
Could white storks return to London? Public's views sought on ‘talismanic' bird
Long-vanished white storks have been reintroduced in southern England, leading to an 'explosion' in sightings across Greater London in recent years.
Now conservationists are looking at whether the metre-tall birds, which are known to thrive in urban settings on the continent, could do the same in London.
Community-focused urban rewilding organisation Citizen Zoo is conducting an appraisal on making London a 'white stork-friendly city', including habitat mapping, reaching out to boroughs across the capital to gauge their response and surveying the public about the birds.
White storks could once be seen flying in Britain's skies and building their huge nests on roofs and buildings as well as in trees, but disappeared centuries ago as a breeding bird due to hunting and habitat loss.
Since 2016, the white stork project in Sussex has sought to create new colonies of rehabilitated injured storks – which can act as a 'magnet' for wild birds that visit from the continent – at Knepp and Wadhurst Park, with the first successful breeding in 2020.
In the four decades before the start of the project there were just 27 records of white storks across Greater London.
But between 2016 and 2023 there have been 472 sightings in the capital, with the numbers increasing year-on-year, conservationists said.
Citizen Zoo has worked with communities to bring beavers back to Ealing, reintroduce water voles in Surrey and restore wetlands in the capital, in efforts to bring city dwellers closer to nature, deliver wellbeing benefits and make London more resilient to climate change, and is now looking at white storks.
The storks have wider ecological benefits for their habitat, creating huge nests which are homes and food sources for an array of species from insects to birds.
But it is their ability to inspire people about nature that has been a key part of reintroduction efforts in the UK.
Elliot Newton, co-founder and director of rewilding at Citizen Zoo, told the PA news agency: 'These are a really talismanic, iconic species that really do draw and attract attention.
'You look up into the skies and see a white stork, it's quite obvious.'
And he said: 'We realised in recent years we've seen an explosion in white stork recordings across Greater London.
'And if you look across European landscapes, this is a bird that can actually thrive in urban landscapes, on chimneys, on pylons, and are associated with thriving in urban settings.
'What we want to see is how can we make London a more white stork-friendly environment, and embrace it for its ability to inspire people about the nature we can and should have close to where we live.'
He added: 'As humans we can dictate what our urban environments look like, we are the actual architects of these spaces.
'It's completely within our will as a species to choose the environments that we build around us and we can make that conscious choice to integrate more nature into our cities, and that will bring a whole wealth of benefits.'
The survey is being led by the University of Brighton's Rachel White, with two phases that mirror a national survey she conducted as part of the white stork project in Sussex.
The first phase of the study has involved surveying a representative sample of 1,000 Londoners, and a second phase is asking residents and frequent visitors to give their view on white storks and their place in the capital.
Dr White said: 'It is really important to be monitoring stakeholders' opinions and attitudes towards any reintroductions, because that's one of the main reasons that reintroduction projects fail – they haven't got the buy-in from the key stakeholders.
'It is really important to not assume, or to not just go ahead with projects, because you see the conservation value in it.'
She said projects need to ensure a majority of people are onboard with a reintroduction, that the rationale has been clearly communicated and people have been given the opportunity to have their say.
The national survey found overall people were very positive towards the species, even if they had never seen storks before, although there was a lack of knowledge about things such as the stork's diet, and even what they looked like.
But a 'relatively small' number of people – often those who were ecologists, conservationists or birders – were not in favour of the reintroduction, largely because it was not a threatened species and they thought it should not be a priority for action, she added.
The London survey will feed into the wider assessment by Citizen Zoo of the political and public enthusiasm and habitat availability for storks, and potential next steps such as creating more habitat to encourage natural colonisation or even a release similar to that in Sussex.
However, Mr Newton added that 'nature has a fantastic tendency to surprise us', with the possibility storks could establish themselves in the capital of their own accord.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
You be the judge: should my partner use a co-working space so I can have our flat to myself?
I want him to work away from the flat so we keep a healthy relationship and avoid a couple bubble Before Xavier moved into my flat in a sunny European city, I lived alone for three years. Ahead of him moving in, I said we could live together but that he needed to find somewhere else to work so we weren't on top of each other. We'd both moved here from other countries, and I think it's healthy to carry on meeting people and not just live in a couple bubble. I asked him to find a co-working space to help us keep a balanced, healthy relationship. Also, when I wake up, I don't want to speak for a while. Because I work remotely for a client who doesn't need me until 1pm, my mornings are my solo time. Having Xavier in my flat all day every day isn't an option. My job is 90% calls, so it had to be him that left. Also, it's my flat, and he was the one who proposed moving in. Luckily, we are super compatible as flatmates, but this was my condition. I like to have different spaces for work, sleep and socialising, but Xavier doesn't think like that. He can get up, start work straight away at the kitchen table and then leave the house when he's done. He likes to do all his work-related activities indoors, then socialise outdoors. It took Xavier a while to commit to a co-working space. Before that, he was hanging around at home. One day, a month after we started living together, he wanted to take a call at the flat. I said it was fine, but actually it was annoying. Later, we had to have a conversation about why I was irritated, and he joined a co-working space right after that. I like to talk about issues that arise right away, whereas Xavier will avoid things and hope they'll disappear. I need to be understood, whereas he can just suppress things. Luckily, there are no other issues between us when it comes to living together. But I think it's important to have boundaries. Xavier can work from home occasionally, but I'd prefer it if he stuck to the routine and came back in the afternoon while I'm working and not when I want to relax alone in the morning. It's important to have separation as a couple. I'm more productive working from home. I wake up, have a coffee and start straight away About a month after I moved into Claire's flat, she told me I needed to go to a co-working space. We both work remotely, and when I moved in she did mention this stipulation. We've only been dating a year, and she didn't want us to be on top of each other. I dragged my heels because I'd never been to a co-working space; I'd always worked at home. I'm more productive that way. I wake up, have a coffee and start work straight away. I like starting early and finishing by 2 or 3pm, and having my own space, with my food, snacks and a toilet all close by. Claire starts at 1pm, so I originally thought: great I'll work in our flat until she needs the office, and pop into a co-working space now and again. But then, about 10 days into this routine, she sat me down and said it wasn't working, that she wanted me to work outside of the flat consistently. So now I have to pack my bag, walk to a co-working space, and speak to people, all because Claire wants me out. I don't like it. I get up at 7am and my productivity starts at 100%. Every little thing I do before working detracts from that – it drops off bit by bit. Claire said she wanted her space in the mornings. She doesn't talk much, whereas I am a morning person. I didn't think I was disturbing her, but she said it was more about having space to just exist away from me in the day. I wasn't offended, but I didn't like having to find a co-working spot right away. I needed to work out what I liked and what I wanted out of one – it's not easy. I tried one place and it was way too social. Everyone said 'hi' every five minutes, and my productivity was affected. Claire is a very open communicator, and I'm glad she told me she wanted me out of the flat. And I have managed to find a more corporate, soulless co-working space that is less sociable and suits me. In some ways, my working there makes our lives more interesting, because I come home with news about my day. But sometimes I wish I had a bit more freedom to be in the flat because it's my home, too. Should Xavier let Claire have the space to herself? Claire wants Xavier to live on her terms and offers no flexibility. The mention of 'her flat' makes it feel as if she hasn't embraced living together as a couple. He is asking for more freedom in his own home, which seems a reasonable 35 If working elsewhere was a condition of moving in, Xavier needs to stick to it. But Claire needs to remember that this is Xavier's home too now – he's allowed to be there during the day. Flexibility on her side would help ease this 40 There seems to be a disparity in the equality dynamic and a disconnect in the relationship harmony. Claire is pulling rank because it's 'her flat' and seems to be insinuating that her needs are more important than his so Xavier should change. Compromise is called 72 Covid taught us that spending 24 hours together is not healthy, particularly for a relatively new couple. Claire could compromise and agree on some occasions when Xavier can work from home, but I am with her when she talks about needing space and quiet in the 53 It doesn't seem as if it would take long for Xavier to walk to his work space, so I don't buy the argument that every second wasted between waking and working drains him of productivity. It also sounds a bit awful to have your boyfriend get up at 7am and start working on your kitchen table. Alone time is good for a 48 In our online poll, tell us if you think Xavier should pack his bags and go to work. The poll closes on Wednesday 13 August at 9am BST We asked whether Wes should stop drinking from a water bladder while having sex with his girlfriend 89% of you said yes – Wes is guilty 11% of you said no – Wes is not guilty


The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
You be the judge: should my partner use a co-working space so I can have our flat to myself?
I want him to work away from the flat so we keep a healthy relationship and avoid a couple bubble Before Xavier moved into my flat in a sunny European city, I lived alone for three years. Ahead of him moving in, I said we could live together but that he needed to find somewhere else to work so we weren't on top of each other. We'd both moved here from other countries, and I think it's healthy to carry on meeting people and not just live in a couple bubble. I asked him to find a co-working space to help us keep a balanced, healthy relationship. Also, when I wake up, I don't want to speak for a while. Because I work remotely for a client who doesn't need me until 1pm, my mornings are my solo time. Having Xavier in my flat all day every day isn't an option. My job is 90% calls, so it had to be him that left. Also, it's my flat, and he was the one who proposed moving in. Luckily, we are super compatible as flatmates, but this was my condition. I like to have different spaces for work, sleep and socialising, but Xavier doesn't think like that. He can get up, start work straight away at the kitchen table and then leave the house when he's done. He likes to do all his work-related activities indoors, then socialise outdoors. It took Xavier a while to commit to a co-working space. Before that, he was hanging around at home. One day, a month after we started living together, he wanted to take a call at the flat. I said it was fine, but actually it was annoying. Later, we had to have a conversation about why I was irritated, and he joined a co-working space right after that. I like to talk about issues that arise right away, whereas Xavier will avoid things and hope they'll disappear. I need to be understood, whereas he can just suppress things. Luckily, there are no other issues between us when it comes to living together. But I think it's important to have boundaries. Xavier can work from home occasionally, but I'd prefer it if he stuck to the routine and came back in the afternoon while I'm working and not when I want to relax alone in the morning. It's important to have separation as a couple. I'm more productive working from home. I wake up, have a coffee and start straight away About a month after I moved into Claire's flat, she told me I needed to go to a co-working space. We both work remotely, and when I moved in she did mention this stipulation. We've only been dating a year, and she didn't want us to be on top of each other. I dragged my heels because I'd never been to a co-working space; I'd always worked at home. I'm more productive that way. I wake up, have a coffee and start work straight away. I like starting early and finishing by 2 or 3pm, and having my own space, with my food, snacks and a toilet all close by. Claire starts at 1pm, so I originally thought: great I'll work in our flat until she needs the office, and pop into a co-working space now and again. But then, about 10 days into this routine, she sat me down and said it wasn't working, that she wanted me to work outside of the flat consistently. So now I have to pack my bag, walk to a co-working space, and speak to people, all because Claire wants me out. I don't like it. I get up at 7am and my productivity starts at 100%. Every little thing I do before working detracts from that – it drops off bit by bit. Claire said she wanted her space in the mornings. She doesn't talk much, whereas I am a morning person. I didn't think I was disturbing her, but she said it was more about having space to just exist away from me in the day. I wasn't offended, but I didn't like having to find a co-working spot right away. I needed to work out what I liked and what I wanted out of one – it's not easy. I tried one place and it was way too social. Everyone said 'hi' every five minutes, and my productivity was affected. Claire is a very open communicator, and I'm glad she told me she wanted me out of the flat. And I have managed to find a more corporate, soulless co-working space that is less sociable and suits me. In some ways, my working there makes our lives more interesting, because I come home with news about my day. But sometimes I wish I had a bit more freedom to be in the flat because it's my home, too. Should Xavier let Claire have the space to herself? Claire wants Xavier to live on her terms and offers no flexibility. The mention of 'her flat' makes it feel as if she hasn't embraced living together as a couple. He is asking for more freedom in his own home, which seems a reasonable 35 If working elsewhere was a condition of moving in, Xavier needs to stick to it. But Claire needs to remember that this is Xavier's home too now – he's allowed to be there during the day. Flexibility on her side would help ease this 40 There seems to be a disparity in the equality dynamic and a disconnect in the relationship harmony. Claire is pulling rank because it's 'her flat' and seems to be insinuating that her needs are more important than his so Xavier should change. Compromise is called 72 Covid taught us that spending 24 hours together is not healthy, particularly for a relatively new couple. Claire could compromise and agree on some occasions when Xavier can work from home, but I am with her when she talks about needing space and quiet in the 53 It doesn't seem as if it would take long for Xavier to walk to his work space, so I don't buy the argument that every second wasted between waking and working drains him of productivity. It also sounds a bit awful to have your boyfriend get up at 7am and start working on your kitchen table. Alone time is good for a 48 In our online poll, tell us if you think Xavier should pack his bags and go to work. The poll closes on Wednesday 13 August at 9am BST We asked whether Wes should stop drinking from a water bladder while having sex with his girlfriend 89% of you said yes – Wes is guilty 11% of you said no – Wes is not guilty


Scotsman
a day ago
- Scotsman
Why floating offshore wind can put Scotland at heart of world-leading industrial renaissance
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Growing up on the Isle of Lewis, I would join my father, uncles and cousins for the back-breaking annual ritual of cutting and drying the peats. That's how we islanders heated our homes when the Atlantic winter gales battered the villages along the coast. There is a point to this reminiscing. Peat, like coal, oil and gas, is a finite resource. For centuries in the UK, we thrived on energy independence. But now, as the world shifts to electricity – and demand grows – we are increasingly and uncomfortably reliant on others. Until government re-establishes the UK's energy security, we remain exposed to supply and price shocks. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The resource available to us in abundance is wind – and, in large part, low-cost energy independence lies in harnessing its power. There are two kinds of offshore wind: 'fixed', where the turbine is directly attached to the seabed; and 'floating', where it sits on a floating foundation secured by moorings in deeper waters. The abundant wind energy just waiting to be harnessed off Scotland's coastline can help provide cheap electricity and protection against international oil and gas price crises (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell) | Getty Images A world first Fixed offshore wind is well established, with many windfarms already in place. Floating offshore wind (Flow) is nascent. But excitingly, the UK Government has given a contract for difference – the mechanism by which developers are guaranteed a minimum price for their electricity – to the world's first commercial-scale floating windfarm. So, the UK is unusually, but necessarily, going first. Flow takes advantage of the stronger, more reliable winds further offshore. Its components are too large to be shipped from yards in Asia or the Middle East, meaning the supply chain of assemblers and manufacturers is incentivised to locate in the UK. Thus, Flow will not only serve energy security but also drive economic growth and create much-needed jobs. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There has been significant criticism of the lack of 'local content' in fixed offshore projects, with the components largely produced and shipped from overseas. Flow, however, could be substantially different. The scale involved offers an industrial renaissance to our coastal communities, and the opportunity for the UK to export expertise and equipment to the European markets that follow behind. New future for fabrication yard For too long, other countries have banked the industrial profit of the UK's energy production. Flow presents the UK with the chance to claw that back. At Ardersier, we are transforming a former oil and gas fabrication yard into the largest facility in the UK dedicated to offshore wind deployment. In the 70s and 80s, the site employed 4,500 men and women and put 600,000 tons of oil and gas rigs into the North Sea. With Flow, we can recover some of that industrial presence for the Highlands and other parts of the UK. We can give young people high-quality jobs where they grow up, rather than having to leave, as I did, to seek a career far from home. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The country is putting plans in place to recapture the energy security and independence we once took for granted. Delivering Flow would help secure substantial provision of the nation's power needs from offshore wind, in perpetuity. We would lead the world. It would be a terrible waste to lose that leadership position and miss not only the benefit of the electrons, but the supply chain and its jobs. Seize Flow, and this power source will benefit us all.