Deloitte Fast 50 celebrates 25 years: Meet the alumni breaking barriers
'For New Zealand business owners and entrepreneurs, the Fast 50 was this very special thing that really recognises excellence in business in New Zealand. For many years, I followed the Fast 50 and it was an aspirational thing to hope to win one day.'
Since the win, White says Legend Story Studios has significantly grown in more ways than one. 'I think around 2022 we were approaching 20 staff, and now we're at 70. We've moved to a state-of-the-art, brand-new studio in Newmarket that we custom-designed and houses our growing team.
'In terms of global reputation and presence, we've really established ourselves as being the number one independent trading card game studio in the world. Our peers in the market are companies with $US15 billion market caps. We're the one independent studio that's taking the fight to these big guys and doing really well.'
When asked if the business's strategy has changed since 2022, White responds, 'For us, it's always been about creating a brand and business that is sustainable and will stand the test of time. Our industry has a 98% failure rate so it can be very cruel and unforgiving.'
Night 'n Day general manager Matthew Lane also recognises the importance of sustainable growth.
'While we're always looking for growth, one thing we do focus on is quality of growth versus just quantity, so it creates a sustainable platform to move forward,' says Lane.
Night 'n Day was a regular feature of the Deloitte Fast 50 index between 2012 and 2019. Photo / Peter McIntosh, file
Night 'n Day, an award-winning retail convenience network with over 50 stores across the country, was a regular feature of the Deloitte Fast 50 index between 2012 and 2019, placing fourth in 2012 with a growth percentage of 952%.
When asked about the pressures of scaling up, especially at speed, Lane comments, 'It was tough and it burst us to the seams in every aspect of our business - from an operational sense, from a financial sense, from an accounting and payroll sense.
'Scaling up highlights any shortcomings in the business when you accelerate growth like that. And if you don't have the right platform, it can set you back a bit, but it has also enabled us to see where we needed to have better scalability to continue growth moving forward,' he continues.
Lane understands firsthand the work that goes into creating and maintaining the growth that fuels a thriving business. Lane notes, 'Growth at a high level doesn't necessarily reflect the effort that goes in to get to that point, nor the effort to maintain it. For any business that has hit the Fast 50 index, it likely hasn't been smooth sailing.'
In line with its Fast 50 results, Night 'n Day has continued its growth trajectory. 'If we're talking footprint, we've increased by about 10 to 15% in terms of number of stores, but, excitingly, we've seen an acceleration of growth within those stores. I'm proud to watch them go from strength to strength,' says Lane.
Entries for the Deloitte Fast 50 2025 programme are now open, inviting the business makers of tomorrow to take their place in the Deloitte Fast 50 hall of fame. More information about this year's programme, including entry criteria, entry forms and key dates, can be found at fast50.co.nz.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
3 days ago
- 1News
Big, awkward, neglected: Auckland scores poorly on international report
The recent report comparing Auckland to nine international peer cities delivered an uncomfortable truth: our largest city is falling behind, hampered by car dependency, low-density housing and 'weak economic performance'. Timothy Welch reports. The Deloitte State of the City analysis was no surprise to anyone who has watched successive governments treat the city as a problem to manage, rather than an engine to fuel. The report's findings were stark: Auckland rates 82nd out of 84 cities globally for pedestrian friendliness, and its car-dependent transport system is more carbon-intensive and slower to decarbonise than peer cities. (Source: This is the direct result of decades of planning failures, including what urban researchers call the 1970s 'great down-zoning' which halved central Auckland's housing capacity. ADVERTISEMENT This isn't just Auckland's problem. When we mismanage what geographers call a 'primate city,' it reveals our fundamental misunderstanding of how modern economies work. The concept of the primate city was formalised by geographer Mark Jefferson in 1939. Such cities are defined as being 'at least twice as large as the next largest city and more than twice as significant'. Auckland fits this definition perfectly. With more than 1.7 million people, it is over four times larger than Christchurch or the greater Wellington region. The city accounts for 34% of New Zealand's population and is projected to hit 40% of the working-age population by 2048. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including Hulk Hogan dies, sentencing for a New Zealander who assaulted two airline stewards, and a big accolade for Te Papa. (Source: 1News) Auckland contributes 38% of New Zealand's gross domestic product and its per-capita GDP is 15% higher than the rest of the country's. Its most productive area, the central business district, enjoys a 40% productivity premium over the national average. To economists, these numbers represent the 'agglomeration benefits' research shows primate cities generate. It is the economic effect of combining businesses, talent and infrastructure. Yet New Zealand systematically underinvests in the very place generating this outsized economic contribution. ADVERTISEMENT A pattern of infrastructure failure Auckland's infrastructure deficit follows a predictable pattern. The City Rail Link, while progressing, has grown from an initial budget of NZ$2-3 billion to $5.5 billion, with opening delayed until 2026. The first train to be tested in Auckland's City Rail Link travels through Maungawhau in February. (Source: City Rail Link) Light rail was cancelled entirely after years of planning. A second harbour crossing has been studied for decades without a shovel hitting dirt. Each represents billions in opportunity costs while congestion worsens. This goes well beyond project mismanagement. It is a deep structural problem. The Infrastructure Commission-Te Waihanga identifies a $210 billion national infrastructure shortfall, with Auckland bearing a disproportionate burden despite generating a disproportionately high level of revenue. International research by the OECD shows successful countries treat metropolitan regions as engines of national growth, not a burden. ADVERTISEMENT The 'Wellington problem' Public policy expert Ian Shirley called it the 'Wellington Problem': the way Auckland's governance became an obsession for politicians and bureaucrats based in Wellington. The tension dates to 1865 when the capital was moved from Auckland to Wellington, establishing a pattern where political power was deliberately separated from economic power. Parliament (file image). (Source: 1News) Auckland loses an estimated $415.35 million annually in GST collected on rates. This goes to Wellington and into government revenue rather than being reinvested locally. Central government properties in Auckland, worth $36.3 million in rates, are exempt from payment while still using Auckland's infrastructure. When Auckland speaks with 'one voice' through its unified council, Wellington responds with legislative overrides. The recent National Land Transport Programme, for example, cut Auckland's transport funding by $564 million. Mayor Wayne Brown said the government's transport policy 'makes zero sense for Auckland'. ADVERTISEMENT Learning from others The contrast with international approaches reveals just how counterproductive New Zealand's approach has been. London has an integrated Transport for London authority with congestion charging powers, generating £136 million annually for reinvestment. Paris is investing more than €35 billion in the Grand Paris Express transit project. Paris: city of trains (Source: Japan's 'Quality Infrastructure Investment' principles include ¥13.2 trillion in regional infrastructure investment. Australia's A$120 billion infrastructure programme explicitly recognises its largest cities contribute over 50% of GDP and require proportional investment. Research has shown excessive urban concentration in one country can create problems. But denying the primate city resources only leads to a 'deterioration in the quality of life' that drags down the entire national economy. The solution lies in making strategic investments that maximise the benefits of agglomeration while managing any negative costs to the national economy. ADVERTISEMENT Growing pains Auckland isn't a problem to be managed, it is an asset to be leveraged. Every successful developed economy has learned this lesson. Paris generates 31% of France's GDP and gets treated accordingly. Seoul produces 23% of South Korea's output and receives massive infrastructure investment. Tokyo drives Japan's economy. The international evidence is unambiguous: countries that strategically invest in their primate cities achieve higher productivity growth and maintain competitive advantages. Auckland doesn't need sympathy or special treatment. It needs what every primate city in every successful economy gets: infrastructure investment proportional to its economic contribution, governance structures that reflect its scale, and political leadership that understands agglomeration economics. The question isn't whether Auckland is too big. The question is whether New Zealand is big enough to nurture its primate city. Timothy Welch Senior Lecturer in Urban Planning, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence.
RNZ News
5 days ago
- RNZ News
Auckland is NZ's ‘primate city', but its potential remains caged in by poor planning and vision
By Timothy Welch* of Auckland is hampered by car dependency, low-density housing and "weak economic performance", a recent report found. Photo: 123RF The recent report comparing Auckland to nine international peer cities delivered an uncomfortable truth: our largest city is falling behind, hampered by car dependency, low-density housing and "weak economic performance". The Deloitte State of the City analysis was no surprise to anyone who has watched successive governments treat the city as a problem to manage, rather than an engine to fuel. The report's findings were stark: Auckland rates 82nd out of 84 cities globally for pedestrian friendliness, and its car-dependent transport system is more carbon-intensive and slower to decarbonise than peer cities. This is the direct result of decades of planning failures, including what urban researchers call the 1970s "great down-zoning" which halved central Auckland's housing capacity. This isn't just Auckland's problem. When we mismanage what geographers call a "primate city," it reveals our fundamental misunderstanding of how modern economies work. The concept of the primate city was formalised by geographer Mark Jefferson in 1939 . Such cities are defined as being "at least twice as large as the next largest city and more than twice as significant". Auckland fits this definition perfectly. With more than 1.7 million people, it is more than four times larger than Christchurch or the greater Wellington region. The city accounts for 34 percent of New Zealand's population and is projected to hit 40 percent of the working-age population by 2048. Auckland contributes 38 percent of New Zealand's gross domestic product and its per-capita GDP is 15 percent higher than the rest of the country's. Its most productive area, the central business district, enjoys a 40 percent productivity premium over the national average. To economists, these numbers represent the "agglomeration benefits" research shows primate cities generate. It is the economic effect of combining businesses, talent and infrastructure. Yet New Zealand systematically underinvests in the very place generating this outsized economic contribution. Auckland's infrastructure deficit follows a predictable pattern. The City Rail Link, while progressing, has grown from an initial budget of NZ$2-3 billion to $5.5 billion, with opening delayed until 2026 . Light rail was cancelled entirely after years of planning. A second harbour crossing has been studied for decades without a shovel hitting dirt. Each represents billions in opportunity costs while congestion worsens. This goes well beyond project mismanagement. It is a deep structural problem. The Infrastructure Commission-Te Waihanga identifies a $210 billion national infrastructure shortfall, with Auckland bearing a disproportionate burden despite generating a disproportionately high level of revenue. International research by the OECD shows successful countries treat metropolitan regions as engines of national growth, not a burden. Public policy expert Ian Shirley called it the "Wellington Problem" : the way Auckland's governance became an obsession for politicians and bureaucrats based in Wellington. The tension dates to 1865 when the capital was moved from Auckland to Wellington , establishing a pattern where political power was deliberately separated from economic power. Auckland loses an estimated $415.35 million annually in GST collected on rates . This goes to Wellington and into government revenue rather than being reinvested locally. Central government properties in Auckland, worth $36.3 million in rates, are exempt from payment while still using Auckland's infrastructure. When Auckland speaks with "one voice" through its unified council, Wellington responds with legislative overrides. The recent National Land Transport Programme, for example, cut Auckland's transport funding by $564 million . Mayor Wayne Brown said the government's transport policy "makes zero sense for Auckland". The contrast with international approaches reveals just how counterproductive New Zealand's approach has been. London has an integrated Transport for London authority with congestion charging powers, generating £136 million annually for reinvestment. Paris is investing more than €35 billion in the Grand Paris Express transit project. Japan's "Quality Infrastructure Investment" principles include ¥13.2 trillion in regional infrastructure investment. Australia's A$120 billion infrastructure programme explicitly recognises its largest cities contribute more than 50 percent of GDP and require proportional investment. Research has shown excessive urban concentration in one country can create problems . But denying the primate city resources only leads to a "deterioration in the quality of life" that drags down the entire national economy. The solution lies in making strategic investments that maximise the benefits of agglomeration while managing any negative costs to the national economy. Auckland isn't a problem to be managed, it is an asset to be leveraged. Every successful developed economy has learned this lesson. Paris generates 31 percent of France's GDP and gets treated accordingly. Seoul produces 23 percent of South Korea's output and receives massive infrastructure investment. Tokyo drives Japan's economy. The international evidence is unambiguous: countries that strategically invest in their primate cities achieve higher productivity growth and maintain competitive advantages. Auckland doesn't need sympathy or special treatment. It needs what every primate city in every successful economy gets: infrastructure investment proportional to its economic contribution, governance structures that reflect its scale, and political leadership that understands agglomeration economics. The question isn't whether Auckland is too big. The question is whether New Zealand is big enough to nurture its primate city. * Timothy Welch is a senior lecturer in urban planning, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau This article was first published by [ The Conversation].
NZ Herald
6 days ago
- NZ Herald
Deloitte Fast 50 celebrates 25 years: Meet the alumni breaking barriers
For many, placing on the Deloitte Fast 50 index is a personal goal that symbolises success. White agrees, citing a Fast 50 award in the office of a business mentor that 'planted a seed'. 'For New Zealand business owners and entrepreneurs, the Fast 50 was this very special thing that really recognises excellence in business in New Zealand. For many years, I followed the Fast 50 and it was an aspirational thing to hope to win one day.' Since the win, White says Legend Story Studios has significantly grown in more ways than one. 'I think around 2022 we were approaching 20 staff, and now we're at 70. We've moved to a state-of-the-art, brand-new studio in Newmarket that we custom-designed and houses our growing team. 'In terms of global reputation and presence, we've really established ourselves as being the number one independent trading card game studio in the world. Our peers in the market are companies with $US15 billion market caps. We're the one independent studio that's taking the fight to these big guys and doing really well.' When asked if the business's strategy has changed since 2022, White responds, 'For us, it's always been about creating a brand and business that is sustainable and will stand the test of time. Our industry has a 98% failure rate so it can be very cruel and unforgiving.' Night 'n Day general manager Matthew Lane also recognises the importance of sustainable growth. 'While we're always looking for growth, one thing we do focus on is quality of growth versus just quantity, so it creates a sustainable platform to move forward,' says Lane. Night 'n Day was a regular feature of the Deloitte Fast 50 index between 2012 and 2019. Photo / Peter McIntosh, file Night 'n Day, an award-winning retail convenience network with over 50 stores across the country, was a regular feature of the Deloitte Fast 50 index between 2012 and 2019, placing fourth in 2012 with a growth percentage of 952%. When asked about the pressures of scaling up, especially at speed, Lane comments, 'It was tough and it burst us to the seams in every aspect of our business - from an operational sense, from a financial sense, from an accounting and payroll sense. 'Scaling up highlights any shortcomings in the business when you accelerate growth like that. And if you don't have the right platform, it can set you back a bit, but it has also enabled us to see where we needed to have better scalability to continue growth moving forward,' he continues. Lane understands firsthand the work that goes into creating and maintaining the growth that fuels a thriving business. Lane notes, 'Growth at a high level doesn't necessarily reflect the effort that goes in to get to that point, nor the effort to maintain it. For any business that has hit the Fast 50 index, it likely hasn't been smooth sailing.' In line with its Fast 50 results, Night 'n Day has continued its growth trajectory. 'If we're talking footprint, we've increased by about 10 to 15% in terms of number of stores, but, excitingly, we've seen an acceleration of growth within those stores. I'm proud to watch them go from strength to strength,' says Lane. Entries for the Deloitte Fast 50 2025 programme are now open, inviting the business makers of tomorrow to take their place in the Deloitte Fast 50 hall of fame. More information about this year's programme, including entry criteria, entry forms and key dates, can be found at
