Engadget review recap: Samsung Z Flip 7, Oakley Meta glasses, DJI Osmo 360 and more
The Z Flip 7 has decent battery life, bigger screens and more AI smarts. However, the cameras are dated and Samsung isn't offering enough utility on this foldable's second screen. $1,091 at Amazon Explore More Buying Options $1,100 at Best Buy$1,090 at Walmart
Alongside the Z Fold 7, Samsung debuted an updated version of its more compact foldable, the Z Flip 7. UK bureau chief Mat Smith noted that the company managed to provide a substantial overhaul, but there are some areas that were left untouched. "Certain aspects of the Flip 7 are lacking, most notably the cameras, which haven't been changed since last year," he said. "Samsung also needs to put more work into its Flex Window."
There are some solid upgrades that will appeal to serious athletes and power users, but they don't quite justify the higher price. $399 at Meta
Meta's first non-Ray-Ban smart glasses have arrived. While we wait for a more affordable version to get here, senior editor Karissa Bell put the white and gold option through its paces. "While I don't love the style of the Oakley Meta HSTN frames, Meta has shown that it's been consistently able to improve its glasses," she wrote. "The upgrades that come with the new Oakley frames aren't major leaps, but they deliver improvements to core features."
DJI's Osmo 360 is a worthy rival to Insta360's X5, thanks to the innovative sensor and 8K 50 fps video. However, the editing app still needs some work. $530 at DJI
Reporter Steve Dent argued that DJI is finally giving Insta360 some competition in the 360-degree action cam space. The design and performance of the Osmo 360 are great, but the problem comes when it's time to edit. "The all-new DJI Studio app also needs some work," he explained. "For a first effort, though, the Osmo 360 is a surprisingly solid rival to Insta360's X5."
The Nothing Phone 3 might be the company's first 'true flagship,' but several specs don't match that flagship moniker. The bigger screen, battery and new Glyph Matrix make it a major step up from Phone 2, but camera performance is erratic and you'd expect a more powerful processor at this price. $799 at Nothing
Nothing's first "true flagship" phone has arrived, ready to take on the likes of the Pixel 9 and Galaxy S25. Despite the company's lofty chatter, Mat argued the Nothing Phone 3 is hampered by a lower-power chip and disappointing cameras. "While I want Nothing to continue experimenting with its phones, it should probably prioritize shoring up the camera performance first," he said.
The redesigned Galaxy Watch 8 has a longer battery life and much more comfortable fit. The Gemini integration is actually helpful and the new health metrics and fitness guidance are useful. $350 at Amazon
Samsung debuted a big update to its Galaxy Watch line when it unveiled the Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7. Senior buying advice reporter Amy Skorheim spent two weeks testing the new wearable, which impressed her so much she declared it was "Samsung's best smartwatch in years." You can read her in-depth review here.
Here are the rest of the reviews you might have missed:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
29 minutes ago
- New York Post
Meta's $250M whiz kid's last AI product ‘sucks at Google Chrome, flopped with Numbers': users
Meta's newest whiz kid has bagged himself a mighty $250 million pay packet, but users of the 24-year-old researcher's last AI offering have labelled it 'clunky' and complained it 'sucks at Google Chrome.' Matt Deitke's last tech tool, Vy is said to handle repetitive tasks 'with high accuracy' and without interrupting users while they browse. The product learns by observing user behavior and executes commands directly on the user's computer. 3 Meta's newest whiz kid, Matt Deitke, bagged himself a mighty $250 million pay packet, but some users of the 24-year-old researcher's last tech product called Vy have complained about its functionality. X / @Scobleizer But some Vy users like Julian Goldie, a search engine optimization expert, said its performance varies depending on the application and others claim the agent's performance hasn't lived up to the buzz 'It sucks at Google Chrome, flopped with Numbers, but it's magic with ChatGPT, Pages and Descript,' Goldie posted on X. Goldie likened Vy to Apple's iPhone during its early development. 'It's like the early iPhone moment for AI agents,' he wrote. He also acknowledged Vy's potential for managing workflow. 'It's like having an intern — except it doesn't ghost you, doesn't get tired and knows how to use your apps better than you do.' Deitke, who ditched his computer science doctoral program at the University of Washington to join Meta, recently turned his nose up at CEO Zuckerberg's 'low-ball' offer of around $125 million over four years, according to the New York Times. 3 Vy is able to observe the user's behavior and repeat commands on one's computer, with great accuracy. But when the Facebook founder had a meeting with him and doubled the offer, he accepted what could be one of the largest pay packets in corporate history, the Times said. Zuckerberg's protegee appears to have jumped ship from his startup, Vercept, which he founded with friends in November. Vercept raised $16 million in funding from venture capital and tech investors to push out Vy, but some users say they're struggling to find practical uses for the tool. One Reddit user, @u/fontainegal66 complained it was clunky. 'Been using it this past week, I've tried a bunch of stuff, some tasks it handles well, others still feel a bit clunky.' 3 One Vy user, Julian Goldie, took to X and said, 'It sucks at Google Chrome, flopped with Numbers, but it's magic with ChatGPT, Pages and Descript.' X / @mattdeitke 'I tried organizing a folder. It takes a lot of time. Takes screenshots, understands and then slowly does it. Maybe jobs like manual scraping it might do. I need to try,' user Glittering-AD-8200 wrote on Reddit. 'I'm really struggling to find a way to make it useful. It's technically impressive, but I … don't know how to get it doing useful things,' user @TonyTrewinnard also posted on X. Some users also noted technical glitches on Vercept's website, including issues signing up for the Vy waitlist. 'Your site won't let us join the waitlist. It keeps saying Mac only. Why does it think I don't have a Mac? You shouldn't make it so hard to follow you,' the @TechGuys account replied to an X video introducing Vy in May. Deitke, who until recently was offering Vy for free, acknowledged before now that the company was still in its early stages. 'We're still very new and very young,' Deitke said in a recent interview with tech blogger Robert Scoble. 'Making it an amazing experience is our number one priority right now.' Deitke did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment. Zuckerberg told investors on the company's Wednesday earnings call Meta is 'building an elite, talent-dense team. 'If you're going to be spending hundreds of billions of dollars on compute and building out multiple gigawatt of clusters, then it really does make sense to compete super hard and do whatever it takes to get that, you know, 50 or 70 or whatever it is, top researchers to build your team,' he said. 'There's just an absolute premium for the best and most talented people.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meta Just Paid $250M To Lure This 24-year-old AI Whiz Kid: A Strategic Move Or A Power Play?
Meta Platforms Inc. (NASDAQ:META) has reportedly invested a staggering $250 million to secure the talents of 24-year-old AI prodigy, Matt Deitke. What Happened: Deitke, a former doctoral student at the University of Washington, initially turned down Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's offer of around $125 million over four years. However, following a meeting with Zuckerberg, Deitke accepted a revised offer of approximately $250 million, with the potential to earn $100 million in the first year alone. As per the report by New York Post, this high-profile recruitment underscores Meta's aggressive strategy in acquiring AI talent. The company has reportedly spent over $1 billion to assemble a team of industry heavyweights, including former Apple AI models team leader, Ruoming Pang. Meta's capital expenditures are projected to surge to $72 billion in 2025, marking a $30 billion increase from the previous year. Also Read: Mark Zuckerberg Poaches Sam Altman's Talent With Multimillion-Dollar Offers To Build Meta's AI Team Deitke has gained recognition in the AI research community through his work at Seattle's Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence and his co-founded startup, Vercept. His research on multimodal systems aligns with Meta's strategic interests. Why It Matters: While Meta's recruitment of top-tier AI talent could fuel innovation, it has also sparked concerns about increasing economic inequality and the concentration of power in AI development. Critics have lambasted companies like Meta for awarding huge sums to a select few elite researchers while simultaneously laying off thousands of workers. As Meta continues to invest heavily in AI, the implications of this strategy on the broader tech industry and society at large remain to be seen. The recruitment of Deitke and other top AI talents is a clear indication of Meta's commitment to AI, but whether this will translate into sustainable success or exacerbate existing inequalities is a question that will unfold in time. Read Next Meta Exec Dismisses OpenAI's Sam Altman's Claims of $100 Million Signing Bonuses: 'Sam Is Just Being Dishonest Here' UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Meta Just Paid $250M To Lure This 24-year-old AI Whiz Kid: A Strategic Move Or A Power Play? originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Just Gave Meta Investors Great News -- or Did He?
Key Points Over the last several weeks, Meta has been offering top artificial intelligence (AI) researchers lucrative contracts. These people are now part of Meta Superintelligence Labs, a division focused on competing directly with OpenAI and others. Jensen Huang appears to be supportive of Meta's hiring strategy, but there's a catch. 10 stocks we like better than Meta Platforms › Every few decades, the technology world is reshaped by a generational visionary who somehow seems to see the future before it actually unfolds. Right now, the most important technologist might just be Jensen Huang, the CEO of Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA). Huang does not understand artificial intelligence (AI) purely from a technical perspective. The way he speaks about it is more cerebral. Beyond Huang, another technological visionary who is worth paying close attention to is Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta Platforms. Over the last several weeks, Meta has reportedly been on an aggressive hiring campaign, poaching top AI researchers from OpenAI, Alphabet, GitHub, and Apple. Huang recently addressed Meta's hiring strategy during a discussion at the All-In Summit, hosted by billionaire venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya. While Huang's comments about Meta sounded supportive overall, I think there are some key nuances to point out as Zuckerberg seeks to take on competition in the AI realm. Let's dig into Huang's comments and assess what could be in the cards for Meta investors. What did Huang just say about Meta? In a video clip shared on social media, Huang shares his thoughts around Meta's recent hiring spree and the reported hundred-million-dollar signing bonuses. Huang said that a team of roughly 150 researchers and appropriate funding could potentially go on to build a rival platform to OpenAI's ChatGPT. To back up his claim, he explained that several existing AI models that compete with ChatGPT were built by a team of similar size to what Zuckerberg is reportedly assembling through the creation of Meta Superintelligence Labs (MSL). On the surface, this sounds like Meta just earned a vote of confidence from Nvidia, once referred to as the "godfather of AI." But is that really the case? I think there might be more than meets the eye to Huang's comments. What Huang didn't say As a private company, OpenAI is not required to publish its financials or operating metrics. However, according to reports from CNBC, OpenAI now has 3 million paying enterprise customers and $10 billion in annual recurring revenue (ARR). To put this into perspective, OpenAI's ARR was estimated to be around $5.5 billion last year. Those numbers show the company has nearly doubled its ARR base in less than a year, underscoring OpenAI's ability to acquire customers and accelerate its growth trends despite intensified competition from other large language models (LLM) from Anthropic, DeepSeek, and Alphabet, for example. These nuances matter because Meta Superintelligence Labs won't just need to launch something, it will need to prove that it can weather challenges across product execution, customer acquisition, and competing with incumbents with strong first-mover advantages. Although Huang appears confident that more companies will introduce products that compete directly with OpenAI, I would say that his comments fall short of an explicit endorsement of Meta, per se. Rather, I think he's more simply implying that Meta has been investing strategically in its quest to conquer the AI landscape. Is Meta stock a buy now? As the chart below illustrates, Meta experienced sizable expansion in its price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) a couple of years ago. During this period, management implemented significant cost reductions, particularly in the metaverse division. It made a strategic decision to reallocate these savings into AI initiatives. Given the trends above, I'd say that investors welcomed the shift from the metaverse to AI and began pricing in some of the upside. However, over the last 18 months, Meta's P/E levels have pulled back considerably. In my eyes, this valuation reset suggests that investors may not fully appreciate the foundation that Zuckerberg and the management team laid a couple of years ago. In other words, the market may have prematurely bought up the stock, only to discount the long-term upside of the AI opportunity now. With the creation of Meta Superintelligence Labs and a roster of all-star talent ready to build and launch new AI-powered services, Meta could be on the cusp of a massive transformation that remains discounted from a valuation standpoint. At its current levels, I see Meta stock as a no-brainer buying opportunity at these prices as I think the company's upside from AI is largely discounted right now. Should you buy stock in Meta Platforms right now? Before you buy stock in Meta Platforms, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Meta Platforms wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Adam Spatacco has positions in Alphabet, Apple, Meta Platforms, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Apple, Meta Platforms, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Just Gave Meta Investors Great News -- or Did He? was originally published by The Motley Fool
