EU prosecutor Laura Kövesi haunts Greece's rotten system
Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis came to power pledging to eradicate corruption and promote 'excellence.'
However, reality has painted a very different picture – one that revives painful memories of the corruption scandals that fueled Greece's 2009 economic crisis.
Two major corruption cases that triggered public outrage emerged only after intervention by EU Chief Prosecutor Laura Kövesi. The story is far from over
The latest scandal centres on OPEKEPE, the Greek agency responsible for distributing EU agricultural subsidies.
The agency stands accused of processing falsified land leases and submitting false declarations – channeling millions of euros to non-existent farmland between 2019 and 2022.
In another case, the European Commission imposed a record €415 million fine on Greece for the mismanagement of agricultural funds between 2016 and 2023 – once again involving OPEKEPE.
Wiretapped phone conversations, recorded by Greek police at the request of the EU prosecutor, have further shocked the public – evoking a past many hoped was buried.
In mafia-style language, those involved named right-wing New Democracy ministers, claiming they were aware of the fraud and were even asked to 'get rid of' the EU prosecutor.
Public frustration intensified after it was revealed that Greek taxpayers will ultimately bear the cost – an estimated half a billion euros in damages.
An EU source told Euractiv that Greek authorities will need to draw from the national budget to compensate farmers in the coming years.
Another investigation led by Kövesi concerns the infamous '717 contract,' funded by the EU to install signalling and surveillance systems on Greek railways.
The contract was never implemented. Its absence played a role in a deadly train crash that killed 57 people. Legal proceedings remain ongoing, as the opposition accuses the government of attempting a cover-up.
Brussels insiders warn that 'too many issues are piling up,' raising serious concerns over Greece's ability to manage EU funds.
Local media report the story is far from over, with the EU prosecutor now scrutinising large-scale projects linked to cohesion funds and the EU Recovery Fund. Local justice under fire
In Athens, the prevailing view is that without the EU prosecutor, these scandals would never have come to light.
Public mistrust of the Greek judiciary is widespread. An opinion poll published in March found that seven in ten Greeks do not trust the judicial system, where top positions remain government-appointed.
Four ministers have already resigned, but Article 86 of the Greek Constitution shields them from prosecution. Only parliament can lift a minister's immunity, but the governing majority can easily block such motions.
Kövesi has openly criticised the article and even lodged a complaint with the European Commission, arguing it hinders her ability to fully pursue investigations.
The Commission, however, remains silent. An EU spokesperson declined to comment, citing 'ongoing criminal investigations or trials.'
The Greek government, for its part, has pushed back – accusing Kövesi of exceeding her mandate by focusing on Article 86.
In November 2020, the conservative government abolished the office of the corruption prosecutor, which had been handling more than 500 active cases.
One of those was the Novartis scandal, in which the pharmaceutical giant allegedly bribed Greek healthcare professionals to promote its drugs.
In the United States – where the scandal was first exposed – Novartis was fined with more than €700 million. In Greece, no one has been prosecuted.
Eleni Touloupaki, the former corruption prosecutor, was herself indicted for abuse of power after New Democracy came to office in 2019. She was acquitted in March 2023.
(aw)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
FIREPOWER: An intermural EU brawl over defence policy
In today's edition: SAFE update, Rheinmetall on bulk orders, EU budget ambitions. Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Take a free trial of Euractiv Pro to get FIREPOWER in your inbox. Good morning and welcome back to Firepower, The EU has been muscling its way into military matters in a major way over recent years. Sidelined in the process has been the European Parliament, with MEPs so far mostly stuck looking on as key capitals and the Commission reshape defence policy for the bloc. But now the Parliament is fighting back. Sources tell Firepower that a widely anticipated legal challenge to the EU's €150 billion SAFE joint procurement programme will be announced on Monday. Parliament negotiators are also digging in their heels over strict rules on non-European defence firms participating in the Commission's flagship European Defence Industrial Programme (EDIP), and preparing for a showdown over the next seven-year EU budget (more on that below). The stakes? Whether MEPs will have any sway in shaping the EU's moves into the defence space. Stay tuned. Shortages of key explosives like TNT has become a major bottleneck holding up European efforts to boost ammunition production. Opening new production lines is costly and requires gruelling permitting processes. Some companies are reopening mothballed Cold War-era factories, but retrofits take time there as well. More here . Rheinmetall CEO Armin Papperger told Firepower that Europeans should pool together more military orders to avoid skyrocketing prices and achieve better economies of scale. Papperger, visiting Brussels on Wednesday, said that a lead nation approach has worked well with ammunition and air defence systems, with one country coordinating orders on behalf of a larger group of purchasers. BUNDLING: He contended that the same 'Europeanisation of contracts' should be used for vehicle systems as well. 'We need to bundle [orders] so that fair prices can be achieved,' Papperger told Firepower after meeting Ursula von der Leyen along with other CEOs from the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia. The European Commission and NATO have both been pushing countries to place joint orders together to fight price inflation. Prices for 155mm artillery ammunition, for instance, have quadrupled since the beginning of the war in Ukraine as exploding demand strained supply chains for critical components such as TNT. ON THAT NOTE, Rheinmetall announced the largest order in company's history yesterday. An unspecified European NATO country finalised a multi-year deal for 155mm artillery ammunition and bimodular propellants worth several hundred million euros. LONG-TERM COMMITMENT: Papperger didn't say so explicitly, but plenty of defence industry executives have tried to make clear in recent years that large, long-term contracts make it much easier for companies to invest in expanding production facilities and forging tighter relations with suppliers. During his stop in Brussels, Papperger said he also lobbied for a new raft of industrial subsidies and incentives – modelled on the EU's just-expired ASAP ammo programme – to boost the production of long-range missiles. ASAP's core is replicated in the European Defence Industrial Programme (EDIP), still under negotiation. On your radar EDIP, SEASON THREE. Trilogues started this week on EDIP, with a first technical talk yesterday and another this morning. Negotiators from the Parliament and the Council hope to reach a deal by October, but at least two substantive obstacles stand in the way: Disagreements over rules for non-European countries participating in the programme, and the (diminutive) size of the programme's proposed budget, just €1.5 billion. ARTILLERY AMMO FOR UKRAINE. 'We will deliver 2 million shells to Ukraine by the end of the year,' von der Leyen said on Thursday. Her remark anticipates that EU countries will end up coming through on the artillery funding initiative pushed by Kaja Kallas, even though ( last we checked ) it'd only collected pledges for about two-thirds of the cash needed to buy that many rounds. The Europeans will now be racing to increase military support to Ukraine, with reports that the US will halt its own aid . ICELAND WANTS DEFENCE PARTNERSHIP. Reykjavík is the latest capital looking to negotiate a 'Security and Defence Partnership' with the EU, a key prerequisite for accessing joint weapons procurement contracts under the EU's SAFE programme . Eight other countries have already signed such deals, to increase cooperation in areas including cyber defence and military exercises. EUROPE GOES QUANTUM. The Commission pitched a quantum strategy on Wednesday to develop and commercialise the EU-made technology key for security of communications and encryption, as competition from the US and China heats up. Cash Corner €100 BILLION FOR DEFENCE IN THE NEXT EU BUDGET? That's how much EPP MEP Christophe Gomart, the co-chair of the Security and Defence Committee, is hoping to see in the EU's next seven-year budget. He told Firepower that the EU could break 12 digits for defence if EU countries increase their direct contributions for a defence budget in the MFF. Current contributions to the EU budget are set at about 1% of GNI. Some back-of-the-envelope maths: If countries agree to increase that contribution by 0.5 percentage points to 1.5%, that works out to around that extra €100 billion. NOT THE FIRST IDEA. Other prominent voices have previously pitched the same big, round figure for defence. Among them? Current Defence Commissioner Andrius Kubilius, former Defence Commissioner Thierry Breton, the chair of the main European defence industry lobby ASD and several Eastern European countries. BUDGET FIGHTS COMING UP. The €100 billion idea is not outside the realm of possibility, considering Ursula von der Leyen's ambitions to make defence a top EU priority. Defence industry representative David Luengo told Firepower that the figure 'makes sense in a security paradigm shift' and called high-level discussions around it 'serious'. Capitals are divided on WHETHER TO INCREASE THE OVERALL EU POT, a decisive factor in the Commission's draft budget, which will be presented on 16 JULY. Among the other options to increase the budget: more re-purposing of EU civilian and social funds – or possibly taking up more EU debt, a controversial step taken during Covid, and for the EU's new €150 billion SAFE joint military procurement programme. But sources tell us there's nothing close to consensus, at least for now, meaning the budget is likely in for lengthy and difficult negotiations. RECAP: The 2021-27 EU defence & security budget includes just €16.4 billion, or about €2.3 billion a year (although EU countries altogether spent €326 billion on defence in 2024 ). By way of comparison: The Pentagon pitched nearly three times as much for next year, a whopping $961.6 billion (€818 billion). How much is 5% of GDP? Leaders are grappling with just how much 5% of GDP is after pledging their countries to spend that much at last week's NATO summit. For Canada, it comes to around C$150 billion (€93bn) per year, according to PM Mark Carney. That's almost a third of the country's yearly budget of C$449.2 (€281.31billion). In Germany, Europe's biggest economy, each percentage point of GDP amounts to around €45 billion, according to Chancellor Friedrich Merz. That means 5% would come in at €225 billion per year, or a full 45% of Germany's current €476.8 billion government budget. Credit rating agency Moody's warned that because of NATO's higher spending pledge, the debt-to-GDP ratios could rise by 3.5 to 5 percentage points by 2029 for Europe's four largest economies: Germany, the UK, France and Italy. News from the Capitals TURKEY's air force could see major changes in the coming years. Sales of Eurofighter jets could be approved soon , according to the UK, part of the consortium behind the planes. Germany, another member, has previously been blocking the sale. The US ambassador to Turkey, meanwhile, said the dispute with Turkey over F-35 fighters could be settled by the end of the year. The US cancelled sales of F-35s to Turkey after bought Russian air-defence systems. GERMANY plans to deepen cooperation with Israel, including to develop a ' cyberdome ' to defend the country against drones and cyberattacks. German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt described the proposal as a 'holistic' system that combines military and civil defence. Dobrindt also pitched increased cooperation between German intelligence agencies and Israel's Mossad, and a new German-Israeli centre for cyber research. UKRAINIAN defence companies plan to open production lines in DENMARK, under a €67 million deal inked on Sunday . The idea of integrating the Ukrainian defence industry into the European market is gaining serious momentum across Europe, and has been named as a key priority for the Commission and Kyiv. Just what it looks like still needs more definition, though. For EU defence chief Kubilius argued back in May that 'Ukraine can benefit from EU production capacity' – while the EU will benefit 'massively' from 'lower production costs'. European Union Next rounds of EDIP technical talks tentatively scheduled for 11, 15 and 17 July; no political trilogues scheduled before September Council EU-Moldova Summit, 4 July, including to 'take stock' of security and defence cooperation ECOFIN Council, 8 July, approve 15 EU countries to activate the national escape clause to increase deficits by 1.5% of GDP each year over the period 2025-2028 to spend more on defence Political and Security Committee, 8-9 July Coreper II, 9 July The Danish Council presidency updated its schedule to move a defence council gathering from 11 November (Armistice Day) to 28 November, and added a second ministerial, 6 October The Agenda of António Costa will be available here European Commission EU Stockpiling Strategy, 8 July, presentation by Commissioner for Social Rights and Skills, Quality Jobs and Preparedness Roxana Mînzatu Andrius Kubilius attends the Ukraine Recovery Conference in Rome, 10-11 July. Agendas of Commissioners will be available here European Parliament Plenary, 7-10 July, with EU defence chief Andrius Kubilus on 7-8 July and a presentation of the Commision's Stockpiling Strategy to MEPs on 9 July. You can find the full agenda here NATO US Army Gen. Christopher G. Cavoli hands over role of NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) to US Air Force Gen. Alexus G. Grynkewich, 4 July The Capitals Emmanuel Macron in the UK, 8-10 July, on a state visit where he will discuss the two countries' relationship on defence at the 37th Summit co-chaired by UK PM Keir Starmer Macron and Starmer will also hold a 'Coalition of the Willing' meeting in the UK on 10 July Other events EESC Public debate on Defence-related investments in the EU budget, 4 July, watch here CSIS event – Denmark's role in European and Transatlantic Security, 8 July, watch here RUSI webinar – Addressing the persistent threat to subsea cables, 10 July, watch here Thank you for reading, Firepower was brought to you by Euractiv's defence team, with additional reporting from Maximilian Henning and Nicoletta Ionta. You can find the rest of our coverage here. We want to hear from you: tell us what you think and what you know! We're at defence@ and each team member is available at Have a nice weekend.
Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
The EU will not budge on deadline for generative AI rules
The Commission is under growing pressure to delay implementation of its landmark artificial intelligence law, the AI Act – but for generative AI models, also known as general-purpose AIs (GPAI), the legal deadline of 2 August is not expected to budge. The last weeks have seen several calls from EU countries and industry for the EU to "stop the clock" on the implementation of the AI Act – with the key complaint being that important guidelines, standards and compliance tools are not yet ready. Some of these appeals specifically target rules for GPAI models – meaning generative AI systems such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, or Mistral's LeChat – which are due to come into force soon on 2 August 2025. A group of some 1,000 lobbyists, academics, experts, and civil society representatives took part in drafting a Code of Practice for GPAIs, which is supposed to support compliance with the law. But the drafting process has taken longer than anticipated, with the group missing the original 2 May deadline. With less than a month to go before the GPAI rules kick in under the AI Act, the Code still needs to be adopted by the Commission – although Tech Commissioner Henna Virkkunen has confirmed it will be published before the 2 August deadline. In parallel, the AI Board a body comprising national representatives – has been discussing the possibility of a "grace period" for signatories to begin applying the Code, in light of the delays in finalising the document. Such a grace period would mean GPAI developers would not be expected to follow the code's specific provisions immediately. However, they would still be legally required to comply with the AI Act as of 2 August 2025. The AI Board is considering extending the deadline for applying the Code until the end of 2025, a Commission spokesperson told Euractiv . Any grace period would apply only to the voluntary Code of Practice and would not suspend the AI Act's GPAI rules themselves. "There is no stop the clock, there is no grace period, there is no pause," a Commission spokesperson said in a Friday press briefing. But it's worth noting that there is a year's compliance grace period baked into the Commission's draft guidelines on GPAI rules – which is why the AI Office, which oversees the AI Act, will not actually start enforcing the GPAI rules until 2 August 2026. For GPAI models already on the market before 2 August 2025, the rules will also only apply from 2 August 2027. Some lobbyists may be aiming for a broader delay in the AI Act's implementation. A Commission spokesperson told Euractiv that the rules on GPAI models will apply from 2 August. However, in the context of the upcoming digital simplification omnibus expected by year-end, they added that 'all options remain open for consideration at this stage.' (nl, aw)
Euractiv
2 hours ago
- Euractiv
Europe's economic suicide pact
For centuries Japan's samurai relied on a practice called seppuku – suicide by disembowelment – as a remedy for failure. Europe's virtue-signalling ritual has a more prosaic (if equally lethal) name: Regulation (EU) 2021/1119, also known as the European Climate Law. Under the law, which was passed in 2021, the EU agreed to achieve climate neutrality by 2055. With that goal looking increasingly shaky, the Commission proposed a 2040 target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 90% by 2040. 'We took the time to think strategically about how we make this a success for Europe,' climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra said on Wednesday as he presented the bill. Unless the commissioner considers accelerating Europe's deindustrialisation a 'success,' he could not be more mistaken. The Commission's attempt to mandate more drastic cuts to emissions at a time when the region's economy has come to a virtual standstill is nothing less than seppuku by another name. Fortunately, Europe's more sober capitals – Rome, Prague and Paris, among them – are pushing back on the Commission's 2040 plan. The big question is what path Germany's centre-right led coalition, which is under intense pressure from the country's Green lobby, will pursue. Germany, which accounts for about one quarter of the EU's output, has been stagnant for the better part of five years. In the broader eurozone, the picture isn't much better, with real growth near zero for more than two years, the weakest in decades. With the prospect of an even deeper slowdown amid a possible trade war with the U.S., there could hardly be a worse time to tighten the shackles on European industry. Few European countries have the fiscal space to cope with the burden of steeper cuts to emissions. Of the eurozone's 20 members, 11 are currently in violation of the bloc's deficit rules, led by Romania with an eye-popping 9.3% budget deficit. The government's attempts to rein in spending have already sparked unrest . While manufacturing in Europe has declined by about 4% since 2015, the drop has been particularly pronounced in the region's industrial core, Germany, where industrial production has contracted by nearly 10% as the pillars of the country's economy – chemicals and autos – have begun to crack. The crisis in Germany should serve as a warning to the rest of the bloc. Like the Commission, Germany's political establishment argued for years that its ambitious climate policy (known in Germany as the Energiewende, or energy transformation) would serve as a model for the rest of the world. Instead, Germany – which has seen heavy industry turn away from the country due in part to high energy costs – serves as an example of a failed climate policy. Though German emissions have fallen considerably, that 'progress' has resulted in the erosion of its industrial base. No one is denying the climate crisis. Yet a go-it-alone strategy won't save the planet. It will only destroy what remains of the European economy and the unprecedented prosperity the continent has enjoyed in recent decades. The samurai also had a word for that: kaishaku, the beheading. May Europe's cooler heads prevail.
