HEDGE FLOW Hedge funds buy stocks at quickest pace since Nov 2024, Goldman Sachs says
LONDON, June 2 (Reuters) - Hedge funds bought global equities last week at the quickest pace since November 2024, Goldman Sachs said in a note, just as stock markets ended the month with their most positive May performance in decades.
The S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab advanced just over 6% in May, its biggest monthly rise since November 2023 and its best gains for the month of May since 1990. The Nasdaq (.IXIC), opens new tab rallied about 9.6%, which was also its biggest monthly gain since November 2023 and its best May performance since 1997.
Hedge funds ended the week bullish in every global region, led by North America and Europe, the Goldman Sachs (GS.N), opens new tab report said.
Technology companies attracted the highest interest, with hedge funds accumulating the largest weekly number of net long positions in the sector in over five years. Buying centered on firms integral to the artificial intelligence industry, including semiconductor manufacturers, technology hardware producers and electrical equipment companies, the report said.
North American tech companies were favoured by hedge fund trades, followed by European counterparts, Goldman Sachs said.
The pan European stock index (.STOXX), opens new tab returned more than 5% in May. Hedge funds bought European stocks for the third straight week and at the fastest pace in three months, the Goldman note said.
Companies in Spain, France, Finland, Germany, Sweden and Denmark were the most net bought markets this week, while Ireland, the Netherlands and Switzerland were the most net sold, said the Goldman report.
European stock sectors bought by global hedge funds last week included consumer discretionary, financial, health care and communications companies, the data showed.
Hedge funds mostly bought single stocks but also made some long trades in stock indexes too, said Goldman Sachs.
A long position expects an asset price to rise.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Hated Man Utd owners The Glazers cost Red Devils £1.2BILLION as club release latest finances
Club have given an update on plans to build a new stadium Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE GLAZERS have cost Manchester United £1.2billion in their nightmare 20-year reign. When the controversial Americans purchased the club in June 2005, they paid a whopping £790m. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 The Glazers have cost United £1.2bn Credit: AFP 5 Fans have protested against their owners Credit: Shutterstock Editorial 5 Sir Jim Ratcliffe has implemented brutal cost-cutting measures Credit: Getty But the deal was funded by borrowed cash and it dumped £604m in debt onto United, who had just £50m borrowed previously. As the Glazers reach the two decade mark in charge, over £1bn has been lost in debt interest, debt repayments, dividends and fees to the family. BBC claim £815m has gone towards debt interest repayments, £166m in dividends to shareholders and £10m in fees to Glazer family companies. And while things continue to get worse on the pitch, finally, things are at least looking up financially. READ MORE IN FOOTBALL 'MISSED BY ALL' Heartbreak for England legend as wife dies after months battling illness Brutal cost-cutting introduced by £1.3bn part owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe are beginning to pay dividends - even if 450 staff jobs were wiped out along with free lunches amidst a host of other spending slashes. In the club's accounts for the third quarter of this year, payments to employees by comparison to 12 months ago were down a huge £20m to £71.2m – a drop of almost 22 per cent. Going out of the 2023-24 Champions League and into the Europa League actually HELPED the figures in not paying extra player bonus costs as well as non-playing staff departures. Total operating expenses for the quarter were £162.1m, a decrease of £41.6m, or 20.4 per cent, over the prior year quarter. BEST ONLINE CASINOS - TOP SITES IN THE UK And operating profit was at £700,000, compared to an operating loss of £66.2m this time last year. Ratcliffe and his recently downgraded Ineos head honcho Sir Dave Brailsford can point to their financial re-structuring having a near-instant impact. But chief executive Omar Berrada pointed the finger at the side that finished a shocking 15th in the table – and will have no European football at all in the forthcoming campaign after losing to Tottenham in the last chance saloon Europa League final. He declared: "We were proud to reach the final of the Europa League but ultimately we were disappointed to finish as runner-up in Bilbao. 'We had a difficult season in the Premier League which we all know fell below our standards and we have a clear expectation of improvement next season.' Berrada and the rest of the Old Trafford hierarchy are working hard to back boss Ruben Amorim in this summer's transfer market having already forked out £62.5m – in what will be three instalments – for Matheus Cunha from Wolves. Despite Ratcliffe warning earlier this year that those sweeping cuts were necessary to stop the club going bust by last Christmas – and concerns over staying within profit and sustainability rules - a £55m bid for Bryan Mbuemo was registered this week. Brentford want at least £60m for the wide attacker and will almost certainly get their money although United, finances improving or not, will also have to sell. Alejandro Garnacho has been told he's going and is valued at £60m while Amorim wants to dump Jadon Sancho, Antony and Marcus Rashford along with Casemiro and Tyrell Malacia. Yet as United juggle their funds to aid the rebuild, the club point to improvements off the pitch. Plans for a new £200bn stadium are progressing, Berrada stressing: 'We remain focused on infrastructure, with the redevelopment of our Carrington Training Complex continuing and on track. 'It will be the heart of our club, providing world class facilities for all our teams and our staff. 'We have also announced our aspiration to pursue a new 100,000-seater stadium, sitting at the heart of the regeneration of the Old Trafford area, which would be a catalyst for growth and investment in our local community. 'We are continuing to work with all the relevant stakeholders, including central Government, to support their vision for growth.' Even the dropping value of the US dollar is working in United's favour. The club's American borrowings still stand at $650m – the same as last year at the same time but due to the USD/GBP exchange rate in GBP United now owe £500.9m compared to £511.3m. United are happy with what they say are 'strong revenues which increased by 17.4 per cent driven by additional matchday and broadcast money by thanks to going all the way to Bilbao as opposed to dropping out of last season's Champions League at the group stage." 5 United want to build a new 100,00-seater stadium Credit: AP
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Tesla seeks to block city of Austin from releasing records on robotaxi trial
June 6 (Reuters) - Tesla is trying to prevent the city of Austin, Texas, from releasing public records to Reuters involving the EV maker's planned launch of self-driving robotaxis in the city this month. The news agency in February requested communications between Tesla and Austin officials over the previous two years. The request followed CEO Elon Musk's announcement in January that Tesla would launch fare-collecting robotaxis on Austin public streets. Austin public-information officer Dan Davis told Reuters on April 1 that 'third parties' had asked the city to withhold the records to protect their 'privacy or property interests.' Austin officials on April 7 requested an opinion on the news agency's request from the Texas Attorney General's office, which handles public-records disputes. On April 16, an attorney for Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab wrote the AG objecting to the release of 'confidential, proprietary, competitively sensitive commercial, and/or trade secret information' contained in emails between Tesla and Austin officials. The Tesla attorney wrote that providing the documents to Reuters would reveal 'Tesla's deployment procedure, process, status and strategy' and 'irreparably harm Tesla.' Tesla and the Texas Attorney General's office did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment. Neal Falgoust, who oversees public records issues for Austin's Law Department, said the city "takes no position on the confidential nature of the information at issue" but is required to seek the Attorney General's opinion when "a third-party asserts that their information is proprietary and should not be released." Musk has staked Tesla's future on self-driving vehicles he has promised for a decade but hasn't delivered, making Austin's robotaxi launch closely watched as a potential milestone. Some analysts and investors attribute the majority of Tesla's stock market value to hopes for robotaxis and humanoid robots it has yet to deliver. Little is known about Tesla's plans in Austin. The company has said it aims to initially deploy between 10 and 20 driverless robotaxis in restricted geographic areas of Austin, which it has not publicly identified. In an April 23 response to Tesla's letter, a Reuters lawyer wrote that Tesla's intent to deploy the unproven technology on Texas roadways makes its plans 'an issue of enormous importance to Texas and the public at large' and underscored the public's right to know. Falgoust, the Austin law department official, did not respond to questions about whether the public was entitled to information about Tesla's driverless technology. Texas state law requires the Attorney General's office to decide within 45 business days, which would be next week.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Wall Street's 'hopium' high not exhausted yet
ORLANDO, Florida, June 5 (Reuters) - By any measure, the recent resilience of U.S. stocks is remarkable, with Wall Street powering through numerous headwinds to erase all its tariff-fueled losses and move into positive territory for the year. And although these headwinds haven't gone away, the rally may still have some juice left in it. Since the April 7 lows plumbed after U.S. President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff debacle, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq are up 23% and 32%, respectively. 'Big Tech' has led the way, with the Roundhill 'Magnificent Seven' ETF gaining more than 35%. On the face of it, this is remarkable given that many of the concerns that sparked the crash – elevated U.S. import tariffs, tensions between the world's two largest economies, and chaotic and unorthodox policy out of Washington – remain in place today. Equity bulls are essentially betting that many things will go right in the coming months: the Federal Reserve will cut rates; no economic downturn; inflation won't spike despite the tariffs; U.S. tech companies will continue generating strong results; fiscal concerns in Washington will moderate; and perhaps most importantly, Trump will continue to back down on his most aggressive tariff threats – or to use the acronym de jour, investors are assuming the 'TACO' (Trump Always Chickens Out) trade will hold. That's a lot of stars aligning. Some of the biggest names in finance are skeptical, particularly regarding the U.S. fiscal outlook. Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio and JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon, both long-time deficit hawks, this week repeated their warnings that the U.S. debt is unsustainable. But these calls have fallen on deaf ears, or equity investors simply think any fiscal fallout will take years to materialize. On the one hand, investors – especially the retail crowd believed to be driving this rally – appear to be overly optimistic. But looked at another way, U.S. equity investors may not be ignoring today's underlying risks, but simply viewing them less apocalyptically than they did a few months ago. Indeed, the overwhelmingly negative sentiment from earlier this year paved the way for the recent rebound. Sentiment among institutional investors reached extreme levels of bearishness in the wake of 'Liberation Day', and recession fears ballooned to historically high levels as well, Bank of America's April fund manager survey showed. Meanwhile, May's survey showed fund managers holding the biggest underweight position in U.S. equities in two years. When sentiment and positioning are that stretched, it doesn't take much for prices to snap back in the opposite direction. If the latest American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) Sentiment Survey is any guide, the snap back in equities still has room to run. Pessimism over the short-term outlook for U.S. stocks increased to an "unusually high" 41.9% last week, above its historical average of 31.0% for the 26th time in 28 weeks. As HSBC's multi-asset strategy team noted this week, it is precisely because these sentiment and positioning indicators are being kept "thoroughly in check" that market dips now are short-lived. It's also good to remember that even though Wall Street has erased its early losses and valuations are rising back towards their recent highs, U.S. stocks are still laggards this year. The S&P 500 is up only 1.5% in 2025 thus far, while the MSCI All Country World Index has jumped around 6%, hitting an all-time high on Wednesday. This suggests there may be room for U.S. outperformance on a relative basis in the coming weeks and months, though, of course, relative value metrics might still favor non-U.S. markets. This doesn't mean we should expect capital to start flooding back into the U.S. again. International institutional investors may continue to rethink their allocation to U.S. assets, creating a long-term risk to U.S. stocks. But for now, domestic U.S. investors are picking up the slack. (The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters)
