Air India crash: Investigators probe ‘un-commanded transition' of fuel switches on AI 171 — What this means
'The probe will ascertain the possibility of an 'un-commanded transition' of the fuel control switches to the cut-off mode seconds after the lift-off,' sources told The Indian Express.
The AAIB report released on July 12 claimed that the London-bound Air India flight had experienced a "fuel cut off" seconds after taking off from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport (VAAH) on June 12.
According to the cockpit voice recording, the pilot denied cutting off the fuel. One pilot was heard asking, "Why did you cut off?" to which the other replied, "I did not do so."
Two switches in the flight deck control the fuel supply to the engine. Switching to "cut-off" is typically done only after landing.
They are used by pilots to start or shut down engines on the ground or to manually shut down or restart engines if an engine failure occurs during a flight. Aviation experts say a pilot would not be able to accidentally move the fuel switches that feed the engines.
To turn the fuel supply on, the switch must be pulled outward and then moved to a 'RUN' position, where it is released and settles back into a locked position. To turn the fuel supply off, the switch must be pulled outward again, moved to the 'CUTOFF' position and then released again.
The London-bound Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed into a medical college hostel in Ahmedabad moments after taking off from the city airport, killing all but one of the 242 onboard and another 19 on ground in the deadliest aviation accident in a decade.
According to the Indian Express, just hours before take-off from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick on June 12, a pilot flying the same aircraft from Delhi to Ahmedabad noted in the technical log a 'Stabilizer Position Transducer Defect'.
The Stabilizer Position Transducer is essentially a sensor that controls aircraft pitch — the up and down movement of the nose — and transmits the data in electrical signals to the flight control system to ensure that responses to pilot input are accurate.
The official told the Indian Express that the malfunction was checked and the engineer did the trouble shooting as per Boeing procedure.
'The malfunction is a critical issue as it can trigger incorrect responses in flight control, including unintended fuel cut-off signal,' the official said.
But he added, 'The Stabilizer Position Transducer malfunction did not cause this crash, but the question is whether it led to multiple sensor failure.'
The official alleged that the aircraft had previously experienced two major snags, including a flight cancellation due to an 'unresolvable electric snag' in December 2024 and an emergency landing in 2015 due to Cabin Air Compressor (CAC) surge, a known malfunction on Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner.
The official said the flight data analysis would focus on the 'trail of errors' as noted in technical logs to ascertain the health of the electric and software components of the aircraft.
The official reportedly said that the Engine Indication and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) of the aircraft in some flights preceding the June 12 Ahmedabad-Gatwick flight had displayed some system warnings.
'The probe is on to ascertain if the switch locks were disengaged due to an anomaly or if the FADEC's (Full Authority Digital Engine Control) Engine Control Unit (the brain of the aircraft) malfunctioned as the microprocessor could have misinterpreted the commands and initiated uncontrolled actions,' he was quoted as saying.
The investigators are likely to, therefore, delve into the 'history of technical fault' or malfunction in the course of the aircraft's life, the official said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Southwest Airlines says 'sorry' for forgetting two blind women in New Orleans, gives $100 vouchers for delay
Southwest Airlines left behind two blind women, Camille Tate and Sherri Brun, at New Orleans Airport, causing a five-hour delay in their journey, though initially the airline denied the allegation and insisted that they were not left behind. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The airline said the flight that the women booked was delayed for five hours and many of the other passengers were accommodated on a different flight but the two women found out about it when they boarded their delayed plane and realized that they were the only two passengers on the plane. They were told that they were only two passengers on the Orlando-bound flight because others had left. "I was angry and frustrated," Camille Tate said. Southwest denied that Brun and Tate were forgotten at the gate. The airline said the flight the women were scheduled for was delayed almost five hours and that many of the other passengers "were accommodated on another MCO-bound flight that left a little earlier from a nearby gate." "These two customers were not re-booked on that flight, so their assigned gate never changed," Southwest said. "Our records show that they flew to MCO on the airplane that had been parked at their original gate." The women complained that they were not told about the rebooking and they could not see any information because of their disabilities. The two friends said they took their unique flight story to the media to raise awareness about something that could happen to other similarly situated passengers unless the airline implements changes. Southwest then issued a public apology and offered Brun and Tate each a $100 voucher and said they were not eligible for a full refuns as they completed their originally scheduled flight. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now 'We apologize for the inconvenience,' the statement continued. 'Southwest is always looking for ways to improve our customers' travel experiences, and we're active in the airline industry in sharing best practices about how to best accommodate passengers with disabilities.'
News18
5 hours ago
- News18
Mizoram: Police seize narcotics worth around Rs 302 crore in multiple operations
Aizawl (Mizoram) [India], August 11 (ANI): Mizoram police has seized a massive haul of illegal drugs valued at nearly Rs 302 crore over multiple coordinated operations across the state in the past two weeks, officials an official statement, Mizoram Police Inspector General of Police (Headquarters) and Chief Public Relations Officer H Ramthlengliana said, 'Our relentless and untiring drive against drugs and other illegal activities continues. Significant seizures of contraband items were recently made by Mizoram Police at several locations."A joint operation on August 9 by the Special Narcotics Police Station under CID Crime and the 225 Battalion CRPF in Aizawl led to the interception of a car in the Seling and Bungbangla areas. Authorities seized 3.930 kilograms of methamphetamine tablets, estimated at Rs 51.09 lakh. Three individuals — Sahab Uddin (41), Emanuel Remnalalliana (25), and Lalbiaksiama (23) — were arrested. A case has been registered under sections 22(c), 25, and 29(1) of the NDPS on August 6, Champhai Police seized 1.053 kilograms (88 soap cases) of suspected heroin valued at Rs 31.59 lakh from a vehicle at the Khankawn Checkgate. Agnes Lalremsiami (32) was arrested in connection with this case registered under section 21(c) of the NDPS Act. One of the largest seizures took place on August 1, when a joint team from CID Special Branch and Special Narcotics PS intercepted a pickup truck on the Zemabawk-Seling route. Officers discovered a hidden compartment containing 20.304 kilograms of suspected crystal methamphetamine worth approximately Rs 300 crore, along with 1.625 kilograms (120 soap cases) of heroin valued at Rs 49.56 lakh. The driver, B Lalthazuala (45), was arrested, and a subsequent interrogation led to the arrest of the main suspect, Bawilianthang (42). The case is registered under sections 21(c), 22(c), and 25 of the NDPS another operation on the night of August 1, Lunglei Police and the 20th Battalion Assam Rifles seized 220.81 grams (18 soap cases) of heroin, valued at Rs 6.62 lakh, from a passenger named Lalrintluangi (33) aboard a Lunglei-bound vehicle from Champhai. Additional heroin totalling 120.31 grams (10 soap cases), worth Rs 3.61 lakh, was seized from three other passengers in the same vehicle. On July 31, Champhai Police at Khankawn Checkgate recovered 167 grams (16 soap cases) of heroin, valued at Rs 5.01 lakh, from Lalmuanawma (38) and K. Lalawmpuia (27). In a separate incident, the same day, 364 grams (31 soap cases) of heroin worth Rs 10.92 lakh were seized from three individuals residing in Aizawl.A coordinated operation on July 28 by Champhai Police and CID Special Branch led to the seizure of 440 grams (36 soap cases) of heroin worth Rs 13.20 lakh from Kalpo Jyoti Borah (26) of Assam and Rajan Brahma (32) of Arunachal Pradesh. The drugs were concealed in a hidden compartment inside a vehicle, which was also seized. (ANI)
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Tech snag diverts AI's Thiruvananthapuram -Delhi flight to Chennai
CHENNAI/NEW DELHI: At least 140 passengers, including MP KC Venugopal and a few other MPs, on an Air India Thiruvananthapuram-Delhi flight experienced a terrifying 3.5-hour journey on Sunday after a technical fault forced pilots to divert the aircraft to Chennai. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Flight AI 2455 circled over the Bay of Bengal for nearly two hours, began its descent for a landing, then ascended again before safely landing on its second attempt. In a detailed statement, the DGCA said AI 2455 'encountered moderate turbulent conditions during flight. Crew observed that weather information depicted on the weather radar was not accurate. Suspecting weather radar malfunction, they diverted to Chennai.' 'After (hovering to burn fuel) the aircraft was cleared (to land) at Chennai. (Crew) was instructed to carry out a missed approach by ATC as a departing Gulf Air flight, GFA 53 (Chennai-Bahrain), reported debris on the left side of the runway,' it said. A runway check found nothing. The AI aircraft landed safely at 10.39 pm. 'During engineering inspection no deficiency was observed. However, as a precautionary measure, the weather radar transceiver was replaced with a serviceable one,' the DGCA said. A combination of multiple factors, including a slightly delayed departure from Thiruvananthapuram, bad weather, announcement of the flight diverting due to a snag, hovering over Chennai, and then a go-around added to passengers' anxiety. Minutes after landing, K C Venugopal, a former junior civil aviation minister, posted on X about the "frighteningly close to tragedy' experience. 'Shortly after take-off, we were hit by unprecedented turbulence. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now About an hour later, the captain announced a flight signal fault and diverted to Chennai. For nearly two hours, we circled around the airport awaiting clearance to land, until a heart-stopping moment during the first attempt — another aircraft was reportedly on the same runway. In a split second, the captain's quick decision to pull up saved every life on board. The flight landed safely on the second attempt,' he said, urging the civil aviation ministry and DGCA to 'investigate the incident and fix accountability.' Air India denied that AI 2455 was asked to go around because there was another aircraft on the runway. An AI spokesperson said: 'The flight crew of AI2455 … made a precautionary diversion to Chennai due to a suspected technical issue and given the weather conditions en route. The flight landed safely in Chennai, where the aircraft will undergo the necessary checks. We regret the inconvenience caused to affected passengers…. At AI, safety of our passengers and crew remains top priority.' In reply to another post on X, AI said: '…diversion to Chennai was precautionary, due to a suspected technical issue and poor weather conditions. A go-around was instructed by Chennai ATC during the first attempted landing, not because of the presence of another aircraft on the runway. Our pilots are well-trained to handle such situations, and in this case, they followed standard procedures throughout the flight…' Air India arranged another Airbus A320neo to fly the passengers from Chennai to New Delhi as AI 2455. The usual flying time of AI 2455 (TRV-Delhi) is 3.5 hours with a scheduled departure time of 7.15 pm. According to flight tracking sites, it took off on Sunday at 8 pm, after a slight delay, and landed in Chennai at 10.39 pm. The alternate aircraft took off from Chennai at 1.40 am and landed in New Delhi at about 4 am. Captain Ranganathan, a former pilot and aviation safety expert, said it is normal for flights to go around while approaching the runway to land. "Even in cases where an aircraft occupies the runway for too long, the incoming flight, which was given clearance to approach the runway, would be asked to go around,' he said. Seasoned aviators say while AI 2455 had a routine suspected snag, passenger anxiety levels have expectedly been higher after the June 12 AI 171 crash in Ahmedabad and subsequent incidents.
