No More Digging for the Latest XRP News: All-in-One Source Is Finally Here
Staying informed with the latest XRP news today is everything. That's especially true for XRP – one of the most followed and hotly debated tokens in the digital asset space. Between market developments, legal battles, partnerships, and new listings, Ripple-related news can change direction within hours. But with so many sources and mixed signals, how can investors and enthusiasts reliably track what matters?
The answer lies in simplifying the noise.
Instead of jumping from site to site, monitoring X threads or filtering through Reddit speculations, there's now a dedicated place where XRP followers can find a real-time stream of reliable news, gathered from the most trusted crypto publications.
All the latest XRP insights, in one place
This new platform was built with one goal: deliver only the most relevant XRP headlines, as soon as they go live.
Pulling directly from top-tier sources like Cointelegraph, CoinDesk, Crypto.news, and Coinpaper.com, the site aggregates stories as they're published ensuring you're always one step ahead. Whether it's a price analysis, an update from the SEC case, or Ripple's newest partnership in Asia, it's covered.
And it's more than just a news feed. The platform is curated to surface content that XRP investors actually care about, with no clickbait, fluff, or off-topic noise.
Discover it for yourself.
Designed for XRP holders, traders, and researchers
Whether you're an investor, a journalist, or simply someone who believes in the future of Ripple, this resource is built for you. There's no need to create an account, download an app, or set up filters—it just works. Clean interface, fast updates, and a singular focus: XRP.
You can check it out here: xrptoday.news
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Engadget
an hour ago
- Engadget
The Switch 2's best feature is its satisfying Joy-Con 2 "thunk"
The first thing you do after tearing open the Switch 2's box is snap its Joy-Con 2 controllers to the sides of the console. But unlike the Switch 1, which used flimsy rails to connect its controllers, the Switch 2's Joy-Con rely on magnets. That leads to a visceral "thunk" whenever you snap them on — it's as if they leap out of your hands and right onto the Switch, ready for some Mario Kart World action. And every time it happens, I can't help but smile. Even before you turn on the Switch 2, it's clear that Nintendo recognized one of the biggest issues of the original Switch: Those Joy-Con rails stunk. They didn't hold the controllers in place well, and they wore down over time, which could lead to Joy-Cons slipping out mid-gameplay. In my case, one bad drop just two weeks into owning the original Switch made one of my Joy-Con gamepads loose for the system's lifetime. The only fix was replacing the controller's locking buckle, or buying a new an entirely new Joy-Con set for $80. So, at the very least, it feels nice to have a new Switch console where the controllers feel sturdy. With the Joy-Con 2 attached, the Switch 2 feels almost as solid as the Switch Lite, which doesn't have removable controllers. To put it another way, the Joy-Con 2's "thunk" is like the satisfying sound of a luxury car door being slammed shut rather than the sound of a cheap economy car closing. The "thunk" means security. The "thunk" means quality. To view this content, you'll need to update your privacy settings. Please click here and view the "Content and social-media partners" setting to do so. We still don't know if the Joy-Con 2 are completely free of the dreaded drifting problem that plagued the original controllers. One Reddit user claimed their launch system arrived with drifting controllers, and Redditor moshi_yo tore their controller apart and noticed that it uses the same joystick mechanism. But Nintendo producer Kouichi Kawamoto said in an interview that the company "redesigned everything from scratch." They added, "Compared to the Joy-Con controllers for Switch, the control sticks are larger and more durable, with smoother movement." Less immediately noticeable than the Joy-Con 2 "thunk" is the Switch 2's wider kickstand, which I quickly learned to appreciate. That's something Nintendo brought over from the Switch OLED model, but it's still useful this time around. As I was playing Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour , the kickstand easily let me balance the system on my lap in tablet mode while using the Joy-Con 2 to mouse around on my leg. Is that an ideal setup? No. But it's certainly functional in a pinch. While the Switch 2 overall feels like a major refinement of the original, with its larger screen, dramatically faster hardware and more usable eShop, new issues have cropped up for Nintendo. The console's reliance on expensive microSD Express cards will make it tough for players to deal with increasingly large games, and similarly developers seem to be balking at actually putting games on physical carts. Instead, many titles are taking advantage of Nintendo's Game-Key Cards, which unlock digital versions of titles and can be resold like a physical used game. Unlike full-fledged carts, though, those Game-Key Cards won't work down the line when Nintendo eventually moves on from the Switch 2 and shuts down its eShop.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US issues new Iran-related sanctions, Treasury website shows
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The United States has issued a new round of Iran-related sanctions targeting 10 individuals and 27 entities, according to a post on the U.S. Department of Treasury website on Friday. The sanctions, which also target some entities in the United Arab Emirates and Hong Kong, come as U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is working to get a new nuclear deal with Tehran.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
X Reforms API Pricing as It Seeks More Revenue Options
This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. Given the rising value of data sources, this could be a smart move from X. Or a disastrous one, depending on the specifics of its implementation. According to reports, X has started informing its top-tier Enterprise API subscribers that it will soon shift away from an access pricing model, to a revenue share one instead, which will see X take a percentage of any money made by projects that utilize its data. As reported by Mashable: 'X recently began sending out emails to paid subscribers of its Enterprise API plans, which start at $42,000 per month, informing them of the upcoming change. The new API pricing scheme is scheduled to go into effect on July 1. X has not yet shared final details about the change, such as exactly what percentage the revenue share model will be, with its customers.' So instead of these users paying $42k per month for access to all of X's posts (Enterprise API has no post access limits), X will presumably determine a percentage share of what X contributes to any relative business offerings or systems, which will see X glean direct revenue from expanded use of its content. Which could be more profitable for X, particularly in cases like LLM development, and AI projects that are accessing X posts to feed their tools. In order to create an effective AI system, you need data input, and a lot of it, so you can ensure that your system is able to understand how people talk and pose different queries, while also providing relevant, timely answers. The value of X in this regard is that it's the home of real-time discussion, so X data can provide relevant, time-sensitive responses, in an always-on feed. X data is also valuable for market research, and tracking stock market movements. When news breaks on X, that often, eventually, leads to market shifts, and staying on top of this can give analysts an advantage in respective trading. How X might value such contribution is another question, as it could be difficult to suggest that X-sourced knowledge led to a relative increase in revenue intake. But the change here seems more pointed towards AI projects, and ensuring that X keeps getting paid for the use of its data, if such initiatives do choose to use X posts as their input. And really, there's not a heap of better options on this front. Meta's data is locked down, and hidden behind various privacy settings, LinkedIn data is also restricted, while TikTok and Pinterest are more visually focused, making them less valuable in this respect (both of their API tools are also aligned with usage insights, not content). Reddit is probably the best comparison, and Reddit has also reformed its API pricing to ensure that it's maximizing benefit from expanded AI developer interest. So X may be one of the best sources for conversational, topical data to inform AI models. Though, strangely, at the same time, X has also updated its Developer Agreement documentation to seemingly stop external projects from using its data to train AI models either way. As reported by TechCrunch: 'In an update on Wednesday, the company added a line under 'Reverse Engineering and other Restrictions,' a subsection of restrictions on use: 'You shall not and you shall not attempt to (or allow others to) […] use the X API or X Content to fine-tune or train a foundation or frontier model,' it reads.' So it wouldn't benefit from AI projects using its API anyway? I don't know, the revenue share model seems geared towards exactly this type of project, but X is also looking to stop people from doing just that. Which means it's seeking to take revenue from other uses, like the stock analytics use case. Which, again, will be much harder to put a value on, in terms of data use. Yeah, it's slightly confusing, and I would ask X's comms department to clarify, if it had one. But essentially, X is looking for alternative ways to make more money from its data, which, depending on its demanded percentage intake, could see some Enterprise API users cut off their X data feed. Recommended Reading xAI Acquires X in a Deal That Secures the App's Immediate Future
