EU keeps a close eye as Zelenskyy U-turns on anti-corruption law
The law, approved by the Ukrainian parliament and signed by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at a speed that caught Brussels off guard, has brought the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) under the direct oversight of the prosecutor general, a political appointee.
The prosecutor general will now be allowed to select cases handled by NABU and SAPO and reassign them to other state entities, which critics say risks empowering the executive branch to sway and possibly derail high-profile investigations. The prosecutor general will also be able to give binding instructions to the agencies.
The changes run counter to the views of the European Commission, which considers both NABU and SAPO cornerstones in the fight against corruption. Last year's enlargement report highlighted that SAPO had become a "separate legal entity" from the prosecutor general's office and recommended that the head of SAPO be allowed to open investigations into members of parliament "independently" from the prosecutor.
In response to the backsliding, Ursula von der Leyen, the Commission president, personally reached out to Zelenskyy.
"President von der Leyen conveyed her strong concerns about the consequences of the amendments, and she requested the Ukrainian government for explanations," a Commission spokesperson said on Wednesday.
"The respect for the rule of law and the fight against corruption are core elements of the European Union. As a candidate country, Ukraine is expected to uphold these standards fully. There cannot be a compromise."
Amid pressure from street protests across Ukraine and warnings from European officials, Zelenskyy made a U-turn and submitted a new bill with what he called "full-fledged guarantees of the independence of anti-corruption agencies". His proposal includes regular polygraphs for NABU and SAPO employees who handle state secrets.
The text was presented to the country's parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, on Thursday. Chairperson Ruslan Stefanchuk confirmed it would be considered on 31 July.
"During the consideration of this draft law, I will propose to adopt it immediately as a basis and in its entirety, as well as to support its urgent signature," Stefanchuk said.
In a joint statement, NABU and SAPO said the new law would restore "all due process powers and guarantees of independence" and urged its approval "as soon as possible".
Brussels cautiously celebrated the reversal.
"We welcome the fact that the Ukrainian government is taking action and we'll work with them to make sure that our concerns, which have been clearly explained, are indeed taken into account," a Commission spokesperson said on Thursday afternoon, before the content of the presidential bill became accessible.
The Commission is largely satisfied with the draft text, a source familiar told Euronews, but will not publicly endorse it until all objections have been properly mitigated. Brussels has offered technical assistance to Kyiv to fine-tune the legislative details.
In the meantime, Zelenskyy made headlines after he vehemently denied that a phone conversation with von der Leyen had taken place.
"I have not communicated with Ursula von der Leyen in recent days. Everything that was written about it, everything that she allegedly told me, is fake. We did not have a conversation," he said, according to the Interfax news agency.
The Commission did not comment on Zelenskyy's remarks.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local France
29 minutes ago
- Local France
France strikes down return of banned bee-killing pesticide
The decision infuriated farmers and France's far right and conservative parties but was welcomed by environmentalists and left-wing parties. The law would have permitted the return of acetamiprid – a chemical known to be toxic to bees and other creatures but relied on by some European farmers. A petition against the bill garnered more than 2.1 million signatures after lawmakers adopted it on July 8th. Critics said it was rushed through parliament's lower chamber without a proper debate. The Constitutional Council said in its ruling that a provision in the bill allowing exemptions to the ban of products containing neonicotinoid chemicals such as acetamiprid would violate France's environmental charter, which has constitutional status. In 2020, the council had granted a temporary exemption to the ban, limited to the beet and nut sectors which suffer most from the insects that acetamiprid acts against. But the ruling said the legislature had undermined 'the right to live in a balanced and healthy environment' enshrined in the environmental charter. 'Neonicotinoids have an impact on biodiversity, in particular on pollinating insects and birds, as well as consequences for water and soil quality, and pose risks to human health,' the council said. The council did approve two other measures in the law: one allowing for the construction of water storage for agricultural purposes, and another raising thresholds at which pig and poultry farms require prior authorisation. President Emmanuel Macron took 'note' of the ruling and will enact the law in a form that takes the ruling into account, his office said. But the main farmers' union, the FNSEA, slammed the decision as 'unacceptable and incomprehensible'. Advertisement Laurent Duplomb, the conservative deputy who introduced the law, said it would mean more imports of products containing acetamiprid and reduced French production. Agriculture Minister Annie Genevard, who supported the reintroduction of acetamiprid, said in a post on X (formerly Twitter) that the government would not leave the sectors affected 'without a solution'. Marine Le Pen, the leading figure in the far-right Rassemblement National, said the court's judges had 'behaved like a legislature while they have no democratic legitimacy'. 'The level of interference of constitutional judges is becoming a real problem for our democracy,' said Laurent Wauquiez, parliamentary head of the conservative Les Républicains. Socialist Party leader Olivier Faure, however, called the decision a 'victory for ecology'. Banned in France since 2018, acetamiprid remains legal in the European Union, and proponents said that some French farmers needed it to help them compete economically. Advertisement The insecticide is particularly sought after by beet and hazelnut growers, who say that they have no alternative against pests and face unfair competition. A petition on France's lower-house National Assembly's website called the measure an 'attack on public health'. And beekeepers have described the chemical as 'a bee killer'. Its potential effect on humans is also a source of concern, though the risks remain unclear in the absence of large-scale studies. For some opponents, frustration stretched beyond environmental and health concerns to exasperation over the country's political deadlock. One supporter of the petition against the law called it 'democratic revenge' after Macron forced a controversial pension reform through parliament in 2023 and dissolved the national assembly last year, sparking political turmoil that resulted in a hung parliament. In June, before the law's passage, several thousand demonstrators — including some farmers, environmental organisations and scientists – rallied across France calling for the bill to be withdrawn.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Russia creates 'catalogue' of Ukrainian children for adoption
Russia-installed occupation authorities in Ukraine's Luhansk region created an online 'catalogue' of Ukrainian children, offering them for coerced 'adoption' through the education department. The database includes 294 Ukrainian children, who are sorted and categorised so that the users can 'filter' them by age, gender and physical traits, like eyes and hair colour. The children are advertised for their character traits, with some described as "obedient" or "calm". In numerous cases, the children are described as 'polite and respectful towards the adults', 'disciplined' and 'not conflictive' or 'can be relied on to execute tasks'. Users can also 'filter' the search by the preferred form of guardianship, such as adoption or foster care. The Russian-run database describes the children listed in the database as 'orphans and children left without parental care'. Mykola Kuleba, CEO of the Save Ukraine organisation, said most of the children from this 'catalogue' were born in Ukraine's Luhansk region before Russia occupied it and had Ukrainian citizenship. 'Parents of some of them were killed by occupation authorities, others were simply issued Russian identification documents to legitimise their abduction.' Kuleba said that many children who grew up in territories occupied since Russia's first invasion of 2014, including Crimea and parts of eastern Ukrainian regions of Donetsk and Luhansk, have been 'systematically deported and transferred to Russian families in Moscow and other Russian regions.' 'This isn't a new tactic. Since 2014, Ukrainian children have appeared in Russian adoption databases. However, since 2022, the practice has become widespread and systematic', Kuleba said on X. He added that initially Russian authorities tried to cover their tracks, shutting down registers and erasing references, but 'now, the pretence is gone'. 'Russia isn't even trying to hide it anymore. Ukrainian orphans are displayed like products in an online marketplace'. Kuleba called it 'state-sponsored child trafficking', adding that Russian authorities have updated the laws to be able to alter the children's surnames and birthdays. The head of Save Ukraine organisation said Russia has 'streamlined' the system to such an extent that 'a Ukrainian child can now be effectively 'ordered' online' and 'stripped of their identity, issued a Russian passport, and subjected to ideological control' with a single click. Kuleba also issued a stark warning that the platform exposes the children to significant dangers, including sexual exploitation, human trafficking, illegal adoption and trafficking for organ harvesting. Forceful deportation of Ukrainian children by Russia Ukraine has been able to verify Russia's deportation of over 19,500 children to date. These are the children for whom detailed information has been collected — their place of residence in Ukraine and their territorial location in Russia are known. Only over 1,350 have been returned, and each return is mediated by a third-party state, notably by Qatar, South Africa and the Vatican. The actual figure is likely to be much higher. Yale's Humanitarian Research Lab placed the number of deported Ukrainian children closer to 35,000. Moscow claimed that the number could be as high as 700,000. The US-based Institute for the Study of War think tank (ISW) stated that stealing the children was one of Russian President Vladimir Putin's priorities, referring to the revelations of Ukrainian human rights activists. The ISW uncovered Kremlin documents dated 18 February 2022, which laid out plans to remove Ukrainian children from orphanages in occupied Luhansk and Donetsk regions and bring them to Russia under the guise of 'humanitarian evacuations'. During the Istanbul talks between Ukraine and Russia, Kyiv delegation handed over to Russia a list of its forcefully deported children. Kyiv wants Moscow to return them to Ukraine, reiterating its commitment to bring the forcefully deported children back as one of the key aspects of a possible ceasefire and a peace deal in the long term. 'If Russia is genuinely committed to a peace process, the return of at least half the children on this list is positive," head of the Ukrainian delegation Rustem Umerov said. The Russian delegation chief Vladimir Medinsky showed the list, which contains the names of 339 abducted Ukrainian children. The Kremlin representative accused Ukraine of "staging a show on the topic of lost children aimed at kind-hearted Europeans." In his words, Kyiv is trying to "squeeze out a tear by raising this issue." Euronews sources familiar with this aspect of the negotiations say Moscow knows exactly where every child on that list is.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Eight EU countries still missing cyber rules for critical sectors
Bulgaria, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden have all yet to adopt cybersecurity rules for critical sectors almost a year after an EU deadline, according to the latest data, meaning they face potential legal action. The Network and Information Security Directive 2 (NIS2), which was approved back in 2022 aims to protect critical entities, such as energy, transport, banking, water and digital infrastructures, against major cyber incidents. Countries had to transpose the rules into national legislation by 17 October last year. The EU executive began an infringement procedure in May against 19 member states for failing to adopt the rules. The countries had two months to take the necessary measures, or else face referral to the EU Court of Justice. Eleven member states have now done the work, but the remaining eight face potential further Commission action. A spokesperson for the institution told Euronews that the Commission is 'monitoring member states' replies" and 'once assessed, will propose either closure or in the absence of a satisfactory response [...] next steps of the infringement procedure.' Under NIS2, companies need to issue a warning within 24 hours and deliver an incident report within 72 hours in case of incidents that cause serious operational disruptions. In case of non-compliance, companies face fines up to €10 million, or 2% of worldwide revenue, whichever is higher. In December, the Commission will present an 'omnibus' simplification package in a bid to identify reporting obligations in existing digital legislation that can be cut to ease pressure on enterprises, particularly SMEs. Cyber rules are expected to be part of that.
