
Leftwing activists less likely to work with political rivals than other UK groups, study finds
Leftwing activists in Britain are less likely to work with their political opponents than other groups and more likely to think those holding different views have been misled, a study has found.
The study by the polling group More in Common finds that 8-10% of the population, whom they classify under the heading 'progressive activists', hold strikingly different views on a range of issues than the rest of Britain.
The research also shows the group is more likely to dislike and criticise those that disagree with them than other voting blocs, a trait the report's authors argue has contributed to the repeated failure of progressive campaigns and the rise of the global far right.
Luke Tryl, an executive director at More in Common and co-author of the study, said: 'Progressive activists are the backbone of many of the UK's campaigning organisations and have often been the drivers of social change in the UK. However, their political outlook and approach to bringing about change makes them outliers from much of the wider public and those they are trying to win over.
'In particular this report finds that a tendency to impose purity tests on those they will campaign with, overestimating how many people share their views, and using language that is inaccessible to the wider public is potentially driving a backlash against progressive causes rather than helping them to win people over.
'If the liberal left are going to get back on the front foot it will require a much more deliberate approach to meeting people where they are, and engaging with the old-fashioned work of persuasion, rather than expecting people to be on board with social change from the outset.'
More in Common carried out a number of polls, focus groups and one-on-one interviews with more than 1,000 people for its deep dive into progressive activists, the most left-wing of the seven 'tribes', which the company has identified among British voters.
The group, which the pollsters define as young, highly educated and socially leftwing, represents about 8% of the population, but is far more represented in certain sectors such as public-sector bodies and charities.
Tryl, and his co-author Ed Hodgson, found that on a range of political and cultural issues, this group stands out from every other section of the UK electorate.
They are the only group, for example, of whom a majority believes that immigration levels should remain the same or rise, and are far more likely to argue that 'woke culture' has had a benefit on British society than other groups.
The authors argue that given this divergence from the rest of the population, it is a particular problem that progressive activists are more likely to misunderstand other voters, criticise them and even refuse to campaign alongside them.
Sign up to Headlines UK
Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
The polling showed that progressive activists on average believe that 35% of the British public agreed with abolishing the monarchy, when the real number is 18%. They thought a quarter of people would agree with letting more refugees into the country, when the actual figure is 8%.
Meanwhile, two-thirds of those polled said they would never be willing to campaign alongside someone who had voted for Reform, while 46% would not do so alongside Conservative voters.
In focus groups, the authors found that progressive activists were more likely than other voters to believe their opponents had been misled by misinformation and, possibly as a result, hold a negative view about them.
While 72% of progressive activists view leave voters negatively, the same is true of 24% of 'backbone conservatives' – the furthest right of the seven tribes – towards remain voters.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Bus users protected from price hikes as Rachel Reeves gives update on £3 cap
Rachel Reeves is expected to extend the nationwide price cap on single trips for bus passengers in the Spending Review - which was due to run out at the end of the year Bus passengers will be protected from fare hikes as the £3 cap on single tickets is set to be extended. In a major boost for bus users, Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to protect the nationwide price cap on single trips, which had been due to run out at the end of the year. The cost-of-living lifeline will now be in place across England until March 2027, the Mirror understands. Single fares could rise by up to £12 in the worst hit areas if the cap is lifted. The Department for Transport previously said a journey between Leeds and Scarborough could cost £15, while a fare from Hull to York would hit £8.50. The decision, which will be confirmed in the Spending Review on Wednesday, is a major boost to millions of Brits who rely on buses every day. A Treasury source told the Mirror: 'We understand the cost of living is a priority for the British people. That is why we are investing in Britain's renewal to make working people better off. Rachel Reeves' Spending Review major predictions on what will and won't be in it 'That's why we're keeping bus fares down by extending the £3 cap to put more money in people's pockets.' The cap covers around 5,000 bus routes across England, costing the Treasury around £150million a year to keep fares at £3. The Tories previously introduced a £2 cap on bus fares but only provided funding until the end of 2024. Last year, Keir Starmer said it would rise to £3 for 2025 but its future was uncertain beyond the end of this year. A Government source said: "Buses provide lifeline access to opportunity for people across the country. "Keeping fares affordable is a top priority for the Transport Secretary, as our landmark Buses Bill overhauls how services are delivered. Better buses are around the corner with Labour." The Chancellor will unveil plans to splash tens of billions of pounds on public services such as the NHS, defence and schools over the next three years in the long-awaited Spending Review on Wednesday. But other departments are expected to feel the squeeze, with cuts looming to unprotected areas such as local government and the Home Office. Ministers have been locked in fraught negotiations for months over their budgets. The final settlement for the Home Office was only signed off on Monday after a row with Home Secretary Yvette Cooper over cash for policing. Ms Reeves will also announce funding for infrastructure investment, including big ticket items like road, rail and energy projects. She will confirm changes to Treasury rules to make it easier to pour cash into projects outside of London and the South East. It comes after a blitz of announcements, including some £15.6 billion of spending on public transport in England's city regions, and £16.7 billion for nuclear power projects, the bulk of which will fund the new Sizewell C plant in Suffolk. Ms Reeves also confirmed on Monday that some 9 million pensioners would be eligible for the winter fuel allowance this year after backtracking on the unpopular decision to strip the benefit from all but the poorest pensioners. The Government also announced plans to expand free school meals eligibility to another 500,000 children whose families get Universal Credit, in a major win for the Mirror's campaign to end hunger in classrooms.


STV News
3 hours ago
- STV News
UK sanctions Israeli ministers over Gaza comments
Israeli government ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich have been sanctioned by the UK government for 'inciting violence against the Palestinian people'. The sanction means their assets will be frozen, and the men will be banned from entering the UK. The UK is taking action alongside Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway. In a joint statement with foreign ministers from the four other countries who have announced sanctions, foreign secretary David Lammy said the two senior Israelis had incited 'serious abuses of Palestinian human rights'. The statement added: 'We have engaged the Israeli government on this issue extensively, yet violent perpetrators continue to act with encouragement and impunity. 'These actions are not acceptable. This is why we have taken action now – to hold those responsible to account.' Foreign Secretary David Lammy announces sanctions against Israeli ministers Ben-Gvir and SmotrichLammy says the men 'have been inciting violence against Palestinian people for months' He reiterated the government's support for a two-state solution — ITVPolitics (@ITVNewsPolitics) June 10, 2025 David Lammy has described Israel's actions as 'monstrous' and condemned the actions of 'extremist' settlers in the West Bank, saying Netanyahu's administration has a responsibility to intervene to halt their actions. In a sign of mounting pressure on Israel over its actions in Gaza, last month the UK suspended trade talks with Israel and sanctioned West Bank settlers. Lammy said: 'We have suspended negotiations with this Israeli government on a new free trade agreement.' Adding that the UK is reviewing its co-operation with the Israeli administration, he said: 'The Netanyahu government's actions have made this necessary.' The sanctions were sparked by a series of comments made by the two men about Gaza – finance minister Smotrich recently said he would allow 'not even a grain of wheat' into Gaza, that 'Gaza will be entirely destroyed', and Palestinian people 'will leave in great numbers to third countries.' Security minister Ben-Gvir has also said Israel should 'encourage the voluntary emigration of the residents of Gaza', and that 'there is no need to bring in aid'. The government has been drawing up the plans to sanction the two men for months. Ben-Gvir also called for the al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem to be replaced with a synagogue. Israel's government responded to the sanctions saying they were 'outrageous'. Minister of foreign affairs Gideon Sa'ar's said: 'We were informed about the UK decision to include two of our Ministers on the British Sanctions list. 'It is outrageous that elected representatives and members of the government are subjected to these kind of measures. 'I discussed it earlier today with PM Netanyahu and we will hold a special government meeting early next week to decide on our response to this unacceptable decision.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Independent Scotland would break ties with Israel, says Stephen Flynn
Speaking to The News Agents podcast, the SNP Westminster leader also said he does not believe it would "wise" for SNP MPs to visit Israel, but he would be "amazed" if they decided to as they are "not daft". He said the UK's position on the atrocities being committed by Israel in Gaza has been "so weak for far too long". Asked if an independent Scotland under the SNP would close embassies in Jerusalem or Tel Aviv and if it would break off diplomatic relations with Israel, Flynn replied "yes" to both questions. On whether he would advise SNP MPs to not visit Israel, Flynn said: "I don't think they'd be wise to visit Israel. READ MORE: UK sanctions Israeli ministers Ben-Gvir and Smotrich over Gaza "I imagine they would probably get the same response that the couple of Labour MPs did at the airport a few months ago, which was where they got taken aside and turned back home." He went on: "It's up to them to decide what they want to do. I'd be amazed if any of them did, because they're not daft, and they probably know that they would get turned around and stuck on a plane right back out Israel. "Look, I'm deeply, deeply upset and angry about what's happened in Gaza and what continues to happen in Gaza, and the fact that the UK position has been so weak for far too long in respect of this. And I think it's important that you convey your views to people who are rational actors." In April, Labour MPs were denied entry to the occupied West Bank. Abtisam Mohamed and Yuan Yang said they were "astounded at the unprecedented step taken by the Israeli authorities" to refuse British MPs entry. (Image: News Agents) A statement from the pair said they had 'spoken out in Parliament in recent months' on Israel's war on Gaza and parliamentarians "should feel free to speak truthfully in the House of Commons without fear of being targeted'. Flynn's comments come after the UK Government sanctioned two far-right Israeli ministers over their comments about Gaza. Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel's security minister, and Bezalel Smotrich, finance minister, will have their assets frozen and travel bans imposed. Smotrich approved the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank. He also campaigned against allowing humanitarian aid into Gaza. Ben-Gvir has advocated for the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza, and said that the Al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem should be replaced with a synagogue. Later on in the podcast, Flynn was asked about whether he intends to contest the leadership of the SNP in the future. READ MORE: Freedom Flotilla Coalition gives update on Madleen crew detained by Israel While he is going to campaign to become an MSP, he stressed he backs John Swinney as SNP leader and believes he can "make sure we're fighting fit to go on and win the election" at Holyrood next year. Flynn said: "It is my intention to stand for Holyrood, I'm seeking to be a candidate for the Scottish Parliament elections next year, in an area that's probably similar to the seat I hold at Westminster." He went on: "When Humza Yousaf stood down as First Minister, the first person I called to take over was John Swinney. When Nicola Sturgeon, prior to that, announced that she was standing down again, the first person I called to take over was John Swinney. Now that's a wee bit of an insight into my thinking. "And my thinking is very clear that John Swinney is by far the best person for the job. I think he's the best politician in Scotland. I think he displays that in Holyrood with acumen on a weekly basis. "And I'm pretty confident over the course of next 11 months, he can make sure we're fighting fit to go on and win the election. The polls would indicate that we are going to win the election. "But it can't be about polls. It has to be about policies and people. And when the SNP is focused on that and our ultimate goal of independence, we tend to do well."