
Treasury minister says ‘headline' rate of income tax won't go up, in hint thresholds might be frozen in budget
Date: 2025-07-14T08:31:38.000Z
Title: Darren Jones
Content: Good morning. This is the last full week the Commons is sitting before the summer recess starts (on Tuesday next week) and, although there is a fair amount coming up (see below), there is no big story dominating the news agenda. The national newspapers are all splashing on different items – which is normally a sign that it was a slow news day yesterday.
The government wants to talk about its new £500m 'better futures fund'.
And , chief secretary to the Treasury, has been in the broadcast studios this morning to promote it – as well as giving an interview to my colleague Heather Stewart.
But, as is often the case, in search of stronger news, broadcasters have been trying to tease out details of what might be in the budget in the autumn. And they may have made a tiny bit of progress.
At PMQs last week Keir Starmer said that he remained committed to the tax pledges that Labour made in its manifesto. That might sound straightforward, but it isn't, because there is some ambiguity as to what they mean.
People thought Labour promised not to raise income tax, VAT or national insurance contribtions – which are levied on employers and employees. But in the budget last year Rachel Reeves did put up employer NICs and, when accused of breaking a manifesto promise, she highlighted the eight-word preamble to the pledge, which in retrospect could be read as a hint that employer NICs were not exempt.
Labour will not increase taxes on working people, which is why we will not increase National Insurance, the basic, higher, or additional rates of Income Tax, or VAT.
The person who wrote the manifesto clearly knew what was coming – but the clue was hidden so well that almost no one managed to decypher it.
In an interview on ITV's Good Morning Britain Jones said this.
The thing I can tell you is that our manifesto commitment coming into this election was that we were not going to increase the headline rate of income tax or employee national insurance on working people in the pay slips that people get when they go to work or on VAT because we know that that disproportionately affects people on lower incomes because they spend more of their money on the day to day shop, essentially.
In fact, the manifesto does not mention the 'headline' rate of income tax. But the fact that Jones sees this as relevant can be seen as yet another hint that Rachel Reeves is considering extending the freeze on income tax thresholds in the autumn. This is seen by economists as very likely, and was not ruled out by Starmer at PMQs last week.
Ed Balls, the former Labour shadow chancellor who is now a broadcaster and podcaster, regularly argues on his Political Currency podcast that freezing tax thresholds would in practice be a breach of the manifesto, because it would amount to a tax increase for workinng people. Jones's comment can be seen as the rebuttal argument.
In his interviews Jones also declined to rule out a wealth tax, as other ministers, have done. But he also suggested that people were 'getting a bit carried away' in interpreting what Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, said about tax yesterday. Alexander told Sky News:
We made a commitment in our manifesto not to be putting up taxes on people on modest incomes, working people.
The Telegraph has interpreted this as meaning that taxes will rise for middle-class workers. But, in his Good Morning Britain interview, Jones said Alexander was just referring to the manifesto promise. Asked what 'modest incomes' meant, he went on:
Modest income means different things to different people. But it's not entirely relevant, because the thing that is relevant is our manifesto commitment not to increase national insurance or employee national or income tax in the payslips that people receive every month.
Jack Maidment from the Telegraph argues that the mixed messaging is a bit of a mess.
Treasury minister says Labour's 'working people' tax pledge refers to 'anyone that gets a payslip, basically'.
Significantly broader than Transport Sec Heidi Alexander's definition yesterday of 'people on modest incomes'.
What a mess, and not for the first time.
Here is the agenda for the day.
10.30am: Sajid Javid, the former Tory health secretary, gives evidence to the Covid inquiry about the impact of the pandemic on the care sector.
Morning: Rachel Reeves, chancellor, speaks to broadcasters on a visit in Wigan where she is promoting plans for a £500m 'beter futures fund'.
11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.
2pm: Wes Streeting, health secretary, gives evidence to the health committee.
2.30pm: Angela Rayner, deputy PM and housing secretary, takes questions in the Commons.
After 3.30pm: Ed Miliband, energy secretary, is expected to make a statement to MPs about the state of the climate report.
Afternoon: Keir Starmer hosts Petr Fiala, prime minister of the Czech Republic, at Downing Street.
5pm: Pat McFadden, Cabinet Office minister, gives evidence to the joint national security strategy committee.
And at some point today the Department for Business and Trade publishes a green paper on the Post Office.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if you put 'Andrew' in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can't promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Marks & Spencer advert with ‘unhealthily thin' model banned
An advert for Marks & Spencer has been banned for featuring a model who looked 'unhealthily thin'. The UK advertising watchdog concluded that it was 'irresponsible' for the retailer to use the image to advertise clothes on its mobile app. The Advertising Standards Authority said the model, who was wearing slim-fit trousers and a white top, 'appeared thin and she wore large pointed shoes which emphasised the slenderness of her legs'. Camera angles used also made the model's head appear out of proportion and 'highlighted her small frame', the ruling added. 'Therefore, we considered that the pose of the model and the choice of clothing meant the ad gave the impression that the model was unhealthily thin,' the ASA said. The retailer apologised for any offence caused and removed the image. An M&S spokeswoman said: 'Our womenswear sizing ranges from size 8 to 24 and we always want to reflect that in our advertising. 'The product images on our website feature models of varying sizes so we can appeal to all our customers, however following the ASA guidance, we have removed this particular image from our website and apologise for any offence caused.' Three more images were reported to the ASA by consumers, but the watchdog said there was no breach and did not ban them.


Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Informa slumps to £254m loss as dollar and US tech spin-off weigh
Informa shares jumped on Wednesday despite the publisher and events organiser slumping to a loss after shouldering a major impairment over the first half. The FTSE 100 firm, which owns academic publisher Taylor & Francis, posted a statutory pre-tax loss of £254.2million, compared to a £237.4million profit over the same period last year. Informa faced a £484.2million non-cash impairment related to its TechTarget business, which was spun-off and listed in the US late last year. The marketing business has seen its share price slump 70 per cent since its December IPO, meaning its market capitalisation has fallen below its net assets and resulting in the impairment TechTarget saw a 4.3 per cent decline in underlying revenues during the first half, which Informa blamed on a 'subdued market backdrop'. Its tech customers are prioritising 'AI-related research and development over investment in product marketing and sales support', according to Informa. But the wider Informa business still saw bumper reported revenue growth of 20.1 per cent to just over £2billlion over the period, as it benefited from new product lines as well as strong growth in live business-to-business events and academic markets. And Informa expects momentum to be maintained as it upgraded it full-year underlying revenue growth guidance from around 5 per cent to more than 6 per cent, helped by growth of more than 8 per cent in live business to business events. The upgrade comes despite further weakening of the US dollar, which has fallen roughly 7.6 per cent since the start of 2025. Informa claims that every cent movement in the dollar impacts its revenues by around £18million and adjusted operating profit by roughly £7million on a full year basis. The group also revealed a fresh £150million share buyback programme for the second half, after buying £200million back at an average price of 757p during the first. Boss Stephen A. Carter sad: 'Informa is further increasing the pace of performance, delivering 20 per cent+ growth in our four key performance measures: revenues, profits, earnings and free cash flow. 'Informa is built around world class brands, leading International market positions, first party data and, most importantly, colleagues with specialist expertise and a passion to deliver for customers.' Informa shares were up 5.7 per cent to 873.4p in early trading, bringing 2025 gains to around 8 per cent.


Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Opinion: Britain is at the mercy of bond markets
It took the British government more than three centuries to rack up debts of £1trillion. That milestone was reached in 2010, in the wake of the financial crisis. It took just ten more years for our debts to hit £2trillion. They now stand just shy of £2.9trillion – and will hit £3trillion either this fiscal year or next. So that's another trillion racked up in less than a decade. Yes, there's the impact of inflation . And the triple-whammy of the financial crisis, the Covid-19 pandemic and the energy shock after the invasion of Ukraine , all of which pushed the debt higher as the government borrowed to support households and businesses. But as the Office for Budget Responsibility warned in a recent report highlighting the parlous state of the nation's finances, successive governments have failed to take the action required to bring the debt back under control in the wake of those crises. And the government's annual borrowing bill has hovered around 5 per cent of GDP a year since the pandemic – levels only previously seen during recession or war. This is a major headache for Rachel Reeves ahead of the Budget this autumn. And that spells yet more pain for households and businesses – because however the Chancellor spins it, another round of tax rises are coming. They will be big. And they will be painful. This is because, far from being a 'beacon of stability' in an uncertain world, as Downing Street would have us believe, Britain is at the mercy of the bond markets. One only has to look back at the Liz Truss debacle to know that twitchy bond markets matter. And twitchy they are. To such an extent that UK gilt yields – a key measure of how much it costs the British government to borrow – are the highest in the G7. In fact, the UK has the third-highest borrowing costs of any advanced economy after New Zealand and Iceland. This is because international investors look at Britain – with its soaring debts and lack of political will to do anything about it – and do not like what they see. So they charge the UK government more to lend it money than almost every other similar economy in the world. To understand what that means one only has to look at the today's figures from the Office for National Statistics that show the UK paid £16.4billion of interest on the national debt in June alone. This was £8.4billion more than in the same month last year and the second highest June on record, amounting to nearly £550million a day and more than £22million an hour. So we are now in a situation where we are forecast to spend £111billion this year servicing the national debt – and just £62.2billion on defence. With the economy slowing, fears are mounting that the fiscal situation is getting worse not better. The scene is set for another punishing Budget this autumn.