Democrats have devolved into a clown show. No wonder polls show voters prefer GOP.
Forget a tale of two cities, the vast differences between today's two major political parties is far more relevant.
A recent Wall Street Journal survey shows that the Democratic Party got its lowest rating from voters in 35 years. Despite President Donald Trump's tariffs, Republicans are still preferred on most issues.
Who can blame voters?
Under President Joe Biden, inflation hit a 40-year high, Russia invaded Ukraine, Hamas brutally attacked Israel and Iran built a robust nuclear program.
Then Americans learned, while he was running for reelection, that Biden suffered from serious cognitive decline, raising questions about what the Democratic Party knew and when. Americans lost trust that Democrats were transparent and honest.
Nine months after Trump was reelected, Democrats still lack direction and competent leaders. Here are a few examples:
Are Democrats OK? They appear desperate, and increasingly are becoming a clown show without direction or purpose.
Democratic Party's future looks grim
The chaos and aimlessness at the national level also exists in Democratic-controlled states. In California and New York, progressive leaders ensure that residents are hurt by high tax rates and other policies that push businesses to relocate.
Opinion: In-N-Out owner places order to go − out of California
California and New York serve as cautionary tales for much of the country. As Democratic states lose population, Florida, Texas and other deep red states are growing rapidly. A Democrat hasn't won statewide office in Texas since 1994. And no Democrat currently holds statewide office in Florida.
Developing new political talent in the second and third largest states in the nation − and in states like Indiana, Ohio and Tennessee − is now almost impossible for Democrats, a reality that is sure to hurt the party's future on the local, state and national levels.
Reapportionment after the 2030 Census also is likely to be brutal for Democrats. The Brennan Center, a progressive think tank, reported that "California would lose 4 of its 52 congressional districts in reapportionment − only the second time the Golden State has ever lost representation. New York, meanwhile, would lose three seats, Illinois two, and Pennsylvania one, leaving all three states with congressional delegations half the size they were in 1940."
It's not just House seats that Democratic states will shed. Red states also stand to gain more Electoral College votes, which gives future Republican presidential candidates a stronger mathematical advantage.
GOP is humming now and into the future
Meanwhile, Trump has accomplished more in his first six months than Joe Biden did in four years. Trump is overhauling the federal bureaucracy, reworking the global economy on more favorable terms for Americans, persuading American allies to pay more for their own defense, forcing universities to better protect Jewish students and faculty and to finally respect conservatives on campus, safeguarding women's rights, promoting the U.S. energy sector and other industries to a remarkable degree around the world, and pushing for peace from India to Ukraine.
Opinion: Trump wins again – Columbia's $200 million fine will reshape higher education
Trump also is building a conservative political dynasty that is set to take his place after he leaves office in 2029.
Vice President JD Vance is the GOP's most promising star. He has proved to be articulate and passionate on difficult issues, in the U.S. and while representing America overseas. Intelligent and media savvy, Vance has most, if not all, of the positive qualities a leader needs with few of Trump's less savory qualities.
Vance is the heavy early favorite to win the GOP presidential nomination in 2028 and could very well lead Republicans to political dominance for years to come.
It's not only Vance, however, with a promising future.
New York Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik has made a name for herself standing against antisemitism, especially in institutions of higher education. She's sharp, bold and outspoken about her values.
At just 31 years old, Texas Rep. Brandon Gill made headlines when he questioned NPR CEO Katherine Maher in a hearing about her leftist political bias.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio is strongly and effectively representing U.S. interests around the globe. Only 54, Rubio, a former senator and presidential candidate from Florida, is a potential Republican presidential nominee for the next two decades.
The Republican Party is in a strong position now and could be even more dominant after Trump leaves office.
Democrats, in contrast, look aimless now, and their future appears even more grim. No wonder voters aren't attracted to them.
Nicole Russell is a columnist at USA TODAY and a mother of four who lives in Texas. Contact her at nrussell@gannett.com and follow her on X, formerly Twitter: @russell_nm. Sign up for her weekly newsletter, The Right Track, here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Judges Press for Answers on Federal Involvement in Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz'
An immigration detention center built in the Florida Everglades threatens protected lands and wildlife, and violated federal laws when the government failed to study potential harms before construction, environmentalists argued in federal court in Miami on Wednesday. Witnesses testified that they worried that the detention center known as 'Alligator Alcatraz' would pollute environmentally sensitive wetlands, hurt endangered species and undo decades of Everglades restoration. 'We are very concerned about potential impacts of runoff,' said Eve Samples, the executive director of Friends of the Everglades, a nonprofit group and one of the plaintiffs. The suit is one of two federal cases filed against the remote detention center, which Florida erected last month to house federal immigration detainees. The environmental suit argues that the federal and state governments failed to conduct a review process required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, which would have allowed for some public input before any construction. Environmentalists are seeking a preliminary injunction to stop operations and any additional construction while their lawsuit moves forward. State officials have tried to portray the environmental impact as minimal. They have said the detention center was necessary to assist the Trump administration with illegal immigration enforcement, because federal authorities did not have enough capacity in existing facilities to hold detainees. Florida has taken an especially aggressive stance in assisting with the illegal immigration crackdown, and is considering erecting a second detention center in North Florida. In legal filings, Florida has also suggested that the detention center is not subject to federal environmental regulations because it is state-run. But what was perhaps most striking during the daylong hearing was how many significant questions remained unanswered about the Everglades detention center, more than a month after the first detainees began to arrive there. Among those questions was the relationship of authority between the Florida Division of Emergency Management, which is in charge of the detention center, and the Department of Homeland Security, which is in charge of immigration detainees. The judge presiding over the environmental case, Kathleen M. Williams of the Federal District Court in Miami, asked the state and federal defendants last week to provide any legal agreement related to the detention center's operations. No such document was provided during Wednesday's hearing or in the days leading up to it. One of the witnesses for the environmental groups, State Representative Anna V. Eskamani, an Orlando Democrat, testified on Wednesday that she had requested a copy of any agreement between the state and federal government but had not been provided with one. Agreements known as 287(g) typically authorize state or municipal authorities to help with immigration enforcement. State officials have also not responded to repeated requests from The New York Times requesting such an agreement, if one exists. The judge presiding over the second federal case, which relates to immigration lawyers' access to their clients inside the detention center, has ordered the state and federal governments to clarify their relationships to the facility by Thursday. 'We need to get to the bottom of the interplay between the federal and state authorities on who's running this thing,' Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz II of the Federal District Court in Miami said last week. The Everglades detention center has come under much criticism since state and federal officials announced in June that Florida would become the first state to erect such a facility for immigration detainees. In addition to environmental and legal concerns, detainees, their relatives and their lawyers have denounced troubling conditions, many related to the center's unusual location. State officials built the detention center on an old airfield with little existing infrastructure. Most services — potable water, sewage, electricity — have to be trucked in or out, or provided by temporary facilities, such as power generators. Detainees have complained about flooding, mosquitoes, lack of showers and floodlights around the clock. In recent weeks, several relatives have said that some detainees have resorted to going on a hunger strike in protest. A spokeswoman for the Division of Emergency Management did not respond to a request for comment on Wednesday. During Wednesday's hearing in the environmental case, lawyers for Homeland Security tried to distance federal authorities' involvement in selecting the Everglades site. Dr. Eskamani testified that Kevin Guthrie, the executive director of the Division of Emergency Management, told elected officials last month that the state had received an email from Homeland Security requesting the construction of the facility. A lawyer for Homeland Security suggested in court that federal authorities might have asked for 'a' facility, without saying where it should be. Judge Williams interjected that she knew how the government could clear things up: 'Get the email for all of us.' Ms. Samples, of Friends of the Everglades, testified that the detention center was initially envisioned as a large and busy jetport in 1969. Opposition to the project led the famed environmentalist Marjory Stoneman Douglas to found Friends of the Everglades that same year — and led to the strengthening of environmental laws. Only one runway was built for the jetport before activists successfully shut it down. That runway now serves the detention center. 'Victories are sometimes imperfect,' Ms. Samples said.
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Cuomo Meets With Business Leaders as He Seeks to Undermine Adams
As former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo tries to make a political comeback in the New York City mayor's race, he met with business leaders on Wednesday in a move to secure their support. Mr. Cuomo lost the Democratic primary in June to Zohran Mamdani, a state lawmaker and democratic socialist who ran on an affordability message. Now Mr. Cuomo must prove that he is the strongest candidate to take on Mr. Mamdani in the general election in November by pushing aside Mayor Eric Adams, who, like him, is running as an independent. At the meeting on Wednesday morning at Rockefeller Center in Manhattan, Cuomo sought to make a case for his path to victory, according to five people who attended. Many in the group were alarmed by Mr. Mamdani's momentum but unsure about whether there was a clear path to beating him, given his strong performance in the June primary. They were also worried about the prospect that Mr. Adams and Mr. Cuomo might split the votes of those who oppose Mr. Mamdani. Mr. Cuomo candidly addressed his primary loss right off the bat, three attendees said, acknowledging that he had not given that campaign his all. He argued that he was embracing new strategies and noted that he had been campaigning throughout the city more than before. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Forbes
a few seconds ago
- Forbes
Texas Dem Chair Urges Blue State Governors To Retaliate TX Redistricting: ‘What Are You Waiting On?'
Republican lawmakers in Texas are in the midst of leading an aggressive redistricting effort by trying to pass a redrawn Congressional map that would help them potentially flip five seats in the House. Democrats in the state's House have since fled the Lone Star state to avoid a quorum needed to pass the redistricting bill. Kendall Scudder, State Chair for the Texas Democratic Party, joined "Forbes Newsroom" to discuss. Watch the full inteview above.
