&w=3840&q=100)
Trump opens door to sales of version of Nvidia's next-gen AI chips in China
Trump also confirmed and defended an agreement calling for US AI chip giant Nvidia, led by Jensen Huang, and Advanced Micro Devices to give the US government 15 per cent of revenue from sales of some advanced computer chips in China, after his administration greenlit exports to China of less advanced AI chips known as the H20 last month.
"Jensen also has the new chip, the Blackwell. A somewhat enhanced-in-a-negative-way Blackwell. In other words, take 30 per cent to 50 per cent off of it," Trump told reporters in an apparent reference to slashing the chip's capability.
"I think he's coming to see me again about that, but that will be an unenhanced version of the big one," he added.
Trump's administration halted sales of Nvidia's H20 chips to China in April, but the company said last month it had won clearance to resume shipments and hoped to start deliveries soon.
"The H20 is obsolete," Trump said, saying China already had it. "So I said, 'Listen, I want 20 per cent if I'm going to approve this for you, for the country'," he added.
The deal is extremely rare for the US and marks Trump's latest intervention in corporate decision-making, after pressuring executives to invest in American manufacturing and demanding new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan resign over ties to Chinese companies.
Analysts said the levy may hit margins at the chipmakers and set a precedent for Washington to tax critical US exports, potentially extending beyond semiconductors.
The US Commerce Department has started issuing licenses for the sale of H20 chips to China, another US official said on Friday. Both the US officials declined to be named because details have not been made public.
The China curbs are expected to cost Nvidia and AMD billions of dollars in revenue, and successive US administrations have sought in recent years to limit Beijing's access to cutting-edge chips that could bolster China's military.
Washington does not feel the sale of H20 and equivalent chips compromises national security, said the first US official.
The official did not know when or how the agreement with the chip companies would be implemented, but said the administration would be in compliance with the law.
The US Constitution prohibits Congress from laying taxes and duties on articles exported from any state. The Export Clause applies to taxes and duties, not user fees.
When asked if Nvidia had agreed to pay 15 per cent of revenues to the US, a company spokesperson said: "We follow rules the US government sets for our participation in worldwide markets." "While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide," the spokesperson added.
A spokesperson for AMD said the US approved its applications to export some AI processors to China, but did not directly address the revenue-sharing agreement and said the company's business adheres to all US export controls.
The Commerce Department did not immediately comment.
China's foreign ministry said the country has repeatedly stated its position on US chip exports. The ministry has previously accused Washington of using technology and trade measures to "maliciously contain and suppress China." The Financial Times, which first reported the development, said the chip firms agreed to the arrangement as a condition for obtaining the export licenses for their semiconductors, including AMD's MI308 chips. It added that the Trump administration had yet to determine how to use the money.
"The Chinese market is significant for both these companies so even if they have to give up a bit of the money, they would otherwise make it look like a logical move on paper," AJ Bell investment director Russ Mould said.
'SLIPPERY SLOPE'
Still, analysts and experts questioned the logic of resuming sales if the chips could pose a national security risk.
"Decisions on export licenses should be determined by national security considerations and the tradeoffs of US policy goals, not a revenue-creating possibility," said Martin Chorzempa, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, an independent research institution.
"What it ends up creating is an incentive to control things, to then extract a payment, rather than controlling things because we're actually concerned about the risk to national security."
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said last month the planned resumption of sales of the AI chips was part of US
negotiations with China to get rare earths and described the H20 as Nvidia's "fourth-best chip" in an interview with CNBC.
He said it was in US interests for Chinese firms to use American technology, even if the most advanced chips remained barred, to keep them on a US "tech stack".
Some elements of Trump's trade policy are already facing legal scrutiny, with a federal appeals panel skeptical of his claim that a 1977 law, traditionally used to sanction enemies or freeze assets, also empowered him to impose tariffs.
"We aren't sure we like the precedent this sets," Bernstein analysts said of the revenue-share deal. "Will it stop with Chinese AI? Will it stop with controlled products? Will other companies be required to pay to sell into the region?" "It feels like a slippery slope to us."
The analysts estimated the deal would cut gross margins on the China-bound processors by 5 to 15 percentage points, shaving about a point from Nvidia and AMD's overall margins.
Nvidia generated $17 billion in revenue from China in the fiscal year ending January 26, representing 13 per cent of total sales.
AMD reported $6.2 billion in China revenue for 2024, accounting for 24 per cent of total revenue.
Nvidia has warned a China sales halt for H20 chips could cut $8 billion from July quarter revenue, while AMD has projected a $1.5 billion annual hit from the curbs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
4 minutes ago
- Economic Times
As 50% US tariff looms, 6 key steps that can safeguard Indian economy
Even as downside risks from Donald Trump's punitive tariffs on Indian exports to the US loom, the government may need to take some immediate to medium-term measures to protect the economy. Economists and industry chambers have suggested a bevy of steps that can protect exporters and provide them temporary relief. They have also suggested measures that can boost India's manufacturing competitiveness. From the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) chipping
The Print
18 minutes ago
- The Print
Will convey displeasure to US over Munir's nuclear threat from American soil—Centre tells House panel
MPs who attended the meeting said Misri told the Lok Sabha Committee on External Affairs headed by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor that New Delhi's position remains that BRICS was not an anti-Western grouping but should be seen instead as a 'non-Western grouping'. The committee, it is learnt, was told by Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri that US President Donald Trump's imposition of steep tariff on Indian exports was not just a response to New Delhi's purchase of Russian crude oil but could also be connected to its presence in BRICS. New Delhi: The Centre told a parliamentary committee Monday that New Delhi will convey to Washington DC its displeasure over Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, delivering nuclear threats from the soil of the United States, sources told ThePrint. Sources said Misri told the MPs that India would not tolerate such nuclear blackmail. ThePrint exclusively reported on 10 August that Munir, speaking at an event in the US, said, 'we are a nuclear nation, if we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us.' 'India's position will be conveyed to the US,' sources quoted Misri as having said. Misri is also learnt to have told the panel that the US's trade deficit with India may also have been a trigger for Trump, who first announced the imposition of 25 percent tariff on Indian exports to the US and later raised it to 50 percent citing the 'direct or indirect import of Russian oil'. The foreign secretary is learnt to have added that India will not cross certain 'red lines'—a reference to US's demand for India to open up its agriculture and dairy sectors—in its trade negotiations with Washington. 'The three issues that India believes could have acted as a trigger for Trump are purchase of Russian crude oil, trade deficit and India's presence in the BRICS multilateral grouping. India's position is very clear. Misri said New Delhi never considered BRICS to be an anti-Western bloc but believes it can be categorised, if at all, as a non-Western bloc,' an MP who was part of the meeting told ThePrint. Sources in the Indian establishment have previously argued that New Delhi's sale of processed Russian crude oil was necessitated by various European countries, who stopped importing from Moscow, becoming dependent on supplies from India. Apart from Misri, Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal was also present in the meeting that lasted over three hours. The officials told the MPs that the latest developments would not have any impact on India's 'friendship' with the US. 'Trade is just one aspect of India-US relations. There are many positives also,' one official is learnt to have told the committee. The officials added that India's trade relations, including defence purchases, would not be affected by Trump's announcements. In response to questions from MPs, they underlined that India is not trying to 'enhance' or recalibrate its relations with China or Russia in light of the US President's remarks and announcements. (Edited by Amrtansh Arora) Also Read: Proxy pushback: After Rajnath, now Gadkari & Venkaiah; BJP is running out of patience with Trump
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
How can Pakistan General give Nuclear-threat from land of a friendly nation, ask MPs in Parliament
NEW DELHI: Members of Parliament raised with govt the 'nuclear sabre-rattling' by Pakistan army chief Asim Munir while in the US, as they asked how could such a statement be made from the soil of a "strategic ally" like America, while also pointing out that Munir's earlier statement that was a precursor to the Pahalgam terror attack too had a US link. The govt is said to have indicated that it may take up the issue with the US embassy. At the meeting of the parliamentary standing committee on foreign affairs Monday, sources said MPs Asaduddin Owaisi, Deepender Hooda and John Brittas asked foreign secretary Vikram Misri about Munir's nuclear threat while he is on a visit to the United States. While Misri said the ministry of external affairs has responded to the objectionable remark, pointing out that it is habitual of Pakistan, and that India will not give in to "nuclear blackmail", Misri was asked how could such a serious threat be issued from the United States. According to sources, Owaisi pointed out that even Munir's earlier incendiary statement preceding the Pahalgam terror attack was given to the Pakistani diaspora in the US. Sources said the issue was latched on to by other members. Interestingly, the parliamentary committee chairman Shashi Tharoor interjected to tell the foreign secretary that govt could take up with the American representative in New Delhi the issue of the use of American soil to issue such a threat to India. According to sources, Misri said that the issue will be taken up with the US official here. The remark by Munir has caused much consternation in the country, with the Pahalgam terror attack under his watch and following his statement appearing to add greater significance to his threats now. Later, confirming the development, Tharoor told reporters that members asked questions about Munir's "nuclear sabre-rattling".
