Edinburgh pro-Palestine protest given go-ahead by councillors despite safety concerns
A pro-Palestine protest in Edinburgh has been given the go-ahead by councillors after concerns were raised over safety.
The city's public safety department had objected to the Support Palestine rally at a licensing meeting on Monday, with a decision on next steps pushed back to Tuesday.
An outright ban was all but ruled out on Monday, when a Police Scotland officer said the demonstration was not likely to place an 'excessive burden' on the agency.
Conservative councillor and Licensing Sub-Committee convener Joanna Mowat said: 'We consider parades and marches from the point of view of public safety, we have very limited powers to even change routes, and to ban them.
'We exercised due scrutiny, given the concerns raised by public safety and the police, but we were grateful that the applicants arranged to attend so that we could speak with them.
'The threshold for making alterations to the route were not met. So we have made an order that the march will go ahead.
'We were pleased that the march organisers have committed to work with officers and the police through the EPOG process to ensure that this is a safe and well stewarded event.'
EPOG refers to an Event Planning Operations Group meeting, where council officers and event organisers meet to coordinate events.
Cllr Mowat continued to say that the event organisers had run over 80 marches in the capital, with only two that caused concerns.
And she said that this was due to factors not entirely within their control.
She added: 'They showed that they've made a commitment to work positively with the police and council officers and so committee, we were happy to make the order.'
At Tuesday's licensing meeting, the organisers of the rally verbally committed to having a management plan in place for any bicycles that join the procession.
Attendees on bicycles joining a previous event without the knowledge of the event organisers was an issue at a previous demonstration, according to Cllr Mowat.
At the meeting on Monday, a council public safety officer objected to the planned demonstration, saying that two previous demonstrations run by the organisers had led to safety concerns.
According to the officer, this was due to severe congestion at a city junction during one march, and another event where protesters entered the tram route.
And a police representative said emergency powers had to be used to clear the junction the public safety officer mentioned.
Local authorities very rarely ban marches outright. Instead, councils can add conditions that they must follow.
The grounds for banning a procession are narrow. For a council to decide to do so, a march must meet one of a handful of requirements.
One reason for a ban is placing 'excessive burden' on policing resources, while another is if the 'likely effect' of holding the procession has an impact on public safety, public order, the 'life of the community' or is likely to cause property damage.
The third is if the organiser of a demonstration had previously organised an event that caused disruption or which breached conditions or a banning order placed on it.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
43 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Starmer to co-chair Ukraine meeting after call with Trump and European leaders
Sir Keir Starmer will co-chair a meeting with pro-Ukraine allies on Wednesday after a call with US President Donald Trump and European leaders about ending the war. Sir Keir will join a virtual call at midday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. They will then be joined by Mr Trump and US vice president JD Vance. Later, the Prime Minister will co-chair a Coalition of the Willing meeting to update wider partners on the day's discussions. The Coalition of the Willing is an international effort to support Ukraine towards a lasting peace, led by the UK, France and Ukraine. I am grateful to the leaders of Europe for their clear support of our independence, territorial integrity, and precisely such an active approach to diplomacy that can help end this war with a dignified peace. Indeed, we all support President Trump's determination, and together… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 12, 2025 It is made up of 31 countries that have pledged strengthened support for Kyiv, including 27 European countries, as well as Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Japan. Ahead of Wednesday's call, a Downing Street spokesperson said: 'The Prime Minister remains absolutely focused on a solution to this conflict grounded in Ukraine's national interests. 'He is determined to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine, backed by robust and credible security guarantees that will deter Russia from threatening Ukraine in future.' Meanwhile, Mr Vance is set to meet US troops stationed at RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire on Wednesday. The US Vice President will receive a briefing on the base's capabilities and deliver remarks. According to The Times, he will also meet Reform UK leader Nigel Farage for breakfast in the Cotswolds. This comes after meeting with shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick and shadow home secretary Chris Philip on Tuesday. The call between European and US leaders comes ahead of the expected meeting between Mr Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. The two leaders are set to meet to discuss the future of the Kremlin's invasion, without the presence of Mr Zelensky. The Ukrainian President said at a news briefing on Tuesday that Mr Putin wants Ukraine to withdraw from the remaining 30% of the Donetsk region that Kyiv controls as part of a ceasefire deal. This was conveyed to him by US officials, Mr Zelensky explained. However, he reiterated that Ukraine would not withdraw from territories it controls because it is unconstitutional and would only serve as a springboard for a future Russian invasion. Mr Trump has also signalled he thinks Ukraine might need to cede territory in order to end the conflict, stating there is likely to be 'some land-swapping going on'. Speaking during a lengthy press conference on Monday, Mr Trump pledged to 'try to get back' some of Ukraine's 'oceanfront property' from Russia. He said: 'We're going to change the lines, the battle lines. Russia has occupied a big portion of Ukraine. They've occupied some very prime territory. We're going to try and get some of that territory back for Ukraine. 'They have taken largely – in real estate we call it oceanfront property. That's always the most valuable property.' A statement released by the European Union on Tuesday read: 'A just and lasting peace that brings stability and security must respect international law, including the principles of independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity and that international borders must not be changed by force. 'The people of Ukraine must have the freedom to decide their future. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. 'Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities.' In response, Mr Zelensky said on X (formerly Twitter): 'I am grateful to the leaders of Europe for their clear support for our independence, territorial integrity, and precisely such an active approach to diplomacy that can help end this war with a dignified peace. 'Indeed, We all support President Trump's determination, and together we must shape positions that will not allow Russia to deceive the world once again. 'We see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war. On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations. 'In such circumstances, it is important that the unity of the world is not threatened. 'As long as they continue the war and the occupation, all of us together must maintain our pressure – the pressure of strength, the pressure of sanctions, the pressure of diplomacy.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Israel rejects UN allegations that its forces have sexually abused detained Palestinians
The U.N. chief warned Israel that the United Nations has 'credible information' of sexual violence and other violations by Israeli forces against detained Palestinians, which Israel's U.N. ambassador dismissed as 'baseless accusations.' Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in a letter to Ambassador Danny Danon that he is 'gravely concerned' about reported violations against Palestinians by Israeli military and security forces in several prisons, a detention center and a military base. Guterres said he was putting Israeli forces on notice that they could be listed as abusers in his next report on sexual violence in conflict 'due to significant concerns of patterns of certain forms of sexual violence that have been consistently documented by the United Nations.' Danon, who circulated the letter and his response Tuesday, said the allegations 'are steeped in biased publications.' 'The U.N. must focus on the shocking war crimes and sexual violence of Hamas and the release of all hostages,' he said. Danon was referring to the militant group's surprise attack in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, where some 1,200 people were killed and about 250 taken hostage. Israeli authorities said women were raped and sexually abused. The Hamas attack triggered the ongoing war in Gaza, which has killed more than 61,400 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not say how many were fighters or civilians but that about half were women and children. Danon stressed that 'Israel will not shy away from protecting its citizens and will continue to act in accordance with international law.' Because Israel has denied access to U.N. monitors, it has been 'challenging to make a definitive determination' about patterns, trends and the systematic use of sexual violence by its forces, Guterres said in the letter. He urged Israel's government 'to take the necessary measures to ensure immediate cessation of all acts of sexual violence, and make and implement specific time-bound commitments.' The secretary-general said these should include investigations of credible allegations, clear orders and codes of conduct for military and security forces that prohibit sexual violence, and unimpeded access for U.N. monitors. In March, U.N.-backed human rights experts accused Israel of 'the systematic use of sexual, reproductive and other gender-based violence.' The Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory said it documented a range of violations perpetrated against Palestinian women, men, girls and boys and accused Israeli security forces of rape and sexual violence against Palestinian detainees. At the time, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lashed out at the U.N. Human Rights Council, which commissioned the team of independent experts, as an 'anti-Israel circus' that 'has long been exposed as an antisemitic, rotten, terrorist-supporting, and irrelevant body.' His statement did not address the findings themselves.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Trump's marijuana laws: New proposals explained
Donald Trump is currently re-evaluating the federal classification of marijuana, indicating a decision could be made in the coming weeks. A potential reclassification from a Schedule I to a Schedule III drug would not lead to nationwide recreational legalisation but would alter regulation, taxation, and facilitate research. This change could result in significant tax savings for legal marijuana businesses, though it is not expected to resolve banking sector reluctance. Trump describes the issue as "very complicated," weighing perceived medical benefits against other concerns, while facing opposition from some conservative and law enforcement groups. The re-evaluation occurs amidst widespread state-level legalisation of medical and recreational marijuana, and growing public support for legalisation across the United States.
