logo
How Trump could lose in court, but still gut Biden's green agenda

How Trump could lose in court, but still gut Biden's green agenda

Politico23-03-2025

The Trump administration is hitting legal roadblocks in its attempt to revoke $20 billion in climate grants, but its efforts are already achieving one of the president's key aims: throttling a crucial part of Joe Biden's clean energy agenda.
In Fort Worth, Texas, one affordable housing developer scrapped plans to add solar to a 116-unit project — and two other deals may soon collapse entirely. In North Carolina, energy efficiency upgrades at a small rural college are on hold. Also in peril is a New Mexico initiative meant to offer below-market loans that would help low- and middle-income people buy furnaces, add solar panels and reduce energy costs.
All told, hundreds of organizations depending on cash from the Environmental Protection Agency's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund must wait out a potentially lengthy courtroom battle before receiving money that the Biden administration had awarded and distributed before President Donald Trump took office. Would-be participants also face potential risks to their reputations as Trump and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin wage unyielding public attacks on the climate grants, which the administration has alleged without evidence are marred by potential fraud and waste.
The Justice Department has also launched a criminal investigation into the grant program, over the objections of a
career prosecutor in D.C. who resigned in February
.
Nine organizations waiting on shares of the climate funding told POLITICO that the controversy is stalling their projects, which range from financing programs for energy efficiency improvements to powering wastewater treatment plants with solar. The snarl could also force them to cancel projects designed to help people lower their energy costs.
Megan Lasch, president of the Texas affordable housing developer O-SDA Industries, scrambled to replace program funding that she said 'evaporated' overnight for a 116-unit affordable housing project in Fort Worth, a city where both home and rent prices are rising. She needed to replace $4 million but only found $3 million — and at a higher interest rate — forcing her to scrap plans to add solar power. She's struggling to plug multimillion-dollar holes for deals with private financiers on two other Fort Worth projects, one of which is supposed to close next month although that timing is now uncertain.
'It's actually really scary,' she said, adding: 'A lot of developers could go belly-up over the situation.'
Brian Depew, executive director of the Center for Rural Affairs, a rural development organization based in Lyons, Nebraska, said he warned a solar developer that the work they were doing was at risk because the federal funding has not materialized. Depew is assessing how the rural development nonprofit can continue the work it had planned to reduce consumers' energy costs through the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund.
'They're asking, 'Are you really going to have this money?'' Depew said. 'It's kicked off a lot of uncertainty at all levels.'
Trump's critics including Democratic Sen.
Chris Van Hollen
of Maryland, Sen.
Ed Markey
of Massachusetts and Rep.
Debbie Dingell
of Michigan
have derided what they call 'sham' investigations
by the FBI and Justice Department into the program. On Tuesday, a federal judge
rejected EPA's attempt to terminate the grant recipients' contracts
, saying the agency had not offered evidence to back up its claims of waste, fraud and abuse, though she did not immediately restore the groups' access to the money.
But the EPA's tactics have already had an impact: Renowned charities Habitat for Humanity International and United Way Worldwide departed nonprofit coalition Power Forward Communities, which is suing EPA to restore access to its $2 billion grant. Habitat and United Way both cited the need to conserve financial resources amid a likely protracted legal fight with EPA.
Habitat said that while it is 'confident these issues will be resolved favorably' for the grantees, it 'must remain committed to stewarding our resources in pursuit of core mission delivery rather than on unprecedented legal battles.'
One supporter of the climate programs accused Trump's appointees of pursuing dubious tactics to obstruct the work.
'They know that a lot of this isn't legal,' said Chris Castro, chief sustainability officer at Climate First Bank who has advised the Coalition for Green Capital, one of the three nonprofit grantees suing EPA. 'The purpose was to stall.'
EPA said it would not comment on pending litigation, but Zeldin has commented often on the program. He has accused the Biden administration of rushing the funds out the door with a structure that gave EPA little oversight of the federal money flow, calling the program 'riddled with self-dealing and wasteful spending.'
'This scheme was the first of its kind in EPA history and it was purposefully designed to obligate all of the money in a rush job with reduced oversight,' he said last month.
The Biden administration selected eight nonprofits for $20 billion of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund grants, which are held at Citibank under an arrangement with the federal government. Those organizations said they would award shares of those funds to hundreds of other local development institutions for clean energy, energy efficiency and housing projects. The Biden administration said each public dollar would leverage an additional $7 in private capital.
But now, in light of the Trump administration's broadsides against the program, nonprofits waiting on the funds say private sector interest is chilled.
'The headwinds are significant. The disruption just makes it hard to proceed,' said Melissa Malkin-Weber, co-director of the North Carolina Clean Energy Fund, which is counting on the money to finance $51 million of projects in North and South Carolina. 'The missed opportunities to really benefit people in the Carolinas is the real heartbreak right now.'
Even if the money begins to flow, private investors will have to weigh whether it's worth partnering with a program the Trump administration is determined to fight.
The relentless attacks could turn the program politically toxic even in a Trump-loving state like Indiana, said Alex Crowley, executive director of the Indiana Energy Independence Fund.
'It will slow down the willingness of private capital to become involved,' he said. 'There's a kind of residual effect that happens regardless of the federal funding coming down.'
A sub-awardee in a conservative Western state said Trump's animosity and misinformation about the program is complicating efforts to attract private investors. The organization may have to significantly scale back initiatives like helping people pay for energy efficiency retrofits without the federal funds, leaving millions of dollars worth of projects without backing, said the person, who was granted anonymity to discuss sensitive financial information.
'It certainly has a cooling effect,' the person said.
That reality is straining resources and culling operations across the country, especially in communities that have long struggled to draw private investment like rural areas and neighborhoods where people lack access to traditional forms of credit.
The freeze is causing 'hesitation from private capital sources — and also hesitation from developers, contractors that we might hire to do the work,' the Center for Rural Affairs' Depew said. 'Capital markets abhor uncertainty.'
Missouri Green Banc Executive Director John Harris said losing the funds would 'hinder our ability to leverage private capital and sustain impactful projects.' He said those private markets 'are key to sustainable community support.'
New Mexico community lender Homewise will have to 'be creative' and 'redirect our strategy' to fulfill a new plan to finance energy efficiency improvements to help low- and middle-income New Mexico households reduce their energy bills, deputy CEO Johanna Gilligan said. The mortgage lender had been counting on Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund money that remains frozen.
But how long any of this takes to resolve is anyone's guess. Zeldin has vowed to keep fighting the program, saying in a statement
posted Tuesday on X
that he 'will not rest until these hard-earned taxpayer dollars are returned to the U.S. Treasury.'
Other institutions suggested that the Justice Department probe has injected additional uncertainty beyond a mere legal dispute.
Illinois Finance Authority Executive Director Chris Meister, whose organization sued EPA and Citibank on Wednesday over its stalled $109 million sub-award, said in an email he is 'equally concerned by the manner in which [the Trump administration is] seeking to deny' access to funds. He referenced news reports that showed political officials at the FBI and Justice Department had initiated investigations against the advice of career staff.
And pushing back against EPA's claims is daunting in the face of the federal government's unlimited resources. Litigation costs are 'a significant factor and variable' for the nonprofits, said Adam Kent, director of blended and inclusive finance at the environmental group Natural Resources Defense Council, who is leading calls coordinating more than 100 groups interested in the funding.
Many nonprofits awaiting funds from the primary grantees cannot afford a lengthy legal battle, said Climate First Bank's Castro, who helped set up the fund as a Biden administration Energy Department official. Some are even discussing laying off staff or moving on from the grant program — which he said might be the Trump administration's goal.
'They're kind of saying, 'Hey, maybe this might not be worth us getting some of these grant dollars, and we might have to pivot our strategy,'' he said. 'Which, again, helps [EPA] and their overall purpose of what they're trying to do.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's former Commerce Secretary, Wilbur Ross, says the US-China deal is still far from comprehensive
Trump's former Commerce Secretary, Wilbur Ross, says the US-China deal is still far from comprehensive

Business Insider

time25 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Trump's former Commerce Secretary, Wilbur Ross, says the US-China deal is still far from comprehensive

President Donald Trump's former Secretary of Commerce doesn't think the trade deal between the US and China is close to being "done." "It looks as though they made a fairly modest deal, mostly focusing on export controls on both the US side and the China side," Wilbur Ross, who was part of the first Trump administration, told Business Insider. "So it's far from a comprehensive deal." On Wednesday morning, Trump said on Truth Social that the deal with China is now "done." "It seems more or less to be reiterating the deal they thought they had set a few weeks ago," Ross said of the deal. China and the US reached a trade framework agreement on Tuesday, after their respective negotiation teams held two-day talks in London. The current Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, is part of the US trade talk team. "Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China," Trump added in all caps in the post. "Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!)." Ross said that the deal has not addressed many important issues, including intellectual property, so it may be too soon to call this a victory. "The Chinese side has been very careful to say it still needs to be approved by President Xi," said Ross. "When we negotiated with the China side last time, it wasn't unusual for the trade negotiators to agree to something, and then they would go back to Xi, and he would not go along with it." This year in duties on imports from China reached up to 245% on some goods. On May 14, many of the tariffs on China were reduced to 30% for 90 days, with a deadline of August 12. A 10% baseline tariff is still in place on the rest of the world, while additional higher tariffs on 75 countries have been paused until July 9. Ross said that it would be important to complete at least a few deals with key trading partners before the tariff pause on 75 countries expires. "I think that will help clear the air for the stock market because it'll start to show a direction and that there is a way to get all these things resolved," he said. "It's very important from a bond market point of view and from an equity market point of view."

Costco announces earlier shopping hours for executive members, more benefits
Costco announces earlier shopping hours for executive members, more benefits

USA Today

time27 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Costco announces earlier shopping hours for executive members, more benefits

Costco announces earlier shopping hours for executive members, more benefits Show Caption Hide Caption The companies standing up to Trump on DEI Companies like Costco and Levi's are rejecting the White House's position on diversity, equity and inclusion. Costco has announced the rollout of new benefits for executive members, set to go into effect at the end of the month. The retail warehouse giant told members on June 11 in an email, and confirmed to USA TODAY, that its locations will open at 9 a.m. exclusively for its upper-level members starting June 30. The company also said its warehouses will remain open an extra hour on Saturdays for all members, closing at 7 p.m. Costco revealed that executive members will receive a monthly $10 credit for orders of $150 placed through the company's "Same-Day" service or Instacart. The company did not provide further comment on the new benefits when contacted by USA TODAY on June 11. Costco's early executive membership shopping hours Monday – Friday: 9 a.m. – 10 a.m. Saturday: 9 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. Sunday: 9 a.m. – 10 a.m. Costco executive membership benefits Costco Executive Members already receive the benefits of Gold Star membership, including: warehouse access, Costco fuel access and a free household card. Executive Members also receive an annual 2% reward on qualified purchases, as well as discounts on Costco services. The membership costs $130 per year.

Trump's first term shows why markets are cautious on the China trade deal
Trump's first term shows why markets are cautious on the China trade deal

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's first term shows why markets are cautious on the China trade deal

The stock market was largely unmoved by the trade agreement the US struck with China. Market pros say investors expect the trade war to unfold much as it did during Trump's first term. The US and China made scant progress on key issues in their 2018-2019 trade dispute. The stock market has been encouraged by easing tensions between the US and China in recent weeks, but investors were largely unmoved by the announcement of a trade deal between the superpowers on Tuesday. US stock futures failed to climb on news of the deal late Tuesday evening. While markets are edging higher on Wednesday, that's largely because the consumer price index report for May showed inflation was tamer than expected at 2.4% year-over-year. Here's where major indexes stood at 10:20 a.m. ET: S&P 500: 6,055.26, up 0.28% Dow Jones Industrial Average: 42,997.65, up 0.31% (+130.78 points) Nasdaq Composite: 19,788.36, up 0.37% On the trade front, observers say it's looking more likely that the trade war will shake out like it did during President Donald Trump's first term, with talk of constructive deals even as tensions remain elevated. Simply put, investors see a long and winding path ahead, and knee-jerk reactions to trade announcements have largely subsided since the chaos of "Liberation Day" in April. The framework agreement announced on Tuesday outlines how the two nations will continue trade talks. Importantly, it involves China allowing exports of rare earth minerals, while the US eases up on restrictions for exports of advanced tech to China, like semiconductors. This embedded content is not available in your region. The reaction is far more muted than how the market reacted last month, when stocks popped after the US struck a rough framework deal with China that lowered tariffs between the nations for 90 days. Art Hogan, the chief market strategist at B. Riley Wealth, told Business Insider that markets are reacting to trade talks similarly to when the US-China trade war first kicked off in 2018. He pointed to regular pullbacks in stocks during Trump's first term as traders digested the lack of progress in US-China negotiations. "We still have that muscle memory from Trump 1.0, that dealing with China is difficult and there's a multitude of issues," Hogan said. "I don't think we're going to solve this in short order and likely never solve it in the longer term." He added that markets are likely waiting for a more positive catalyst, pointing to more than 100 nations that have yet to strike a trade deal with the US. Peter Berezin, the chief global strategist at BCA Research, said the framework made only small progress on negotiations with China. "I would say that the 'deal' in London simply restores things to how they were right after Geneva," he told BI in an email. He added that he expected tariffs on China to remain high "for the foreseeable future." Strategists at Deutsche Bank also said that tariff talks appear to mirror the 2018-2019 period, when the US and China didn't make much headway in resolving key issues. Back then, the US said that China had unfair trade practices related to industries like agriculture and manufacturing. It also said China had unfairly transferred technology and stolen intellectual property from the US. Deutsche Bank pointed out that the agreement announced Tuesday skipped over fentanyl-related tariffs that Trump implemented against China earlier this year. "So while the mood music has stayed positive, investors may be wary of the pattern that emerged during the previous US-China trade talks in 2018-19," strategists wrote. "So there's perhaps a little disappointment this morning that we haven't yet got a bigger announcement." The agreement also appeared to lack detail that markets were looking for, David Morrison, a senior market analyst at Trade Nation, wrote in a note. "The big question is what kind of trade deals can the US negotiate that will be good enough to get the indices to fresh records?" he said. US stocks have whipsawed this year amid the turmoil surrounding tariffs and incremental news of trade agreements between the US and other countries. Indexes have erased their steep losses since the April 2 tariff announcements, with major averages now positive year-to-date. Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store