Plans to protect UK steel industry amid threat of tariffs
The Plan for Steel will include measures that seek to bring down the cost of production and encourage the use of domestic steel in infrastructure projects.
It also hopes to protect UK steel from "unfair trading practices abroad", including being undercut by cheaper suppliers.
The announcement comes days after US President Donald Trump said he would impose a 25% tariff on all steel imports from 12 March - something the UK sector fears would cost it millions in trade.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds launched a consultation on the government's Plan for Steel to look at long-term issues facing the industry, after ministers committed to providing up to £2.5bn in support.
While the consultation does not directly address the threat tariffs may pose to the sector, Reynolds said the financial support for the steel industry was "to protect our industrial heartlands, maintain jobs, and drive growth".
Shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said the "uncertainty" the steel industry faced due to US tariffs was something the government "has been entirely silent on when instead they should be talking to the US, our closest trading partner".
The Plan for Steel will address issues that have been "holding the industry back for too long", the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) said.
These include:
Identifying opportunities to expand steel production
Encouraging the use of UK-made steel in public infrastructure projects, such as the proposed Heathrow Airport expansion
Improving scrap processing facilities
Investing in electric arc furnaces, which are less energy-intensive than blast furnaces and use less carbon-emitting coke
The consultation will also examine electricity costs for steel companies "to make the UK competitive globally", and how to protect the sector from unfair trading practices abroad, such as cheap imports flooding the market, the DBT added.
The announcement does not directly address the potential impact of Trump's tariff plans at this stage, nor does it include a firm commitment to reduce energy bills.
The government has previously said it would not retaliate immediately to the tariffs announced by Trump, despite many in the steel industry calling on Britain to join the EU and Canada in threatening reciprocal measures.
Reynolds told the BBC earlier this week the UK had a strong case to avoid the import taxes - which Trump has said will be enforced "without exceptions or exemptions" - as British exports to the US were small in comparison to other nations and steel was used in areas such as defence.
Trump says metal tariffs to start in March
UK signals it will seek US steel tariff exemption
Three US goods that could rise in price due to metal tariffs
Is Trump right when he says the US faces unfair trade?
UK Steel, which represents the industry, has said the tariffs would be a "devastating blow" that would damage the sector's £400m-a-year contribution to UK-US trade.
The UK is not a big supplier of steel to the US, with the country accounting for about 10% of British steel exports.
But there are concerns within the industry the tariffs might not just hinder exports to the US, but also lead to excess steel being "dumped" in the UK.
This could occur if other countries no longer exporting to the US decide to offload steel at cheaper prices, which could potentially lead to UK steelmaking businesses being undercut.
The government hopes its plan will secure jobs in the UK's steel industry and secure its future.
Financial support could benefit Scotland and areas such as Scunthorpe, Lincolnshire, Rotherham in South Yorkshire and Redcar in North Yorkshire "which have a strong history of steel production", the DBT said.
Help will be available through the National Wealth Fund, which partners the government with the private sector and local authorities to finance infrastructure and other projects.
The DBT said it was "wasting no time" supporting UK steel, pointing to the government's backing of expanding Heathrow Airport, which it said would require 400,000 tonnes of steel.
The UK steel industry has faced heavy job losses in recent years.
Tata Steel said it was replacing traditional blast furnaces with an electric arc furnace at its largest UK site in Port Talbot, Wales. Traditional steelmaking at the site ceased in September, resulting in 2,800 job cuts.
British Steel announced in 2023 it would close blast furnaces in Scunthorpe, and unveiled plans to roll out an electric arc furnace, which requires fewer workers to keep it going, with 3,000 jobs expected to be axed.
The GMB union said the government's plan to support the "beleaguered" steel industry provided "desperately needed" funding after "years of dithering".
"As the world becomes more volatile, primary domestic steel making capacity is vital for both our economy and domestic security," the union's national secretary Andy Prendergast added.
Gareth Stace, director-general of UK Steel, said the government's commitment to the industry was "both vital and welcome".
Information gathered in the consultation will be used to help form a "steel strategy", to be launched in the spring.
Stace added a robust strategy "has the power to reverse the sector's decline, particularly as we face increasing competition from imports benefiting from more favourable business conditions".
Griffiths said he looked forward to seeing a detailed plan, but added "a clear part must be steps to reduce the cost of energy which is placing an intolerable strain on UK steel".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
27 minutes ago
Trump says Zelenskyy can end Russia war 'almost immediately' before White House meet
LONDON -- President Donald Trump on Sunday teased what he said would be a "big day" as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and a host of European leaders prepared for a White House meeting that Trump said can end Russia's invasion of Ukraine "almost immediately." Monday's Washington, D.C., summit follows Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. Since that meeting, Trump appears to have dropped his demand for Russia to agree to an immediate ceasefire and is now pressuring Kyiv to accept territorial concessions to secure a peace deal. On Sunday, Trump explicitly said Ukraine will not regain Crimea -- occupied by Russia in 2014. The president also repeated that Ukraine will not be allowed to join NATO, though White House special envoy Steve Witkoff and Zelenskyy have hinted at alternative security guarantees involving the U.S. "President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight," Trump wrote on social media on Sunday. The president has previously incorrectly framed Ukraine as the initiator of the conflict, which began with Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. That invasion followed Moscow's cross-border aggression in 2014, which saw Russia seize Crimea and parts of the eastern Donbas region. "Big day at the White House tomorrow," Trump added. "I've never had so many European leaders at one time. It's my great honor to host them!!!" "NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE," Trump added. "Some things never change!!!" Trump is expected to greet Zelenskyy outside the West Wing at 1 p.m. ET, according to a schedule published by the White House, after which they will hold a bilateral meeting. The president is scheduled to take photos with European leaders at around 2:30 p.m. ET and hold a multilateral meeting with them at 3 p.m. Zelenskyy said in a post to social media that he had arrived in Washington on Sunday night, expressing his gratitude to Trump for hosting the planned meeting. "We all share a strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably," Zelenskyy wrote. "And peace must be lasting," he added, noting Moscow's 2014 aggression plus the failure of the international community to enforce the 1994 Budapest Memorandum -- which was also signed by Russia -- that offered Ukraine "security assurances" in exchange for Kyiv surrendering its Cold War-era nuclear arsenal. "Ukrainians are fighting for their land, for their independence," Zelenskyy wrote. "Russia must end this war, which it itself started. And I hope that our joint strength with America, with our European friends, will force Russia into a real peace." Friday's summit in Alaska ended with Russia demanding that Ukraine cede the entirety of its contested and fortified eastern Donetsk region in exchange for an end to the fighting, two sources told ABC News. Trump then challenged Kyiv to "make the deal" and lavished praise on Putin. "Look, Russia is a very big power, and they're not," Trump told Fox News after the meeting. Putin, he added, is a "strong guy" and "tough as hell." A host of European leaders will accompany Zelenskyy at the White House meeting. European leaders have backed Zelenskyy and Ukraine's positions during the Trump administration's pressure campaign on Kyiv. Those confirmed as attending are European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Finnish President Alexander Stubb. Ahead of last week's summit in Alaska, European leaders echoed Zelenskyy's position that a ceasefire must precede peace negotiations, that security guarantees for Kyiv must be put in place and that only Ukraine can make the final decision on any territorial concessions. On Sunday, French President Emmanuel Macron told reporters that he and his fellow European leaders will be traveling to Washington both to support Zelenskyy and "to defend European interests" at a "very serious" moment for the continent's security. "If we are weak today with Russia, we prepare the wars of tomorrow," Macron said, adding that Moscow had "never" respected past "promises of non-aggression." The nature of Western security guarantees for Ukraine will be a key topic for discussion, Macron said, explaining to journalists a two-pronged approach by which Ukraine's military would be bolstered and a Western "reassurance force" would be deployed to Ukraine to act as a deterrent against renewed Russian attacks. Any concessions will spark intense debate within Ukraine. The country's constitution dictates that any changes to the national borders must be approved by an all-Ukraine referendum. Kyiv's ambitions to join both NATO and the European Union are also enshrined in the constitution, meaning it may need to be amended for Ukraine to accept exclusion from either bloc. "Territorial concessions are impossible," Oleksandr Mrezhko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament and chair of the body's foreign affairs committee, told ABC News. "Under the present circumstances, we need a ceasefire and security guarantees to prevent Putin from violating the ceasefire." "In my opinion, Putin's idea about a 'peace treaty' instead of a ceasefire is extremely dangerous and unacceptable for both Ukraine and the U.S.," he added. "That the U.S. offers to be engaged in security guarantees is great news for us, but we don't know yet what it will be in practice," Merezhko said. "I personally continue to believe that the best option for all -- Ukraine, the U.S. and the EU -- is NATO membership for Ukraine." "Putin is afraid of only one thing -- NATO," Merezhko added. "That's why it's the most reliable and effective security guarantee for us." Meanwhile, both Russia and Ukraine continued long-range attacks overnight into Monday. Ukraine's air force said Russia launched 140 drones and four missiles in the country, of which 88 drones were shot down or suppressed. Missile and drone impacts were reported across 25 locations in Donetsk, Kharkiv, Sumy, Dnipropetrovsk, Odesa and Kyiv regions, the air force said. At least seven people, including a child, were killed when a Russian drone impacted an apartment complex in Kharkiv, local officials said. Russia's Defense Ministry said its forces downed at least 24 Ukrainian drones overnight.
New York Times
27 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Wants to Fight Democrats on Crime. They're Treading Cautiously.
With his efforts to take control of law enforcement in Washington, D.C., this week, President Trump has pushed the issue of crime back to the foreground of American politics. In doing so, he's invited a fight with Democrats, who are treading cautiously as they seek to forcefully oppose the federal incursion into the nation's capital, something no president has ever attempted, without getting caught up in a debate over public safety on Mr. Trump's terms. Mr. Trump and his Republican allies wielded the sharp increase in violent crime in urban areas during the pandemic as a campaign cudgel, winning control of the House in the 2022 midterms. Mr. Trump expanded his winning coalition two years later, in part with promises to prevent the rest of America from becoming like the cities he called 'unlivable, unsanitary nightmares,' deriding the data that showed improvement across the country. While his tactics in Washington, D.C., are extraordinary, the effort is an actualization of one of his most tried-and-true political arguments: Democrats — often Black Democrats — have let lawlessness run rampant in the cities and states they were elected to run. At a moment when Mr. Trump's approval ratings even among his supporters are declining, he appears to be laying the groundwork for Republicans to once again weaponize the issue in the midterm elections. Mr. Trump has sent National Guard troops to patrol the streets, turned federal law enforcement officers into beat cops and sought to put the local police department fully under his administration's control. And the president has suggested he wants to bring his brand of law and order to Chicago; Baltimore; Oakland, Calif.; and New York, all liberal cities in blue states, while avoiding any mention of high-crime cities in red states, like Memphis or St. Louis. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
27 minutes ago
- New York Times
For D.C.'s Homeless, Strained Lives Become More Unstable
For some 15 years, David Brown had made a home in Washington Circle, living in a tent with a handful of others in an encampment. On Friday, that home was destroyed — his tent, clothing and other possessions were tossed into a dumpster by police officers carrying out President Trump's crackdown on some of the city's most powerless residents. Left with a fraction of his things, Mr. Brown and his 6-month-old puppy, Molly, moved a block away and slept outside the Foggy Bottom subway station. Sitting in a wheelchair outside the station on Saturday, he was still baffled at what was happening. 'Why is he doing this, for no reason?' he asked of Mr. Trump. The clearing of homeless people off the streets of Washington, part of the president's marshaling of federal forces on the nation's capital, has been more scattered than sweeping, and it is unclear how many of the estimated 900 people who sleep on the city's streets have been affected. But what emerged over the weekend were more stories like Mr. Brown's. Many people are on the move, seeing their lives uprooted and their futures become even more precarious, whether as a result of force or out of fear. Some have moved into shelters. Others have secured temporary hotel rooms with the help of nonprofit groups. Some have taken buses to surrounding areas, or are using donated metro cards to ride the subways back and forth at night. Still others have simply moved to another spot on the streets. David Beatty, who was removed from an encampment between the Kennedy Center and the U.S. Institute for Peace, said he spent the first night after being cleared out behind bushes near the Foggy Bottom subway station. But without his tent or foam mat, he was getting little sleep. His other belongings had been put into storage, thanks to the Georgetown Ministry Center — but he kept his broom and dustpan, which he carried with him as he walked around the city during the day, sweeping up cigarette butts and litter. Making the city safe and beautiful includes 'removing mentally disturbed individuals and homeless encampments,' Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said at a news conference last week. The White House also said that scores of homeless encampments have been cleared since the president issued an executive order in March that included creating a program to beautify the district. His supporters, including Scott Turner, the housing secretary, say the president's measures have been needed to rid the city of blight. Mr. Trump has claimed on social media that authorities would give homeless people somewhere to stay far from the capital, and Ms. Leavitt said they would be offered shelters or addiction and mental health services. But advocates for homeless people say no federal aid to get them help has materialized. 'Precisely zero resources — no money, no vacant federal buildings, no housing — have come from the federal government to support moving people inside,' Amber W. Harding, the executive director of the Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless, said in a statement. Organizations that provide support in the region estimate that several hundreds of people in Washington remain without a place to sleep. They also said that news of the clearings had driven fear through homeless communities even though the moves may not have displaced huge numbers of people. The district does not have large encampments similar to ones in other big cities. Homelessness was a vexing problem for the district well before Mr. Trump's crackdown. Mayor Muriel Bowser made the issue a focus of her administration when she took office in 2015, vowing to end long-term homelessness in the district and make it a 'rare, brief and nonrecurring experience' by 2020. Advocates say those goals are far from being met and that the district's latest budget for 2026 will undermine the social safety net for the neediest. While city data shows that the number of homeless people in the city dropped by 9 percent over the past year, it had been rising for two years before that. The city acknowledges that more work needs to be done but points to the decrease over the past year as evidence of progress. It says it has expanded its shelter system and that one of its programs has diverted nearly 400 people from entering homelessness. Still, the sudden disruption of the past week has left city workers and volunteers scrambling to assemble a patchwork safety net. Claire Wilson, the executive director of Georgetown Ministry Center, said that close to a dozen of the more than 60 individuals her organization sees on a regular basis were displaced on Friday. It was done without warning, she said, which was out of the norm. Ms. Wilson added that on Saturday morning, more than 50 people came to the center for shelter — a much larger crowd than what the ministry typically sees on a Saturday. 'Yesterday was frantic — and traumatic,' said Ms. Wilson, talking about Friday. She added that it was unlike any other crisis she had seen homeless individuals face in about a decade of working on housing issues. On Friday night, as federal and local law enforcement patrolled the streets of Washington, advocates for the homeless were roaming transit hubs in Montgomery County, Md., wealthy suburbs that border of Washington, searching for unhoused people who had left the city. John Mendez, Bethesda Cares's executive director, and Renee Siepierski, the group's street outreach program director, drove to Chevy Chase, a wealthy enclave on the northwest border of Washington. They pulled on bright orange wind breakers and walked the hollow concrete transit hubs in the area, tucked away behind luxury retail stores and bars. Mr. Mendez anticipated that some of Washington's homeless would seek refuge by blending in at libraries and coffee shops during the day and on public transit at night. But they were unlikely to permanently leave the city they called home, Mr. Mendez said. He counted four people who appeared to be homeless, which he said was a higher than usual number. They were laden with bags of belongings. Some of them took a pair of new socks he offered them. They all climbed onto a bus back to Washington that pulled away just before midnight. In Bethesda, Md., Erica Jones got off a bus from the city. She said she did not have a place to live but relied on the generosity of friends and family. On Friday night, she was heading to her mother's apartment in Silver Spring, Md. Ms. Jones said her friends and acquaintances, who are homeless, were intimidated by the number of law enforcement in the streets. And she was alarmed by the way people are being treated. 'These are people like me and people like you,' she said, adding later, 'That's just where they sleep.'
