logo
Early in-person, mail-in voting deadlines approach before Tuesday's Election Day

Early in-person, mail-in voting deadlines approach before Tuesday's Election Day

Yahoo02-05-2025

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — This weekend marks the last time voters in Ohio can cast their ballot early before Tuesday's primary and special election.
Ohioans have a couple more chances — Saturday from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. and Sunday from 1 to 5 p.m. — to take part in early in-person voting at their county boards of elections before the May 6 election.
Voters casting a ballot will be deciding various primaries, countywide races and municipal issues, from city council seats to property taxes and library funding. Each ballot will also feature the statewide Issue 2, which would allow Ohio to give out up to $250 million in bonds annually to fund local infrastructure projects, like building roads, bridges, water supply systems and more.
House Bill 6's repeal, Delta-8 THC among bills moving through Ohio Statehouse
Ohio school districts are hoping to find success at the ballot, when voters decide the fate of several school bon issues or levies. Columbus City Schools is facing a packed race of 10 school board candidates hoping to advance in Tuesday's primary.
Those who requested and completed an absentee ballot must ensure their ballot is postmarked by the day before the election, on Monday. Voters can also return their absentee ballot in person to their county board of elections before the polls close at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday.
Ohio requires in-person voters to have a form of photo identification in order to vote. That includes an Ohio driver's license, an Ohio ID card, a U.S. passport or passport card, a U.S. military ID, a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs ID, or an Ohio National Guard ID.
All identification must have an expiration date that has not passed, a photograph of the voter, and the voter's name, which must substantially conform to the voter's name as it appears in the poll list. An unexpired Ohio driver's license, Ohio ID card, or interim documentation with your former address is an acceptable form of ID when your current address is in the pollbook.
Ohio lawmakers revive Statehouse bill to restrict drag queen shows
If voters do not have any of the above forms of identification, they may cast a provisional ballot. However, for that ballot to be counted, voters must return to the board of elections no later than four days after Election Day to provide a qualifying form of identification.
There are many resources on the Secretary of State's website that will make your trip to the polls easier:
View your sample ballot here.
Find your May 6 polling location here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal vs. state power at issue in a hearing over Trump's election overhaul executive order
Federal vs. state power at issue in a hearing over Trump's election overhaul executive order

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Federal vs. state power at issue in a hearing over Trump's election overhaul executive order

BOSTON (AP) — Democratic state attorneys general on Friday will seek to block President Donald Trump's proposal for a sweeping overhaul of U.S. elections in a case that tests a constitutional bedrock — the separation of powers. The top law enforcement officials from 19 states filed a federal lawsuit after the Republican president signed the executive order in March, arguing that its provisions would step on states' power to set their own election rules and that the executive branch had no such authority. In a filing supporting that argument, a bipartisan group of former secretaries of state said Trump's directive would upend the system established by the Constitution's Elections Clause, which gives states and Congress control over how elections are run. They said the order seeks to 'unilaterally coronate the President as the country's chief election policymaker and administrator.' If the court does not halt the order, they argued, 'the snowball of executive overreach will grow swiftly and exponentially." Trump's election directive was part of a flurry of executive orders he has issued in the opening months of his second term, many of which have drawn swift legal challenges. It follows years of him falsely claiming that his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election was due to widespread fraud and an election year in which he and other Republicans promoted the notion that large numbers of noncitizens threatened the integrity of U.S. elections. In fact, voting by noncitizens is rare and, when caught, can lead to felony charges and deportation. Trump's executive order would require voters to show proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections, prohibit mail or absentee ballots from being counted if they are received after Election Day, set new rules for voting equipment and prohibit non-U.S. citizens from being able to donate in certain elections. It also would condition federal election grant funding on states adhering to the strict ballot deadline. The hearing Friday in U.S. District Court in Boston comes in one of three lawsuits filed against the executive order. One is from Oregon and Washington, where elections are conducted almost entirely by mail and ballots received after Election Day are counted as long as they are postmarked by then. The provision that would create a proof-of-citizenship requirement for federal elections already has been halted in a lawsuit filed by voting and civil rights groups and national Democratic organizations. In that case, filed in federal court in the District of Columbia, the judge said the president's attempt to use a federal agency to enact a proof-of-citizenship requirement for voting usurped the power of states and Congress, which at the time was considering legislation that would do just that. That bill, called the SAVE Act, passed the U.S. House but faces an uncertain future in the Senate. Trump's executive order said its intent was to ensure 'free, fair and honest elections unmarred by fraud, errors, or suspicion.' The Justice Department, in arguing against the motion by the attorneys general for a preliminary injunction, said the president is within his rights to direct agencies to carry out federal voting laws. The order tasks the U.S. Election Assistance Commission with updating the federal voter registration form to require people to submit documentation proving they are U.S. citizens. Similar provisions enacted previously in a handful of states have raised concerns about disenfranchising otherwise eligible voters who can't readily access those documents. That includes married women, who would need both a birth certificate and a marriage license if they had changed their last name. A state proof-of-citizenship law enacted in Kansas more than a decade ago blocked the registrations of 31,000 people later found to be eligible to vote. The two sides will argue over whether the president has the authority to direct the election commission, which was created by Congress as an independent agency after the Florida ballot debacle during the 2000 presidential election. In its filing, the Justice Department said Trump's executive order falls within his authority to direct officials 'to carry out their statutory duties,' adding that 'the only potential voters it disenfranchises are noncitizens who are ineligible to vote anyway.'

Texas bill creating more weekend early voting could boost turnout, but delay election results
Texas bill creating more weekend early voting could boost turnout, but delay election results

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Texas bill creating more weekend early voting could boost turnout, but delay election results

This coverage is made possible through Votebeat, a nonpartisan news organization covering local election administration and voting access. Sign up for Votebeat Texas' free newsletters here. Texans will have a new schedule for early voting in coming years under new legislation that starts the voting period later but slides it right up to Election Day, eliminating the three-day break in between. Experts say Senate Bill 2753, which lawmakers approved this week, will likely boost turnout, as it includes more time for voting on weekends. The author of the bill, Sen. Bob Hall, R-Edgewood, told Votebeat that the change also 'simplifies the process' and would reduce the cost of election operations and equipment. But local election officials said they aren't so sure of that, and are still determining how it will work and what it could cost counties. The bill doesn't allocate any funding for counties to implement the changes. And there's one notable side effect of taking away the gap after the early-voting period: Partial vote tallies from the early ballots, which are typically released shortly after polls close on Election Day, won't be available until later, election administrators said. The bill is headed to Gov. Greg Abbott's desk for his signature, though it can become law without it. The changes have to go into effect no later than August 2027. Some election officials warned that they are likely to need additional election workers to work longer hours to comply with the requirements, as well as more voting equipment and possibly additional polling locations. 'These are just things that we don't know yet because we haven't run an election in this model yet,' said Jennifer Doinoff, Hays County elections administrator and the legislative committee chair for the Texas Association of County Election Officials. 'It's something we're going to have to look at and build from the ground up.' It's not yet clear when counties would begin implementing the changes. The bill directs the Texas secretary of state to adopt rules and procedures to implement the new timeline and provide a report telling the Texas Legislature 'as soon as practicable' after Sept. 1 that the agency 'has consulted with county election officials and is confident that the counties in this state are prepared." Also, the Legislature could make changes based on the secretary of state's report because there is a full regular legislative session in 2027 before SB 2753's new early voting timeline has to be used. Currently, during general elections that have county and state offices on the ballot, Texas offers 12 days of early voting, starting the 17th day before Election Day and ending four days before Election Day. This allows for only a single weekend of voting. The new law would also require 12 days of early voting, but the period would begin on a Thursday and run for 12 days straight, including two weekends, right up to Election Day. In addition, Sunday voting hours would be extended from six to nine hours a day, and early voting would also be available on any holidays during that period. While the number of days doesn't change, election officials said the new schedule will eliminate a treasured break for workers before Election Day, and they worry they'll lose workers without it. Some officials also said it can be hard to find people to work Sundays. In Collin County, the early-voting staffers typically also work on Election Day, said Kaleb Breaux, the county's elections administrator. 'It's a laborious process for them, just mentally and physically,' Breaux said. 'By the time they get to that last week of early voting, they're just worn out.' Election offices also used the break to set up equipment for Election Day voting, which uses a different set of machines. Election officials will have to work out whether and how to pay poll workers for any overtime. The bill didn't allocate any funds for counties to pay poll workers. Hall, the bill author, played down the concerns about staffing, and said he expects some workers would prefer to work on the weekend. 'It's a matter of organization and management,' he said. Hall said he doesn't anticipate new personnel costs since the total number of days the polls will be open won't change. The bill will also require changes to the way election officials allocate their space and equipment. It will require any location used as an early-voting polling place to also be used as an Election Day polling place, a new mandate. But in some counties, finding and leasing facilities is difficult. 'We'll have to completely reconfigure early voting,' Trudy Hancock, the Brazos County elections administrator said. Election officials are also anticipating changes in the timeline for posting election results on Election Day. Early-voting ballots will have to be tabulated at the same time as Election Day ballots, and the extra volume will add to the time needed to complete the security and paperwork steps required after polls close. So tallies from each polling place could take longer to come in, Breaux said. Hall said he doesn't expect the timeline for full election results to change very much. The partial results that may be delayed 'serve absolutely no purpose in the election process other than to give people a piece of information as quickly as possible,' he said. 'I expect they'll be able to get the total votes not much later if the counties handle it right,' he said. The schedule change aligns Texas more closely with 22 other states that have a single voting period that runs right up to Election Day, including Arkansas, Missouri, Colorado, Indiana, California and Illinois, according to the Voting Rights Lab. Hall told Votebeat he didn't model the bill after any specific state. In some of those states, making voting accessible the day before Election Day has helped increase voter turnout, said Daniel Griffith, senior policy director at Secure Democracy Foundation. 'That Monday just right before Election Day, that's when a lot of folks are really thinking about the election,' Griffith said. 'The later you kind of push that last early voting day, the more participation you get.' Colorado, which is primarily a vote-by-mail state, implemented a single voting period over a decade ago and it has worked smoothly. For in-person voting, the entire state uses a countywide voting model, where people can vote at any polling location in their county — for the entire voting period. That means election officials have fewer polling locations to staff. Fewer than half of Texas' 254 counties use the countywide model. In the rest, voters have to cast their ballot at their assigned precinct, which typically requires more polling locations on Election Day. The number of early-voting sites varies from county to county, and not all of them use the same sites on Election Day. Texas counties will need funds and resources to implement the changes in the bill, said Jennifer Morrell, CEO and co-founder of The Elections Group, an election administration consulting firm. Colorado reimburses local jurisdictions when there are state or federal candidates on the ballot, Morrell said, and adjusts the amount for changes in poll worker pay and other costs. Texas will need to do the same, she said. 'Costs go up: paper, ink, equipment,' Morrell said. 'You can't just make stuff up and then expect a local jurisdiction to just do it without additional funding. And even if election officials get creative, they can't maintain it for long.' Natalia Contreras is a reporter for Votebeat in partnership with the Texas Tribune. She's based in Corpus Christi. Contact Natalia at ncontreras@ Disclosure: Secure Democracy and Texas Secretary of State have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer. Get tickets. TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

New Columbus drone manufacturer providing weapons for Ukraine
New Columbus drone manufacturer providing weapons for Ukraine

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New Columbus drone manufacturer providing weapons for Ukraine

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – Military analysts are still studying Operation Spider Web, the unprecedented weekend assault on Russia's nuclear-capable, long-range bombers. More than 100 Ukrainian drones struck air bases deep inside Russia, with explosions reported in five separate regions. The operation was said to be in the planning stages for 18 months, and a new Columbus defense contractor might have been part of that plan. Unsolved Ohio: Who killed Amy Jo Nelson? Family wants answers in 2017 homicide Anduril is building its newest manufacturing facility near Rickenbacker air base, but its vice president for strategy said it is already supplying autonomous weapons — including drones — to the United States and its allies, including Ukraine. 'I think the biggest lesson to take away from Ukraine is not just what they can do, but what's needed, the timelines on which they are needed that very much animates what we're building here in Columbus, Ohio, at our Arsenal One campus,' Anduril Senior Vice President of Strategy Zachary Mears said. And what a campus it will be; five million square feet of manufacturing space that will eventually employ 4,000 people. Anduril is the nation's newest defense contractor and it is changing the landscape for the military-industrial complex. 'Central Ohio is going to be vital to the future of what we do,' Mears said. 'Many of the products that we've designed and built are literally going to be made here over the next many decades.' After faculty overwhelmingly voted to unionize, Ohio University is suing them again Unlike other defense suppliers who come up with a proposed weapon and ask the Pentagon to pay for research, development and production, Anduril uses its own capital to design and build high-tech software and weapons that are ready for market. 'Well, we, we very much ascribe to the view that we're providing capabilities to defend the West,' Mears said. And to defend America's allies around the world with a never-before-seen business model. 'We think competition within the industrial base is overdue, and our model, our way of producing product, our way of investing in that product, is different than your traditional defense prime, and they need that healthy, healthy dose of competition,' Mears said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store