logo
Students from Southeast Asia in demand at universities – DW – 08/08/2025

Students from Southeast Asia in demand at universities – DW – 08/08/2025

DW5 days ago
As competition to attract international talent intensifies around the world, students from Southeast Asian countries are becoming more included in recruitment strategies. European universities are trying to catch up.
Last week, the Australian government announced it will raise its cap on foreign students by 9%, to 295,000, and will prioritize applicants from Southeast Asia.
Japan aims to increase its foreign student population to 400,000 by 2033, while South Korea is targeting 300,000 by 2027. In Taiwan, the government announced plans last year to attract 25,000 Southeast Asian students annually to help address labor shortages in key industries.
A 2023 report by international education consultancy Acumen found that approximately 132,000 Vietnamese were studying abroad, accounting for nearly 40% of all Southeast Asian overseas students. Malaysia and Indonesia each sent over 50,000 students abroad, while Thailand contributed around 32,000.
In 2022, Southeast Asia became the third-largest region globally for outbound student mobility, following China and India, with 350,000 students studying overseas, according to Acumen.
European universities, struggling with chronic underfunding and aware that demographic challenges across the continent necessitate higher-skilled migrant workers, have begun looking toward Southeast Asia.
In June, the German Embassy in Hanoi funded a "career truck" to tour Vietnam and promote study opportunities in Germany. Just a month earlier, French President Emmanuel Macron gave a keynote speech at the University of Science and Technology in Hanoi during a state visit.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Meanwhile, Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, speaking in Brussels in July, called for more Indonesians to pursue higher education in Europe. Around 3,300 Indonesians study in Europe annually, he said.
However, students from Southeast Asia remain underrepresented.
Of the 1.66 million international students currently enrolled at universities across the EU, only a small proportion are Southeast Asian.
In Germany, there are around 7,060 Vietnamese undergraduate students, according to the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).
"Despite the growing significance of Southeast Asia, there is still little focus on the region in European academia," Alfred Gerstl, head of a European–Southeast Asian relations project at the Central European Institute of Asian Studies think tank.
Many European universities face growing financial pressures. In May, the UK's Office for Students reported that 40% of English universities are expected to operate at a financial deficit this year.
In Germany, the DAAD cut 2,500 scholarships in February due to budget constraints. The Freie Universität Berlin and other institutions have also seen sharp reductions in funding.
France's 2025 national budget cut education and research spending by €1 billion ($1.15 billion) compared with the previous year.
A March report by the European University Alliance warned that universities across Europe are facing a "new normal" of underfunding. As costs rise and revenues stagnate, many institutions are being pushed to attract more international students.
"There are powerful incentives to enroll a greater number of foreign (non-EU) students in systems that allow universities to set fees for this sector of the student population," the report stated.
Respondents to the study noted that foreign student recruitment remains "a key factor in generating much-needed income," suggesting that competition for this demographic will only intensify.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Since the Myanmar coup in 2021, Kristina Kironska, of Palacky University Olomouc in the Czech Republic, helped secure prestigious fellowships for Burmese students fleeing the military junta.
Many accessed prestigious EU funds and grants, but the main challenge remained the visa and residency documentation, Kironska told DW.
She said European government could review their visa and long-term stay requirements for documents for Southeast Asian citizens and simplify the procedure.
However, the solution seems to always come back to money.
"In order to attract more students from Southeast Asia, it is essential to provide more funding for mobility exchanges and scholarships, in particular for PhD students," said Gerstl from the Central European Institute of Asian Studies.
Several European countries are beginning to adapt policies to remain competitive.
Last month, Norway relaxed its Norwegian language requirements for university admission and simplified employment pathways for international PhD candidates. Importantly, it adjusted tuition fees for foreign students after a hike led to a steep decline in enrolment.
In May, the European Commission launched the "Choose Europe Initiative," a €500-million scheme designed to attract top global researchers.
It includes expanded long-term grants via the European Research Council and a doubling of top-up grants for relocating scholars.
However, there are signals that students from Southeast Asia are increasingly looking closer to home for study abroad options.
A recent British Council study found declining numbers of students from Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand enrolling at UK institutions since 2015.
Increasingly, Southeast Asian students are looking closer to home.
Japan now hosts more Vietnamese students than any English-speaking country. This shift is partly driven by improvements in the quality of higher education across Asia.
In 2024, 23 East Asian universities made it into the QS ranking of the world's top 100 universities, a 35% increase compared to 2015.
The current political landscape in the United States may present opportunities for European institutions. Since returning to office in January, the Trump administration has taken a more restrictive approach to academic funding and student mobility.
Fulbright grants have reportedly been slashed, affecting over 7,400 foreign scholars. The White House has also cut $400 million in funding from Columbia University and $800 million from Johns Hopkins. Tens of thousands of international student visas have reportedly been revoked, although official numbers remain unconfirmed.
In March, a Nature survey revealed that three-quarters of US-based scientists were considering leaving the country.
While many European universities are looking to lure disillusioned American academics, some are also seizing on the instability in US academia to attract students from Asia, particularly China and Southeast Asia.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What Ukrainians expect of the Putin-Trump summit – DW – 08/13/2025
What Ukrainians expect of the Putin-Trump summit – DW – 08/13/2025

DW

timean hour ago

  • DW

What Ukrainians expect of the Putin-Trump summit – DW – 08/13/2025

Are Ukrainian experts and politicians optimistic about the upcoming talks between US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska? Or do they doubt there will be a real breakthrough? Soon after the August 15 meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska was announced, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy put out a video warning against excluding his country from the talks: "Any decisions made against us, any decisions made without Ukraine, are decisions made against peace. They will not work." Many Ukrainians share this view, according to a survey conducted by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS) in late July and early August. "Ukrainians remain open to negotiations and making difficult decisions," Anton Hruschezkyj of KIIS told DW. "The absolute majority, however, continues to reject demands for [Ukrainian] surrender." According to the survey, 76% of Ukrainians reject Russia's "peace plan" and the idea of making concessions to Russia. At the same time, 49% oppose the US peace plan that entails security guarantees for Ukraine from European countries but not from the US, recognizes Crimea as part of the Russian Federation, maintains Russian control over Ukraine's occupied territories, and lifts sanctions against Russia. Ukrainians do not rule out that the upcoming negotiations between Putin and Trump, which will not have Ukrainian or European representatives present, will be aimed at forcing Ukraine to capitulate. "The Russians never changed their negotiating stance and will not do so as long as they do not suffer serious military and political defeats," Volodymyr Horbach of the Ukrainian Institute for Northern Eurasia Transformation (INET) told DW. The fact that Trump is talking to Putin without first pressuring Russia to change its stance shows that this approach is doomed to failure, Horbach says. "The Russians will stick to their position and want to offer a ceasefire in return for Ukraine's de facto surrender, in other words, fulfilling Russian demands. So calling this concessions is very naive," Horbach said. The analyst does not regard the upcoming Putin-Trump talks as a disaster, but says they signal an "alarming trend" as Trump is "legitimizing Russian war criminal Vladimir Putin, which is unacceptable to Ukraine and Europe." Horbach said he sees "no possibility of implementing any real, practical outcomes of these negotiations in the context of the Ukrainian-Russian war. The proposals that Putin may make will satisfy neither Ukraine nor the European Union." He added that "Trump will have to maneuver, he will not be able to force Ukraine and its European partners to accept Putin's terms." Ukraine was in a similar situation in March 2025, says Dmytro Levus, who heads the Ukrainian Meridian Social Research Center. At the time, Donald Trump believed that the war could be quickly ended by negotiating with Russia and enforcing a peace agreement based on Ukraine's surrender. Lifting sanctions on Russia, however, proved impossible, as most of them had been imposed by the Europeans, Levus said. He believes that after this Alaska meeting, the US and Russia will once again have to face reality — Ukrainian forces continue defending their country and Ukrainian's European partners will not unconditionally accept and implement any deal agreed between Putin and Trump. "Ukraine's position, as stated by Zelenskyy, is clear and correct: the [Ukrainian] constitution does not allow for the ceding of [Ukrainian] territory," Levus told DW. "That is why I do not expect anything meaningful to come out of the Alaska meeting." Iryna Herashchenko, one of the leaders of Ukraine's opposition European Solidarity Party, says the Putin-Trump meeting represents a challenge for the entire international security system. She explains that it would signal to the whole world that violence can go unpunished if Russia, the aggressor, is rewarded for its attack on Ukraine, for annexing parts of the country and for committing war crimes. That is why Herashchenko says recognizing Russian occupation is a red line that must not be crossed. "This would pave the way for new wars, not only in our region," Herashchenko said on Telegram. "That is why all negotiations should be conducted with the participation of Ukraine and the EU, with strict security guarantees, international monitoring, and provisions for sanctions." Anything else would not bring peace, but only lead to new war. Danylo Hetmantsev of Ukraine's rulingServant of the People party takes a more positive view of the upcoming talks, saying the summit will finally reveal Russia's stance. "If there are once again attempts at 'diplomatic maneuvering' instead of productive negotiations at the meeting, this will likely lead to the imposition of tough American sanctions, including on Russia's allies, who will have to pay for supporting the aggressor, which they will not like," Hetmantsev said on Telegram. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video At the same time, Ukrainian experts do not rule out that the US will once again try blackmailing Ukraine into accepting unacceptable conditions after the Putin-Trump summit. Kyiv-Mohyla Academy lecturer and Ukrainian Prism think tank researcher Oleksandr Kraiev believes that Trump could threaten to halt arms deliveries to Ukraine. "But [weapons] deliveries are already sporadic and unsystematic, so it won't be as much of a shock as when Trump first announced something like this," Kraiev told DW. He believes the summit will be purely held for the "sake of talks," as neither side has any real idea of how the war should end. "There could be a joint statement on continuing the talks, but that's all," Kraiev said.

Gas push fuels fears of climate backsliding in Germany
Gas push fuels fears of climate backsliding in Germany

Local Germany

time2 hours ago

  • Local Germany

Gas push fuels fears of climate backsliding in Germany

Chancellor Friedrich Merz's coalition has made reviving Europe's struggling top economy a priority and argues that reliable and affordable energy supplies are crucial for the country's manufacturing titans. But critics charge the bid to boost fossil fuel production is ideologically driven and highlights a shift away from green policies under the new government. Merz leads a coalition that includes his centre-right CDU party and junior partners the centre-left SPD -- but without the Greens, who were in the last administration. The economy ministry, headed by Katherina Reiche of the CDU, is vocally backing a target of building new gas plants with about 20 gigawatts of power production capacity by 2030. Reiche, a former energy company executive, has argued it is important to "move very quickly" towards building the plants "in order to maintain a high level of security of supply in our country". The goal is to have a backup source of power in times there are shortfalls of renewables, which sometimes happens when the sun is not shining or there is not enough wind. Supporters say more supply is needed in the short term as nuclear power has been switched off in Germany and coal should follow suit in the coming years. Under German climate law, the share of renewable electricity consumed in the country should rise to 80 percent by 2030. It stood at around 55 percent in 2024, according to the federal environment agency. READ ALSO: Climate change made recent European heatwave 'up to 4C hotter' Energy focus Earlier this month, the government agreed gas production could begin off a North Sea island in an area straddling the border with the Netherlands, with a Dutch company planning to extract the fossil fuel, sparking condemnation from environmentalists. Advertisement Plans to build more gas plants are not new, and the previous government also wanted to expand capacity, but the new targets are around double those of the past. Underlining the new government's changing priorities, Reiche's ministry has been renamed the "Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy" -- under the Greens in the previous, SPD-led coalition, it was called the "Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action". She also appeared at one point to question Germany's legally binding target of achieving greenhouse gas neutrality by 2045, sparking tensions with SPD environment minister Carsten Schneider. An economy ministry spokesman told AFP that Reiche "stands by" the current climate goal. "The government is committed to achieving these targets with the political measures at its disposal -- while maintaining Germany's position as an industrial location," he said. Advertisement 'Dramatic setback' The Greens have regularly attacked Reiche while more than 380,000 people have so far signed a petition by campaign group Campact warning her policies risk "a dramatic setback in climate policy". But criticism is emerging even within the conservatives. The Climate Union, grouping CDU and other conservative politicians, has warned subsidies for new gas plants could push up power costs, the Handelsblatt financial daily reported. Energy think tank Agora Energiewende estimates that only a maximum of 10 gigawatts of extra gas plants would be needed by 2030 to supplement other power sources. "This will ensure security of supply -- even if coal-fired power plants are taken off the grid as planned," Philipp Godron, the head of the group's power programme, told AFP. READ ALSO: Why gas bills in Germany are set to get cheaper Meanwhile, questions remain over how quickly the plants can be built, while the European Commission, the EU's executive arm, still needs to give its approval. The economy ministry spokesman told AFP that talks with the EU for putting out tenders for a "significant portion" of the plants were "well-advanced". He also stressed that any new gas-fired plants must be "decarbonised in the long term", for example by switching them to green hydrogen, which was necessary "in view of the decarbonisation of the electricity system and compliance with EU law".

Germany rejects US censorship claims in human rights report – DW – 08/13/2025
Germany rejects US censorship claims in human rights report – DW – 08/13/2025

DW

time3 hours ago

  • DW

Germany rejects US censorship claims in human rights report – DW – 08/13/2025

The report itself has been accused of political bias, with the US softening criticism of Israel and El Salvador. Germany rejected the report saying it has "a very high level of freedom of expression." Human rights, such as freedom of expression, are under threat in Germany and other European countries, according to the 2024 Human Rights Report by the US State Department. The report, which in former years has been seen as a reliable point of reference for global human rights advocacy, has been criticized by human rights groups as containing numerous omissions and mischaracterizations to fit the current US administration's political aims. The German government rejected the report. "There is no censorship in Germany," Deputy Government Spokesman Steffen Meyer said. "We have a very high level of freedom of expression in Germany, and we will continue to defend it in every form," he added. "The human rights situation in Germany worsened during the year," an executive summary of the report's Germany entry said. "Significant human rights issues included restrictions on freedom of expression and credible reports of crimes, violence, or threats of violence motivated by antisemitism," the report said. The report stated, however, that the German government "took some credible steps to investigate, prosecute, and punish officials who committed human rights abuses." The report follows on from comments made by US Vice President JD Vance in February, in which he accused Germany and other European allies of imposing restrictions on free speech and attempting to marginalize far-right parties, including the Alternative for Germany (AfD). His remarks have been described as "intrusive" by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. The report devotes a much smaller section to Israel than it did last year and fails to mention the severe humanitarian crisis and death toll in the Gaza Strip amid Israel's ongoing offensive against the Palestininian militant group Hamas. El Salvador, which was described in the 2023 report under the Biden administration as having "significant human rights issues," also got off lightly in 2024. "There were no credible reports of significant human rights abuses," the 2024 report said about the Central American country, whose president, Nayib Bukele, is accused of overseeing unlawful and arbitrary killings, torture and harsh prison conditions. The Trump administration's relations with El Salvador have strengthened in recent months, with Washington using a high-security mega-prison in the country to house migrants it has deported under draconian new migration policies. Russia's ongoing invasion of Ukraine was referred to in the report mainly as the "Russia-Ukraine war," though it did say Russia's forces and officials were reported to have committed war crimes, crimes against humanity and abuses in Ukraine. In contrast, countries such as South Africa and Brazil, with whose governments Trump has clashed, came in for severe criticism that was not contained in the 2023 report. The report was issued with a delay as officials appointed by US President Donald Trump altered an earlier draft to bring it into line with his administration's foreign policies and ideological slant. It was prepared after the department underwent a major revamp during which hundreds of people were dismissed, many from the agency's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, which has a large role in writing the report. In April, Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote in an opinion piece that the bureau had become a nest of "left-wing activists" and pledged that the Trump administration would change its focus in favor of "Western values." "The report demonstrates what happens when political agendas take priority over the facts," said Josh Paul, a former State Department official and director of nongovernmental organization A New Policy. "The outcome is a much-abbreviated product that is more reflective of a Soviet propaganda release than of a democratic system," he told Reuters news agency. Rights groups Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have also criticized the report, saying the Trump administration had mischaracterized some records of abuses and omitted others to suit its political agenda. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce, however, defended the report, saying it had been restructured to improve readability and to stop it from being a list of "politically biased demands and assertions."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store