
Indian town mourns young twins killed in Pakistani shelling
POONCH: The death of 12-year-old twins who were killed in a Pakistani strike as they fled the town of Poonch in India-held Kashmir has helped unite a community in shock.
Zian Khan and his sister Urwa Fatima were hit by an artillery shell on Wednesday as their parents tried to leave the town that has come under repeated attack.
The latest clashes are the worst in decades between the nuclear-armed foes and have killed more than 60 civilians on both sides.
Both sides confirmed on Saturday a full and immediate ceasefire that was surprisingly announced first by US President Donald Trump.
The twins' mother, Urusa Khan, 30, survived the attack with minor wounds.
Their 46-year-old father, Rameez Khan, is in hospital with life-threatening injuries, unaware that his children are no longer alive.
'None of us have ever experienced such a direct targeting of our town or civilian areas in our lifetime,' Sarfaraz Mir, 40, a cousin of the dead twins told AFP.
'No one thought it could happen, but it feels like civilians and the town are being specifically targeted,' he said. 'People are really afraid now.'
At least 12 people have been killed and 49 others injured since shelling intensified in Poonch, about 145 miles (230 kilometres) from Jammu, the second largest city in Indian-administered Kashmir.
Only a few thousand residents remain in Poonch, which was home to around 60,000 people.
Most of the residents fled on Wednesday evening in cars, buses and even on foot, hours after the unprecedented overnight shelling started.
'We regret that decision'
As the twins' family hurriedly tried to leave their home on Wednesday, their mother briefly went back inside to pick up something she had forgotten.
'At that very instant a shell exploded in the narrow lane outside their residence,' Mir said.
Urwa died instantly and her brother in hospital later.
'The people only got to the father later... and (he) is still in a critical condition,' he added.
The family had moved from a village to Poonch to be near the dead twins' school.
'We regret that decision,' Fiaz Diwan, 30, a family friend and former neighbour in the village of Chaktroo told AFP.
'The news of their death was shocking, unbelievable,' Diwan said. 'They may still have been alive if not for the parents' desire to give them the best education and future.'
'Nerves of steel'
The twins' death has united disparate communities grappling with loss and destruction in Poonch.
Mir said that many had suffered including 'a child whose head was cut off, a victim from the local Sikh minority -- but twins are hard to forget'.
Poonch 'is a bouquet of communities -- Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims -- happily living together, and it feels like an attempt to target that,' he said.
A Sikh and a Hindu temple complex were damaged in the shelling.
Indian foreign secretary Vikram Misri on Friday raised the twins' deaths and accused Pakistan of 'targeting and shelling places of worship with a particular design'.
'This includes Gurdwaras (Sikh temples), these convents, and (Hindu) temples. This is a new low, even for Pakistan.'
The latest clashes follow an attack last month in the Indian-administered side of disputed Kashmir that killed 26 tourists, mostly Hindu men, which Delhi blamed on Islamabad.
Pakistan has denied any involvement and called for an independent probe.
Pankaj Sharma, 48, a Hindu from Poonch, bemoaned the twins' death, saying their 'entire lives (were) still ahead of them'.
Right after the twins' funeral, their mother went to hospital to be with her gravely wounded husband.
'God has really given her nerves of steel to go through all of this with calm and dignity,' Mir said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Borneo Post
an hour ago
- Borneo Post
Climate change: Small actions matter
A major barrier to stronger climate action in industrialised nations is their reluctance to reduce reliance on fossil fuels, which remain central to many of their industries. — AFP photo BACK in September 2015, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, then serving as chairman of the Bank of England, delivered a speech warning of the catastrophic impact climate change could have on future generations. He noted that the current generation had little incentive to address this looming threat. Investors and corporations remain overly focused on short-term returns, leading to underinvestment in sustainable growth. This is further exacerbated by resistance to technological disruption, which many fear could destabilise labour markets and productivity. Yet the worsening toll of extreme weather events offers undeniable proof that climate change is no longer a distant threat. Numerous international conferences have been convened to tackle the issue, and many nations have pledged to play their part, but their follow-through has often fallen short. A damning indictment of this lack of seriousness is reflected in the 2025 Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI), which ranks countries on their efforts to combat climate change. No country has met all the criteria to earn a place in the Top 3. As a result, Denmark – ranked fourth – has been declared a global leader in climate action. Its ambitious policies on renewable energy, green investments, and international cooperation have set it apart. The Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and Chile follow closely behind in the rankings. Conversely, the world's two largest economies – the United States (52nd) and China (55th) – are among the laggards. Russia (64th) and Saudi Arabia (66th) also rank near the bottom among the 67 countries evaluated. A major barrier to stronger climate action in industrialised nations is their reluctance to reduce reliance on fossil fuels, which remain central to many of their industries. During Donald Trump's first term (2017–2021) and again in his current term, the United States withdrew from the Paris Agreement and rolled back numerous climate regulations, citing concerns about job losses and energy costs, while promoting fossil fuel use. China, despite leading the world in renewable energy investments and green initiatives, still depends on coal for 60 per cent of its electricity generation. Meanwhile, only 21 countries have submitted their 2035 climate plans, with the UK, Brazil, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) leading in transparency. While coordinated international action among major industrialised nations appears grim, growing awareness and initiatives by smaller countries, regional governments, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and individuals, offer a ray of hope. Sarawak, for example, has emerged as a leading example of a small state making a global impact. It has actively promoted clean energy and hosted international climate conferences. Notably, Sarawak is pioneering green hydrogen development in the region and has established Asia's first hydrogen plant in Bintulu. At the individual level, each of us can contribute – no matter how small the act may seem. The belief that climate change is too massive a problem for one person to impact often leads to paralysis and inaction. We should remember the parable of the child picking up starfish from a beach strewn with thousands that had washed ashore after a storm. A bystander mocked the child, saying: 'There are thousands – what difference can you make?' The child replied: 'It made a difference to the ones I threw back.' Like that child, we must not be discouraged by the scale of the challenge. If everyone takes small, meaningful steps, together we can make a significant impact. So ask yourself: are you picking up starfish – or throwing up your hands in resignation?


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Iran confronts Trump with toughest choice yet
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump faces potentially the hardest choice of his time in the White House, as he weighs up whether the United States should join Israel's bombing campaign against Iran. Trump fueled speculation about a US intervention as he dashed back from a G7 summit in Canada, warning Tuesday that the United States could kill Iran's supreme leader, but would not 'for now.' The choice is a monumental one for a president who has vowed throughout both his first and second terms in the Oval Office to get the United States out of its 'forever wars' in the Middle East. 'It's a major political and military choice that could define his legacy in the Middle East,' Behnam Ben Taleblu, director of the Iran program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told AFP. As Trump met his National Security Council in the White House Situation Room on Tuesday, there were already hints that he was considering abandoning what was until recently his preferred diplomatic route. The most likely option under consideration by Trump would be the use of giant US 'bunker-buster' bombs against Iran's deeply buried Fordow nuclear facility that Israel's bombs could not reach. US officials said dismantling Iran's nuclear program -- which Western countries say Tehran is using to seek a nuclear weapon -- remained Trump's priority. Fluid situation Trump also implied that the assassination of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is back on the table, just days after a US official said he had waved off such a move by Israel. US officials stressed that Trump had not yet made a decision and was keeping all options on the table, with the situation fluid and changing 'hourly.' The Axios news site said Trump was even considering a new meeting between his top negotiator Steve Witkoff and Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi. A game-changer however would be any Iranian attack on US forces in the region, with an official saying that Trump would not tolerate a 'hair on the back of an American' being harmed. Trump's change of tone is remarkable for coming less than a week after the US president -- who has openly talked about wanting to win the Nobel Peace Prize -- called on Israel to avoid strikes. But amid frequent phone calls with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Netanyahu's own hints about pursuing regime change in Iran, Trump has pivoted. Trump has ordered the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier to the region along with a number of US military aircraft, raising questions about whether he will act. 'Decisions on your shoulders' A further hint that action may be on the cards came from the White House's apparent efforts to see off any backlash from his own Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement. There has been growing opposition to any Iran intervention from the isolationist wing of his base, who hold him to his pledge to keep the United States out of wars like those in Iraq and Afghanistan. Vice President JD Vance defended his boss, saying Trump had 'earned some trust' on the issue and 'may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian (uranium) enrichment.' 'Having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish American people's goals,' the Iraq veteran said, in a nod to MAGA skeptics. Trump himself meanwhile hinted at his mood as he mulled his critical decision. He reposted a comment by US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, an evangelical Christian, saying God had 'spared' Trump from an assassination attempt last year. 'The decisions on your shoulders I would not want to be made by anyone else. You have many voices speaking to you Sir, but there is only ONE voice that matters. HIS voice,' Huckabee said.


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
UK MPs vote to decriminalise abortion for women in all cases
LONDON: UK MPs on Tuesday voted to end contentious prosecutions of women in England and Wales for terminating a pregnancy, paving the way for a huge overhaul of how the country's abortion laws are enforced. Currently, a woman can face criminal charges for choosing to end a pregnancy after 24 weeks or without the approval of two doctors, under laws which technically still carry a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The issue has gained attention in the UK due to recent court cases. In one, a woman was cleared by a jury at trial, while another was released from prison on appeal. MPs voted by a majority of 242 on Tuesday in favour of an amendment put forward by Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, which would ensure that no woman would be criminally pursued for terminating her own pregnancy at any time -- even though the amendment leaves the underlying abortion laws unchanged. The full crime and policing bill must now be voted on by parliament and then pass the upper House of Lords before becoming law. 'Women are currently being arrested from hospital bed to police cell and facing criminal investigations on suspicion of ending their own pregnancy,' Antoniazzi told AFP. 'My amendment would put a stop to this,' she said, adding it was 'the right amendment at the right time'. Abortion in England and Wales is a criminal offence under the Offences Against the Person Act, passed in 1861 during the Victorian age and which theoretically carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The Abortion Act 1967 made terminations legal in certain circumstances, including by permitting it up to 23 weeks and six days of gestation if done by an authorised provider. Abortions are allowed in limited circumstances after this time, such as if the mother's life is in danger or there is a 'substantial risk' the child could be born with a serious disability. An update to the law introduced during the Covid-19 pandemic allows women to take abortion pills at home up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy. In May, Nicola Packer was acquitted after taking prescribed abortion medicine when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the 10-week legal limit. The 45-year-old told jurors during her trial, which came after a four-year police investigation, that she did not realise she had been pregnant for so long. 'It was horrendous giving evidence, absolutely awful,' she told The Guardian newspaper last month. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children has however called the proposed amendment 'the greatest threat to unborn babies in decades'. 'Optimistic' Antoniazzi's amendment will not change any of the laws regarding the provision of abortion services, including the time limits. And anyone assisting a woman in getting an abortion outside the remits of the law, such as medical practitioners, will still be liable for prosecution. Some 50 organisations, including abortion providers, medical colleges, and women's rights groups, have backed the amendment. They say six women have appeared in court in England charged with ending or attempting to end their own pregnancy outside abortion law in the last three years. Carla Foster was jailed in 2023 for illegally obtaining abortion tablets to end her pregnancy when she was between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant. The Court of Appeal eventually suspended her sentence. Antoniazzi said police have investigated 'more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortion in the last five years including women who've suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths'. 'This is just wrong. It's a waste of taxpayers money, it's a waste of the judiciary's time, and it's not in the public interest,' she told the BBC Tuesday. When asked about the vote, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Tuesday that women have the right to a 'safe and legal abortion'. Northern Ireland decriminalised abortion for women in 2019. Scotland is currently reviewing its abortion laws.