How Trump could lose in court, but still gut Biden's green agenda
The Trump administration is hitting legal roadblocks in its attempt to revoke $20 billion in climate grants, but its efforts are already achieving one of the president's key aims: throttling a crucial part of Joe Biden's clean energy agenda.
In Fort Worth, Texas, one affordable housing developer scrapped plans to add solar to a 116-unit project — and two other deals may soon collapse entirely. In North Carolina, energy efficiency upgrades at a small rural college are on hold. Also in peril is a New Mexico initiative meant to offer below-market loans that would help low- and middle-income people buy furnaces, add solar panels and reduce energy costs.
All told, hundreds of organizations depending on cash from the Environmental Protection Agency's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund must wait out a potentially lengthy courtroom battle before receiving money that the Biden administration had awarded and distributed before President Donald Trump took office. Would-be participants also face potential risks to their reputations as Trump and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin wage unyielding public attacks on the climate grants, which the administration has alleged without evidence are marred by potential fraud and waste.
The Justice Department has also launched a criminal investigation into the grant program, over the objections of a
career prosecutor in D.C. who resigned in February
.
Nine organizations waiting on shares of the climate funding told POLITICO that the controversy is stalling their projects, which range from financing programs for energy efficiency improvements to powering wastewater treatment plants with solar. The snarl could also force them to cancel projects designed to help people lower their energy costs.
Megan Lasch, president of the Texas affordable housing developer O-SDA Industries, scrambled to replace program funding that she said 'evaporated' overnight for a 116-unit affordable housing project in Fort Worth, a city where both home and rent prices are rising. She needed to replace $4 million but only found $3 million — and at a higher interest rate — forcing her to scrap plans to add solar power. She's struggling to plug multimillion-dollar holes for deals with private financiers on two other Fort Worth projects, one of which is supposed to close next month although that timing is now uncertain.
'It's actually really scary,' she said, adding: 'A lot of developers could go belly-up over the situation.'
Brian Depew, executive director of the Center for Rural Affairs, a rural development organization based in Lyons, Nebraska, said he warned a solar developer that the work they were doing was at risk because the federal funding has not materialized. Depew is assessing how the rural development nonprofit can continue the work it had planned to reduce consumers' energy costs through the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund.
'They're asking, 'Are you really going to have this money?'' Depew said. 'It's kicked off a lot of uncertainty at all levels.'
Trump's critics including Democratic Sen.
Chris Van Hollen
of Maryland, Sen.
Ed Markey
of Massachusetts and Rep.
Debbie Dingell
of Michigan
have derided what they call 'sham' investigations
by the FBI and Justice Department into the program. On Tuesday, a federal judge
rejected EPA's attempt to terminate the grant recipients' contracts
, saying the agency had not offered evidence to back up its claims of waste, fraud and abuse, though she did not immediately restore the groups' access to the money.
But the EPA's tactics have already had an impact: Renowned charities Habitat for Humanity International and United Way Worldwide departed nonprofit coalition Power Forward Communities, which is suing EPA to restore access to its $2 billion grant. Habitat and United Way both cited the need to conserve financial resources amid a likely protracted legal fight with EPA.
Habitat said that while it is 'confident these issues will be resolved favorably' for the grantees, it 'must remain committed to stewarding our resources in pursuit of core mission delivery rather than on unprecedented legal battles.'
One supporter of the climate programs accused Trump's appointees of pursuing dubious tactics to obstruct the work.
'They know that a lot of this isn't legal,' said Chris Castro, chief sustainability officer at Climate First Bank who has advised the Coalition for Green Capital, one of the three nonprofit grantees suing EPA. 'The purpose was to stall.'
EPA said it would not comment on pending litigation, but Zeldin has commented often on the program. He has accused the Biden administration of rushing the funds out the door with a structure that gave EPA little oversight of the federal money flow, calling the program 'riddled with self-dealing and wasteful spending.'
'This scheme was the first of its kind in EPA history and it was purposefully designed to obligate all of the money in a rush job with reduced oversight,' he said last month.
The Biden administration selected eight nonprofits for $20 billion of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund grants, which are held at Citibank under an arrangement with the federal government. Those organizations said they would award shares of those funds to hundreds of other local development institutions for clean energy, energy efficiency and housing projects. The Biden administration said each public dollar would leverage an additional $7 in private capital.
But now, in light of the Trump administration's broadsides against the program, nonprofits waiting on the funds say private sector interest is chilled.
'The headwinds are significant. The disruption just makes it hard to proceed,' said Melissa Malkin-Weber, co-director of the North Carolina Clean Energy Fund, which is counting on the money to finance $51 million of projects in North and South Carolina. 'The missed opportunities to really benefit people in the Carolinas is the real heartbreak right now.'
Even if the money begins to flow, private investors will have to weigh whether it's worth partnering with a program the Trump administration is determined to fight.
The relentless attacks could turn the program politically toxic even in a Trump-loving state like Indiana, said Alex Crowley, executive director of the Indiana Energy Independence Fund.
'It will slow down the willingness of private capital to become involved,' he said. 'There's a kind of residual effect that happens regardless of the federal funding coming down.'
A sub-awardee in a conservative Western state said Trump's animosity and misinformation about the program is complicating efforts to attract private investors. The organization may have to significantly scale back initiatives like helping people pay for energy efficiency retrofits without the federal funds, leaving millions of dollars worth of projects without backing, said the person, who was granted anonymity to discuss sensitive financial information.
'It certainly has a cooling effect,' the person said.
That reality is straining resources and culling operations across the country, especially in communities that have long struggled to draw private investment like rural areas and neighborhoods where people lack access to traditional forms of credit.
The freeze is causing 'hesitation from private capital sources — and also hesitation from developers, contractors that we might hire to do the work,' the Center for Rural Affairs' Depew said. 'Capital markets abhor uncertainty.'
Missouri Green Banc Executive Director John Harris said losing the funds would 'hinder our ability to leverage private capital and sustain impactful projects.' He said those private markets 'are key to sustainable community support.'
New Mexico community lender Homewise will have to 'be creative' and 'redirect our strategy' to fulfill a new plan to finance energy efficiency improvements to help low- and middle-income New Mexico households reduce their energy bills, deputy CEO Johanna Gilligan said. The mortgage lender had been counting on Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund money that remains frozen.
But how long any of this takes to resolve is anyone's guess. Zeldin has vowed to keep fighting the program, saying in a statement
posted Tuesday on X
that he 'will not rest until these hard-earned taxpayer dollars are returned to the U.S. Treasury.'
Other institutions suggested that the Justice Department probe has injected additional uncertainty beyond a mere legal dispute.
Illinois Finance Authority Executive Director Chris Meister, whose organization sued EPA and Citibank on Wednesday over its stalled $109 million sub-award, said in an email he is 'equally concerned by the manner in which [the Trump administration is] seeking to deny' access to funds. He referenced news reports that showed political officials at the FBI and Justice Department had initiated investigations against the advice of career staff.
And pushing back against EPA's claims is daunting in the face of the federal government's unlimited resources. Litigation costs are 'a significant factor and variable' for the nonprofits, said Adam Kent, director of blended and inclusive finance at the environmental group Natural Resources Defense Council, who is leading calls coordinating more than 100 groups interested in the funding.
Many nonprofits awaiting funds from the primary grantees cannot afford a lengthy legal battle, said Climate First Bank's Castro, who helped set up the fund as a Biden administration Energy Department official. Some are even discussing laying off staff or moving on from the grant program — which he said might be the Trump administration's goal.
'They're kind of saying, 'Hey, maybe this might not be worth us getting some of these grant dollars, and we might have to pivot our strategy,'' he said. 'Which, again, helps [EPA] and their overall purpose of what they're trying to do.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
23 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Is Trump's troop deployment in LA a prelude to martial law?
Neither did Hegseth announced that National Guard members and the Marines will stay in Los Angeles for Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up At a Advertisement This is a Trump made-for-TV spectacle of authoritarianism disguised as law and order. It's likely a prelude to martial law. Rob Bonta, California's attorney general, is Advertisement Protests were sparked last week after Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials conducted several workplace raids in Los Angeles, including a But what began as boisterous but peaceful protests against Trump's anti-immigrant scheme which now demands 'If I didn't ''SEND IN THE TROOPS,'" Trump said Tuesday on social media, Los Angeles 'would be burning to the ground right now,' before he disparaged Bass and Newsom. Yes, there has been looting, and some cars have been burned and vandalized. But Trump is lying about the extent of lawlessness. Trump is following his bad policies with even worse provocations that could portend a modern-day Kent State tragedy with soldiers firing live bullets at protesters. But for Trump, the more chaos, the better. As a White House official said, 'We're happy to have this fight.' To some extent this fight to suppress dissent has been boiling in Trump for five years. During nationwide demonstrations after the police murder of George Floyd in 2020, Trump, then in his first term, asked members of his Cabinet whether protesters could be shot. 'He thought that the protests made the country look weak, made us look weak, and 'us' meant him,' Mark Esper, Trump's former defense secretary, Advertisement Esper recalled Trump saying to now-retired General Mark Milley, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ''Can't you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something?' … It was a suggestion and a formal question. And we were just all taken aback at that moment as this issue just hung very heavily in the air.' Ultimately, Trump was talked out of it. That won't happen this time, with an administration packed with people whose only loyalty is to him, not to the Constitution or rule of law. After Tom Homan, Trump's bloviating border czar, If not for the ICE arrest of But not now. Everything in Trump's second administration is designed to codify his authoritarianism. If Trump can convince enough people, especially among his white base, that he alone represents the thin orange line between civilization — as Advertisement Right now, the administration claims the military is in Los Angeles to protect federal buildings and assets — theoretically. Trump has not invoked the Insurrection Act, but neither has he ruled out unleashing US troops on protesters. With his draconian policies, Trump has lit the fuse for what could be a long and difficult summer of protests. With an occupying military force in this nation's second largest city, he has declared war against America itself. Renée Graham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at


New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump promised not to send in military to tamp down on NYC protests — if NYPD keeps demonstrators in line
President Trump promised NYPD brass over the weekend that he will not send in the military or National Guard to tamp down on anti-ICE protests in New York City — as long as cops keep the demonstrators in line, The Post has learned. Trump's pledge was made to Deputy Mayor of Public Safety Kaz Daughtry and NYPD Chief of Department John Chell as the pair palled around with the president at his New Jersey golf club. Sources with knowledge of the meeting said Trump had voiced concerns over the destructive mass protests engulfing Los Angeles and them being replicated in the Big Apple. Advertisement But Chell reassured the president that any demonstrations in the city would not get out of hand, the sources said. Kaz Daughtry and John Chell though didn't tee it up with the commander in chief. Linkedin/john-chell The two Big Apple police officials met with Trump on Sunday. Linkedin/john-chell Advertisement Trump then told the two he didn't believe the National Guard would be necessary in New York City. It came after he ordered an initial 2,000 National Guard troops to LA Saturday amid the raging protests over federal immigration enforcement raids. Since then, the Trump administration has in total dispatched roughly 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to the city– sparking an emergency request by California Gov. Gavin Newsom Tuesday for a federal court to block the deployment. On Monday, Mayor Eric Adams and his police commissioner, Jessica Tisch, decried the anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles and issued a stern warning to New Yorkers to not follow suit. 'The escalation of protests in Los Angeles over the last couple of days is unacceptable and would not be tolerated if attempted in our city,' Adams said. Advertisement Tisch added that 'any attacks against law enforcement will be met with a swift and decisive response from the NYPD.' Earlier Monday, dozens of protestors calling for an end to the ICE raids were arrested at Trump Tower after refusing to leave the Manhattan high-rise. The meeting between Trump and Adams' allies raised eyebrows in New York City political circles — after Daughtry and Chell posted photos on social media from the Bedminster club. 'Great day on the links today with POTUS, #45-#47 – Donald J. Trump. Good conversation with a few laughs and a great lunch. Deputy Mayor of Public Safety Kaz Daughtry and I were grateful for the invite,' Chell wrote. Advertisement Sources said the two Big Apple officials didn't actually tee it up with the prez, despite the photos showing them chatting with him on the links. Still, Adams defended the outing on Tuesday, telling reporters, 'A lot of great deals have been made on the golf course.' 'I thank the two of them for doing it,' he said. 'Many of you who play golf know that great decisions are made on the golf course.' Both Chell and Daughtry also joined the mayor at Trump's inauguration earlier this year.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
IQVIA Holdings (NYSE:IQV) Sees 11% Share Price Rise Over Last Week
IQVIA Holdings experienced a 10% rise in share price over the last week, correlating with its recent developments, notably the dosing of the first patient in the RENEW Phase 2 trial and its strategic alliance with Sarah Cannon Research Institute to optimize oncology trials. These initiatives likely provided a positive sentiment boost, aligning well with the broader market momentum, as indices such as the S&P 500 also reached new highs. The market's anticipation over US-China trade talks and overall strong corporate earnings have supported the upward trend, further enhancing IQV's market performance. We've identified 1 warning sign for IQVIA Holdings that you should be aware of. Uncover 18 companies that survived and thrived after COVID and have the right ingredients to survive Trump's tariffs. The recent 10% rise in IQVIA Holdings' share price has been influenced by important developments like the dosing in the RENEW Phase 2 trial and a key alliance with Sarah Cannon Research Institute. These initiatives are expected to potentially drive revenue growth, particularly as the strategic alliance optimizes oncology trials. The company's past performance, with total returns of 10.45% over five years, suggests modest growth in investor value. However, compared to the US Life Sciences industry's one-year return of 27% decline, IQVIA's recent rise highlights positive market sentiment. These initiatives, combined with FDA reforms and NVIDIA collaboration, may lower operational costs and have a favorable impact on earnings forecasts. Analysts predict revenue to grow by 5.2% annually over the next three years, which is somewhat cautious compared to the general expectations for the life sciences sector. The recent share price movement to US$146.2 remains below the consensus price target of US$216.31, indicating potential for future appreciation if the projected growth in revenue and earnings materializes. Click here to discover the nuances of IQVIA Holdings with our detailed analytical financial health report. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NYSE:IQV. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data