Trump gives Saudi Arabia cause to pause joining BRICS
Saudi Minister of Economy and Planning Faisal Al-Ibrahim told the World Economic Forum during last month's Davos Summit, 'We've been invited to the BRICS, similar to how we've been invited to many other multilateral platforms in the past historically. We assess many different aspects of it before a decision is made and right now, we are in the middle of that.'
Saudi Arabia has good reason to delay on formally joining BRICS.
It was posited here in January 2024 when the country first revealed that it hadn't yet accepted the group's official membership invitation, saying this 'is due to Western perceptions about this association, Iran's involvement in the Red Sea Crisis, and Israeli-US pressure,' which still holds true.
Regarding the first, Saudi Arabia would arguably feel uncomfortable with its name and national brand being included in the plethora of agenda-driven promotional materials misportraying BRICS as an anti-Western alliance.
The Kingdom used to be solidly in the Western camp but has taken a page from India's book in recent years by multi-aligning between them and what Russia now calls the 'World Majority.'
This grand strategic recalibration is due to Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed Bin Salman (MBS), whose character and vision were praised by Russian President Vladimir Putin in late 2022, which was analyzed here at the time. MBS understandably doesn't want to fuel the false perception that he's pivoting away from the West.
The second reason about Iran's involvement in the Red Sea Crisis is also still relevant since Saudi Arabia doesn't want to formally join an organization in which its historic rival is also a member amidst the latest support that the latter has given to the Kingdom's Houthi enemies.
Moreover, Iran also supports Hamas, whose sneak attack on October 7, 2023 abruptly delayed work on the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), which was supposed to make Saudi Arabia a key node in Euro-Asian trade.
The final reason builds upon the aforementioned and includes joint pressure from its fellow Israeli-American IMEC investors who didn't want Saudi Arabia joining a group within which Iran is also now a member as the West Asian Wars between Israel and the Iranian-led Resistance Axis were raging.
Even though the two main ones in Gaza and Lebanon have since officially ended, neither would look approvingly upon Saudi Arabia formally joining BRICS, which could endanger its ties with both.
MBS wants to revive IMEC as soon as possible since it's expected to function as an integral part of his 'Vision 2030' grand strategic plan (the end date of which will likely be pushed back due to all that's happened since its announcement in 2016) to revolutionize his country's socio-economic systems.
That's not possible without a large degree of US involvement and Israel's cooperation, the latter of which requires formal Saudi recognition of the Jewish State, possibly explaining Bibi's concessions on Gaza.
Openly defying them by formally joining the same group within which their shared Iranian nemesis is already a member, and doing so right after Trump returns to power amidst reports that he'll reimpose his 'maximum pressure' policy against the Islamic Republic, could lead to both abandoning IMEC.
The US and Israel offer Saudi Arabia tangible economic and financial benefits whereas BRICS has yet to provide its members with any whatsoever at all as explained here after the latest Kazan Summit.
Additionally, Trump is under the false impression (subsequently debunked by Indian Minister of External Affairs Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar) that BRICS is focused on de-dollarizing and wants to create a new currency to rival the dollar, so he'd predictably overreact if Saudi Arabia decides to formally join now.
That could scuttle MBS' ambitious IMEC plans, which are one of the centerpieces of his 'Vision 2030' grand strategic plan, so he's loath to risk such consequences in exchange for literally nothing at all from BRICS.
It, therefore, makes perfect sense why Saudi Arabia is dilly-dallying on formally joining BRICS since it presently enjoys all the knowledge-sharing and elite-networking benefits brought about through its partial participation without any of the political or economic risks inherent in being a full member.
MBS can, therefore, maintain his Kingdom's careful multi-alignment between the West (which includes Israel in this formulation) and the 'World Majority' by indefinitely delaying a decision on this either way.
This article was first published on Andrew Korybko's Substack and is republished with kind permission. Become an Andrew Korybko Newsletter subscriber here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Convoy sets off for Gaza from North Africa to protest against Israel's blockade
A convoy of buses and private cars departed for Gaza from Tunisia's capital on Monday as part of efforts to spotlight Israel's blockade on humanitarian aid to the territory, even as Israeli authorities stopped a high-profile flotilla from landing there. Advertisement The overland effort – organised independently but moved up to coincide with the flotilla – is made up of activists, lawyers and medical professionals from North Africa. It plans to cross Tunisia, Libya and Egypt before reaching Rafah, the border crossing with Egypt that has remained largely closed since Israel's military took control of the Gaza side in May 2024. The Tunisian civil society groups behind the convoy said their aim is to demand 'the immediate lifting of the unjust siege on the strip'. They asserted that Arab governments have not pushed enough to end the 20-month war between Israel and Hamas. After a two-and-a-half-month blockade of Gaza aimed at pressuring Hamas, Israel started allowing in some basic aid last month. Experts, however, have warned of famine in the territory of more than 2 million people unless the blockade is lifted and Israel ends its military offensive. Advertisement
Asia Times
9 hours ago
- Asia Times
Taiwan's de-sinicization drive as geostrategic leverage
In an era where US-China tensions run high but full decoupling is unfeasible, Washington must seek new low-cost diplomatic tools. One such tool may lie in an unexpected domain: Taiwan's internal cultural policies. Specifically, the island's ongoing de-sinicization campaign—while locally motivated—has inadvertently become a geopolitical irritant, escalating Beijing's threat perception. This article proposes that the US quietly explore the recalibration of Taiwan's de-Sinicization policies as a symbolic, non-security concession in broader negotiations with Beijing. Such a move could provide a controlled way to reduce tensions while preserving America's core commitments to Taiwan's security and democracy. Since the early 2000s, Taiwan has taken deliberate steps to shift its cultural identity away from China. Curriculum changes, altered national symbols, and linguistic prioritization form part of a longer campaign to assert a distinct Taiwanese identity. While understandable domestically, these measures have consistently provoked sharp reactions from Beijing, feeding its narrative of Taiwan's irreversible drift toward independence. For the United States, de-Sinicization poses a strategic paradox. On the one hand, it reflects democratic agency. On the other, it may undercut regional stability by giving Beijing a perceived justification to escalate. Importantly, Taiwan's cultural trajectory does not directly impact US national security priorities such as freedom of navigation, semiconductor supply chains or military deterrence. Therefore, Washington could — discreetly — signal to Taipei that a soft pause or reframing of the de-Sinicization drive could serve broader strategic goals. This could manifest as a period of 'consolidation' rather than reversal, buying time to focus on national resilience, defense and external alignment. Such a move would not require a formal public endorsement. Instead, it could surface through Track II dialogues, think tank publications or behind-the-scenes diplomatic conversations. Allies like Japan or South Korea could reinforce this approach by advocating for cultural moderation as a path to regional confidence-building. This approach offers several advantages. It provides the US a symbolic concession to offer in potential high-level US-China discussions without undermining core deterrence postures. It demonstrates to Beijing that the US-Taiwan relationship is not driven by ideological maximalism. And it reinforces Washington's image as a responsible power seeking balance, not confrontation, in the Indo-Pacific. Public emotion variable While most Western observers tend to focus on the Chinese government's calculated use of nationalism, what is often overlooked is that the Chinese state itself is restrained by popular nationalist sentiment, especially on issues like Taiwan. On matters of cultural sovereignty and national unity, it is often the Chinese public—not the leadership—that demands hardline responses. This dynamic creates a powerful incentive for Beijing to avoid appearing 'weak' in the face of perceived provocations, even when the government itself may prefer strategic patience. In this context, Taiwan's highly visible cultural distancing from China—through language reforms, educational shifts, and symbolic removals—acts as a flashpoint that fuels public anger more than elite strategic concern. Therefore, if Taiwan were to partially moderate or reframe its de-Sinicization policies—emphasizing cultural heritage, continuity or mutual historical roots—it could significantly lower emotional hostility among the Chinese populace. Such a change would reduce the pressure on Beijing to escalate or retaliate and empower more flexible policy responses. For Washington, this presents a critical window: by encouraging symbolic de-escalation in the cultural sphere, the US can indirectly calm Chinese domestic sentiment, giving the central leadership more room to maneuver diplomatically without being seen as capitulating. In short, strategic signaling toward Beijing doesn't only happen through naval deployments or economic tools—it can also take shape in how narratives of culture and identity are modulated. By understanding and leveraging the emotional logic of Chinese public nationalism, Washington may gain more influence in managing the Taiwan issue than through deterrence alone. L. Y. Chu is a retired engineer and independent analyst focused on cross-strait relations, US-China strategy and the role of cultural signaling in geopolitical competition.
RTHK
17 hours ago
- RTHK
Israeli military board Thunberg's Gaza-bound ship
Israeli military board Thunberg's Gaza-bound ship Activist Greta Thunberg and crew stand aboard the aid ship Madleen, which left the Italian port of Catania on June 1. File photo: Reuters The Freedom Flotilla Coalition said early on Monday that the Israeli military had "boarded" the Gaza-bound charity ship the Madleen. Connections have been lost on the ship, the coalition added in a post on Telegram. Earlier, the Israeli foreign ministry said its navy was communicating with the Madleen, instructing it to change its course as it approached a restricted area. The ministry referred to the ship as "selfie yacht" in a post on X. Before the Coalition lost contact with its vessel, it said quadcopters were surrounding the Madleen and spraying it with a 'white irritant substance'. Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz told the military on Sunday to stop the charity boat, which is carrying activists - including Sweden's Greta Thunberg - planning to defy an Israeli blockade and reach Gaza. The British-flagged Madleen yacht set sail from Sicily on June 6. "I instructed the IDF to act so that the Madleen... does not reach Gaza," Katz said in a statement. "To the antisemitic Greta and her Hamas-propaganda-spouting friends, I say clearly: You'd better turn back, because you will not reach Gaza." Climate activist Thunberg said she joined the Madleen crew to "challenge Israel's illegal siege and escalating war crimes" in Gaza and highlight the urgent need for humanitarian aid. She has rejected previous Israeli accusations of antisemitism. Israel went to war with Hamas in October 2023 after the Islamist militants launched a surprise attack on southern Israel, killing more 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages back to the enclave, according to Israeli tallies. More than 54,000 Palestinians have died during the ongoing Israeli assault, according to Gaza health authorities, with much of the Palestinian territory reduced to rubble. The United Nations has warned that most of Gaza's 2.3 million population is at risk of famine. Katz said the blockade was essential to Israel's national security as it seeks to eliminate Hamas. Besides Thunberg, there are 11 other crew members aboard, including Rima Hassan, a French member of the European Parliament. (Reuters)
