Order blocking YouTube channel ‘4PM' withdrawn, Supreme Court told
The Supreme Court was on Tuesday (May 13, 2025) informed that an order blocking YouTube channel "4PM", which has a subscriber base of 73 lakh, was withdrawn.
'They have withdrawn the blocking order,' senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the petitioner, informed a Bench of Justices B.R. Gavai and Augustine George Masih.
The apex court was hearing a plea filed by Sanjay Sharma, who is the editor of digital news platform 4PM, seeking quashing of an order blocking the channel.
The plea claimed the blocking was effected by the intermediary pursuant to an undisclosed direction allegedly issued by the Centre citing vague grounds of "national security" and "public order".
Mr. Sibal requested the Bench that the plea be tagged with separate pending petitions which have challenged Rule 16 of the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009.
Also Read | Over 8,000 X accounts blocked in India; The Wire says will challenge site blocking
He said Mr. Sharma's petition also sought quashing of Rule 16 of the 2009 Rules.
Rule 16 says strict confidentiality shall be maintained regarding all the requests and complaints received and actions taken thereof.
The plea also sought striking down or reading down Rule 9 of the Blocking Rules, 2009, to mandate issuance of a notice, opportunity of hearing and communication of a copy of the interim order to the originator or creator of the content prior to passing of a final order.
The Bench tagged the plea with the pending separate pleas.
On May 5, the top court sought responses from the Centre and others on Sharma's plea, which said the blocking was a "chilling assault on journalistic independence" and the right of public to receive information.
The plea, filed through advocate Talha Abdul Rahman, said no blocking order or underlying complaint was furnished to the petitioner, violating both statutory and constitutional safeguards.
The petition said it was a settled law that the Constitution does not permit blanket removal of content without an opportunity to be heard.
"'National security' and 'public order' are not talismanic invocations to insulate executive action from scrutiny," it said.
The plea said the action was not only ultra vires the parent statute but also strikes at the core of democratic accountability ensured by a free press.
'The blocking is a chilling assault on journalistic independence and the right of the public to receive information,' it said.
Seeking a direction to the Centre to produce the order with reasons and records, if any, issued to the intermediary for blocking the channel, it asked for a direction to quash the blocking order.
The plea said the petitioner's YouTube channel was blocked without giving any fair opportunity to clarify or justify his case.
Blocking Rules, 2009, including Rules 8, 9, and 16, infringe upon fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution, particularly the rights to freedom of speech and expression, right to equality and the right to life and personal liberty, it added.
It said the authorities concerned have a duty under the law to ensure that blocking of YouTube channels were not done arbitrarily, suppressing the freedom of speech and expression.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bhatti vows caste-based budget allocations
Hyderabad: Riding high on the momentum of social justice following the recent induction of three new ministers, deputy chief minister Bhatti Vikramarka on Monday said the Congress govt would aim to allocate funds proportionate to the population of each caste and community in the 2025–26 state budget. Speaking at a public meeting in Khammam during the foundation stone laying ceremony for the Gouda Sangham Bhavan, Bhatti said the next budget would reflect the govt's commitment to social equity by enhancing access to education, employment, and welfare for all communities. "The Congress govt is committed to building an egalitarian society where every section is given equal opportunity. As promised in our manifesto, we conducted a caste census which revealed that BCs constitute 56% of the population," he said. He added that the govt passed 42% reservation bills for BCs in local bodies and govt jobs and had forwarded the proposal to the Centre. "This is a major achievement of the Indiramma govt," he noted. Bhatti also credited Telangana's inclusive policies for inspiring the national discourse. "When Rahul Gandhi began advocating the Telangana model, many laughed. But today, it has become a model for the entire country — this is a victory of Telangana's people," he said. He assured the Goud community that the new building would be completed within a year, alongside a coaching centre for unemployed youth and a statue of Sardar Sarvai Papanna. Earlier in the day, the deputy CM flagged off 45 battery-operated buses at the Suryapet bus stand. He announced that 79 such buses were sanctioned for the depot and that 2,800 more would soon be launched within Hyderabad's Outer Ring Road. Since the launch of the women's free travel scheme, RTC has issued 182 crore zero-fare tickets, with the govt reimbursing ₹6,088 crore, he added.
The Hindu
30 minutes ago
- The Hindu
The Census and the remaking of a people
A population is a group of inhabitants in a particular place. A people, as in 'We the People,' in the preamble of the Constitution, is a political community. The counting and the labelling of the population under multiple categories, i.e., a census, is not merely a technical exercise. It mediates the transformation of the population to a people in a significant manner. The people — a political community — have a shared view of how they govern themselves and allocate their resources. The 2027 Census will so impact the notion of people that it is going to be a centennial event, like the COVID-19 pandemic that delayed the decadal census which was to happen in 2021. A census counts the total population, and under various categories and qualities — rural and urban, Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST), economic activity, literacy and education, housing and household amenities, migration, fertility and mortality. It also enumerates the latest administrative map of the country. A census, technically speaking, only captures the reality that exists. But the very act of capturing it under definitive categories alters and creates realities. There are organic, natural demographic trends which are underway, whether you document them or not. For instance, we know that more people in Chennai or Mumbai speak Hindi today than 20 years ago. In the same time period, we know that Kerala received and sent out a large number of migrants, but we do not know the exact numbers. These patterns of birth, death, migration, languages, and economic activity will have political implications; their recording itself is an influencer of that process. The study of this link, between demography and politics (political demography), is an underdeveloped field the world over. Issue of parliamentary representation After half a century, India's parliamentary representation will be redistributed between the States. Article 81 of the Constitution mandates that the next inter-State redistribution representation according to population will be done after 'the relevant figures for the first census taken after the year 2026 have been published'. The Census of 2021 was delayed due to the pandemic, but it could have been done much earlier than now. In normal course, the first Census after 2026 would have been in 2031, with the new delimitation exercise after that. The delay in the 2021 Census has advanced delimitation by at least five years. This is going to be the first census in which all data will be captured digitally, and its processing can be much faster than previous ones which took up to three years. The work of past Delimitation Commissions took years, but that too will be much quicker in the next round. All things considered, it is possible, and even likely, that the general election in 2029 can be conducted on the basis of a new parliamentary map of India. What happens if the distribution of population becomes the sole criteria for the redistribution of parliamentary seats? Some States have grown faster population-wise and slower economy-wise; for some States, the inverse holds true. People are moving from where there are more of them to where there are fewer of them such as from the north and central regions of the country to the west and southern regions, and also to Delhi NCR which is in the heartland. This movement is linked to demography and the economy. People are moving in search of better opportunities, and, in many cases, to escape distress. Regions of higher economic growth attract people from elsewhere, while their native populations age. If relative population remains the only and sole criteria for an inter-State reallocation of parliamentary representation, political power will move from regions with a 'stronger economy-low birth rate' combination to regions that have a 'weaker economy-high birth rate' combination. The Centre has said that the demand for fair delimitation from States that fear a reduction in their political representation will be discussed at the appropriate time, but there is no clarity as yet on its thoughts on this issue. Factors of caste, revenue sharing There are other adjacent factors that are inherent and contingent upon Census 2027, which will be determinants in this remaking of the people. For the first time since Independence, all castes will be counted separately as against the counting of only SCs and STs now. The caste census until 1931, during British rule, triggered multiple claims and resultant politics. It will be difficult to predict the political impact of a new caste census, but it is certain that the clamour for removal of the 50% ceiling on quotas will get louder. The next delimitation will allocate one third of the seats in Parliament and Assemblies for women. The Centre has made it clear that it will push for simultaneous elections to Parliament and the State Assemblies. The individual citizen is considered to constitute the elementary unit of people, in liberal democracy. But a simple reading of the relevant provisions of the Constitution makes it clear how group identities were accepted in the constitutional scheme of things — before that in the national movement, and later in governance. National unity of the modern Republic of India was designed in three dimensions — unity of religions, castes and regions as highlighted in an article in this daily, 'National unity, a three-dimensional view' (Editorial page, October 6, 2023). That contract of unity is now being renegotiated to make place for the changes and the learnings of at least 50 years. Census 2027 is a milestone in this ongoing process and will unleash unpredictable forces. There is also a simultaneous development that is also relevant in this context. The Sixteenth Finance Commission (tasked with making recommendations for revenue sharing across States and between the Centre and the State for five years and commencing its work from April 1, 2026), is in deliberations with stakeholders. It is required to make its recommendations available by October 31, 2025. The mechanism devised by the previous Finance Commission for revenue sharing remains a source of grievance for many States. The Sixteenth Finance Commission's report will have the additional import of its timing, coming as it does on the cusp of a dramatic realignment of political power across social groups and regions. From a population to a people, the transition is achieved by administrative measures and politics. Census categories have been a key determinant in Indian identities. The first Census of 1881, under the colonial administration, had rigid religious and caste categories of its Indian subjects — which have remained key determinants of politics since then. All politics in India has been about various attempts to slice and dice and aggregate and disaggregate these categories. Population management involves the absolute numbers of people, their spatial distribution and their quality through health care and education. None of this is apolitical; education is a particularly notable field. Integral to political strategies The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) seeks to achieve its goal of national consolidation through a change in thinking of how Indians see themselves as a people. It is not a disinterested actor in this emerging scenario of a demographic transition. A population-based inter-State delimitation will shift political power to its strongholds and weaken its political opponents. Gender and caste are national categories. By introducing these factors, the BJP can shift the delimitation debate beyond the conflicting demands of regions, and create new political constituencies. The Congress and the Left too are theoretically national formations, which require them to balance regional aspirations and national requirements. The Congress is trying to reclaim some space in heartland politics by joining the caste debate, but it remains to be seen how its contest with the BJP will progress on this count. The BJP has a totalising vision of national identity, and a population-based delimitation is a tempting route for it to follow. Alternatively, if it wants to emerge as a truly national party which reassures interests across castes, regions and religions, then this is a good opportunity for it. varghese.g@
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
43 minutes ago
- First Post
Federal judge strikes down Trump's anti-diversity and anti-transgender grants
U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar said Monday that the federal government cannot force recipients to halt programs that promote diversity, equity and inclusion or acknowledge the existence of transgender people in order to receive grant funding read more A federal judge in California has blocked the Trump administration from enforcing anti-diversity and anti-transgender executive orders in grant funding requirements that LGBTQ+ organizations say are unconstitutional. U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar said Monday that the federal government cannot force recipients to halt programs that promote diversity, equity and inclusion or acknowledge the existence of transgender people in order to receive grant funding. The order will remain in effect while the legal case continues, although government lawyers will likely appeal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The funding provisions 'reflect an effort to censor constitutionally protected speech and services promoting DEI and recognizing the existence of transgender individuals,' Tigar wrote. He went on to say that the executive branch must still be bound by the Constitution in shaping its agenda and that even in the context of federal subsidies, 'it cannot weaponize Congressionally appropriated funds to single out protected communities for disfavored treatment or suppress ideas that it does not like or has deemed dangerous.' More from World Mpox epidemic remains international health emergency warns WHO The plaintiffs include health centers, LGBTQ+ services groups and the Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Historical Society. All receive federal funding and say they cannot complete their missions by following the president's executive orders. The San Francisco AIDS Foundation, one of the plaintiffs, said in 2023 it received a five-year grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to expand and enhance sexual health services, including the prevention of sexually transmitted infections. The $1.3 million project specifically targets communities disproportionately affected by sexual health disparities. But in April, the CDC informed the nonprofit that it must 'immediately terminate all programs, personnel, activities, or contracts' that promote DEI or gender ideology. President Donald Trump has signed a flurry of executive orders since taking office in January, including ones to roll back transgender protections and stop DEI programs. Lawyers for the government say that the president is permitted to 'align government funding and enforcement strategies' with his policies. Plaintiffs say that Congress — and not the president — has the power to condition how federal funds are used, and that the executive orders restrict free speech rights.
