Is The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) the Best Food Stock to Buy Under $30?
Consumer Defensive Sector: Trends and Outlook
On April 25, Shana Sissel, Founder & CEO of Banrion Capital Mgmt, appeared on CNBC to talk about the struggles in the consumer staple sector and investor caution due to tariffs and 'Trump exhaustion.' She said the consumer defensive stocks are going on a downward trend, which makes sense to her, especially if you look at how the market's momentum flows. The concern about a recession and potential economic downturn might be too aggressive. She opined that she wouldn't take it as much of a point right now because even if we are going to see any economic slowdown from tariffs, one thing is certain: consumers do not tend to cut back on staples. The sector includes the types of companies and consumer goods that people cannot and will not live without.
However, even in this sector, there are some unusual economic indicators that may reflect signs of an economic recession. This includes the snack indicator, where people tend to cut back on snacks in tough times instead of staple food items and other more essential nutrition types. While this is something to keep in mind about the sector, Sissel said that how the consumer staples are performing reflects the momentum swing we have seen in the market. The outlook is, of course, concerning, as it is necessary to look at how people are thinking about the market conditions and the effects of tariff impacts.
JP Morgan also recently gave a market outlook amid tariffs, saying that the market is very bearish, especially in the macro community. It further said that:
'Most are disregarding the latest trade developments, partly due to 'Trump exhaustion.' We observe that many prefer to stay in cash and maintain lower leverage in their books.'
Talking about this outlook, Sissel said that one of the triggers that one must look out for a potential change in sentiment is the fact that there is a contrarian sentiment, where we have seen a lot of investors buying the dip. A whole generation of investors has learned to buy the dip because, most of the time, the market recovers quickly.
She also said that the Trump exhaustion appears to be very real, as continuous policy changes have created uncertainty in the market, especially regarding tariffs. While it looks like things are calming down, investors are going to be cautious about jumping in too quickly because of the continuous policy changes. She thus opined that we might see cash staying on the sideline a little bit longer, which meant that we have not seen enough change to indicate that any market gains we are seeing right now are sustainable.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
World's Largest Hedge Fund Sells All Its US-Listed China Stocks
Hedge fund giant Bridgewater is unloading $1.5 billion in Chinese stocks, stepping away from Chinese investments entirely for the first time. President Donald Trump is moving to strengthen America's drug supply. How dependent is the United States on China, and what would happen if Beijing cut off the flow? As Trump meets with ...
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
M&A News: BlackRock Stock (BLK) Strengthens Despite $23B Panama Ports Deal Slipping to 2026
Shares in U.S. asset manager BlackRock (BLK) were higher today despite its $22.8 billion Panama Ports deal with CK Hutchison (CKHUF) being delayed until 2026. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. 'The deal is taking much longer than we had expected when we announced in March, but frankly that's not particularly troublesome,' CK group managing director and finance director Frank Sixt said. 'There is a reasonable chance that discussions will lead to a deal that is good for all of the parties and that will be capable of being approved by all the relevant authorities.' Complex Deal He added: 'With a deal of this size and complexity, closing… would not in any case occur this year, even if binding arrangements are agreed this year.' According to recent reports China's state-owned shipping giant Cosco is aiming to secure at least a 20%-30% stake in the proposed deal alongside BlackRock and Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC). The proposed deal includes two ports at either end of the Panama Canal and more than 40 others around the world. BlackRock and MSC, which reached a preliminary agreement to buy the ports from Hong Kong conglomerate CK back in March, are reportedly open to Cosco taking a stake. Last month, CKH had announced that the exclusive negotiation period with the consortium led by BlackRock and Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) had expired, and it intended to invite major strategic investors from mainland China to join as key members of the consortium. Chinese officials have told BlackRock, MSC and Hutchison that if Cosco is left out of the deal, Beijing would take steps to block Hutchison's proposed sale. This won't be too much of a surprise for BlackRock given that legal and regulatory hurdles are a key risk for the group – see above. Trump Concern A delay to the deal could be bad news for President Trump who has put a lot of political capital into ensuring that U.S. dominance over the Panama Canal is reasserted. There is also the current trade and tariff spat between the U.S. and China, as well as wider geopolitical concerns. The Chinese government has also repeatedly expressed concerns about the deal since March. This has included slamming CK for betraying the Chinese people and being 'spineless.' It was concerned, and presumably still is, that the deal could hit China's shipping and trade interests. Is BLK a Good Stock to Buy Now? On TipRanks, BLK has a Strong Buy consensus based on 14 Buy and 1 Hold ratings. Its highest price target is $1,255. BLK stock's consensus price target is $1,174.53, implying a 1.24% upside.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income
Key Points Statistical evidence supports the idea that these two ETFs can simultaneously grow capital and generate income. Maximum monthly drawdowns are less than the benchmark's performance, and so is the risk as defined by standard deviation. These ETFs do relatively best when benchmark indexes are highly volatile but still make money in bull markets. 10 stocks we like better than JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF › The JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (NYSEMKT: JEPI) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (NASDAQ: JEPQ) have garnered significant investor attention, in part due to their trailing-12-month dividend yields of 8.2% and 11.2%, respectively. Moreover, they offer monthly income, making them a favorite among passive income investors. As such, it would be interesting to share some modeling of their performance to see if they do offer investors a way to a relatively low-volatility strategy that practically guarantees a monthly income. (Keep in mind dividends can always be cut.) Introducing two JPMorgan ETFs The first thing to understand about these two exchange-traded funds is that they are not tailored to invest in dividend stocks. Instead, they both follow the same strategy of investing up to 80% of net assets in equities (stocks), with the only difference being that the Equity Premium ETF focuses on S&P 500 stocks while the Nasdaq Equity Premium ETF focuses on stocks in the Nasdaq-100. As noted above, the stocks are not explicitly selected for their dividend yield, an essential point because high-yield equity-focused ETFs often involve concentrating holdings in sectors with high yields. The remaining net assets, up to 20%, are invested in equity-linked notes (ELNs) that follow a strategy of selling call options on the indexes that the two ETFs benchmark -- S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100, respectively. A call option is the right to buy shares of the index at a specified price (the strike price) and is bought by bullish investors. The seller of the call options (in this case the ETF) receives a premium from the buyer. However, if the index increases significantly, the option is exercised, and the ELN typically incurs a loss. Conversely, when the index experiences a small gain, stays flat, or loses value, the option isn't exercised. The idea is that an anticipated net profit in premiums collected from the ELNs, combined with some dividend income from stock holdings, will generate sufficient income for distributions to be paid to shareholders under any condition, particularly in the event of a substantial increase in the index. And note that the upside is limited (gains less than the market), but the downside is also restricted. This table lays out how the portions of the ETFs will perform based on how the underlying index performs in a month. Monthly Index Performance Strong Gain Moderate Gain Moderate Loss Strong Loss Equities (At least 80% of the ETF assets) Strong Gain Gain Loss Strong Loss ELNs (Up to 20% of the ETF's assets) Loss Profit Profit Profit Overall Gain, but less than the market Gain, but less than the market Slight profit/slight loss Loss, but less than the market Author's analysis. What the ETFs need to do to demonstrate they work Before I throw charts at you, it's worth noting that the proof of the strategy working includes: The ETF should have a lower volatility than the index (measured here by the standard deviation of monthly returns). The ETFs should have relatively low maximum monthly drawdowns because passive investors usually do not want to lose a significant amount in any one month. The strategy should demonstrate a high coefficient of determination, or R^2, indicating that the independent variable (in this case, the benchmark index) is primarily responsible for determining the outcome. Performance consistent with the outcomes outlined in the table above. That said, here are the charts comparing the monthly index performance to the ETF's performance. Both sets of data include reinvestment of dividends. First, here's the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF. And now the JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF. A few conclusions can be drawn from the data, along with some additional calculations. The monthly standard deviation of the S&P 500 over the period is 4.7%, compared to 3.1% for JEPI, indicating lower volatility returns. The monthly standard deviation of the Nasdaq-100 over the period is 5.7%, compared to 4.2% for JEPQ, indicating lower volatility returns. Both ETFs exhibit high R^2 values, indicating a consistency of outcome from the strategy. The three most significant monthly drawdowns for JEPI are -6.4%, -4.2%, and -4.1%. The three most significant monthly drawdowns for JEPQ are -8.7%, -6.8%, and -6.6%. In general, the strategy is effective, generating a collection of positive returns when the indices report moderate gains and losses. The downside is limited compared to the index when the market declines significantly, and the upside is limited when the indexes perform well. What it means to passive investors Both indices have performed very well over the periods, with an average monthly gain of 1.5% on the S&P 500 and 1.8% on the Nasdaq; therefore, the ETFs have understandably underperformed. However, there's no guarantee that these conditions will continue, and these ETFs have demonstrated lower volatility returns while maintaining substantial dividends for those seeking monthly income. As such, they are excellent options for those seeking to generate passive income across a range of market conditions. Should you invest $1,000 in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF right now? Before you buy stock in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income was originally published by The Motley Fool
