Samay Raina's Remarks On People With Disabilities "Disturbing": Supreme Court
Terming jokes made by standup comic Samay Raina and other comedians on persons with disabilities and those suffering from rare diseases "disturbing," the Supreme Court has said it will "scrutinise individual conduct minutely".
Hearing a petition by the CURE SMA (spinal muscular atrophy) Foundation of India on Tuesday, the bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi directed the stand-up comics to reply to the plea, which has highlighted insensitive jokes by them, and remain present in court again during the next hearing, which will be in three weeks
Appearing for the foundation, Senior Advocate Aparajita Singh had argued that offensive expressions used to mock people with disabilities by Mr Raina and others amount to "hate speech", which does not deserve any protection under the right to free speech guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.
The top court had taken strong objection to the remarks and directed the impleading of the comics for their crass jokes. After recording the personal presence of the comics in court on Tuesday, the bench asked them to file their replies within two weeks.
The bench also told the Centre that the guidelines on regulating content on social media and OTT platforms should be in conformity with constitutional principles, balancing the right to freedom with duties of citizens.
Guidelines
Earlier, the top court, while hearing YouTuber Ranveer Allahabadia's case over his controversial remarks on 'India's Got Latent', had directed the Centre to consider bringing in guidelines to regulate vulgar and crass content on social media and OTT platforms.
"...you have to have guidelines which are in conformity with constitutional principles, comprising both parts - freedom, where the limit of that freedom ends, and where duties start...we would like to invite open debate on that," Justice Kant said.
He made it clear that the court will have an open debate on the guidelines and also sought the views of all stakeholders.
On May 5, the Supreme Court had summoned five influencers and stand-up comics, including Samay Raina, over offensive and derogatory remarks made against persons with disabilities.
The top court had said any speech that demeans a community or class of persons would be curtailed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
15 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Monsoon Session: Cong chief Kharge questions Centre over Operation Sindoor
Congress MP Kharge said, 'I have given notice under Rule 267 on Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. Till today, the terrorists have not been caught or neutralised' ANI Addressing the Upper House of the Parliament on Monday, Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge questioned the Centre over the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. Congress MP Kharge said, "I have given notice under Rule 267 on Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. Till today, the terrorists have not been caught or neutralised. All parties extended unconditional support to the government. The government should inform us about what has happened." He further raised the US President Donald Trump's claim of intervening between India and Pakistan during the Operation Sindoor. "The LG of J & K had made a statement that there was an intelligence President Trump has claimed 24 times that the ceasefire happened only due to his intervention," he said Earlier today, several Opposition leaders invoked the Rule 267 (Notice of Motion for Suspension of Rules) of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) to demand a discussion on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. Congress MP KC Venugopal also submitted a notice to move an adjournment motion in Lok Sabha to discuss the "grave security lapses resulting in the terrorist attack in Paghalgam, and the foreign policy implications post Operation Sindoor". Meanwhile, addressing the media persons ahead of the commencement of the Monsoon Session, Prime Minister Modi highlighted the achievements of Operation Sindoor, saying that the whole world is attracted towards the new "Made in India form of Indian military power." The Prime Minister also hailed Indian defence forces on the stupendous success of Operation Sindoor, stating that the objectives of the target were achieved 100 per cent and terrorist bases were razed in just 22 minutes. "This monsoon session is a celebration of victory. The whole world has seen the strength of India's military power. The target set by the Indian Army in Operation Sindoor was achieved 100%. Under Operation Sindoor, the houses of the masters of terrorists were razed to the ground within 22 minutes. The world has been very attracted to this new form of Made in India military power. These days, whenever I meet people of the world, the world's attraction towards the Made in India weapons being made by India is increasing," the Prime Minister said. The Monsoon Session of the Parliament began today and will continue till August 21, with a break from August 12 to August 18. There will be a total of 21 sittings across 32 days. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
15 minutes ago
- Business Standard
J&K CM pushes for 2 key projects as IWT pause opens door for water storage
Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, an open critic of the 1960 Indus-Water Treaty, is hopeful that the central government will give a go-ahead for the completion of the Tulbul Navigation project in Kashmir and the diversion of Chenab River water to alleviate Jammu's water scarcity. In the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror strike on April 22 that killed 26 people, mainly tourists, the Centre announced a slew of measures against Pakistan for supporting terror groups and waging a proxy war against India. It included keeping the 1960 Indus-Water Treaty in abeyance. According to the treaty, India has unrestricted access to the waters of the eastern rivers -- Sutlej, Beas and Ravi -- amounting to around 33 million acre-feet (MAF) annually, while Pakistan receives the majority of the water from the western rivers -- the Indus, Jhelum and Chenab --totalling around 135 MAF annually. In an interview to PTI recently, Chief Minister Abdullah said that while the benefits of a full reversal of the IWT will take time, his government is focusing on medium-term projects that can begin immediately. Abdullah has been vociferously opposing the treaty since he was the Minister of State of External Affairs, saying that the 1960 agreement was the "most unfair document" ever imposed on the people of Jammu and Kashmir. He described the IWT as a document that "essentially denied Jammu and Kashmir the opportunity to store water" and forced all power projects to be "run of the river". "We can't suddenly build power projects and start storing water," Abdullah said and acknowledged the long-term nature of such undertakings. "It will take time before the benefits of the Indus water treaty start flowing to us." However, he highlighted two specific projects that he believes need to be taken up "immediately" -- which include the revival of the Tulbul navigation barrage in Sopore. This project, he explained, would not only enable the use of the Jhelum River for navigation but also "enable us to generate more electricity" in winter for all our downstream power projects, including Lower Jhelum and Uri hydroelectric projects. The suggestion from the Jammu and Kashmir government to the Centre was to build drop gates at the Tulbul Navigation Project, also known as Wullar Barrage, located on the boundary of Bandipora and Sopore, so that the water level in the Jhelum River could be managed properly. Work on the project was expedited by India following the Uri terror attack in 2016. This initiative was initially suspended in 1987 due to Pakistani objections. Despite India's efforts to resolve the issue, Pakistan declined to engage in discussions during five meetings of the Permanent Indus Commission held between 2017 and 2022. The barrage would also be especially effective in reducing the flow of water during the flood season in the Union territory. The Tulbul project was conceived in 1986 so as to enable year-round flow of water in the Wular Lake for commercial and tourism purposes, which in turn would generate employment in Kashmir. India opposed the Pakistani stand against the barrage, saying that construction of the Tulbul does not violate the treaty since the project is not a storage facility for either drinking water or irrigation but falls into the category of a regulating structure on water flows for non-consumptive use. The second project is a vital water-lifting scheme from Akhnoor to provide a sustainable source of water for Jammu city, which is facing "increasing water shortages". The chief minister said that Chenab is an ideal source, and this project could "feed Jammu for the next two to three decades". When asked if a formal proposal had been submitted to the Centre, the chief minister confirmed that "we have already had the conversation" and added that a senior advisor to the Prime Minister had recently visited the region to review these specific projects linked to the IWT. The advisor's visit, Abdullah noted, signifies that the Centre may give its nod for the projects to move forward. The second short-term suggestion was about lifting water from the Chenab River to ensure a better supply for people in Jammu, the six-month winter capital of Jammu and Kashmir. Jammu city lies on the banks of the Tawi river, which divides the old city on its eastern bank from the new on the west. The Tawi flows from Jammu and Kashmir into Pakistani Punjab, eventually merging with the Chenab River. The JK government has sought approval to engage an international funding agency for the Chenab Water Supply Scheme, aimed at lifting drinking water from the river and supplying it in different areas of the Jammu district to meet the rising water requirements of the town. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
New Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Don't politicise legal matters: SC rejects Karnataka govt's plea for FIR against BJP MP Tejasvi Surya
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday refused to consider a plea filed by the Karnataka government against the High Court's order quashing a criminal case lodged against BJP MP Tejasvi Surya for allegedly spreading misinformation. A two-judge bench of the top court, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) B R Gavai and K Vinod Chandran, pronounced the order. Surya had, on November 7, 2024, reportedly shared an article from Kannada news portals claiming that a farmer, Rudrappa Channappa Balikai, died by suicide after discovering his land had been taken over by the Waqf Board. A single Judge bench of the Karnataka High Court, Justice M Nagaprasanna quashed the FIR against Surya and said in its order that, allowing the criminal proceedings would amount to abuse of the process of law when there is nothing to investigate. Subsequently, an appeal was filed by the Karnataka government in the top court challenging the HC's order, but it was rejected by the SC on Monday. The bench, while dismissing the Karnataka goverment's appeal, warned it: "What is this? Don't politicise the matter. Fight your battles before the electorate. Dismissed with costs." The South Bengaluru MP had deleted the post after it was revealed by the police that the claims were unfounded. The police had registered a suo-motu case under Section 353(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) for spreading fake news. The HC said, "the tweet is posted; tweet is clarified; and tweet is deleted. Therefore, it is ununderstandable as to how the ingredients of Section 353(2) of BNS are met in the case at hand."
