Prairie canola producers brace for 'devastating' 100 per cent tariffs from China
Canola farmers are bracing for impact as China looks to impose hefty tariffs on their industry in response to Canadian tariffs on the country's electric vehicle exports.
Just mere weeks away from when farmers plant their first seeds, China is to enact a 100 per cent levy on Canadian canola oil and meal, plus a 25 per cent duty on seafood and pork.
"All in all, it's just bad news," said Clinton Monchuck, a fourth-generation canola farmer from Lanigan, Sask.
The tariffs come in response to Canada's 100 per cent levies on Chinese-made EVs and a 25 per cent tax on aluminum and steel products. Former prime minister Justin Trudeau said China had claimed an unfair advantage that was hurting Canada's auto industry.
It's unclear how consumers will be affected by the tariffs, but industry players say the sticker price of canola oil may not increase in Canada. The federal government has said China's tariffs are unjustified, but it has not announced any concrete plans to help canola farmers.
"From the beginning, our focus has been and will continue to be the protection of Canadian workers and the unwavering support of our hard-working farmers," read a Tuesday joint statement from three federal cabinet ministers, including Agriculture Minister Kody Blois.
Monchuck said the tariffs pose an existential threat to his family's nearly 120-year-old canola farm. He expects to take a $100,000 hit this year, if the tariffs stay in place.
That's without accounting for any other trade actions taken by the U.S., which intends to impose 25 per cent tariffs on all imports from Canada starting in April.
China's actions are bound to resurface difficult memories of 2019 for canola farmers, who were hit with similar tariffs after Canadian authorities detained Meng Wanzhou, an executive of Chinese telecom mammoth Huawei, on a warrant from the U.S.
"We've gone through this before," Monchuck said.
Farmers point the finger at the federal government because the tariffs are a direct response to measures to protect the Canadian auto sector, he said.
"It's pretty tough as a farmer, when a government is kind of picking winners and losers," he said.
"We happen to be on the losing end of this discussion."
In response to the tariffs, leaders from the Prairie provinces have requested action from Ottawa to support farmers. Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba rely heavily on China for canola exports, sending billions of dollars in products overseas each year.
An association representing canola growers in Alberta has also asked the federal government to cover losses resulting from the tariffs. The impact of tariffs from China alone "could be potentially devastating," said Karla Bergstrom, executive director of Alberta Canola.
The current situation has left many farmers without bids from sellers, Bergstrom said. Canola prices have also plummeted since China announced the tariffs.
"It's prohibitive," Bergstrom said. "It will be uncompetitive to sell to China."
Alberta Agriculture Minister RJ Sigurdson said he hopes the federal government can reboot talks with China to resolve the trade war. He would not say whether he thought the tariffs on China were a mistake.
The governing United Conservative Party set aside $4 billion this year to manage its response to tariffs, up $2 billion from the year before.
Speaking to rural leaders, Premier Danielle Smith said Wednesday the province could avoid the worst pain because canola seed, the largest of the province's canola-based exports, is exempted from China's tariffs.
"There are going to be some products impacted, but the bulk of what we export is not," she said.
Saskatchewan, with a slim $12-million surplus in its budget tabled Wednesday, did not set aside money to help manage the potential impact of tariffs. Manitoba will deliver its provincial budget Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
This ‘hero' took an airline to small claims court over cancelled flights and won — a victory for all travellers
A recent small claims court decision in Nova Scotia has called out a troubling and growing business practice among Canadian airlines. And consumers can thank Maritimer Jason Hennigar for this. Three years ago, Hennigar bought round-trip tickets to Florida from Halifax through Sunwing. Not once, but twice, the airline cancelled his scheduled flight for 'unanticipated business or operational constraints.' Baloney, a small claims adjudicator ruled in a decision issued in April. Hennigar just wanted to go on holiday — a trip to Disney he'd been planning since September 2022. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW After Sunwing cancelled his first flight and offered to rebook him on another plane — for $500 more — Hennigar agreed. When the airline cancelled the second flight and ignored his requests for the airline to get him on another plane, Hennigar felt he had no choice but to dig deeper into his pockets. Sunwing did not respond to the Star's emailed request for comment. The Advocate Is Sunwing responsible for reimbursing travellers after fire near resort? It says no — but a lawyer says not so fast Star advocate Diana Zlomislic takes a deep dive into Ontario's Travel Industry Act and wonders With his scheduled vacation just weeks away, he forked over $5,155.92 to Air Canada to get him to Florida — twice the amount he had already paid Sunwing. Hennigar read Canada's Air Passenger Protection Regulations, and knew that when an airline cancels a flight for reasons within its control, as Sunwing did, the law says a carrier must provide customers an alternate flight at no additional charge. But he also knew that time was running out and that he wasn't likely to convince a company that had stopped communicating with him that it was in the wrong. So he took his vacation and filed a legal action against Sunwing in a small claims court in Nova Scotia when he returned home. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW The case, which Hennigar won, shines a light on a 'highly problematic and growing business practice by airlines,' says Gabor Lukacs, president of Air Passenger Rights, a Canadian advocacy group. The group, Lukacs says, had no involvement in the case. The Nova Scotia man compiled a 16-tabbed binder of evidence for his Zoom hearing and represented himself. Lukacs, who has never met Hennigar, calls him a 'hero.' At the hearing, Sunwing's claims director testified that the second plane the airline cancelled — a 737 — was scheduled to carry 189 passengers from Halifax to Orlando in February 2023. In a public decision issued in April, small claims adjudicator August Richardson took Sunwing to task. Evidence presented in court, he wrote, shows the airline's business model 'was premised on selling enough tickets for a particular flight or destination to fill a plane.' If the airline failed to reach its target number of passengers by a specific date, it would cancel the flight. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW 'The best that could be said was that the defendant thought it would be too expensive to fulfil its obligation to the claimant to find an alternate flight at no additional cost,' Richardson wrote. 'But the fact that a contract proves more expensive than a contracting party thought it would be does not excuse that party from performance. A bad deal is still a deal.' Lukacs loves that last line and repeats it several times during our interview. 'It's the first time this practice has been called out,' he says. 'When an airline says your only option is to cancel or pay more, that's not acceptable. That's illegal.' The Advocate Air Canada placed this family's 20-month-old on standby — then the real problems began Airline apologizes and offers flight compensation and a travel voucher after family's rough ride Before taking his case to small claims court, Hennigar submitted a request for damages to Sunwing. The airline, without discussion, eventually refunded $2,503 to his credit card. In his small claims case, which he filed in September 2024, Hennigar asked the court to order Sunwing to pay him the remaining cost he incurred as a result of the cancellations, which totalled $2,652.76. Sunwing argued that the federal air passenger regulations upon which Henningar's case relied pertained primarily to 'large carriers' and that it was not a large carrier. Hennigar agreed. He turned to another piece of legislation, the 1999 Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air — commonly referred to as the Montreal Convention. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW He successfully argued that the word 'delay' in Article 19 of the Montreal Convention included the cancellation of a flight — that a cancellation by definition amounts to a delay of the intended arrival date and time. Richardson agreed. The Advocate Airline compensation horror stories take flight. Here's why it may get a whole lot worse After sharing a traveller's odyssey for compensation from Turkish Airlines last week, readers He ordered Sunwing to pay Hennigar for the extra cost of the substitute tickets he purchased himself from Air Canada and layover expenses for a total of $2,652.76 plus costs of $200. There are a surprising number of people named Jason Hennigar in Nova Scotia. I left phone and Facebook messages with three of them but never connected with the right one. If you're reading this Jason, I'd still love to talk with you.
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
Katherine Zien
Liberal support for oil and gas has hurt the Canadian economy. On average, other economic sectors sustain more than eight times more jobs per million dollars of GDP than oil and gas extraction. By Greg Mikkelson Katherine Zien
Canada Standard
2 hours ago
- Canada Standard
Economic Watch: Doubled U.S. steel, aluminum tariffs spark criticism, trade war concerns across globe
As the largest supplier of U.S. steel, Canada has called the additional levies "unlawful and unjustified," and vowed to fight. BEIJING, June 5 (Xinhua) -- Government leaders, businesspeople, and analysts have voiced concerns and criticisms over the recent U.S. tariff hikes on imported steel and aluminum, warning that the measures would not only harm the interests of U.S. trade partners, but also fuel a global trade war and deal a blow to the world economy. The United States started to raise tariffs on imported steel and aluminum from 25 percent to 50 percent starting from Wednesday, according to an executive order signed by U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday. The European Commission criticized the new U.S. tariff measures, warning that the move could prompt swift European retaliation. "The EU is prepared to impose countermeasures, including in response to the latest U.S. tariff increase," the commission's spokesperson said in an emailed statement. The U.S. action undermines the EU's ongoing efforts to reach a negotiated agreement with the United States, according to the statement. As the largest supplier of U.S. steel, Canada has called the additional levies "unlawful and unjustified," and vowed to fight. "Canada's new government is engaged in intensive and live negotiations to have these and other tariffs removed as part of a new economic and security partnership with the United States," the Prime Minister's office said in a statement Tuesday. "We are in intensive negotiations with the Americans, and, in parallel, preparing reprisals if those negotiations do not succeed," said Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney on Wednesday. Unifor, a Canadian general trade union, called on Carney to retaliate immediately and urged Canada to pause exports of critical minerals to the United States. Hundreds of Canadian steelworkers have lost their jobs since initial tariffs took effect, said Unifor, warning that layoffs in the auto and aerospace industries could also occur. "This isn't trade policy, it's a direct attack on Canadian industries and workers," said Marty Warren, United Steelworkers National Director for Canada, in a statement. Thousands of Canadian jobs are on the line, and Canada needs to respond immediately and decisively to defend workers, added Warren. Calling the impact of the initial 25 percent tariffs "devastating," after it resulted in job losses and a drop in shipments to the United States, Catherine Cobden, CEO of the Canadian Steel Producers Association, said a 50 percent tariff will lead to a "dramatic acceleration" of those trends. "At a 50 percent tariff, we basically consider the U.S. market closed -- completely closed, door slammed shut, if you will -- to Canadian steel," she said. "We can't ship at 50 percent. Perhaps we can stockpile for a few days, but obviously we can't keep producing if one of our major markets is shuttered." Gary Clyde Hufbauer, a non-resident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said: "With the 50 percent tariff, not only is American steel going to be less internationally competitive but so are the multitude of American industries that depend on steel as a necessary input." The new rate on imported steel will almost certainly enlarge the profits of domestic steel companies while U.S. manufacturers and American households will pay dearly for the bonanza to steel barons, wrote Hufbauer in an opinion piece on Monday. The tariffs make it more expensive for domestic auto manufacturers to produce here, and "it's an economically inconsistent, illiterate policy that seems to be hiding under the national security justifications," said Wayne Winegarden, a senior fellow at the Pacific Research Institute. "They've never given any justification why 25 percent is the right number, let alone why 50 percent is," Winegarden was quoted by a report on According to Felix Tintelnot, a professor of economics at Duke University, no business leader should make massive upfront investments in heavy industry if they don't believe that the same policy will last for a few years. Jeremy Flack, CEO of Flack Global Metals, a U.S.-based steel trader and manufacturer, said the tariffs have led to a pause of orders and reduced demand for steel. "We are not getting any orders. Volumes starting from February have begun to decline," Flack said.
