimately constituted conduct unbecoming in breach of AFL Rule 2.3(a). Full details: — AFL (@AFL) August 3, 2023 A bit happening here with Jayden Short and Mabior Chol — Daniel Cherny (@DanielCherny) July 29, 2020 'This is the fleeting interaction on Saturday between Nick Blakey and Henry Smith,' Whateley said. 'But this is the angle as to why the AFL needed to investigate what had happened. 'We went through a couple of different phases with this during the day.' Lyon agreed, saying Smith in particular was lucky to escape further scrutiny. 'The first photo I looked at I went "hang on a minute". And then the other bit of vision which turned up I said "hang on a minute",' he said. 'They needed to look at that and this young man, I think that's unnecessary. The AFL have cleared him of any wrongdoing, there's no complaint from Sydney or Nick Blakey. 'I think it's unnecessary, I just thought he lost his balance and put his hand down for balance initially.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
More countries added to UK's ‘deport first' scheme for foreign criminals
Foreign criminals from 15 more countries face deportation before they have a chance to appeal in an expansion of the UK government's 'deport first, appeal later' scheme. Ministers are extending the scheme, which applies in England and Wales and was restarted in 2023, to cover 23 countries including India, Bulgaria, Australia and Canada. The policy, which was introduced by the Conservatives in 2014, removes the right of foreign criminals to appeal against their conviction in the UK unless they show they are at risk of harm if they are deported to their country of origin. It is already operational in eight countries including Tanzania, Finland, Estonia and Belize. Other countries brought under the scheme by Labour ministers include Angola, Botswana, Brunei, Canada, Guyana, Indonesia, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Malaysia, Uganda and Zambia. The move is part of the Labour government's efforts to step up the deportations of foreign criminals to deal with overcrowded prisons and public concerns about crime. Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, announced proposals on Sunday to allow foreign criminals given fixed-term sentences to be deported immediately after sentencing and barred from re-entering the UK. Those serving life sentences, such as terrorists and murderers, are exempt and will serve their full prison sentence in the UK before being considered for deportation. The policy has come under fire from two former Conservative justice secretaries who say it risks making the UK a soft touch for foreign criminals, because offenders would not be serving sentences at home. The former justice secretary Alex Chalk told the Guardian: 'I have real misgivings about this, and it could make people in Britain a magnet for crime from foreign national offenders.' He told Times Radio that 'rapists, people who commit child cruelty, aggravated burglars, knife crimers, domestic abusers' who were deported to their home countries 'would not have to spend a day in custody'. 'If you have been the victim of an appalling rape that has shattered your life, and you pluck up the courage to go to court, the jury convict this guy [and] within two weeks he's in Tirana, drinking a cocktail paid by the British taxpayer, and on TikTok laughing at his victim,' Chalk said. 'The real danger is you're giving a green light to foreign national offenders. You come to Britain, you're not going to get punished. You're thinking: the worst that happens to me is I'm released immediately and put on a plane.' He added: 'You've got to have a measure of justice so if you come to our country and commit a crime, you expect punishment. I would urge parliament to scrutinise this extremely carefully'. Robert Buckland, another former justice secretary, said Chalk was right to express concerns. 'Many victims of these crimes want justice to be served here first before deportation. Has the government taken the views of victims into consideration in all of this?' The Ministry of Justice confirmed to the Guardian that foreign offenders deported under the expansion of the 'deport first, appeal later' scheme would not necessarily face prison in their home country. After a legal challenge, the supreme court ruled in 2007 that the 'deport first, appeal later' system was unlawful because it infringed on people's right to give live evidence to their appeal. The government dealt with the court's concerns by setting up agreements with several countries for foreign criminals to give live evidence to their appeal hearings using a video link. The scheme was restarted in 2023. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, said that 'for far too long, foreign criminals have been exploiting our immigration system, remaining in the UK for months or even years while their appeals drag on. That has to end. 'Those who commit crimes in our country cannot be allowed to manipulate the system, which is why we are restoring control and sending a clear message that our laws must be respected and will be enforced.' David Lammy, the foreign secretary, said ministers were in talks with several countries about extending the scheme. Foreign offenders make up about 12% of the prison population in England and Wales, with each prison place costing an average of £54,000 each year, according to the government. Of the new countries covered by the scheme, only Indians are in the top nationalities in the prison population. Officials said that in the year since Labour came to power in July 2024, 5,179 foreign nationals who had been convicted of crimes had been deported, a 14% increase on the year before.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Arkansas authorities say additional employees disciplined at prison where ex-police chief escaped
Additional employees at an Arkansas prison have been disciplined for not following procedures after a convicted murderer known as the 'Devil in the Ozarks' escaped earlier this summer, a state prison system official told lawmakers Monday. Arkansas Division of Correction Director Dexter Payne said several employees at the Calico Rock prison had been suspended and another demoted for allowing inmates to use an outdoor kitchen dock unsupervised. Payne did not specify how many employees had been suspended, and did not give their names. 'Those employees have also been disciplined for their actions,' Payne told members of the Legislative Council's Charitable, Penal and Correctional Institutions Subcommittee. The dock had played a key role in the May 25 escape of Grant Hardin from the prison, formally known as the North Central Unit. Two employees at the facility, including one who allowed Hardin on the dock unsupervised, had previously been fired in the weeks following his escape. Hardin held a job in the prison's kitchen. Hardin was captured 1.5 miles (2.4 kilometers) northwest of the Calico Rock prison on June 6. Authorities said he escaped by donning an outfit designed to look like a law enforcement uniform. The outfit was crafted from an inmate uniform and a kitchen apron dyed black using a marker, while a soup can lid and a Bible cover were fashioned to look like a badge, corrections officials told the panel last month. The other employee who had been fired earlier had opened the gate that Hardin walked through without confirming his identity. Payne said corrections officials have nearly completed the report on their critical incident review of the escape. A report on the State Police 's investigation into the escape has also been sent to the governor's office, the Department of Public Services said. Payne said the review also found that Hardin had been incorrectly classified as eligible to be housed at Calico Rock, which is primarily a medium-security facility. Hardin had been held at the Calico Rock prison since 2017. Payne said he didn't know why Hardin wasn't correctly classified. 'Without an override, he should not have been there,' Payne said. After he was captured, Hardin was taken to a maximum-security prison. Hardin has pleaded not guilty to an escape charge and is set to go on trial in November. Hardin, a former police chief in the small town of Gateway, near the Arkansas- Missouri border, is serving lengthy sentences for murder and rape. He was the subject of the TV documentary 'Devil in the Ozarks.' One change that has been made at the facility since the escape is an increase in searches outside the facility, Payne said. Officials have previously said Hardin fashioned a ladder out of wooden pallets that he kept on the dock. 'The back dock area was not searched enough, or they would have found he was hiding items on that back dock,' he said. Payne faced further pushback from lawmakers who said the escape points to a more systemic issue than two employees not doing their job. 'Yeah, people didn't do their job, but also there should be checks and balances to ensure that people do their job,' Republican Sen. Ben Gilmore said. 'Where are those checks and balances?'
