Need to address statistical issues in entrance, recruitment exams: NSC Chairman to government
The government has been called on to form a comprehensive policy on certain statistical issues related to entrance and recruitment exams by Rajeeva Laxman Karandikar, Chairman of the National Statistical Commission (NSC), who argued on Sunday that different agencies conducting their own exams have their own methods that can lead to dissatisfaction among candidates and legal proceedings.
Speaking at the 19th Statistics Day organised by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI), Karandikar said statistical issues such as negative marking and normalisation of marks in examinations that are being conducted online and see lakhs of candidates should be addressed 'appropriately'.
'The fact that when such a large number (of candidates) appear (for exams), we don't have computer systems which simultaneously 27 lakh candidates can write,' Karandikar said, referring to an earlier recruitment exam held by the railways. 'So we have parallel exams, or exams in phases, different question papers. Then the question comes: how do we compare them? This is a strictly statistical question.'
'Somehow, each agency goes on its own way to define the policy: there is a question of negative marking, normalisation. And each agency declares its own formula which is different. That leads to dissatisfaction, especially from the candidates that don't make it, some of them making it to the court system,' the NSC Chairman added.
In 2019, Karandikar was part of an expert committee constituted by the Supreme Court to suggest ways to deal with fraud in online examinations. The committee – led by retired Supreme Court justice GS Singhvi – was formed after the alleged leak of the Staff Selection Commission's Combined Graduate Level 2017 question papers, which led to massive protests. On Sunday, Karandikar said the expert committee had written a report just before COVID 'and perhaps that report is lying somewhere'.
'The point is that normalisation and negative marking, both are statistical questions. And perhaps – which body in government, I don't know, because there are multiple stakeholders – comprehensive effort should be made to create one group which gives thought to all this, brings in all the stakeholders, and comes out with one policy,' Karandikar added.
'Precision policymaking'
Moderating a panel discussion at the Statistics Day event – held to commemorate the birth anniversary of famed statistician PC Mahalanobis – Shamika Ravi, member of the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister, said India was moving into an era of 'precision policymaking'.
According to Ravi, given the size of the country, indicators such as the infant mortality rate and even the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) don't mean much at an all-India level, although such measures are needed for comparisons.
'But the reality is, policymaking largely depends on highly localised estimates, which is the effort we are now doing. We are moving towards district-level estimates because a lot of policymaking requires local, unbiased, as precise or as close to the truth – that's what an unbiased estimate is… We are moving into the realm of what is called precision policymaking. And precision policymaking, then and therefore, requires data which is representative at the local level, whatever local we define. We have now moved beyond aspirational districts to aspirational blocks,' Ravi said.
Also speaking at the same event, MoSPI Secretary Saurabh Garg said it was essential the statistics ministry produces data which is 'machine readable' given the advent of artificial intelligence and machine learning and follows basic standards and norms so that data can be more effectively used for decision making. Towards this, the ministry is looking at data and statistics at a much broader level, Garg said, with a focus on ensuring that the data produced by different departments and ministries within the government – or administrative data – is focused and usable.
Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy.
... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Women's safety a priority of governance: Delhi CM Rekha Gupta
New Delhi: Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta on Monday said that her government has made women's safety a priority of governance, and work is in progress to eliminate unsafe and dark spots in the city. In a post on X, the Chief Minister said, 'We have made women's safety in the capital not just a promise but a priority of governance. Continuous efforts are being made in coordination with the police and administration to make Delhi safer for women.' She said, 'Dark spots are being identified and security measures are being strengthened there, PCR patrolling has been increased, panic buttons and women's PCR facilities in public transport have been empowered, and effective mechanisms like 'One Stop Centres' are working to provide immediate assistance to women. Our goal is- a safe Delhi.' CM Gupta also highlighted the work being done by her government on fighting air pollution and ensuring the execution of court orders to stop the sale of fuel to end-of-life (EoL) vehicles. "Considering Delhi's pollution, the Hon'ble Supreme Court and pollution control bodies like CAQM, etc, are continuously stressing the seriousness of this matter and saying that end-of-life vehicles should be stopped — meaning such vehicles should not be given petrol or diesel. This matter is under constant discussion, and as per the court's directions, we want to implement the measures." The entire process is dependent on cameras, and we are studying its viability. 'The government is working to ensure minimal inconvenience is caused,' she said. Starting Tuesday, the Delhi government is planning to stop the sale of petrol and diesel to end-of-life (EoL) or over-age vehicles – a move aimed at fighting vehicular emission-linked air pollution in the Capital, an official said. Petrol pump owners on Monday confirmed that Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras and other devices linked to the transport ministry's data bank have been installed at their outlets to identify EoL vehicles. The Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) has issued a direction that all EoL vehicles identified through ANPR cameras or other such devices installed at filling stations shall be denied fuel from July 1 in the NCT of Delhi. The transport department has defined EoL vehicles as those which are no longer validly registered vehicles, whether running on petrol, CNG or diesel. These also include petrol vehicles more than 15 years old and diesel vehicles more than 10 years old.
NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
Sariska's Tigers Await Rajasthan Government vs Opposition Boundary Showdown
Jaipur: A Rajasthan government proposal to alter Core Tiger Habitat boundaries at the Sariska Reserve - which is home to nearly 50 tigers - has angered environmentalists and the opposition. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party has claimed the CTH changes are a 'rationalisation of forest area', and has pointed to a re-drawing of boundaries that adds a net 42.52 sq km to the reserve. But critics say the move could impact wildlife corridors tigers use to move between forests, and also restart 57 mines shut down by the Supreme Court to protect tigers and their environment. The controversy revolves around 48.39 sq km of land that happens to contain almost all the mines the Supreme Court had shut down in August last year; the court had said the mines violated the law by operating within a buffer zone meant to protect tigers from human activity. Restarting these mines - which dig out limestone, dolomite, and marble - could have an adverse long-term impact on the environment, including affect the tigers' habitat and forcing them to move out of their territories, and into villages and towns bordering the reserve, in search of food. That the mines will be restarted appears likely because the state has argued land excluded from the CTH 'are impacted by human activity and moving them out will benefit conversation'. The demarcation of CTH in and around Tehla is also expected to benefit hotels being built in the area, which, unchecked and uncontrolled, will add even more pressure on the environment. The other point of concern is that most of this 48.39 sq km is around Tehla - one of the main gateways in and out of Sariska - and where a tigress and her cub were sighted last month. Wildlife activists have questioned the altering of CTH where tigers have been seen, while the opposition has slammed the BJP for 'selling out to mining interests'. The Congress' Tikaram Jully, the Leader of the Opposition, and the local MLA said the state's move 'smacks of corruption'. "They changed the CTH where a tiger was seen. The question is 'who benefits? There should be a proper inquiry... almost all of Alwar (the district that contains the reserve) is industrialised... Bhiwadi, Chopanki... everything. This is the only ecological zone," Mr Jully said. Wildlife activist Rajesh Kishan Sidh, a local who is planning a legal challenge to the CTH alteration, told NDTV any redrawing of boundaries could endanger all 48 tigers in Sariska. "We are decreasing CTH in Tehla... where a tiger was sighted with her cub. The question is - why are you decreasing CTH land area? What pressure has led to this re-drawing of the map of Sariska?" he asked, noting also that no independent environmentalist had been consulted. Wildlife officials have raise questions too. RS Shekhawat, the former Field Director of Sariska, who oversaw the resurgence of tigers in the reserve, stressed the need for wildlife corridors. "Eco corridors are necessary for movement of tigers. Now it appears CTH will reduce by about two km, so from Tehla to Jamwa Ramgarh, and towards Rajgarh, the corridor will be impacted." Mr Shekhawat also said that even if the CTH was to be altered the state should have prioritised the interests of wildlife conservation by giving an assurance that the ESZ, or eco sensitive zone, around Sariska will be maintained at a minimum of five km, and that this will not be affected. But perhaps the fiercest criticism is from Congress leader and ex-Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh, who said the proposed changes endanger forests re-generated against great odds. Mr Ramesh also pointed out both the current Union Environment Minister, Bhupendra Yadav, and his state counterpart, Sanjay Sharma, are from Alwar district, and posted on X, "... surely this double engine cannot be supporting such corridor fragmentation to benefit mine owners..." The Rajasthan government, meanwhile, has declared it is, in fact, honouring the spirit and word of a Supreme Court ruling that said forest areas could not be allowed to decrease. Insisting the end result will be 'positive', it pointed to the increased reserve area and hit back at critics, declaring 'those who are opposing this don't have full knowledge of what is being done'. "'Critical habitat' means the tiger should be conserved and the forests should be protected, which means both the buffer zone and the critical habitat. the Supreme Court was also clear - forest areas should not decrease. So, in fact, our forest area has increased, The Rajasthan Wildlife Board and National Wildlife Board have agreed to this proposal," he declared. "Our aim is to expand the buffer area also because the numbers of tigers is Sariska is increasing. Those who are opposing this do not have full knowledge of what is being done." Fifteen years after Sariska was left without tigers - thanks to poachers - the reserve has become a success story. But now its new population of tigers is under threat again.
Scroll.in
3 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Denying trans woman status of a ‘woman' violates Constitution, says Andhra Pradesh HC
Denying a transgender woman the status of a 'woman' is unconstitutional, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has held. Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa in an order on June 16 said that a trans woman married to a man is entitled to file a criminal complaint of cruelty and harassment against her husband and his relatives under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. This section addresses cruelty inflicted upon a married woman by her husband or his relatives. The High Court made the observation while hearing petitions to quash a criminal case filed by a trans woman against her husband, his parents and a relative. 'To deny a trans woman the status of a 'woman'…solely on the ground of her reproductive capacity is to perpetuate discrimination and to violate Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution,' the order said. The High Court called such an argument 'deeply flawed and legally impermissible.' While Article 14 ensures equality before the law, Article 15 prohibits discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. Article 21 guarantees the protection of life and personal liberty. The order also stated that a narrow view of womanhood based on the ability to reproduce 'undermines the very spirit of the Constitution, which upholds dignity, identity, and equality for all individuals, irrespective of gender identity.' The trans woman married the man in 2019 according to Hindu rites. She later filed a complaint with the Ongole Police, alleging that her husband left her and that she received threatening messages. The police filed a chargesheet against the husband and his family for cruelty under Section 498A and for offences under the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. In their petitions to quash the criminal case, the husband and his family argued that the complainant, being a trans woman, could not be considered a 'woman' under the anti-cruelty law. They claimed that since she cannot bear a child, she could not be seen as a woman in the 'complete sense'. In its order on June 16, the High Court drew support from several landmark Supreme Court judgements. It cited the 2014 National Legal Services Authority v Union of India verdict, which had recognised the right of transgender persons to self-identify their gender. The order also referred to the 2023 Supreme Court judgement on same-sex marriage. It noted that while the top court did not grant a universal right to marry, it unanimously affirmed that transgender persons in heterosexual relationships have the right to marry under existing laws. Pratapa concluded that the complainant, being a trans woman in a heterosexual marriage, could not be deprived of her right to lodge a complaint against her husband and his relatives. However, while ruling on the substance of allegations of cruelty made by the woman, the High Court said that the claims were 'bald and omnibus' and lacked specific details. It held that allowing criminal proceedings against the man and his parents to continue would amount to abuse of the legal process. The court went on to quash the criminal proceedings against the accused persons. However, it clarified that a trans woman in a heterosexual marriage would have protection under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
