Bioethanol plant deems lack of Government support an ‘act of economic self-harm'
This followed the end of the 19% tariff on American bioethanol imports as part of the recent UK-US trade deal.
On Friday, the Government said: 'This Government will always take decisions in the national interest.
'That's why we negotiated a landmark deal with the US which protected hundreds of thousands of jobs in sectors like auto and aerospace.
'We have worked closely with the companies since June to understand the financial challenges they have faced over the past decade, and have taken the difficult decision not to offer direct funding as it would not provide value for the taxpayer or solve the long-term problems the industry faces.
'We recognise this is a difficult time for the workers and their families and we will work with trade unions, local partners and the companies to support them through this process.
'We also continue to work up proposals that ensure the resilience of our CO2 supply in the long-term in consultation with the sector.'
Ben Hackett, managing director of Vivergo Fuels, said: 'The Government's failure to back Vivergo has forced us to cease operations and move to closure immediately.
'This is a flagrant act of economic self-harm that will have far-reaching consequences.
'This is a massive blow to Hull and the Humber.
'We have fought from day one to support our workers and we are truly sorry that this is not the outcome any of us wanted.
'This decision by ministers will have a huge impact on our region and the thousands of livelihoods in the supply chain that rely on Vivergo, from farmers to hauliers and engineers.'
Mr Hackett said the industry has faced 'unfair regulations' for years that favoured overseas producers, and the recent US-UK trade deal pushed the sector 'to the point of collapse'.
He said: 'We did everything we possibly could to avoid closure, but in the end it was the Government that decided the British bioethanol sector was something that could be traded away with little regard for the impact it would have on ordinary hard-working people.
'We did not go down without a fight and I hope that the noise we generated over the past three months will make the Government think twice before it decides to sign away whole industries as part of future trade negotiations.'
The Vivergo Fuels site in Hull is the UK's largest bioethanol plant (Vivergo Fuels/PA)
A spokesman for Associated British Foods, which owns Vivergo, said: 'It is deeply regrettable that the Government has chosen not to support a key national asset.
'We have been left with no choice but to announce the closure of Vivergo and we have informed our people.
'We have been fighting for months to keep this plant open.
'We initiated and led talks with Government in good faith. We presented a clear plan to restore Vivergo to profitability within two years under policy levers already aligned with the Government's own green industrial strategy.'
The spokesman said the Government had 'thrown away billions in potential growth in the Humber and a sovereign capability in clean fuels that had the chance to lead the world'.
The bioethanol industry, which also includes the Ensus plant on Teesside, has argued the trade deal, coupled with regulatory constraints, has made it impossible to compete with heavily subsidised American products.
Vivergo said the Hull plant, which employs about 160 people, can produce up to 420 million litres of bioethanol from wheat sourced from thousands of UK farms.
It has described bioethanol production as 'a key national strategic asset' which helps reduce emissions from petrol and is expected to be a key component in sustainable aircraft fuel in the future.
The firm recently signed a £1.25 billion memorandum of understanding with Meld Energy to anchor a 'world-class' sustainable aviation fuel facility at the site.
But Meld Energy said earlier this month uncertainly over the bioethanol industry was putting this plan in jeopardy.
The Vivergo plant is also the UK's largest single production site for animal feed, and the company says it indirectly supports about 4,000 jobs in the Humber and Lincolnshire region.
Vivergo has said it buys more than a million tonnes of British wheat each year from more than 4,000 farms, and has purchased from 12,000 individual farms over the past decade.
But it took its last wheat shipment earlier this month.
The farmers' union described the imminent closure of the Vivergo plant as a 'huge blow'.
NFU combinable crops board chairman Jamie Burrows said: 'Not only is it terrible news for those hundreds of workers who will lose their jobs but also for the thousands of people whose livelihoods depend on this supply chain – that includes local farmers who have lost a vital market for their product.'
The Ensus plant in Teesside differs from the Vivergo operation because it also produces CO2 as part of the process.
Ensus, which is owned by CropEnergies, part of the German firm Sudzucker, is the UK's only large scale manufacturer of CO2, which is used in a wide range of sectors, including in drinks and the nuclear industry.
Grant Pearson, chairman of Ensus UK, said on Friday: 'I met with Sarah Jones, the minister for business, today, to receive the Government's response to our request for financial support and the policy changes required to ensure that the Ensus facilities can continue to operate.
'The minister confirmed that they value both our contribution to the UK economy, the jobs we provide and support in the north east of England and in particular our production of biogenic CO2 which is a product of critical national importance.
'They are therefore looking at options to secure an ongoing supply of CO2 from the Ensus facility.
'This is positive news, however it is likely to take time to agree upon and finalise and therefore urgent discussions will be taking place to provide a level of assurance to the Sudzucker and CropEnergies' boards that there is a very high level of confidence that an acceptable long-term arrangement can be reached.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
12 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump administration in talks to take 10% stake in Intel, Bloomberg News reports
Aug 18 (Reuters) - The Trump administration is in talks to take a 10% stake in Intel by converting some or all of the struggling company's Chips Act grants into equity, Bloomberg News reported, citing a White House official and other people familiar with the matter. Shares of Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab fell about 3% on Monday, after rallying last week on hopes of U.S. federal support. A 10% stake in the American chipmaker would be worth about $10 billion. Intel has been slated to receive a combined $10.9 billion in Chips Act grants for commercial and military production, and the figure is roughly enough to pay for the government's holding, according to the Bloomberg report on Monday. Intel declined to comment on the report, while the White House did not respond to a request for comment. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. Media reports said last week that the U.S. government may buy a stake in Intel, after a meeting between CEO Lip-Bu Tan and President Donald Trump that was sparked by Trump's demand for the new Intel chief's resignation over his ties to Chinese firms. Federal backing could give Intel more breathing room to revive its loss-making foundry business, analysts have said, but it still suffers from a weak product roadmap and challenges in attracting customers to its new factories. "The fact that the U.S. government is stepping in to save a blue-chip American company likely means that Intel's competitive position was much worse than what anybody feared," said David Wagner, head of equity and portfolio manager at Intel shareholder Aptus Capital Advisors. Wagner added that while he was skeptical about the U.S. government investing taxpayer money into U.S. companies, it was better than having Intel become a state-owned entity. Aptus Capital Advisors holds 80,581 shares of Intel. Trump, who said the meeting with Tan was "very interesting" one, has taken an unprecedented approach to corporate interventions. He has pushed for multibillion-dollar government tie-ups in semiconductors and rare earths, such as a pay-for-play deal with Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab and an arrangement with rare earth producer MP Materials (MP.N), opens new tab to secure critical minerals. The U.S. government has previously taken equity stakes in companies under stress. During the 2007-2009 financial crisis, it took a stake in General Motors (GM.N), opens new tab — later exiting the stake in 2013. Intel last year secured nearly $8 billion in subsidies, the largest outlay under the act, to build new factories in Ohio and other states as former CEO Pat Gelsinger bet on them to restore the company's manufacturing edge. Tan, however, pared back such ambitions, slowing construction in Ohio. He plans to build factories based on demand for the services, which analysts have said could put him at odds with Trump's push to shore up American manufacturing.
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Now London pub adds 4pc 'optional charge' to drinks customers order at the bar
A London pub has now added a four per cent 'optional charge' to any drinks customers order at the bar. Punters at The Well and Boot in Waterloo station have been slapped with the automatic tariff, which applies to any food and drink, The Telegraph reports. The boozer, which is owned by hospitality firm Glendola Leisure, has a small sign on the bar informing customers of the service charge. It notes, '100 per cent of all tips go to our staff' - and, in another blow, that the venue is cashless, accepting card and contactless only. Cash acceptance campaigner Martin Quinn said: 'You can understand it if you're sitting down and it's table service, but you're ordering it from the bar. 'Where's the service in that?' Mr Quinn visited the pub, buying a half pint of cider for £3.90 - around 15p more than the price listed on the menu due to the additional charge, which he paid. It could be a real money-making measure for the pub in the busy London station, which sees more than 60million people pass through its doors every year. Pubs and restaurants normally add a service charge of roughly 12.5 per cent to the bill for customers seated at a table and attended to by a waiter. It means extra tipping on top of this is not usually expected in the UK - in contrast with the US and some other European countries. But sadly, conventions are changing, consumer expert Martyn James said, as he is seeing more and more a service charge on drinks bought at the bar in pubs. He called it 'insidious', adding there are few regulations to stop it, with the only real definitive rule on tipping being that the house is not supposed to keep tips. And signs advertising a bar service charge can sometimes be hard to spot, with news of the levy often written in small print. Mr James reminded punters it is optional, recognising they might feel too awkward to say no to it as it goes against 'our British sensibilities'. At The Well and Boot, an Aspall cider or Guinness sets you back £7.45 - while customers have to cough up £7.65 for a pint of Camden IPA. A glass of sauvignon blanc costs £8.50 while cocktails come in at £12.50 apiece. Prices look only set to rise further, with ballooning overheads for licenced venues expected to see the cost of the average pint in the UK rise to £5. Things look even worse in London, where the standard price of a pint is set to bed in at £7. It is a marked increase even on March this year, when the average pint cost £4.80 across the country and £6.75 in the capital. Struggling venues have taken increasingly extreme measures to stay afloat, with one major pub chain increasing the pint of 15p after Chancellor Rachel Reeves's tax raid. Fuller's said in June the rise in national insurance contributions (NICs) from last October's Budget and the higher minimum wage from April has left the firm badly hit. The Chiswick-based company - which has 5,500 staff members - warned back in November last year the financial measures would cause the price of its pints to rise. It came after hospitality bosses warned in April the industry faces a £3.4billion hit over the next year from the measures in the autumn Budget. Rises in the national minimum wage and employer NICs, and cuts to business rate relief announced last October all kicked in during the first week of April. The triple-whammy means individual businesses face tens of thousands of pounds in extra costs – and prices have already soared in pubs, restaurants and hotels. UK Hospitality – representing 130,000 venues – has said across the sector, the minimum wage rise will add a £1.9billion burden. It added an extra £1billion will have to be paid in NICs after the tax was expanded to take in more part-time workers. Meanwhile, a further £500million of costs will come from business rate relief being lowered from 75 per cent to 40 per cent. The Institute of Directors also revealed business leaders are 'highly concerned' about the extra costs – with a monthly study of bosses' confidence showing levels as low as during the pandemic. Glendola Leisure was approached for comment.
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The UK's least affordable cities to live revealed as renters hand over more than a THIRD of their wages to landlords every month
The UK's least affordable cities have been revealed, with renters now handing over more than a third of their wages to landlords every month. Individuals renting across England were forking out up to 36.3 per cent of their income on rent alone in 2024, new data has revealed. This marks an increase of more than 33.1 per cent compared to 2023, with rent prices now officially above the 30 per cent threshold that the ONS deems affordable. The significant new findings have prompted calls for rent regulation across the UK, as tenants desperately struggle to match the unprecedented rise in rent prices. London has taken the top spot as England's most expensive city, with average rents of a whopping £1,957 per month seen across the capital. This equates to roughly 41.6 per cent of a typical renter's income, setting tenants back hugely. Meanwhile, in the affluent London borough of Kensington and Chelsea, average renters were spending a whopping 74.3 per cent of their gross earnings on rent. Other notably unaffordable London boroughs included Westminster (55. 8 per cent), Wandsworth (54 per cent), and Camden (51.7 per cent). All of the 32 council areas across London have been above the 30 per cent affordability threshold for eight of the nine financial years ending 2016 to 2024. The picture looked similarly bleak for prospective renters in large cities such as Bristol, Bath and Brighton. In Bristol, renters were forking out 44.6 per cent of their income on rent each month, while in Bath and North East Somerset tenants were paying up to 42.7 per cent and in the popular seaside hub of Brighton this figure stood at 42.6 per cent. Meanwhile, those in popular commuter towns such as Sevenoaks and Watford have also seen their average rent rise above the 30 per cent threshold. Monthly rents across England averaged at £1,232, compared with £3,396 of monthly household incomes, representing a stark difference. In other areas of the UK, rental affordability seemed to be slightly less of a distant dream, with rents found to be below the 30 per cent threshold in Wales and Northern Ireland last year. Indeed, affordability increased in Wales, from 26.3 per cent of an average renter's income in 2023 to 25.9 per cent in 2024. In Northern Ireland, rental prices remained relatively unchanged, having increased slightly from 25.1 per cent to 25.3 per cent in the span of a year. were relatively flat with the ratio ticking up to 25.3% from 25.1%. Affordability also improved in the North East, North West, East Midlands and South East. The North East of England was found to be England's most affordable region, with average rents at £641 per month, amounting to 19.8 per cent of income. Explaining the findings, Sarah Coles, head of personal finance for Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'Renters faced a horrible squeeze on their incomes, and there's every sign it has got worse since. 'Landlords are continuing to sell up - concerned about higher costs from more regulation and more tax. 'It means more tenants chasing dwindling numbers of properties, so rents are continuing to rise.' Ms Coles added that any wage increases have been 'consistently outpaced' by a growth in the private rental market. 'At the same time, although wages have risen impressively, they have been consistently outpaced by private rental increases.' Meanwhile, Joseph Elliott, lead analyst at the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, said the data indicates an urgent need for the government to 'tackle unaffordable rents, frozen housing support, and a chronic shortage of social housing.' He told The Guardian: 'High rents are locking people out of their homes and driving poverty and homelessness.' Labour's Renters' Rights Bill, set to become law next year, plans to prohibit landlords from relisting a property with higher rent until at least six months after tenants have moved out - where they have ended a tenancy in order to sell a property. The Government previously said the end of a private rental contract is 'one of the leading causes of homelessness'. But Labour's homelessness minister was forced to resign earlier this month after she was accused of 'staggering hypocrisy' amid claims she ejected tenants from one of her homes, before putting it back on the market for an extra £700 a month rent. Rushanara Ali, who had championed the bill, which is currently going through Parliament, hiked rent on a property she owns by hundreds of pounds just weeks after the previous tenants' contract ended. Ms Ali, 50, has repeatedly cast herself as a voice for hard-up tenants, and spoke out against private renters 'being exploited and discriminated against'. Her actions would have been illegal under this proposed law. The new ONS figures also come amid a rise in the number of Gen z students giving up the chaotic joys of student digs at university to instead live with their mum and dad due to rising rent costs. Nearly a third of 18-year-old applicants in the UK for the academic year 2024-25 planned to stay at home, the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (Ucas) said earlier this month. This some 30 per cent figure is more than double that seen around 20 years ago, the Times reports - and also the highest recorded in this same timeframe. In 2007, only 14 per cent of teens said they would not be moving out during their studies - and even more recently, in 2015, this figure had only risen to 21 per cent. Stay-at-home student living started to peak sharply after the Covid pandemic, which saw families get used to rubbing along together at home during lockdowns. It came after a similar rise after the 2008 financial crash, after which family budgets suddenly became tight. Passing on student accommodation is particularly common in London, where rents are famously high, and Scotland, where students go tuition fee-free. Meanwhile, applicants in Wales, the south east and throughout the south west seem largely to stick with a traditional student room. The most common reasons mentioned for living with the parents were saving money (64 per cent) and being near family (46 per cent), as per a survey of 1,000 UK students by Leeds Beckett University. More than half (53 per cent), meanwhile, said it motivated them to consistently attend classes - perhaps with mum and dad there to keep them in line. Ucas chief executive Jo Saxton pointed out some students stay at home as it is close to the best course or university for them or to caring and family responsibilities. But the former school leader emphasised, generally speaking: 'More needs to be done to ensure the cost of living doesn't become a limit on young people's ambition.'
