You be the judge: should my partner use a co-working space so I can have our flat to myself?
Before Xavier moved into my flat in a sunny European city, I lived alone for three years. Ahead of him moving in, I said we could live together but that he needed to find somewhere else to work so we weren't on top of each other.
We'd both moved here from other countries, and I think it's healthy to carry on meeting people and not just live in a couple bubble. I asked him to find a co-working space to help us keep a balanced, healthy relationship.
Also, when I wake up, I don't want to speak for a while. Because I work remotely for a client who doesn't need me until 1pm, my mornings are my solo time. Having Xavier in my flat all day every day isn't an option.
My job is 90% calls, so it had to be him that left. Also, it's my flat, and he was the one who proposed moving in. Luckily, we are super compatible as flatmates, but this was my condition.
I like to have different spaces for work, sleep and socialising, but Xavier doesn't think like that. He can get up, start work straight away at the kitchen table and then leave the house when he's done. He likes to do all his work-related activities indoors, then socialise outdoors.
It took Xavier a while to commit to a co-working space. Before that, he was hanging around at home. One day, a month after we started living together, he wanted to take a call at the flat. I said it was fine, but actually it was annoying. Later, we had to have a conversation about why I was irritated, and he joined a co-working space right after that.
I like to talk about issues that arise right away, whereas Xavier will avoid things and hope they'll disappear. I need to be understood, whereas he can just suppress things. Luckily, there are no other issues between us when it comes to living together. But I think it's important to have boundaries.
Xavier can work from home occasionally, but I'd prefer it if he stuck to the routine and came back in the afternoon while I'm working and not when I want to relax alone in the morning. It's important to have separation as a couple.
I'm more productive working from home. I wake up, have a coffee and start straight away
About a month after I moved into Claire's flat, she told me I needed to go to a co-working space. We both work remotely, and when I moved in she did mention this stipulation. We've only been dating a year, and she didn't want us to be on top of each other.
I dragged my heels because I'd never been to a co-working space; I'd always worked at home. I'm more productive that way. I wake up, have a coffee and start work straight away. I like starting early and finishing by 2 or 3pm, and having my own space, with my food, snacks and a toilet all close by.
Claire starts at 1pm, so I originally thought: great I'll work in our flat until she needs the office, and pop into a co-working space now and again. But then, about 10 days into this routine, she sat me down and said it wasn't working, that she wanted me to work outside of the flat consistently.
So now I have to pack my bag, walk to a co-working space, and speak to people, all because Claire wants me out. I don't like it. I get up at 7am and my productivity starts at 100%. Every little thing I do before working detracts from that – it drops off bit by bit.
Claire said she wanted her space in the mornings. She doesn't talk much, whereas I am a morning person. I didn't think I was disturbing her, but she said it was more about having space to just exist away from me in the day. I wasn't offended, but I didn't like having to find a co-working spot right away. I needed to work out what I liked and what I wanted out of one – it's not easy.
I tried one place and it was way too social. Everyone said 'hi' every five minutes, and my productivity was affected.
Claire is a very open communicator, and I'm glad she told me she wanted me out of the flat. And I have managed to find a more corporate, soulless co-working space that is less sociable and suits me.
In some ways, my working there makes our lives more interesting, because I come home with news about my day. But sometimes I wish I had a bit more freedom to be in the flat because it's my home, too.
Should Xavier let Claire have the space to herself?
Claire wants Xavier to live on her terms and offers no flexibility. The mention of 'her flat' makes it feel as if she hasn't embraced living together as a couple. He is asking for more freedom in his own home, which seems a reasonable request.Robbie, 35
If working elsewhere was a condition of moving in, Xavier needs to stick to it. But Claire needs to remember that this is Xavier's home too now – he's allowed to be there during the day. Flexibility on her side would help ease this issue.Rose, 40
There seems to be a disparity in the equality dynamic and a disconnect in the relationship harmony. Claire is pulling rank because it's 'her flat' and seems to be insinuating that her needs are more important than his so Xavier should change. Compromise is called for.Naomi, 72
Covid taught us that spending 24 hours together is not healthy, particularly for a relatively new couple. Claire could compromise and agree on some occasions when Xavier can work from home, but I am with her when she talks about needing space and quiet in the morning.Silvia, 53
It doesn't seem as if it would take long for Xavier to walk to his work space, so I don't buy the argument that every second wasted between waking and working drains him of productivity. It also sounds a bit awful to have your boyfriend get up at 7am and start working on your kitchen table. Alone time is good for a couple.Matthew, 48
In our online poll, tell us if you think Xavier should pack his bags and go to work.
The poll closes on Wednesday 13 August at 9am BST
We asked whether Wes should stop drinking from a water bladder while having sex with his girlfriend
89% of you said yes – Wes is guilty
11% of you said no – Wes is not guilty
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
17 minutes ago
- Times
Catholicism and cannoli on show in a century-old London parade
I talian songs are playing loudly over a speaker while a man to my right masterfully spoons filling into giant, fresh cannoli for a crowd of transfixed, hungry onlookers. The smell of hot pizza wafts through the air, but it's not enough to lure people away from the longest queue of all — the one for porchetta. 'It's a three-day process,' explains Mario Zeppetelli, one of the British-Italian community living in London. 'On Wednesday, we head to Smithfield Market in the early hours to get the meat. Thursday is for preparing the pigs — stuffing them with top-secret ingredients, handed down in a family recipe — and on Friday, we cook them overnight for 14 hours.' The roasted pork is then carved and, in true Italian style, very generously packed into buns. No wonder this labour of love draws such a crowd, even at 11 in the morning.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘Bizarre and wrong': Danish zoo sparks debate with plea for pets to use as food
After a Danish zoo posted a reminder of its long-running programme allowing people to donate their healthy, small pets to be 'gently euthanised' and fed to predators, reaction poured in from across the globe. But beyond the battleground playing out on social media – where some protested against the idea of using pets as prey and others praised the zoo's efforts to drum up a practical food supply – some were swift to point out that the zoo was simply laying bare the reality of keeping carnivores in captivity. 'If you accept the fact that you have carnivores in human care, either as a pet or as a zoo, you will agree to the fact that you feed them animal matter. Basically there is no other choice,' said Marcus Clauss, the co-director of the Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife at the University of Zurich, pointing to vegan dog food as one of the few exceptions to this. 'And then the logical next step is the question, where do you source that animal product from?' As the zoo's plea made headlines around the world, Aalborg zoo closed comments on its post, citing 'hateful and malicious rhetoric'. The zoo said it was simply aiming to mimic the natural food chain by urging those with chickens, rabbits and guinea pigs that need to be put down to instead hand them over to the zoo. 'That way, nothing goes to waste – and we ensure the natural behaviour, nutrition and wellbeing of our predators.' Few would question the alternative, even though it came with the risk that zoo animals could end up being fed meat from animals raised in relatively poor conditions, said Clauss. 'As long as it's beef from the slaughterhouse, nobody sees it and nobody needs to think about it,' he said. 'As soon as it's an animal that is being killed at the zoo, it's in everybody's face.' Some of the backlash was likely down to the wording of the appeal, said Dan Ashe of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, which counts more than 200 accredited facilities spanning from the US to the UAE. 'I think the thing that people maybe see as potentially shocking is the use of the word pet,' he said. He chalked it up to cultural differences. 'Professionally, I would not expect anything like that to happen at one of our accredited zoos, certainly not here in the US. But our accreditation policies wouldn't necessarily prohibit it.' The plea, however, spoke to a common understanding among zoos around the world: the importance, both nutritionally and behaviourally, of mimicking nature by feeding carnivores the entire carcass of animals. 'Carcass-feeding is a regular feature of what our members do when they are available, some of our members accept donations of road-killed deer or animals,' said Ashe. Some zoos had actively sought to spotlight this, he said, citing a recent event at Denver zoo where the public was invited – and warned appropriately beforehand – to watch as lions were fed pig carcasses. 'The lions seemed to benefit, and certainly the guests who chose to watch it – it was packed,' he said. Others, however, found little redeeming in the Danish appeal. 'To me this was so far beyond the pale,' said Clifford Warwick, a UK-based consultant biologist and medical scientist. 'The entire thing is bizarre and wrong.' As the zoo did not specify how the donated pets would be euthanised, Warwick worried it would be impossible to do so in a way that was both humane and ensured that the animals remained safe to be eaten by predators such as the European lynx. 'And there's no validity to their claim of needing to give animals a natural diet this way,' he said. 'Lynx don't eat guinea pigs. Where do they get guinea pigs from? Lynx would eat almost any small mammal, sure, but they can't turn around and say that's a natural behaviour.' Aalborg zoo did not reply to a request for an interview. At a time when animal shelters around the world are grappling with overcrowding, Warwick also bristled at what he saw as the wider implications of the zoo's message. 'It further devalues the lives of pets … It's a horrendous devaluation of animal life,' he said. 'Are you really happy saying: 'OK, well Rex or Bruno, the time has come, there's a hungry lion at the local zoo. Bye, off you go.'' The wide range of reactions hints at the many factors that play into the broader question of how to keep carnivores fed at zoos, said Alessandro Di Marzio, the science lead at Riga zoo. 'Zoos are spread across a wide range of areas, so you'll find places where certain techniques are considered acceptable and more or less normal for society, while in other areas they're not,' he said, with local laws, economic resources and culture also helping to shape these tactics. 'It depends on all these circumstances.' The resulting clash of cultures has at times been glaring; earlier this year, Germany's Nuremberg zoo sparked protests after it confirmed it had killed six of its 12 Guinea baboons due to overcrowding and had fed the primates to lions, tigers, maned wolves and marbled polecats. In Denmark, Copenhagen zoo was the focus of global protests in 2014 after it put down an 18-month-old giraffe, citing the risk of inbreeding, and fed some of the meat to the zoo's lions. For Clauss, the heated debate unleashed this week recalled one of the emails sent to Copenhagen zoo after the euthanasia of the giraffe. 'It said: 'Why do you have to kill animals to feed your carnivores? Can't you just buy meat?'' While he did not think the view was representative in any way, he marvelled at how the Danish appeal had served to kickstart a global conversation. 'The amazing thing is that we learn about these things because of zoos,' he said. 'And not because of what we do at the supermarket.'
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
EXCLUSIVE: 'I let a zoo feed my pet rabbit to the tigers, it was a super-nice experience'
A Danish zoo, which caused international outrage after asking the public to donate their unwanted "healthy pets" for predators, has defended its actions, stating that the animals need "fur and bones." Aalborg Zoo in North Jutland posted a plea on social media for live rabbits, chickens, and guinea pigs to be donated, which its trained staff would "gently euthanise". The zoo explained that these animals are "an important part of the diet of our predators - especially the European lynx, which needs whole prey that resembles what it would naturally hunt in the wild." Aalborg Zoo, which is home to 1,500 animals belonging to 126 species, also sought donations of live horses under 147cm tall with a pet passport. Furthermore, it mentioned that if pet owners need to rehome animals "for various reasons", they could bring up to four small species at a time. It comes as a millionaire hunter was gored to death by 'Black Death' buffalo he was trying to kill. The zoo's statement read: "In zoos, we have a responsibility to imitate the animals' natural food chain - for the sake of both animal welfare and professional integrity," adding, "Nothing goes to waste - and we ensure natural behaviour, nutrition and well-being of our predators." Pet owner Kristina Meincke recounted her experience of surrendering her rabbit, which was then humanely put down and served as food for the carnivores. She commended the zoo for the "super nice" process. Her feedback was positive, writing on social media: "This is such a fine arrangement. I have delivered a rabbit to you, and it was a super nice and professional experience."
